By Ananda-USA
July 1, 2010
The unilateral action of the Secretary General of the United Nations, Mr. Ban Ki Moon, in appointing a UN Panel to investigate any "War Crimes" that may have been committed in Sri Lanka by the warring parties in the recently concluded war against terrorists, appears to exceed his authority under the UN Charter, in that this is purely an internal domestic matter under Sri Lanka's sole jurisdiction, that did not, and does not, threaten international peace.
For example, Article 2, Item #7, of the UN Charter, states
Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state, or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter VII.
Since this matter does not threaten international peace, the provisions of Chapter VII do not apply to it.
As such, the Secretary General's appointment of this UN Panel amounts to unwarranted interference in the domestic matters of the sovereign UN member state of Sri Lanka, that is not sanctioned by the UN Charter which specifically prohibits such intervention.
In recent years, the United Nations has sanctioned several such illegal actions against a number of countries at the bidding of certain powerful western nations who act with impunity. It is high time that the vast majority of member states of the UN, who do not agree with these high-handed interventions, organize and act to prevent the misuse of the United Nations as a cover to demonize and punish targeted nations, at the bidding of powerful nations with self-serving political agendas of their own that are unrelated to the allegations made against those countries.
I present below the full text of the UN Charter of 26th June, 1945, to assist the readers of this blog to do their own legal analysis of the situation. I will add all amendments to this version of the UN Charter in due course.
...................................................................................................................................................................
Ban Ki Moon changing the rules of UN decisionmaking with a South Korean "Ban Team"!
..........................................................................................................................................................................
July 1, 2010
The unilateral action of the Secretary General of the United Nations, Mr. Ban Ki Moon, in appointing a UN Panel to investigate any "War Crimes" that may have been committed in Sri Lanka by the warring parties in the recently concluded war against terrorists, appears to exceed his authority under the UN Charter, in that this is purely an internal domestic matter under Sri Lanka's sole jurisdiction, that did not, and does not, threaten international peace.
For example, Article 2, Item #7, of the UN Charter, states
Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state, or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter VII.
Since this matter does not threaten international peace, the provisions of Chapter VII do not apply to it.
As such, the Secretary General's appointment of this UN Panel amounts to unwarranted interference in the domestic matters of the sovereign UN member state of Sri Lanka, that is not sanctioned by the UN Charter which specifically prohibits such intervention.
In recent years, the United Nations has sanctioned several such illegal actions against a number of countries at the bidding of certain powerful western nations who act with impunity. It is high time that the vast majority of member states of the UN, who do not agree with these high-handed interventions, organize and act to prevent the misuse of the United Nations as a cover to demonize and punish targeted nations, at the bidding of powerful nations with self-serving political agendas of their own that are unrelated to the allegations made against those countries.
I present below the full text of the UN Charter of 26th June, 1945, to assist the readers of this blog to do their own legal analysis of the situation. I will add all amendments to this version of the UN Charter in due course.
...................................................................................................................................................................
Ban Ki Moon changing the rules of UN decisionmaking with a South Korean "Ban Team"!
..........................................................................................................................................................................
Charter of the United Nations (June 26, 1945)
Preamble
We the Peoples of the United Nations Determined
to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and
to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and
to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and
to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,
And for these Ends
to practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbors, and
to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security, and
to ensure by the acceptance of principles and the institution of methods, that armed force shall not be used, save in the common interest, and
to employ international machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement of all peoples,
Have Resolved to Combine our Efforts to Accomplish these Aims
Accordingly, our respective Governments, through representatives assembled in the city of San Francisco, who have exhibited their full powers found to be in good and due form, have agreed to the present Charter of the United Nations and do hereby establish an international organization to be known as the United Nations.
CHAPTER I
PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES
Article 1
The Purposes of the United Nations are:
1. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;
2. To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and selfdetermination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace;
3. To achieve international cooperation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion; and
4. To be a center for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends.
Article 2
The Organization and its Members, in pursuit of the Purposes stated in Article 1, shall act in accordance with the following Principles.
1. The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members.
2. All Members, in order to ensure to all of them the rights and benefits resulting from membership, shall fulfill in good faith the obligations assumed by them in accordance with the present Charter.
3. All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.
4. All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.
5. All Members shall give the United Nations every assistance in any action it takes in accordance with the present Charter, and shall refrain from giving assistance to any state against which the United Nations is taking preventive or enforcement action.
6. The Organization shall ensure that states which are not Members of the United Nations act in accordance with these Principles so far as may be necessary for the maintenance of international peace and security.
7. Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter VII.
CHAPTER II
MEMBERSHIP
Article 3
The original Members of the United Nations shall be the states which, having participated in the United Nations Conference on International Organization at San Francisco, or having previously signed the Declaration by United Nations of January 1, 1942, sign the present Charter and ratify it in accordance with Article 110.
Article 4
1. Membership in the United Nations is open to all other peace-loving states which accept the obligations contained in the present Charter and, in the judgment of the Organization, are able and willing to carry out these obligations.
2. The admission of any such state to membership in the United Nations will be effected by a decision of the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.
Article 5
A member of the United Nations against which preventive or enforcement action has been taken by the Security Council may be suspended from the exercise of the rights and privileges of membership by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council. The exercise of these rights and privileges may be restored by the Security Council.
Article 6
A Member of the United Nations which has persistently violated the Principles contained in the present Charter may be expelled from the Organization by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.
CHAPTER III
ORGANS
Article 7
1. There are established as the principal organs of the United Nations: a General Assembly, a Security Council, an Economic and Social Council, a Trusteeship Council, an International Court of Justice, and a Secretariat.
2. Such subsidiary organs as may be found necessary may be established in accordance with the present Charter.
Article 8
The United Nations shall place no restrictions on the eligibility of men and women to participate in any capacity and under conditions of equality in its principal and subsidiary organs.
CHAPTER IV
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Composition
Article 9
1. The General Assembly shall consist of all the Members of the United Nations.
2. Each member shall have not more than five representatives in the General Assembly.
Functions and Powers
Article 10
The General Assembly may discuss any questions or any matters within the scope of the present Charter or relating to the powers and functions of any organs provided for in the present Charter, and, except as provided in Article 12, may make recommendations to the Members of the United Nations or to the Security Council or to both on any such questions or matters.
Article 11
1. The General Assembly may consider the general principles of cooperation in the maintenance of international peace and security, including the principles governing disarmament and the regulation of armaments, and may make recommendations with regard to such principles to the Members or to the Security Council or to both.
2. The General Assembly may discuss any questions relating to the maintenance of international peace and security brought before it by any Member of the United Nations, or by the Security Council, or by a state which is not a Member of the United Nations in accordance with Article 35, paragraph 2, and, except as provided in Article 12, may make recommendations with regard to any such questions to the state or states concerned or to the Security Council or to both. Any such question on which action is necessary shall be referred to the Security Council by the General Assembly either before or after discussion.
3. The General Assembly may call the attention of the Security Council to situations which are likely to endanger international peace and security.
4. The powers of the General Assembly set forth in this Article shall not limit the general scope of Article 10.
Article 12
1. While the Security Council is exercising in respect of any dispute or situation the functions assigned to it in the present Charter, the General Assembly shall not make any recommendation with regard to that dispute or situation unless the Security Council so requests.
2. The Secretary-General, with the consent of the Security Council, shall notify the General Assembly at each session of any matters relative to the maintenance of international peace and security which are being dealt with by the Security Council and shall similarly notify the General Assembly, or the Members of the United Nations if the General Assembly is not in session, immediately the Security Council ceases to deal with such matters.
Article 13
1. The General Assembly shall initiate studies and make recommendations for the purpose of:
a. promoting international cooperation in the political field and encouraging the progressive development of international law and its codification;
b. promoting international cooperation in the economic, social, cultural, educational, and health fields, and assisting in the realization of human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion.
2. The further responsibilities, functions and powers of the General Assembly with respect to matters mentioned in paragraph 1(b) above are set forth in Chapters IX and X.
Article 14
Subject to the provisions of Article 12, the General Assembly may recommend measures for the peaceful adjustment of any situation, regardless of origin, which it deems likely to impair the general welfare or friendly relations among nations, including situations resulting from a violation of the provisions of the present Charter setting forth the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations.
Article 15
1. The General Assembly shall receive and consider annual and special reports from the Security Council; these reports shall include an account of the measures that the Security Council has decided upon or taken to maintain international peace and security.
2. The General Assembly shall receive and consider reports from the other organs of the United Nations.
Article 16
The General Assembly shall perform such functions with respect to the international trusteeship system as are assigned to it under Chapters XII and XIII, including the approval of the trusteeship agreements for areas not designated as strategic.
Article 17
1. The General Assembly shall consider and approve the budget of the Organization.
2. The expenses of the Organization shall be borne by the Members as apportioned by the General Assembly.
3. The General Assembly shall consider and approve any financial and budgetary arrangements with specialized agencies referred to in Article 57 and shall examine the administrative budgets of such specialized agencies with a view to making recommendations to the agencies concerned.
Voting
Article 18
1. Each member of the General Assembly shall have one vote.
2. Decisions of the General Assembly on important questions shall be made by a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting. These questions shall include: recommendations with respect to the maintenance of international peace and security, the election of the non-permanent members of the Security Council, the election of the members of the Economic and Social Council, the election of members of the Trusteeship Council in accordance with paragraph 1(c) of Article 86, the admission of new Members to the United Nations, the suspension of the rights and privileges of membership, the expulsion of Members, questions relating to the operation of the trusteeship system, and budgetary questions.
3. Decisions on other questions, Composition including the determination of additional categories of questions to be decided by a two-thirds majority, shall be made by a majority of the members present and voting.
Article 19
A Member of the United Nations which is in arrears in the payment of its financial contributions to the Organization shall have no vote in the General Assembly if the amount of its arrears equals or exceeds the amount of the contributions due from it for the preceding two full years. The General Assembly may, nevertheless, permit such a Member to vote if it is satisfied that the failure to pay is due to conditions beyond the control of the Member.
Procedure
Article 20
The General Assembly shall meet in regular annual sessions and in such special sessions as occasion may require. Special sessions shall be convoked by the Secretary-General at the request of the Security Council or of a majority of the Members of the United Nations.
Article 21
The General Assembly shall adopt its own rules of procedure. It shall elect its President for each session.
Article 22
The General Assembly may establish such subsidiary organs as it deems necessary for the performance of its functions.
CHAPTER V
THE SECURITY COUNCIL
Article 23
1. The Security Council shall consist of fifteen Members of the United Nations. The Republic of China, France, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America shall be permanent members of the Security Council. The General Assembly shall elect ten other Members of the United Nations to be non-permanent members of the Security Council, due regard being specially paid, in the first instance to the contribution of Members of the United Nations to the maintenance of international peace and security and to the other purposes of the Organization, and also to equitable geographical distribution.
2. The non-permanent members of the Security Council shall be elected for a term of two years. In the first election of the non-permanent members after the increase of the membership of the Security Council from eleven to fifteen, two of the four additional members shall be chosen for a term of one year. A retiring member shall not be eligible for immediate re-election.
3. Each member of the Security Council shall have one representative.
Functions and Powers
Article 24
1. In order to ensure prompt and effective action by the United Nations, its Members confer on the Security Council primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security, and agree that in carrying out its duties under this responsibility the Security Council acts on their behalf.
2. In discharging these duties the Security Council shall act in accordance with the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations. The specific powers granted to the Security Council for the discharge of these duties are laid down in Chapters VI, VII, VIII, and XII.
3. The Security Council shall submit annual and, when necessary, special reports to the General Assembly for its consideration.
Article 25
The Members of the United Nations agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council in accordance with the present Charter.
Article 26
In order to promote the establishment and maintenance of international peace and security with the least diversion for armaments of the world's human and economic resources, the Security Council shall be responsible for formulating, with the assistance of the Military Staff Committee referred to in Article 47, plans to be submitted to the Members of the United Nations for the establishment of a system for the regulation of armaments.
Voting
Article 27
1. Each member of the Security Council shall have one vote.
2. Decisions of the Security Council on procedural matters shall be made by an affirmative vote of nine members.
3. Decisions of the Security Council on all other matters shall be made by an affirmative vote of nine members including the concurring votes of the permanent members; provided that, in decisions under Chapter VI, and under paragraph 3 of Article 52, a party to a dispute shall abstain from voting.
Procedure
Article 28
1. The Security Council shall be so organized as to be able to function continuously. Each member of the Security Council shall for this purpose be represented at all times at the seat of the Organization.
2. The Security Council shall hold periodic meetings at which each of its members may, if it so desires, be represented by a member of the government or by some other specially designated representative.
3. The Security Council may hold meetings at such places other than the seat of the Organization as in its judgment will best facilitate its work.
Article 29
The Security Council may establish such subsidiary organs as it deems necessary for the performance of its functions.
Article 30
The Security Council shall adopt its own rules of procedure, including the method of selecting its President.
Article 31
Any Member of the United Nations which is not a member of the Security Council may participate, without vote, in the discussion of any question brought before the Security Council whenever the latter considers that the interests of that Member are specially affected.
Article 32
Any Member of the United Nations which is not a member of the Security Council or any state which is not a Member of the United Nations, if it is a party to a dispute under consideration by the Security Council, shall be invited to participate, without vote, in the discussion relating to the dispute. The Security Council shall lay down such conditions as it deems just for the participation of a state which is not a Member of the United Nations.
CHAPTER VI
PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES
Article 33
1. The parties to any dispute, the continuance of which is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, shall, first of all, seek a solution by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice.
2. The Security Council shall, when it deems necessary, call upon the parties to settle their dispute by such means.
Article 34
The Security Council may investigate any dispute, or any situation which might lead to international friction or give rise to a dispute, in order to determine whether the continuance of the dispute or situation is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security.
Article 35
1. Any Member of the United Nations may bring any dispute, or any situation of the nature referred to in Article 34, to the attention of the Security Council or of the General Assembly.
2. A state which is not a Member of the United Nations may bring to the attention of the Security Council or of the General Assembly any dispute to which it is a party if it accepts in advance, for the purposes of the dispute, the obligations of pacific settlement provided in the present Charter.
3. The proceedings of the General Assembly in respect of matters brought to its attention under this Article will be subject to the provisions of Articles 11 and 12.
Article 36
1. The Security Council may, at any stage of a dispute of the nature referred to in Article 33 or of a situation of like nature, recommend appropriate procedures or methods of adjustment.
2. The Security Council should take into consideration any procedures for the settlement of the dispute which have already been adopted by the parties.
3. In making recommendations under this Article the Security Council should also take into consideration that legal disputes should as a general rule be referred by the parties to the International Court of Justice in accordance with the provisions of the Statute of the Court.
Article 37
1. Should the parties to a dispute of the nature referred to in Article 33 fail to settle it by the means indicated in that Article, they shall refer it to the Security Council.
2. If the Security Council deems that the continuance of the dispute is in fact likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, it shall decide whether to take action under Article 36 or to recommend such terms of settlement as it may consider appropriate.
Article 38
Without prejudice to the provisions of Articles 33 to 37, the Security Council may, if all the parties to any dispute so request, make recommendations to the parties with a view to a pacific settlement of the dispute.
CHAPTER VII
ACTION WITH RESPECT TO THREATS TO THE PEACE, BREACHES OF THE
PEACE, AND ACTS OF AGGRESSION
Article 39
The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security.
Article 40
In order to prevent an aggravation of the situation, the Security Council may, before making the recommendations or deciding upon the measures provided for in Article 39, call upon the parties concerned to comply with such provisional measures as it deems necessary or desirable. Such provisional measures shall be without prejudice to the rights, claims, or position of the parties concerned. The Security Council shall duly take account of failure to comply with such provisional measures.
Article 41
The Security Council may decide what measures not involving the use of armed force are to be employed to give effect to its decisions, and it may call upon the Members of the United Nations to apply such measures.
These may include complete or partial interruption of economic relations and of rail, sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio, and other means of communication, and the severance of diplomatic relations.
Article 42
Should the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. Such action may include demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations.
Article 43
1. All Members of the United Nations, in order to contribute to the maintenance of international peace and security, undertake to make available to the Security Council, on its call and in accordance with a special agreement or agreements, armed forces, assistance, and facilities, including rights of passage, necessary for the purpose of maintaining international peace and security.
2. Such agreement or agreements shall govern the numbers and types of forces. their degree of readiness and general location, and the nature of the facilities and assistance to be provided.
3. The agreement or agreements shall be negotiated as soon as possible on the initiative of the Security Council.
They shall be concluded between the Security Council and Members or between the Security Council and groups of Members and shall be subject to ratification by the signatory states in accordance with their respective constitutional processes.
Article 44
When the Security Council has decided to use force it shall, before calling upon a Member not represented on it to provide armed forces in fulfillment of the obligations assumed under Article 43, invite that Member, if the Member so desires, to participate in the decisions of the Security Council concerning the employment of contingents of that Member's armed forces.
Article 45
In order to enable the United Nations to take urgent military measures Members shall hold immediately available national air-force contingents for combined international enforcement action. The strength and degree of readiness of these contingents and plans for their combined action shall be determined, within the limits laid down in the special agreement or agreements referred to in Article 43, by the Security Council with the assistance of the Military Staff Committee.
Article 46
Plans for the application of armed force shall be made by the Security Council with the assistance of the Military Staff Committee.
Article 47
1. There shall be established a Military Staff Committee to advise and assist the Security Council on all questions relating to the Security Council's military requirements for the maintenance of international peace and security, the employment and command of forces placed at its disposal, the regulation of armaments, and possible disarmament.
2. The Military Staff Committee shall consist of the Chiefs of Staff of the permanent members of the Security Council or their representatives. Any Member of the United Nations not permanently represented on the Committee shall be invited by the Committee to be associated with it when the efficient discharge of the Committee's responsibilities requires the participation of that Member in its work.
3. The Military Staff Committee shall be responsible under the Security Council for the strategic direction of any armed forces placed at the disposal of the Security Council. Questions relating to the command of such forces shall be worked out subsequently.
4. The Military Staff Committee, with the authorization of the Security Council and after consultation with appropriate regional agencies, may establish regional subcommittees.
Article 48
1. The action required to carry out the decisions of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security shall be taken by all the Members of the United Nations or by some of them, as the Security Council may determine.
2. Such decisions shall be carried out by the Members of the United Nations directly and through their action in the appropriate international agencies of which they are members.
Article 49
The Members of the United Nations shall join in affording mutual assistance in carrying out the measures decided upon by the Security Council.
Article 50
If preventive or enforcement measures against any state are taken by the Security Council, any other state, whether a Member of the United Nations or not, which finds itself confronted with special economic problems arising from the carrying out of those measures shall have the right to consult the Security Council with regard to a solution of those problems.
Article 51
Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of selfdefense shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.
CHAPTER VIII
REGIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
Article 52
1. Nothing in the present Charter precludes the existence of regional arrangements or agencies for dealing with such matters relating to the maintenance of international peace and security as are appropriate for regional action, provided that such arrangements or agencies and their activities are consistent with the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations.
2. The Members of the United Nations entering into such arrangements or constituting such agencies shall make every effort to achieve pacific settlement of local disputes through such regional arrangements or by such regional agencies before referring them to the Security Council.
3. The Security Council shall encourage the development of pacific settlement of local disputes through such regional arrangements or by such regional agencies either on the initiative of the states concerned or by reference from the Security Council.
4. This Article in no way impairs the application of Articles 34 and 35.
Article 53
1. The Security Council shall, where appropriate, utilize such regional arrangements or agencies for enforcement action under its authority. But no enforcement action shall be taken under regional arrangements or by regional agencies without the authorization of the Security Council, with the exception of measures against any enemy state, as defined in paragraph 2 of this Article, provided for pursuant to Article 107 or in regional arrangements directed against renewal of aggressive policy on the part of any such state, until such time as the Organization may, on request of the Governments concerned, be charged with the responsibility for preventing further aggression by such a state.
2. The term enemy state as used in paragraph 1 of this Article applies to any state which during the Second World War has been an enemy of any signatory of the present Charter.
Article 54
The Security Council shall at all times be kept fully informed of activities undertaken or in contemplation under regional arrangements or by regional agencies for the maintenance of international peace and security.
CHAPTER IX
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CO-OPERATION
Article 55
With a view to the creation of conditions of stability and well-being which are necessary for peaceful and friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, the United Nations shall promote:
a. higher standards of living, full employment, and conditions of economic and social progress and development;
b. solutions of international economic, social, health, and related problems; and international cultural and educational co-operation; and
c. universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion.
Article 56
All Members pledge themselves to take joint and separate action in cooperation with the Organization for the achievement of the purposes set forth in Article 55.
Article 57
1. The various specialized agencies, established by intergovernmental agreement and having wide international responsibilities, as defined in their basic instruments, in economic, social, cultural, educational, health, and related fields, shall be brought into relationship with the United Nations in accordance with the provisions of Article 63.
2. Such agencies thus brought into relationship with the United Nations are hereinafter referred to as specialized agencies.
Article 58
The Organization shall make recommendations for the coordination of the policies and activities of the specialized agencies.
Article 59
The Organization shall, where appropriate, initiate negotiations among the states concerned for the creation of any new specialized agencies required for the accomplishment of the purposes set forth in Article 55.
Article 60
Responsibility for the discharge of the functions of the Organization set forth in this Chapter shall be vested in the General Assembly and, under the authority of the General Assembly, in the Economic and Social Council, which shall have for this purpose the powers set forth in Chapter X.
CHAPTER X
THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL
Composition
Article 61
1. The Economic and Social Council shall consist of fifty-four Members of the United Nations elected by the General Assembly.
2. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 3, eighteen members of the Economic and Social Council shall be elected each year for a term of three years. A retiring member shall be eligible for immediate re-election.
3. At the first election after the increase in the membership of the Economic and Social Council from twentyseven to fifty-four members, in addition to the members elected in place of the nine members whose term of office expires at the end of that year, twenty-seven additional members shall be elected. Of these twenty-seven additional members, the term of office of nine members so elected shall expire at the end of one year, and of nine other members at the end of two years, in accordance with arrangements made by the General Assembly.
4. Each member of the Economic and Social Council shall have one representative.
Functions and Powers
Article 62
1. The Economic and Social Council may make or initiate studies and reports with respect to international economic, social, cultural, educational, health, and related matters and may make recommendations with respect to any such matters to the General Assembly, to the Members of the United Nations, and to the specialized agencies concerned.
2. It may make recommendations for the purpose of promoting respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all.
3. It may prepare draft conventions for submission to the General Assembly, with respect to matters falling within its competence.
4. It may call, in accordance with the rules prescribed by the United Nations, international conferences on matters falling within its competence.
Article 63
1. The Economic and Social Council may enter into agreements with any of the agencies referred to in Article 57, defining the terms on which the agency concerned shall be brought into relationship with the United Nations. Such agreements shall be subject to approval by the General Assembly.
2. It may coordinate the activities of the specialized agencies through consultation with and recommendations to such agencies and through recommendations to the General Assembly and to the Members of the United Nations.
Article 64
1. The Economic and Social Council may take appropriate steps to obtain regular reports from the specialized agencies. It may make arrangements with the Members of the United Nations and with the specialized agencies to obtain reports on the steps taken to give effect to its own recommendations and to recommendations on matters falling within its competence made by the General Assembly.
2. It may communicate its observations on these reports to the General Assembly.
Article 65
The Economic and Social Council may furnish information to the Security Council and shall assist the Security Council upon its request.
Article 66
1. The Economic and Social Council shall perform such functions as fall within its competence in connection with the carrying out of the recommendations of the General Assembly.
2. It may, with the approval of the General Assembly, perform services at the request of Members of the United Nations and at the request of specialized agencies.
3. It shall perform such other functions as are specified elsewhere in the present Charter or as may be assigned to it by the General Assembly.
Article 67
1. Each member of the Economic and Social Council shall have one vote.
2. Decisions of the Economic and Social Council shall be made by a majority of the members present and voting.
Procedure
Article 68
The Economic and Social Council shall set up commissions in economic and social fields and for the promotion of human rights, and such other commissions as may be required for the performance of its functions.
Article 69
The Economic and Social Council shall invite any Member of the United Nations to participate, without vote, in its deliberations on any matter of particular concern to that Member.
Article 70
The Economic and Social Council may make arrangements for representatives of the specialized agencies to participate, without vote, in its deliberations and in those of the commissions established by it, and for its representatives to participate in the deliberations of the specialized agencies.
Article 71
The Economic and Social Council may make suitable arrangements for consultation with non-governmental organizations which are concerned with matters within its competence. Such arrangements may be made with international organizations and, where appropriate, with national organizations after consultation with the Member of the United Nations concerned.
Article 72
1. The Economic and Social Council shall adopt its own rules of procedure, including the method of selecting its President.
2. The Economic and Social Council shall meet as required in accordance with its rules, which shall include provision for the convening of meetings on the request of a majority of its members.
CHAPTER XI
DECLARATION REGARDING NON-SELF-GOVERNING TERRITORIES
Article 73
Members of the United Nations which have or assume responsibilities for the administration of territories whose peoples have not yet attained a full measure of self-government recognize the principle that the interests of the inhabitants of these territories are paramount, and accept as a sacred trust the obligation to promote to the utmost, within the system of international peace and security established by the present Charter, the well-being of the inhabitants of these territories, and, to this end:
a. to ensure, with due respect for the culture of the peoples concerned, their political, economic, social, and educational advancement, their just treatment, and their protection against abuses;
b. to develop self-government, to take due account of the political aspirations of the peoples, and to assist them in the progressive development of their free political institutions, according to the particular circumstances of each territory and its peoples and their varying stages of advancement;
c. to further international peace and security;
d. to promote constructive measures of development, to encourage research, and to cooperate with one another and, when and where appropriate, with specialized international bodies with a view to the practical achievement of the social, economic, and scientific purposes set forth in this Article; and
e. to transmit regularly to the Secretary-General for information purposes, subject to such limitation as security and constitutional considerations may require, statistical and other information of a technical nature relating to economic, social, and educational conditions in the territories for which they are respectively responsible other than those territories to which Chapters XII and XIII apply.
Article 74
Members of the United Nations also agree that their policy in respect of the territories to which this Chapter applies, no less than in respect of their metropolitan areas, must be based on the general principle of goodneighborliness, due account being taken of the interests and well-being of the rest of the world, in social, economic, and commercial matters.
CHAPTER XII
INTERNATIONAL TRUSTEESHIP SYSTEM
Article 75
The United Nations shall establish under its authority an international trusteeship system for the administration and supervision of such territories as may be placed thereunder by subsequent individual agreements. These territories are hereinafter referred to as trust territories.
Article 76
The basic objectives of the trusteeship system, in accordance with the Purposes of the United Nations laid down in Article 1 of the present Charter, shall be:
a. to further international peace and security;
b. to promote the political, economic, social, and educational advancement of the inhabitants of the trust territories, and their progressive development towards self-government or independence as may be appropriate to the particular circumstances of each territory and its peoples and the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned, and as may be provided by the terms of each trusteeship agreement;
c. to encourage respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion, and to encourage recognition of the interdependence of the peoples of the world; and
d. to ensure equal treatment in social, economic, and commercial matters for all Members of the United Nations and their nationals and also equal treatment for the latter in the administration of justice without prejudice to the attainment of the foregoing objectives and subject to the provisions of Article 80.
Article 77
1. The trusteeship system shall apply to such territories in the following categories as may be placed thereunder by means of trusteeship agreements:
a. territories now held under mandate;
b. territories which may be detached from enemy states as a result of the Second World War, and
c. territories voluntarily placed under the system by states responsible for their administration.
2. It will be a matter for subsequent agreement as to which territories in the foregoing categories will be brought under the trusteeship system and upon what terms.
Article 78
The trusteeship system shall not apply to territories which have become Members of the United Nations, relationship among which shall be based on respect for the principle of sovereign equality.
Article 79
The terms of trusteeship for each territory to be placed under the trusteeship system, including any alteration or amendment, shall be agreed upon by the states directly concerned, including the mandatory power in the case of territories held under mandate by a Member of the United Nations, and shall be approved as provided for in Articles 83 and 85.
Article 80
1. Except as may be agreed upon in individual trusteeship agreements, made under Articles 77, 79, and 81, placing each territory under the trusteeship system, and until such agreements have been concluded, nothing in this Chapter shall be construed in or of itself to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments to which Members of the United Nations may respectively be parties.
2. Paragraph 1 of this Article shall not be interpreted as giving grounds for delay or postponement of the negotiation and conclusion of agreements for placing mandated and other territories under the trusteeship system as provided for in Article 77.
Article 81
The trusteeship agreement shall in each case include the terms under which the trust territory will be administered and designate the authority which will exercise the administration of the trust territory. Such authority, hereinafter called the administering authority, may be one or more states or the Organization itself.
Article 82
There may be designated, in any trusteeship agreement, a strategic area or areas which may include part or all of the trust territory to which the agreement applies, without prejudice to any special agreement or agreements made under Article 43.
Article 83
1. All functions of the United Nations relating to strategic areas, including the approval of the terms of the trusteeship agreements and of their alteration or amendment, shall be exercised by the Security Council.
2. The basic objectives set forth in Article 76 shall be applicable to the people of each strategic area.
3. The Security Council shall, subject to the provisions of the trusteeship agreements and without prejudice to security considerations, avail itself of the assistance of the Trusteeship Council to perform those functions of the United Nations under the trusteeship system relating to political. economic, social, and educational matters in the strategic areas.
Article 84
It shall be the duty of the administering authority to ensure that the trust territory shall play its part in the maintenance of international peace and security. To this end the administering authority may make use of volunteer forces, facilities, and assistance from the trust territory in carrying out the obligations towards the Security Council undertaken in this regard by the administering authority, as well as for local defense and the maintenance of law and order within the trust territory.
Article 85
1. The functions of the United Nations with regard to trusteeship agreements for all areas not designated as strategic, including the approval of the terms of the trusteeship agreements and of their alteration or amendment, shall be exercised by the General Assembly.
2. The Trusteeship Council, operating under the authority of the General Assembly, shall assist the General Assembly in carrying out these functions.
CHAPTER XIII
THE TRUSTEESHIP COUNCIL
Composition
Article 86
1. The Trusteeship Council shall consist of the following Members of the United Nations:
a. those Members administering trust territories;
b. such of those Members mentioned by name in Article 23 as are not administering trust territories; and
c. as many other Members elected for three-year terms by the General Assembly as may be necessary to ensure that the total number of members of the Trusteeship Council is equally divided between those Members of the United Nations which administer trust territories and those which do not.
2. Each member of the Trusteeship Council shall designate one specially qualified person to represent it therein.
Functions and Powers
Article 87
The General Assembly and, under its authority, the Trusteeship Council, in carrying out their functions, may:
a. consider reports submitted by the administering authority;
b. accept petitions and examine them in consultation with the administering authority;
c. provide for periodic visits to the respective trust territories at times agreed upon with the administering authority; and
d. take these and other actions in conformity with the terms of the trusteeship agreements.
Article 88
The Trusteeship Council shall formulate a questionnaire on the political, economic, social, and educational advancement of the inhabitants of each trust territory, and the administering authority for each trust territory within the competence of the General Assembly shall make an annual report to the General Assembly upon the basis of such questionnaire.
Voting
Article 89
1. Each member of the Trusteeship Council shall have one vote.
2. Decisions of the Trusteeship Council shall be made by a majority of the members present and voting.
Procedure
Article 90
1. The Trusteeship Council shall adopt its own rules of procedure, including the method of selecting its President.
2. The Trusteeship Council shall meet as required in accordance with its rules, which shall include provision for the convening of meetings on the request of a majority of its members.
Article 91
The Trusteeship Council shall, when appropriate, avail itself of the assistance of the Economic and Social Council and of the specialized agencies in regard to matters with which they are respectively concerned.
CHAPTER XIV
THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Article 92
The International Court of Justice shall be the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It shall function in accordance with the annexed Statute which is based upon the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice and forms an integral part of the present Charter.
Article 93
1. All Members of the United Nations are ipso facto parties to the Statute of the International Court of Justice.
2. A state which is not a Member of the United Nations may become a party to the Statute of the International Court of Justice on conditions to be determined in each case by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.
Article 94
1. Each Member of the United Nations undertakes to comply with the decision of the International Court of Justice in any case to which it is a party.
2. If any party to a case fails to perform the obligations incumbent upon it under a judgment rendered by the Court, the other party may have recourse to the Security Council, which may, if it deems necessary, make recommendations or decide upon measures to be taken to give effect to the judgment.
Article 95
Nothing in the present Charter shall prevent Members of the United Nations from entrusting the solution of their differences to other tribunals by virtue of agreements already in existence or which may be concluded in the future.
Article 96
1. The General Assembly or the Security Council may request the International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion on any legal question.
2. Other organs of the United Nations and specialized agencies, which may at any time be so authorized by the General Assembly, may also request advisory opinions of the Court on legal questions arising within the scope of their activities.
CHAPTER XV
THE SECRETARIAT
Article 97
The Secretariat shall comprise a Secretary-General and such staff as the Organization may require. The Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council. He shall be the chief administrative officer of the Organization.
Article 98
The Secretary-General shall act in that capacity in all meetings of the General Assembly, of the Security Council, of the Economic and Social Council, and of the Trusteeship Council, and shall perform such other functions as are entrusted to him by these organs. The Secretary-General shall make an annual report to the General Assembly on the work of the Organization.
Article 99
The Secretary-General may bring to the attention of the Security Council any matter which in his opinion may threaten the maintenance of international peace and security.
Article 100
1. In the performance of their duties the Secretary-General and the staff shall not seek or receive instructions from any government or from any other authority external to the Organization. They shall refrain from any action which might reflect on their position as international officials responsible only to the Organization.
2. Each Member of the United Nations undertakes to respect the exclusively international character of the responsibilities of the Secretary-General and the staff and not to seek to influence them in the discharge of their responsibilities.
Article 101
1. The staff shall be appointed by the Secretary-General under regulations established by the General Assembly.
2. Appropriate staffs shall be permanently assigned to the Economic and Social Council, the Trusteeship Council, and, as required, to other organs of the United Nations. These staffs shall form a part of the Secretariat.
3. The paramount consideration in the employment of the staff and in the determination of the conditions of service shall be the necessity of securing the highest standards of efficiency, competence, and integrity. Due regard shall be paid to the importance of recruiting the staff on as wide a geographical basis as possible.
CHAPTER XVI
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Article 102
1. Every treaty and every international agreement entered into by any Member of the United Nations after the present Charter comes into force shall as soon as possible be registered with the Secretariat and published by it.
2. No party to any such treaty or international agreement which has not been registered in accordance with the provisions of paragraph I of this Article may invoke that treaty or agreement before any organ of the United Nations.
Article 103
In the event of a conflict between the obligations of the Members of the United Nations under the present Charter and their obligations under any other international agreement, their obligations under the present Charter shall prevail.
Article 104
The Organization shall enjoy in the territory of each of its Members such legal capacity as may be necessary for the exercise of its functions and the fulfillment of its purposes.
Article 105
1. The Organization shall enjoy in the territory of each of its Members such privileges and immunities as are necessary for the fulfillment of its purposes.
2. Representatives of the Members of the United Nations and officials of the Organization shall similarly enjoy such privileges and immunities as are necessary for the independent exercise of their functions in connection with the Organization.
3. The General Assembly may make recommendations with a view to determining the details of the application of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article or may propose conventions to the Members of the United Nations for this purpose.
CHAPTER XVII
TRANSITIONAL SECURITY ARRANGEMENTS
Article 106
Pending the coming into force of such special agreements referred to in Article 43 as in the opinion of the Security Council enable it to begin the exercise of its responsibilities under Article 42, the parties to the Four-Nation Declaration, signed at Moscow October 30, 1943, and France, shall, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 5 of that Declaration, consult with one another and as occasion requires with other Members of the United Nations with a view to such joint action on behalf of the Organization as may be necessary for the purpose of maintaining international peace and security.
Article 107
Nothing in the present Charter shall invalidate or preclude action, in relation to any state which during the Second World War has been an enemy of any signatory to the present Charter, taken or authorized as a result of that war by the Governments having responsibility for such action.
CHAPTER XVIII
AMENDMENTS
Article 108
Amendments to the present Charter shall come into force for all Members of the United Nations when they have been adopted by a vote of two thirds of the members of the General Assembly and ratified in accordance with their respective constitutional processes by two thirds of the Members of the United Nations, including all the permanent members of the Security Council.
Article 109
1. A General Conference of the Members of the United Nations for the purpose of reviewing the present Charter may be held at a date and place to be fixed by a two-thirds vote of the members of the General Assembly and by a vote of any seven members of the Security Council. Each Member of the United Nations shall have one vote in the conference.
2. Any alteration of the present Charter recommended by a two-thirds vote of the conference shall take effect when ratified in accordance with their respective constitutional processes by two thirds of the Members of the United Nations including all the permanent members of the Security Council.
3. If such a conference has not been held before the tenth annual session of the General Assembly following the coming into force of the present Charter, the proposal to call such a conference shall be placed on the agenda of that session of the General Assembly, and the conference shall be held if so decided by a majority vote of the members of the General Assembly and by a vote of any seven members of the Security Council.
CHAPTER XIX
RATIFICATION AND SIGNATURE
Article 110
1. The present Charter shall be ratified by the signatory states in accordance with their respective constitutional processes.
2. The ratifications shall be deposited with the Government of the United States of America, which shall notify all the signatory states of each deposit as well as the Secretary-General of the Organization when he has been appointed.
3. The present Charter shall come into force upon the deposit of ratifications by the Republic of China, France, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America, and by a majority of the other signatory states. A protocol of the ratifications deposited shall thereupon be drawn up by the Government of the United States of America which shall communicate copies thereof to all the signatory states.
4. The states signatory to the present Charter which ratify it after it has come into force will become original Members of the United Nations on the date of the deposit of their respective ratifications.
Article 111
The present Charter, of which the Chinese, French, Russian, English, and Spanish texts are equally authentic, shall remain deposited in the archives of the Government of the United States of America. Duly certified copies thereof shall be transmitted by that Government to the Governments of the other signatory states.
IN FAITH WHEREOF the representatives of the Governments of the United Nations have signed the present Charter.
DONE at the city of San Francisco the twenty-sixth day of June, one thousand nine hundred and forty-five.
866 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 601 – 800 of 866 Newer› Newest»[the problem is that the world does not work on racism for most part. and the importance of it is reducing fast as ppl move further away from a tribal society to a multiethnic one.]
"Western part of the world works independent of race, religion or racism. They are moving more toward human based society rather than race based one. And they advocate and help third world countries to do the same.":This is the idea we get via our education and media both managed by west itself.
The reality is west is fully developed now and what they want is to enjoy life. Suddhas are in full control and No 1 position. So giving equal opportunities, following so called human rights etc make suddhas more comfortable to enjoy their lives in already well developed countries rather than continuing their previous method of slavery etc.
If and when west is under any kind of external threat we will see U turns. I am not saying all suddhas are racist but about 50% are. Its true that right now racism affects racists negatively but in a SL type situation in future if happens for them it will be a different story.
Online suddha bashing and WW type fasts against UN will do one good thing (at some expense). It shows readers and people that there are alternative approaches other than worshipping and obeying always right suddhas, (we apologize for the inconvenience occurred for colombians.) Other than that there is no affect as UN or USA don't make decisions after reading our comments. GSL need to understand and make people who voted them understand that what USA/UN/west is up to and how we should deal with them. This is different to UNPs 'we are your good boys' approach.
Sri Lanka removed from high risk war insurance list
ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.
July 15, Colombo: Sri Lanka has been removed from the high risk war insurance list paving the way for increased business growth through reduction of import costs and removal of insurance surcharges, the External Affairs Ministry said in a statement Wednesday.
The Sri Lanka High Commission, London has informed the Ministry that effective from 05th July 2010 Sri Lanka has been removed from all marine war, and marine strikes risk of the Joint Cargo Committee (JCC) Joint Cargo Watch List.
The high level of Ground Insurance Risk that had been assigned to the whole country previously at 2.6 has been removed except for the Vavuniya � Jaffna Section of the A-9 Highway.
Sri Lanka ended the protracted war with the Tamil Tiger rebels in May 2009 successfully eliminating the three-decade long terrorism that plagued the country and hindered the economic development.
Lloyds Market Association Joint Cargo Committee Review Meeting held in London had decided to de-list Sri Lanka on July 02 following the removal of Sri Lanka from the Joint War Committee Hull War, Strikes, Terrorism, and Related Perils Listed Areas with effect from June 11.
The High Commission has facilitated a comprehensive programme in Colombo for the visit of the international intelligence company and Advisor of the JCC to Colombo facilitated by this Mission and the line agencies/Ministries in Colombo.
The Mission has facilitated several meetings between External Affairs Minister Prof. G.L. Peiris, and a delegation from Ministry of Ports and Lloyds Markets Association and their Advisors.
Post � war economic revival would be greatly boosted with increased business confidence, reduction of the cost of imports, removal of insurance surcharge, and inducement for more shipping lines to call over at Sri Lanka Ports due to the de-listing of Sri Lanka from War, and Marine risks, down to only a minimal level of Ground risks, the Ministry said.
Jayawewa!
Dengue Prevention EDUCATION is here!
..........
Education Ministry to get Sri Lankan schools involved in national dengue prevention programmes
ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.
July 15, Colombo: Sri Lanka's Education Ministry today (15) issued a circular to schools making it compulsory for every school to reserve half an hour off two days a week to clean the school grounds and class rooms.
The circular number 2010/22 was issued by the Ministry in a bid to prevent the spread of dengue.
Education Ministry Secretary Sunil S. Sirisena has told the local media that it is important for schools to contribute to the national dengue prevention programmes that are being carried out.
The Education Ministry circular has also addressed the importance of maintaining a clean environment in schools as well as in other educational institutions while maintaining proper waste management systems.
Each school has also been advised to appoint a committee to look into the dengue prevention activities of the school.
GREAT!
But, the GOSL should MAKE CERTAIN they are prepared to cope with disasters like that of BP in the Gulf of Mexico!
..............
Sri Lanka to begin oil drilling in Mannar basin early next year
ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.
July 15, Colombo: The Ministry of Petroleum and Petroleum Resources Development says acquiring 3D seismic data on 1,450 square kilometers off Mannar in the northwestern coast is in progress and the drilling will proceed in early 2011 once the data acquisition is completed.
Sri Lankan government has signed a Petroleum Resources Agreement in 2008 with Cairn India to explore and produce hydro - carbon and natural gas in the Mannar Basin in Northern Sri Lanka.
According to the Agreement, Cairn India will start exploration activities in one of the 8 blocks in the Mannar Basin which covers 3,400 sq. km. at depths between 200 to 1,800 meters.
Mannar basin has eight oil and gas exploration blocks and two of them have been granted to China and India. Russia's largest oil company, Gazprom also plans to take part in the exploration of offshore oil in the Mannar basin.
US oil giant Chevron-Texaco has also expressed interest in bidding for the offshore oil exploration blocks off Sri Lanka waters.
Meanwhile, the Ministry says it has collected 2D seismic data offshore Galle and Hambantota to evaluate petroleum potentials.
A survey has been carried out last year to investigate the petroleum potential off the Southern coastal belt of Sri Lanka. Satellite data has indicated two gravity anomalies in the region, a Ministry report has said.
Sri Lanka has identified and demarcated three blocks in the Cauvery Basin off the northeastern coast and one block off the coast of Hambanthota in addition to the eight blocks in Mannar basin.
sam,
i'm not for praising USA or anyother country except sri lanka and israel.
all i say is we have to admit facts and be objective.
the danger of getting USA off side is they can cripple our exports and that paves way for anti-SL ponnayas to come to power and do what the USA, etc. would THEN tell them.
we cannot be another iran, venizuela, north korea, burma, syria, zimbabwe, congo, cuba, fiji, laos, etc.
(BTW the list is GROWING!!!)
its not praise but a friendly approach when needed and a not so friendly approach when that is required.
ninja,
as i explined to sam and pol, there is no need to,
1. praise
2. worship
3. arselick
4. etc.
"sudda" or anyone else. no need to jump from one extreme to another.
we should have an
1. objective
2. relationship
that
1. appreciates the NET good, and,
2. protects SL from the bad
my biggest fear is we UNNECESSARILY lock horns with the "sudda" and play into the hands of TAMIL ELAMIST and URINEEPEE motherfckers.
we have to avoid another 2001 for SL.
we also have to start to move away from economic and financial dependance on "sudda". we cannot depend on them for anything as they are so unpredictable.
we have to increase exports to the fast developing asian region including japan, china, india, malaysia, indonesia, singapore, south korea, etc.
unfortunately they are our NET IMPORTERS NOW!!!!
Anti-semitic? What?
As for Christians I have no problem with Christians or Christianity as a whole but I do have a problem with Christian extremists operating in Sri Lanka, the activities of the Church and conversion programs taking advantage of poor, war/natural disaster affected.
Can’t speak about it because its “anti-Christian”?
The rest, hmz I will not contest :))
Moshe if you think the world is moving away from racism and ethnic tribalism it is not, that “moving away” was an illusion masking it, and today racism is on the rise (maybe internet has something to do with it?).
The level of racism exhibited by suddha to China and Chinese is very high as it is against Arabs, Persians and Pakistanis and other followers of the Islamic faith, all reflective of suddhas own growing insecurities hence desire to comfort themselves. Mainstream Western media has this under current as well.
There are prejudices which just cannot be broken, hence why we, “little brown people” are automatic human rights violators and war criminals because they say so and it fits their pre-set perception. It does not matter whether it is factual or not, if they say so it is a fact.
It is why channel 4s bs videos are automatically “legitimate” and so “impactful”, it fits the audiences pre-set view of us because “they never do such backward things” and hence we, who are already viewed as inferior, are already guilty.
pol,
we have a serious disagreement on the "sudda"-TE connection.
i dont like the word "sudda" so i use the word "west".
YOUR HYPOTHESIS
west's acts to disintegrate SL and all other matters incidental to that are NOT influenced in anyway by tamil elamists.
MY HYPOTHESIS
1. west is seriously influenced by TEs.
2. in addition, west has a plan for SL based on their kosovo model.
2.1. in doing so, the west needs slaves. for some reason the west finds direct decendants of negroid/negrotis ppl to be better slaves than others. they also recognize that, "you cannot enslave" humans, animals, even machines (!!!) without giving back something in return.
even machines need to be serviced, overhauled, maintained!!!
for this reason, although the west wants to disintegrate SL, it does it in such a way that it has support from elements that like to be used as cats' paws.
so even the west's OWN AGENDA has a BIG ROLE for TEs.
2.2. west govt agents are not going to live in SL in large enough numbers to influence SL's direction. they need CONDUITS in SL.
they have conduits in SL. the largest number of conduits are TEs.
2.3. when you take out 2.1 and 2.2 from 2, there is a residual western interest in disintegrating SL that functions independantly from TEs.
if we allocate weights to 1 & 2, each gets 50%.
one third of 50% is 17%.
so i allocate only 17% to west's disintegration plan for SL that is functioning without the DIRECT, CRITICAL support of TEs.
this will be there even if TEs one day give up TE.
the remaining 1-17% = 83% is either TE instigated/begged/centred/facilitated/etc.
----------------------------------------------------
so our main focus should be TEs than the west.
A. we should attack, 1, 2.1 and 2.2 based on a strategy that will frustrate TE.
we need to win back the west as much as we can.
50% weight - COLONIZATION, SL DIPLOMATIC MISSIONS FUNCTIONING PROPERLY
B. 2.1 and 2.2 should involve handling the west in frustrating the TE campaign
33% WEIGHT - STOP ALL FORMS OF RACIST DEVOLUTION, MANAGE THE ECONOMY AND MOVE AWAY FROM DEPENDING FROM THE WEST, COLONIZATION, MILITARISATION OF NE
C. we should attack west as best as we can to counter 2.3 regardless of TE.
17% WEIGHT - SUPPORT NAM WORK, GET INDIA/CHINA APPRORPIATELY INVOLVED IN SL DEFENCE, STRONGER RELATIONSHIP WITH RUSSIA, SOVERIGNTY, NEVER RATIFY THE ROME STATUTE
pol,
we have a serious disagreement on the "sudda"-TE connection.
i dont like the word "sudda" so i use the word "west".
YOUR HYPOTHESIS
west's acts to disintegrate SL and all other matters incidental to that are NOT influenced in anyway by tamil elamists.
MY HYPOTHESIS
1. west is seriously influenced by TEs.
2. in addition, west has a plan for SL based on their kosovo model.
2.1. in doing so, the west needs slaves. for some reason the west finds direct decendants of negroid/negrotis ppl to be better slaves than others. they also recognize that, "you cannot enslave" humans, animals, even machines (!!!) without giving back something in return.
even machines need to be serviced, overhauled, maintained!!!
for this reason, although the west wants to disintegrate SL, it does it in such a way that it has support from elements that like to be used as cats' paws.
so even the west's OWN AGENDA has a BIG ROLE for TEs.
2.2. west govt agents are not going to live in SL in large enough numbers to influence SL's direction. they need CONDUITS in SL.
they have conduits in SL. the largest number of conduits are TEs.
2.3. when you take out 2.1 and 2.2 from 2, there is a residual western interest in disintegrating SL that functions independantly from TEs.
if we allocate weights to 1 & 2, each gets 50%.
one third of 50% is 17%.
so i allocate only 17% to west's disintegration plan for SL that is functioning without the DIRECT, CRITICAL support of TEs.
this will be there even if TEs one day give up TE.
the remaining 1-17% = 83% is either TE instigated/begged/centred/facilitated/etc.
----------------------------------------------------
so our main focus should be TEs than the west.
A. we should attack, 1, 2.1 and 2.2 based on a strategy that will frustrate TE.
we need to win back the west as much as we can.
50% weight - COLONIZATION, SL DIPLOMATIC MISSIONS FUNCTIONING PROPERLY
B. 2.1 and 2.2 should involve handling the west in frustrating the TE campaign
33% WEIGHT - STOP ALL FORMS OF RACIST DEVOLUTION, MANAGE THE ECONOMY AND MOVE AWAY FROM DEPENDING FROM THE WEST, COLONIZATION, MILITARISATION OF NE
C. we should attack west as best as we can to counter 2.3 regardless of TE.
17% WEIGHT - SUPPORT NAM WORK, GET INDIA/CHINA APPRORPIATELY INVOLVED IN SL DEFENCE, STRONGER RELATIONSHIP WITH RUSSIA, SOVERIGNTY, NEVER RATIFY THE ROME STATUTE
Moshe,
"A friendly approach when needed and a not so friendly approach when that is required."
That is the method. Isn't that exactly what we are doing right now?
sam,
yes. but here at the forum some bloggers proposed a different approach to look at USAID!!!
SL has its checks and balances re: USAID and i think they are sufficient. further skeptisim is not required. and we certainly must appreciate USAID.
my biggest fear is we UNNECESSARILY lock horns with the "sudda" and play into the hands of TAMIL ELAMIST and URINEEPEE motherfckers.
Moshe,
How many times have we locked horns with the masters for fun? All the way along we repeatedly told them to leave us alone. There is a substantial difference between unnecessarily locking horns and standing up to master bullies when they wash the hands over our heads. I don't think that we have a big choice here.
sam,
very few.
and it should be zero.
the word "unnecessarily" may not be the most suitable. my bad. it should be "without a favourable outcome for SL".
however, some bloggers proposed a DIFFERENT approach and i was countering that.
re: world is moving away from racism/tribalism
1. re: racism in west
west has come a LON way since there were seperate churches, schools, etc. for blacks and whites.
USA has a black man as the president.
so even they are moving in the right direction.
2. the world is going to be more of the asians than the west's in the future. they are less racists.
that is also a sign that the world (as a whole) is fast moving away from racism.
3. tamil elam movement SUFFERED A SERIOUS set back in 2009. with over 100 million tamils around the world, it is a big good move towards less racism. that should teach other racist movements around the world that racism won't work today as easily as it worked a thousand years ago.
Patriots,
Think of this.
http://www.ranavirufund.org/PriorityChildren/FPS-MEDS-13/Summary.html
"Responding to the claims in a statement, the UK's Ministry of Defence told the BBC: "We are aware that an individual has contacted the media claiming responsibility for the killing of three British soldiers on Tuesday morning in Helmand Province.
"While we cannot comment on the legitimacy of this individual's claims to be the suspect responsible for this cowardly attack, it is ridiculous to suggest that we are engaged in suicide attacks or are deliberately killing civilians.
"Insurgents and those who are against the coalition mission in Afghanistan routinely make false and exaggerated claims and so care must be taken not to accept their accounts at face value.""
sure. don't take ANY terrorists' claims at face value.
Moshe,
[sure. don't take ANY terrorists' claims at face value.]
And, when Sri Lanka makes SIMILAR representations regarding the atrocities committed by the LTTE, and the LTTE hiding behind human shields and exaggerating casualties, we would like you British to BELIEVE US as well.
The SHOE IS NOW ON YOUR FOOT .. that is the ONLY difference!
Moshe,
[USA has a black man as the president.]
It has ALWAYS puzzled me why OBAMA, who is half-black and half-white, is ALWAYS called a black-man.
Why don't we call him a white-man .. at least HALF-THE-TIME, for EQUITY's sake?
["While we cannot comment on the legitimacy of this individual's claims to be the suspect responsible for this cowardly attack, it is ridiculous to suggest that we are engaged in suicide attacks or are deliberately killing civilians.]
Oh really? no legitimacy..? Individual is probably not a tamiz tiger huh?
["Insurgents and those who are against the coalition mission in Afghanistan routinely make false and exaggerated claims and so care must be taken not to accept their accounts at face value."]
Geez.. bad insurgents... why they don't find a legitimate, reliable, humane, friendly, honest, good terrorist outfit like LTTE to fight..?
[USA has a black man as the president.]
It has ALWAYS puzzled me why OBAMA, who is half-black and half-white, is ALWAYS called a black-man.
Why don't we call him a white-man .. at least HALF-THE-TIME, for EQUITY's sake?
HAHA Obama may be black skinwise, half black-half white parentelswise, but he is 100% white-american culturelwise.
Moshe,
Let me address your post, point by point ...
[YOUR (Pol's)HYPOTHESIS
west's acts to disintegrate SL and all other matters incidental to that are NOT influenced in anyway by tamil elamists.]
Pol is a COMMITTED Sri Lankan Patriot FRANTIC with worry. He criticizes every perceived enemy of Sri Lanka with EQUAL VIGOR .. we NEED SUCH MOTIVATED PATRIOTS.
Among all of his inspired posts are some kernels of TRUTH .. so I find myself agreeing with his basic statements .. though I would not put them exactly the way he does .. after all Wisdom, they say, is the better part of valor.
I am with Moshe in deprecating Pol's uninhibited frequent use of the word "suddha", and posing serious questions about the human origins of suddha ancestry.
[MY (Moshe's) HYPOTHESIS
1. west is seriously influenced by TEs.]
Nah! TEs happen to give them an excuse to bring Sri Lanka to heel.
Why they want to bring Sri Lanka to heel is best explained by Ananda's Hypothesis (which is clearer and simpler.
Begin Ananda's Hypothesis
The Western Power Club is looking for ways and means of countering the growing power of emerging superpowers like China, their resurgent age old enemy of Russia, the ever present threat of the Islamists, and those pesky nouveau-riche petroleum producers like Venezuela, Iran etc, who are beggining to act as a opposing power block.
Of particular relevance to their posture on Sri Lanka are two issues: the emerging threat of Islamists centered in Pakistan, and contaminating the former Soviet states of Central Asia, and the growing might of an increasingly assertive China.
They see India, as the Hindutva, as a convenient foil against the growth of Islamists in Pakistan. Also, India .. with its own fears of China .. is a convenient bulwark against the growth and spread of China's power. Although the West profits mightily from the availability of low-cost Chinese products, and loans to prop up their economies, they fear its rapid growth, and are uncertain that China of the future may not be as cooperative as it is now.
Both of these factor into the support of the Western Power Club for India, which already helping with "stabilizing" Afghanistan for its own reasons of confronting Pakistan and Islamist terror.
However, although the Western Power Club is comfortable with India as a "Fellow Democracy" .. blithely ignoring that little Sri Lanka is also an ENDURING SOUTH ASIAN DEMOCRACY as old as India .. they are worried about the ability of India to solve its internal problems of separatism, communal violence, the growing numbers of disaffected poor, the growing divide in wealth, to become a stable and reliable counterweight to China and an opponent of the Islamists.
Nevertheless, they are trying their best to propup India, and hopefully to remake India as another "South Korea" with creeping religious conversion of Hindus, a phenomenon which is proceeding apace.
That is where Sri Lanka comes in:
FIRST, is on the the Dravidian/ Tamil nationalist threat to India's integrity. In their view, the Sri Lankan Tamil problem, if not solved to meet the goals of the GREATER DRAVIDA NADU concept, will exacerbate the dissatisfaction of the Indian Tamils. They fear it may catalyze the breakaway of South India, hitherto the most stable and arguably the most productive region of India, weakening India and putting a spike in the plans of using India as a cat's paw against China and the Islamists.
Ergo .. Sri Lanka must be dissuaded from any action that would upset the South Indian Applecart. Given the magnitude of their bet on India, Sri Lanka is small potatoes .. and can be thrown to the wolves .. a a dispensible pawn .. forgetting ALL OF THE RHETORIC preached from the ROOFTOPS against GENERIC TERRORISM and PROMOTING DEMOCRACY. I recall here that Sri Lanka is the SECOND OLDEST FUNCTIONING DEMOCRACY in South Asia!
oba-ma got michael jackson's whitening disorder AFTER becoming president!!
but he shows a different approach to MANY problems than ALL his predecesors. we have to accept that. a little bit MORE practical approach to things.
there is very little a US president can do on his own afterall.
Hypothetically Speaking
......continued 1...
The independence displayed by Sri Lanka's war winning GOSL, and the massive support it consistently wins from the GREAT MAJORITY of Sri Lankans, poses a substantial problem for the Western Power Club.
Therefore, they are resorting to a gradual process of minimizing, denigrating, undermining and demonizing Sri Lanka, using the UN as one PUPPET, following a well-practiced formula, to arrive at a "kosovo type" solution.
Little by little they plan to exert economic pressure, political pressure, infiltrate the body politic in various ways through NGOs and such like, bribe every leader who can be bribed, and fund political demonstrations and disobedience in the country, with the goal of reducing the GOSL and confuse the people who elected into impotence.
At that point, they figure, they can nicely slice and dice Sri Lanka to their hearts content, perform a kosovo type lobotomy, paving the way for a stable India to emerge as an ally by their side.
This scenario will emerge in every neighboring small country of India for the same reasons. The process is underway in Nepal ..even as we speak.
Understanding this scenario, which was moving into high gear even during the Eelam War IV, the GOSL started to strengthen its alliances, with China, Russia, the NAM, the nouveau-riche petro-nations, the South Americans republics in general, and the newly independent nations of Central Asia, often with the tacit support of the newly emerging superpowers. It must continue to do so as a part of diversifying its support base, even as it moves to win over the Western Power Club .. if that is at all possible .. without compromising the essential interests of Sri Lanka.
Sri Lanka cannot be BLAMED for not wanting to SACRIFICE its territorial integrity, and the vision of prosperous future for its people, just to satisfy the self-serving agenda of the Western Power Club, although it would much rather live-and-let live with them.
Sri Lanka WILL do what it MUST to SURVIVE .. it is up to the Western Power Club to ABANDON its agenda against Sri Lanka, and STOP trying to help others at Sri Lanka's expense.
End Ananda's Hypothesis...
Hypothetically Speaking
......continued 2...
[2. in addition, west has a plan for SL based on their kosovo model.]
Agreed!
2.1. in doing so, the west needs slaves.
[so even the west's OWN AGENDA has a BIG ROLE for TEs.]
Yes, to undermine and divide Sri Lanka, satisfy the needs of India, and prop up India as their ally.
[2.2. west govt agents are not going to live in SL in large enough numbers to influence SL's direction. they need CONDUITS in SL.
they have conduits in SL. the largest number of conduits are TEs.]
Agreed!
[2.3. when you take out 2.1 and 2.2 from 2, there is a residual western interest in disintegrating SL that functions independantly from TEs.]
Disagree! This is 100% of the Western Power Club agenda. TEs is one of the MEANS, the MAJOR one, of achieving it.
[if we allocate weights to 1 & 2, each gets 50%.
one third of 50% is 17%.
so i allocate only 17% to west's disintegration plan for SL that is functioning without the DIRECT, CRITICAL support of TEs.
this will be there even if TEs one day give up TE.
the remaining 1-17% = 83% is either TE instigated/begged/centred/facilitated/etc.]
Largely, BS! Western Power Club agenda drives its use of TEs.
[so our main focus should be TEs than the west.]
There is NO DIFFERENCE here. The TE is the main means the Westren Power Club hopes to use to achieve its agenda.
[A. we should attack, 1, 2.1 and 2.2 based on a strategy that will frustrate TE.
we need to win back the west as much as we can.]
Yes, as much as we can .. that is why EI is so important. That enables it.
[50% weight - COLONIZATION, SL DIPLOMATIC MISSIONS FUNCTIONING PROPERLY]
Resettlement and Settlement under EI is ESSENTIAL!
[33% WEIGHT - STOP ALL FORMS OF RACIST DEVOLUTION, MANAGE THE ECONOMY AND MOVE AWAY FROM DEPENDING FROM THE WEST, COLONIZATION, MILITARISATION OF NE]
Absolutely, agree!
[C. we should attack west as best as we can to counter 2.3 regardless of TE.]
Agreed!
[17% WEIGHT - SUPPORT NAM WORK, GET INDIA/CHINA APPRORPIATELY INVOLVED IN SL DEFENCE, STRONGER RELATIONSHIP WITH RUSSIA, SOVERIGNTY, NEVER RATIFY THE ROME STATUTE]
Absolutely agree!
the afghan FREEDOMFIGHTER who launched a HEROIC attack on OCCUPYING british soldiers engaged in the GENOCIDE of ISLAM followers, busted a western hegemonic theory that only the majority in afghanistan is against OCCUPYING TROOPS.
he belongs to a minority community that has traditionally not supported TALIBAN FREEDOMFIGHTERS!!!
following the MAHAVEERAR (great heroic) attack on OCCUPYING ALIEN TROOPS on afghan HOMELAND, british troops have engaged in acts of revenge in helmud province unnamed sources said. These sources that remain unnamed fearing retaliation, further point out that for the past 9 years of afghan occupation, NATO troops have only brought in misery, death and destruction.
these sources point out the inevitable end facing occupying troops as people's grudge is increasingly directed at them.
the heroic soldier who has now joined the makkal padai (people's army) has stated that it was killing of afghan islam following civilians by occupying chrisitian troops in genocidal proportions that motivated him to take heroic action.
authoritative tamil sources point out that during the same time a similar thing happened in ebba'vellai in sri lanka where a chingala soldier fired at another chingala soldier killing him and wounding others.
meanwhile the tamil scholar mahalingam after a series of research says afghan is tamil. as evidence he says, tamil brahmi used to read from right to let and not left to right as other languages and when the word AFGHAN is thus read it reads, "NAGA". since nagas were tamils, afghans too are tamils.
ananda,
"Western Power Club agenda drives its use of TEs."
no!!
WPC ALSO uses TEs to achieve their plans.
1. assume TE becomes a reality comprising north and east of the country.
the north is devoid of millions today. i think at the PE an equal % of voters in the north voted as the east + IDPs.
this means more than 20% of its population would be muslims. in future this will increase to 25%, 30%, 35%,...........90%.
would the USA be better off with a nation of 10% muslims or 20%??????
if a new nation is formed in the lines of afghanistan, pakistan, bangladesh, indonesia with VERY STRONG ideological links with iran, etc. would that benefit the USA or not?????
2. it is IMPOSSIBLE to stop the east seperating from the TE as NAZARSTAN or whatever.
then we have ANOTHER MUSLIM MAJORITY nation in south asia. another headache for the USA. and india.
3. in dividing SL, USA teams up with india. blake mentioned this too. india will not fall to the US plan of disintegrating india by using TE as a bait.
4. US is STILL eying trincomalee. but they know the majority around trincomalee are muslims. IF the east becomes a new country, trincomalee's fate will be sealed.
also this new nation - NAZARSTAN will be the link between jamah islaia (based MAINLY in indonesia), philippine & thai islamic terrorists AND paki/afgha terrorists.
this is the LAST THING USA wants!!!!
the best way to avoid is to keep SL together bcos SL is MORE capable of retaining the EAST than TE.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
these things pull the US in the oppositte direction.
now USA has to make a choice.
1. TE OR
no TE but a federal or some other BS.
2. neither. then the problem is US's regional domination strategy has no supporters.
so RELUCTANTLLY the USA decides to support TEs so that they will carry forward the US agenda. but USA is aware of the GROWING ISLAMIC RADICALISATION in the east.
(that is part of the reasons why USAID is POURING money to HUMAN DEVELOPMENT matters in the east).
don't forget india is less of a headache for USA than ANOTHER pakistan.
we should highlight this threat in articles.
no one has done so, yet.
it is better for USA to RETAIN strong colombo control over EAST than let it be part of a smaller nation/admin unit, etc. where it will have a BIGGER SAY.
copyright MD.
Sam,
[Ha ha ha, what are you up to these days?]
I am anxiously waiting for you to respond to my Ranu Viru Fund email so we can proceed to incorporate the Fund with you as the Maximum Leader. Lots of responsibility young man! :):)
Besides that, my wife and I (both scientists/engineers) are building a small grid-tied horizontal axis wind turbine of our own advanced design for residential use.
It has a 3.3m diameter 3-bladed fixed-pitch propeller, and should have a maximum generation capacity somewhere between 1-2kW. The primary consideration is low-cost.
We have designed and built a direct-drive slow-speed 3-phase permanent-magnet generator, designed and built the yaw and automatic furling mechanisms, and have completed the bench testing of the generator, and wind tunnel testing of a small scale propeller. We have dug a 1.5m deep hole, poured a concrete base for a 10-m high mast made out of galvanized pipe, and tested the mast. The two of us are now getting ready raise the turbine on the mast, and test it next week.
During testing, the turbine will be connected to a 10kW, 120VAC gas generator through a grid-tie inverter and will also charge a small 48VDC battery bank. Later it will be permanently connected to the house mains and feed power to the grid, without the battery storage. I will deploy a commercially available wireless data acquisition system to acquire wind speed and direction data, and a data acquisition system of my own design to acquire turbine and generator performance and control data and feed it to a laptop computer.
When it is perfected, I will make a few kits, take them to Sri Lanka, and install them at a couple of residential and farm properties I own. These will be used as demonstration models and to actually generate power. Then, if all goes well, I plan to manufacture it in Sri Lanka and sell it worldwide, including the US.
We are building big castles in the air with our commercial plans, ideas are flowing fast and thick, but MOSTLY WE ARE HAVING FUN LETTING OUR IMAGINATION RUN RIOT!
Alternative Energy on a Shoe String or BUST!
Moshe,
["Western Power Club agenda drives its use of TEs."
no!!
WPC ALSO uses TEs to achieve their plans.]
What do you mean no?
"WPC ALSO uses TEs to achieve their plans" is exactly what I meant by "Western Power Club agenda drives its use of TEs".
My point was that the US wants to use India against Islamists and China .. so the US wants to assure Integrity integrity and growth as an ally.
US is pushing the TE agenda because it wants to placate Tamil Nadu to keep TN within India.
You said, "india will not fall to the US plan of disintegrating india by using TE as a bait" but I neither said that, nor meant that .. that is NOT TRUE in my view.
You fears about a separate NAZIRISTAN in SL is NOT REALISTIC at all in my view. Now that LTTE's goal of Eelam is GONE, Sri Lankan Muslims will not raise such an issue .. they know what that the fate of the LTTE will befall them too if they try that. In time, the Muslim of Sri Lanka will reintegrate into a Sri Lankan identity, PROVIDED WE KEEP THOSE WAHABI MONEY and Islamist IDEOLOGY OUT of Sri Lanka.
Here again, as in the case of the Tamils, GOSL backed implementation of EI is the KEY.
Thank you for the comforting words, Mr. Cader, but we will keep our eyes peeled, our swords sharp, and our powder dry, FOREVER!
................
Rebels have been routed for good, says Sri Lankan Tamil MP
By Allan Jacob, Khaleej Times, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
July 15, 2010
July 16--DUBAI -- Sri Lanka is finding its feet a year after the rout of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) and the death of its leader Velupillai Prabhakaran.
The sesssionist struggle for a Tamil homeland in the north and east of the country by the Tiger rebels may have come to nought, but many Tamils are happy about the government's reconciliation efforts with the minorities. With development projects in full swing, there is no indication of the dreaded outfit regrouping, according to a senior Tamil MP.
Political will and military muscle may have ensured there are no more tears from terrorists in the tiny tear-drop shaped country, south of India. Critics, however, accuse the government of human rights violations and for the plight of thousands of refugees displaced by war. ''There is no room for violence in the new Sri Lanka, the focus is on growth and civil harmony,'' said Tamil-Muslim Member of Parliament Abdul Cader of the opposition United National Party, a political veteran of over two decades.
Speaking to Khaleej Times, he dismissed reports of an LTTE revival, and of funds flowing in for the group from sympathisers in Canada, the US, India, Britain and Australia.
The leading Tamil politician, who has never lost an election, said the Sri Lankan government under Mahinda Rajapaksa was reaching out to the minority Tamils, who make up about 10 per cent of the population. The Sinhalese are in majority with 82 per cent, while the Lankan Moors comprise a little over eight per cent of the populace.
Only on Wednesday, Sri Lankan President Rajapaksa chaired a cabinet meeting in Killinnochi, where ironically, the slain Tamil Tiger leader held his first and only press conference in April 2002.
Speaking in the town, the president, said: ''If not for terrorism the district would have developed long ago. The terrorist who destroyed the northern railway line. We have to obtain foreign loans to restore all this devastation. Who will pay for them? The entire nation will.''
''The country comes first, it belongs to everyone, and the president is sending out a message that unity is paramount and we should progress together -- Sinhalese, Tamils, Muslims, Buddhists...'' said Cader, who lauded efforts by the government to resettle Tamil refugees.
The IMF predicts a growth rate of 5.5 per cent for the country this year. It attributes such growth to improving domestic demand and potential export growth after the end of the war and the global economic recovery, which is now taking hold.
Rebels have been routed for good, says Sri Lankan Tamil MP
......continued.....
President Rajapaksa has been facing the heat in recent months from the United Nations, which recently set up a three-member panel to probe war crimes purportedly committed by the army on Tamils in the last days of the conflict in May last year. Over 7,000 perished as troops made a final push for Tamil leader Prabhakaran, who met his end on May 19.
Cader, who claims to be a nationalist above all else, said Tamils and the Muslim minority were fed up by the gory past and the lack of development, a price the country paid during decades of conflict.
The LTTE began its ruthless struggle for a Tamil state and carried out a series of attacks from the early eighties. A largely defensive Indian Peace Keeping Force was deployed on the island in 1987 to disarm the rebels, but made a hasty exit after three years. Former Indian prime minister Rajiv Gandhi was killed by a female suicide bomber in 1991. This turned Indian sentiment against the group, which had backers in the state of Tamil Nadu. Then Lankan president Premadasa met his end in 1994, again at the hands of a suicide bomber, a killing strategy the group had perfected. More political assassinations followed and a Norway-brokered peace deal in 2002 didn't last.
Rajapaksa's ascent to power in 2005 changed the dynamics of the game. The gutsy leader matched the LTTE firepower with more guns and ammunition for his troops with Chinese help, as a wary India watched, until the denoeument last May. ''We don't want to see such violence again. There's work to be done and countries in the region like India and China will play a major role in reconstruction efforts,'' said Cader.
As for the president. ''He looks good to rule for another 15 years.''
allan@khaleejtimes.com
Canadians! Prepare to give up your hearth and home to the "real natives" returning to their "only homeland".
What homeland you say? Well, just give them some time to rewrite Canadian Paleo-history from the beginning of time, and you will find out!
Make Way .. for the Superior Highly Intelligent Folk from Sri Lanka!
..............
Ship full of migrants heading to Canada: foreign report
Canadian authorities have been monitoring the MV Sun Sea for months
Adrian Morrow
Globe and Mail Update Published on Friday, Jul. 16, 2010 12:04AM EDT
A ship suspected of being connected to the Tamil Tigers and carrying as many as 300 migrants has weighed anchor and set a course for Canada, according to reports in the Sri Lankan media.
Canadian authorities have been monitoring the ship for months.
The Sunday Observer, a Colombo newspaper, reports that the MV Sun Sea, formerly known as the Harin Panich 19, is carrying Tamil Tiger leaders among its passengers.
In May, the Philippine coast guard issued a warning asking officials to keep an eye out for the vessel.
Last month, the ship was believed to be in the Gulf of Thailand, heading towards Australia. That country has been cracking down recently on Sri Lankan asylum seekers.
The Observer said the ship idled for a while before heading towards Canada last week.
“This could end up being a prime example of individuals trying to take advantage of our generous immigration system,” said Celyeste Power, press secretary to Immigration Minister Jason Kenney, in a prepared statement. “Our government is committed to cracking down on bogus refugees while providing protection to those that truly need our help.”
Ms. Power said the Immigration Department would only become involved if the ship landed in Canada. Otherwise, it would be up to the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade to monitor it.
A spokesperson for DFAIT could not be reached for comment. The department has said in the past that it attempts to stop migrant ships at their point of departure.
Last month, The Globe and Mail reported that Canadian spies were working with authorities in Australia and Asian countries to track the ship's progress.
The federal government has been eager to do this because, once refugee claimants land in the country, the government must go through a lengthier process to examine their applications for asylum.
Last October, for instance, 76 Tamil refugees landed in British Columbia in another ship believed to be connected to the Tigers. The migrants have been freed while their claims are processed, which could take several years.
With a report from Colin Freeze
MORE Nonsense Aid Projects designed to BRIBE & BUY Sri Lankans and influence Sri Lanka's INTERNAL POLITICS!
................
US Embassy announces grants program to support youth in Sri Lanka and the Maldives
ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.
July 15, Colombo: The U.S. Embassy in Colombo has announced the Youth Empowerment Grants Program to fund projects for Sri Lankan and Maldivian youth.
The main objective of the grant program is to support innovative, small-scale, cutting-edge projects developed and implemented by and/or for young people between the ages of 15-25 in the areas of educational development, environment issues, community development, civil society building, human rights, youth enrichment activities, health and human services and employability.
The competition is open to Non-Governmental Organizations registered in Sri Lanka or the Maldives. The maximum award amount is one million rupees or 115,000 rufiyaa.
The application form and further information can be found on the U.S. Embassy's website at http://srilanka.usembassy.gov . Completed applications must be submitted to the U.S. Embassy by August 15, 2010.
Lanka and the world
By STANLEY A. MAYADUNNE, RIYADH
ArabNews.com
Sri Lanka’s bruised ties with the West and the angry reaction against a panel appointed by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon are not without reason.
Sri Lanka was subjected to terrorism at its worst form for 30 years. Only those who lived in the country know to what extent the so-called Western friends and the United Nations helped Sri Lanka in those difficult years. It is no secret that most of the Western countries and the UN umbrella organizations contributed immensely to the cause of terrorism in Sri Lanka in many ways. Although a banned organization in European Union as well as in US, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) were allowed to run offices in these countries, collect funds, organize rallies etc. During the last stages of the war, some Western countries attempted to intimidate Sri Lanka and force it into a cease-fire to save the LTTE leaders.
It is not coincidence that the UN chief appointed a panel to advise him on Sri Lanka and the European Union decided to cancel the GSP (Generalized System of Preferences) and trade concessions to the island nation at the same time. It is a chain of events, which is influenced by certain NGO lobbies that were banned from Sri Lanka during the war due to their proven connection to terrorism, as well as the large Tamil diaspora in Europe and the US.
Now all of them are in the “human rights violation” bandwagon, the modern version of the colonial rule, to harass Sri Lanka, though there are other regions where thousands of human rights violations are taking place daily. But the UN seems to be reluctant to take up these issues as some powerful and rich nations are involved in these regions and instead the UN is showing its power by intimidating a small country like Sri Lanka.
Sri Lanka’s relations with China and Russia go back to many decades and China and Russia have been Sri Lanka’s good friends, though Colombo maintained good relations with the US and Europe too.
However, the war against Tigers gave Sri Lanka an opportunity to know who its real friends are. And Sri Lankans know they will be safer and happier with tried and trusted friends like China and Russia.
Evidence in support of Ananda's Hypothesis
..............
Curb terror against India: US tells Pakistan
July 15, 2010
NEW DELHI: As India and Pakistan held talks in a bid to revive their stalled dialogue, the US Thursday sternly warned Islamabad to stop tolerating home-grown terrorists who are trying to disrupt Indian and the American way of life.
"Pakistan must recognize that it is contrary to their own interests, for the future in the stability of the region, to continue to tolerate the existence of insurgents within their borders," US National Security Adviser James Jones told CNN-IBN's Rajdeep Sardesai in an interview.
"So, the first means of correcting that and as a first means of showing that Pakistan wants the same thing that we want, they have to make a tough decision to go after these terrorist organisations," Jones, who wrapped up his two-day visit to India Thursday, said.
"Moreover, they need to state concretely and publicly that this is a matter of policy and this cannot be tolerated," he stressed.
"Yes. We want to see a more comprehensive programme that addresses all aspects of terrorism. Because all of these groups that we are finding out are linked," Jones said when asked whether the US will see action as Hafiz Saeed, the suspected mastermind of the 26/11 attacks, as a test of Pakistan's seriousness in dealing with terrorism.
"They are not necessarily targeting one nation or the other. They are terrorist organisations that have in mind to disrupt India, to disrupt our way of life and they are actively planning to do that," he said.
Jones also indicated that the US was willing to provide Indian investigators more access to American-Pakistani Lashkar-e-Taiba operative David Headley, who has disclosed that besides LeT operatives, some serving and retired officers of the Pakistani Army were involved in the Mumbai terror spree.
"I think the state of our bilateral relationship is such a good quality, that we would cooperate with anything that India needs to better understand the threat that it faces," he replied.
In his talks with his Pakistani counterpart Shah Mahmood Qureshi in Islamabad, External Affairs Minister S.M. Krishna pressed Pakistan to take urgent action against Saeed and all those involved in the Mumbai attacks and reminded them of the disclosures made by Headley in this regard.
UNP changes tune on executive PM
July 16, 2010
COLOMBO: The Opposition United National Party (UNP) has made it clear that it will not agree to a wholesale transfer of the powers of the executive president to the Prime Minister in a parliamentary system.
This was stated by the UNP chief and Leader of the Opposition, Ranil Wickremesinghe, at a seminar organised by the USbased National Democratic Institute here on Wednesday.
Foiling Rajapaksa's plans
Opposition activists told 'Express' on Thursday that the UNP's stand would dash President Rajapaksa's hope of becoming an executive PM with all the powers of the executive president, on completion of his second and last consecutive presidential term in December 2016.
UNP's Deputy leader Karu Jayasuriya said that his party would also oppose any bid to give the office of the executive PM immunity from prosecution, a privilege which the executive president enjoys under the present constitution.
The ruling Peoples Alliance (PA) led by Rajapaksa and the UNP led by Wickremesinghe, had, at a meeting on Monday, agreed to pursue the goal of making Lanka a parliamentary democracy with executive power vested in a cabinet of ministers headed by an executive PM who is answerable to parliament.In an interaction with the media, the UNP's spokesman, Tissa Attanayake, said that his party would press for the full implementation of the 17th Constitutional Amendment which was meant to depoliticise key institutions of the state by having them run by independent commissions.
But the UNP's stand on the 17th Amendment clashes with Rajapaksa's stand that the amendment should be drastically revised because it erodes the constitutionally sanctioned powers of the executive president. The Rajapaksa government has not implemented the Amendment.
Moshe,
I do not disagree with the need to destroy the conduit on our side (recol obviously).
However i disagree with the idea that they are "influenced" or being "duped" by Tamils. I see them using Tamils for their own interests, if TE or Tamils suddenly became a threat to them (heavily unlikely) then they would ditch them so fast and if need be mercilessly kill/genocide the whole lot (burning Chennai).
Keeping the slave happy of course does make plenty of sense, but I doubt they are pursuing the war crimes bs vigorously because Radkrumar is paying money. More to do with trying to threaten SL (“you are war criminals now, dance or suffer as we have a ample justification to make you suffer if you do not”) and get other nations to be “scared” away from SL, as well as a grounds for forcing TE on us and doing a Kosovo. Again ICG report spells it all out, “use war crimes to make MR make ‘meaningful’ political changes”, i.e. devolution --> TE.
Also cannot ignore their vindictive nature (so much so for such a “moving forward people”).
Suddha had a powerful hit force in South Asia and MR screwed it.
Suddha still has that hit force, but now they need to re-build.
Suddha is furious with MR for that and in that respect all Sinhalese for keeping MR around (rejected puppet Gonseka) which in itself comes back to the issue of racism and the way these suddhas got personal when we “did not know our place” and MR rightly gave them the finger.
re: world is moving away from racism/tribalism
1. re: racism in west
west has come a LON way since there were seperate churches, schools, etc. for blacks and whites.
LOL.
In the West if you speak a different language, have a different culture that is non conforming or alien to the white culture/language you will be ostracised by the white community.
The West is a covertly deeply intolerant place and society that cannot stand different cultures and ways of life.
Comically the West which spearheads all the “talk” about political solutions and “multi” this or that to “little brown people” the world over have had their own populations revolt to the concept, overwhelmingly they reject the “Multi ethnic” ideology and detest it significantly, pushing “integration”, i.e. becoming more white in culture.
Furthermore their idea of “tolerance” and “multi ethnic” for them is merely seeing beyond a persons skin colour (it took them how long to “grow” out of this?), however if you do not conform to the views of the white majority, if you do not speak the same language, follow the same culture traditions and religious views (openly at least) then you are rejected and viewed as an alien treated with disdain (both in open or in secret) and at times a hate figure.
Even right now they have such difficulty seeing beyond something as superficial as ones colour which in itself reflects on the damning nature of the worlds “human rights” crusaders. They only see beyond skin colour by force –i.e. law and in reality fear of being prosecuted which in turn has created a hidden resentment.
All you need to do is see their treatment of muslims and the demonisation and degradation they are going through and compare it to SL where Tamils are pampered the more they unleash violence.
In Sri Lanka, our case is completely different our “issues” are not based on something ridiculous as skin colour but more complex differences: on race, religion, culture language, traditions and involves the deep intolerance and hegemonic ideology of Tamils.
USA has a black man as the president.
so even they are moving in the right direction.
US has a "black president". So?
What does he have to do with being black? Nothing.
He grew up in a white family, follows the same religion, is the same culture, speaks the same language of the white population and during the election campaign made more emphasis on his white heritage to allay the fears of the white population and win their votes. And still he only got 52-54% of the total number of votes cast.
Furthermore there is deep frustration and anger at Obama in the US because they feel he does not deserve to be President and got it “because he is black” and that was the only reason. Basically the whole thing was a cheat, which encapsulates the West: a place of fraud and deception.
"Rebels have been routed for good, says Sri Lankan Tamil MP"
Just look at the comments on Adaderana by the UNPers/Colombians to Cader.
They are attacking him for "destroying the partys image internationally". Such crass hypocrisy. These people really are their masters slaves.
pol,
you and i both agree racism in the USA is MUCH MUCH less than SL.
let me give you a striking example you will not forget!!
in sri lanka a sinhala homosexual ponna TRAITOR (CURSE HIS VOTERS) can be the prime minister TWICE but a patriotic tamil gentleman cannot become the prime minister ONCE!!!
pol,
they are not duped by tamil alone.
they too have an agenda of which tamil elamists play a VITAL role.
in getting them to do the dirty work of the USA, their "chinna chinna aasei" are also satisfied. otherwise they won't stick to the US plan.
ananda-usa,
you jump to conclusions b4 properly reading what i wrote.
IF (IF) TE comes into being, nazarstan is inevitable. that is not against SL, but against TE. can anyone other than a vehhala tamil live in TE????
i don't think so.
that is why the eastern majority will find their own self determination IF TE comes into being.
this is why USA has reasons not to disintegrate SL.
of course they have other reasons to disintegrate.
re: india
you talk in irnoy!!
if US wants pakistan to stop destablizing india, does that mean the oppositte????
no. USA wants india to remain MOSTLY in one piece.
why????
bcos india is the first line of defence against islamic expansion in the region. of course USA wants to keep india under its control but disintegration of india is disastrous for US interests in the region.
Ananda, Moshe, Ninja, Pol & Sudda Racism,
Obama’s mother is white and still Moshe calls him a black ! ! !.
Why does the West integrate races from all over the world ? Because :
1. It provides a large number of people who can interfere and change national policies in the countries of origin of these immigrants. Africa is a good example of its success. CBK is another example, her children are offered as servile citizens of the Great British Empire ! ! !
2. Culturally, these immigrants become the trend-setters in their countries of origin and it becomes the dream of everyone to go West. This is the foundation of the neo-colonial resource exploitation.
3. Mixing improves the genetic composition of the population.
4. Genetically targeted WMDs becomes inoperative ! ! !
I’m with Pol when he digs out Sudda’s subversive plans.
I’m with Moshe when he points out stark realities of today’s world.
I’m with Ananda with his constructive approach to Suddas.
I’m with Ninja when, true to his tradition, he finds some useful targets to attack!!!
In a way, we must be thankful to the creative powers of the universe for producing these Sudda viruses which will certainly strengthen our brains & brawns.
It is certainly the Sudda challenge which made MR to give a trilingual speech in Vauniya – isn’t it wonderful?
MD/ others
Do west interfere/ intervene/ manipulate other countries in the world, other than SL? (yes)
If yes, is it becuz tamiz di-ass-pora? (no)
West use tamils/ diasspora to manage SL and they use other groups to manage other countries.
So you are right when you say to attack peelamists, do colonization etc so that west's tool will be of no use. 9So lets do it.) But they will find another.
I agree we can't destroy/ defeat or even change west. We need to deal with them.
I don't see any thing we disagree critically here though we keep arguing a lot.
There has been some real heated discussions lately in this blog with some of the patriots holding opposite views.
I hope this is all healthy discussions and not a parting of ways due to these disagreements. Would be good to make that clear....
OneNation,
I believe that it is a healthy discussion. In any case, it is impossible to agree on every matter. However, when it comes to keeping the terrorist crap out of Sri Lanka, it is hard to disagree with anybody.
http://www.divaina.com/2010/07/17/feature02.html
Ninja,
Udaya idea makes good sense. Just like we did in May of 2009, we need to talk to our friends and show them the truth. That will make it easy for them to stand by us.
SP
UG makes sense possibly apart from last part. He says 15 lax Sri Lankans are abroad. If so 10 lax are tamil diaspora and around 50% of rest are UNP/JVP who now work together with tamil diaspora to attack MR/GSL. Its hard for remaining 250,000 to deal with this with their busy works. JHU/PCR as usual should pioneer this front again.
Moshe,
[if US wants pakistan to stop destablizing india, does that mean the oppositte????
no. USA wants india to remain MOSTLY in one piece.]
OK. This is my view too.
If you believe this, why did you say in a previous post "india will not fall to the US plan of disintegrating india by using TE as a bait"?
That is what I was contesting: that the US is "planning" to disintegrate India .. quite the reverse, in fact.
It appears to me you were in a temporary confused state of mind when you wrote it .. so why don't you admit you mis-spoke yourself in a moment of discombobulation and let us move on, OK?
Discombobulation happens to us all .. given the crushing burden of our animated armchair debates!
Also, just go easy on the Gin .. extreme inebriation is guaranteed to induce incoordination of the ambulatory extremities!
[Moshe Dyan said...
pol,
you and i both agree racism in the USA is MUCH MUCH less than SL.
let me give you a striking example you will not forget!!
in sri lanka a sinhala homosexual ponna TRAITOR (CURSE HIS VOTERS) can be the prime minister TWICE but a patriotic tamil gentleman cannot become the prime minister ONCE!!!]
Sinhalese are the only nation I know who accepted a (supposed to be elite, good) foreigner as their king - only condition was to accept buddhism and protect buddhist culture.
If you compare SL with any other country under same condition I think Sri Lankans behaved with minimum level of racism.
We travelled in buses knowing very well the tamil guy next to be could be either a innocent human or a suicide bomber or tiger carrying a bomb to kill us. One must be living a super fantasy world expect to same patience from other nations.
We can see next Hiroshima some where at the first moment USA feel they are really under a dangerous threat..
[USA wants india to remain MOSTLY in one piece.]]
USA wants to enjoy their control over rest of the world keeping other countries in one piece or two pieces. Main threat for India is via Kashmir and they get weapons via PK and PK's main weapon and financial supplier is non other than USA. Basically, USA use muslim PK to manage India. USA used buddhist Tiebt to manage China. USA use tamil christians to manage sinhala buddhists. List goes on...
Milibanda Nailed on SIX LIES on TORTURE!
Roll out the Barrell!
............
Nailed, Miliband and six lies on torture
Grilled: Former Foreign Secretary David Miliband lied six times during an interview with the BBC's Andrew Neil
All five candidates for the Labour Party leadership have been scuttling to distance themselves from the record of Gordon Brown in power.
But the odds-on favourite to win the leadership contest, former Foreign Secretary David Miliband, is finding it very hard indeed to disentangle himself from the most sordid and shameful aspect of New Labour rule - British involvement in the torture of numerous terror suspects overseas.
Today, a special Mail investigation can reveal the depths of Miliband's embroilment in the torture scandal - and shows that Labour's latest golden boy is in complete denial about New Labour's record in sanctioning and then covering up British involvement in torture over the past decade.
Indeed, I can reveal that David Miliband uttered no fewer than six massive lies when grilled in an interview with BBC inquisitor Andrew Neil on the subject of torture for the first time since stepping down from office.
The six lies came in the course of a nine-minute interview - that's a phenomenal strike rate of one lie every 90 seconds.
Though outwardly confident and relaxed, Miliband told a series of falsehoods that cast a giant shadow over his personal integrity, and even his fitness to succeed Gordon Brown as Labour leader.
Milibanda's SIX LIES
.....continued.....
Lie number 1: The first lie was quickly produced when Neil asked whether Miliband believed there was 'any evidence' that British intelligence officials had been complicit in the use of torture on terror suspects when New Labour was in power.
Back came the insouciant reply: an emphatic 'no'.
Yet Miliband's response is bewildering. It suggests that he is completely unaware of the mountain of very troubling testimony which has emerged in recent years suggesting that Britain was 'complicit' in torture (i.e. that we received information from foreign intelligence services, even though we had grounds for suspecting it was supplied under duress: nobody suggests that British agents themselves took part in torture).
The grim truth is that there have been at least 15 cases of British nationals or residents who have claimed over the past two years to have been tortured with the complicity, knowledge and sometimes even in the presence of British intelligence officers.
The combined circumstantial evidence of our complicity with torture is nothing short of overwhelming. It is also a matter of national shame.
Some of the evidence has been provided by groups such as the humanitarian organisation Human Rights watch. Some has emerged in court testimony.
Two parliamentary watchdogs, the Foreign Affairs Committee and the Joint Committee on Human Rights, regard it as troubling and serious.
But not, apparently, our former Foreign Secretary.
Lie number 2: This came when Andrew Neil asked whether Britain has, at any stage, provided questions to be put by foreign intelligence agents to those who were being tortured. Miliband replied: 'we don't have evidence of that.'
Unfortunately for Miliband, there is once again abundant evidence.
Indeed, he himself as Foreign Secretary was obliged to submit documents to court which showed beyond doubt that British intelligence was involved in questioning terror suspects.
This was during the hearing concerning the terror suspect Binyam Mohamed, since cleared on all charges. Miliband was obliged to confess that we were submitting questions for Binyam to answer even when he was being held (and cruelly abused) by the U.S. in a Pakistani prison.
Lie number 3: Miliband's third lie also concerns the Binyam Mohamed case. He told Andrew Neil that not one of the allegations of torture which have so far been taken to court in Britain involved torture carried out by the Americans.
In fact, the courts have indeed found that the U.S. authorities subjected Binyam to 'cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment'.
By this stage of the TV interview, the lies and mis-statements were coming thick and fast.
Milibanda's SIX LIES
.....continued 2....
Lie number 4: The fourth lie came when David Miliband absurdly told Neil that he had not tried to prevent public disclosure of court evidence in the Binyam Mohamed case.
In fact, as Binyam's lawyer Clive Stafford Smith told me last night, Miliband 'fought us tooth and nail' to prevent vital documents being brought into the public domain.
Miliband used every legal ruse - and spent some £213,000 in legal fees - in a battle to keep vital evidence secret from the public.
Lie number 5: This concerns David Miliband's troubled dealings with one of Britain's most senior judges, Master of the Rolls Lord Neuberger.
Last year, in an utterly devastating judgment, Lord Neuberger stated that there were grounds for 'distrusting' legal statements made by Miliband based on advice from MI5 personnel about British involvement in torture.
And yet when this was put to him by Andrew Neil, Miliband offered a bland and unruffled denial that such a thing had ever occurred. It is inconceivable that Miliband could have forgotten such a shattering verdict.
Lie number 6: Miliband's final lie came when Neil asked him why, as Foreign Secretary, he did not institute an inquiry to get to the bottom of the mass of evidence that Britain has been complicit in torture.
In response, Miliband claimed that he took 'extensive measures inside the system' to get at the truth.
Yet he once again denied that he had 'fought against an inquiry' - notwithstanding the fact that he faced down a barrage of pressure from newspapers like the Mail, human rights organisations and political parties (such as the Conservatives) for one to be held.
There can be only two explanations for Miliband's set of wildly inaccurate, partial and misleading answers. One is that he is exceptionally stupid and genuinely does not know what he is talking about.
But this does not stand up. David Miliband is a well- trained and competent man who has held high office and aspires to be Prime Minister.
As Foreign Secretary, he was obliged to deal almost daily with allegations about British complicity with torture. He knew the subject matter backwards.
So the only realistic conclusion is that Miliband was knowingly deceiving TV viewers. In other words, he was lying.
How he expected to get away with such a monumental deceit, however, is another matter. The best guess is that Miliband is in denial.
He simply cannot accept that a New Labour government was responsible for what looks like a retreat into barbarism.
To be fair to Miliband, the worst of the abuses would appear to have ended by the time he became Foreign Secretary in the summer of 2007. He was not personally responsible for the abuses - only the subsequent lying and cover-up.
So why didn't Miliband do the decent and sensible thing and order his officials to come clean?
One answer may be a well-meaning, though morally damnable, desire to stick up for the intelligence agencies who mistakenly believed they were serving their country while tolerating the physical abuse of terror suspects.
Another possible answer is that Miliband was simply being loyal to Tony Blair, his political mentor and friend.
For almost every day we are learning new facts about how, under Blair, Britain turned her back on human decency when it came to torture and human rights.
Is Miliband about to throw away his reputation and perhaps his entire career in defence of Tony Blair?
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1295158/TORTURE-INQUIRY-Nailed-David-Miliband-6-lies-abuse.html?ito=feeds-newsxml#ixzz0tssdBYto
Ninja,
There is a factual error in your post:
[Sinhalese are the only nation I know who accepted a (supposed to be elite, good) foreigner as their king - only condition was to accept buddhism and protect buddhist culture.]
Not really. Many countries have accepted foreigners as kings. Examples are: King George of England (late 1700's to early 1800's) was a German, the current Windsor royalty of Britain is German, King Constantine of Greece was German .. the list goes on. There were over 300 German principalities, with a "royal family" in each, in Europe before Bismark unified Germany. Their principal function was to supply kings for other countries through a network of marriages with important people.
Catholics assuming kingship in England was a recurring problem for the largely Protestant English until Henry VI (of six wives fame) established the Church of England, albeit to divorce his barren nwife for a hopefully fertile newer model. Later England's laws were altered to specify that the English monarch MUST BELONG TO THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND as the monarch was its head and its defender.
The famous Salah-al-Din or Saladin, who defeated the Crusaders and expelled them from the Holy Land, was a Moslem Kurd of Aryan descent. He led an army of mostly Arab Moslems in those battles. He was the greatest monarch of that period in the European-Middle East world, much greater than his greatest opponent Richard the Lionheart of England, who achieve nothing significant in his participation in the last Crusade.
There are many more examples from all over the world.
Ananda-USA
Factual error.. mm.. I think thats why I said as I know.. HAHA Anyway thanks for the info.
My point was sinhalese didn't care 'race' (coming from birth) rather they consider culture (how u live after u born) when it comes to dealing with others in other races.
Ninja said ...
[My point was sinhalese didn't care 'race' (coming from birth) rather they consider culture (how u live after u born) when it comes to dealing with others in other races.]
Largely TRUE ... I suppose it is the Buddhist influence.
GOSL should construct the last mile and drive the last stake in where the Northern Sri Lanka and Southern Sri Lanka lines meet in the middle of Sri Lanka (Batticaloa?, Kandy?).
Can't have an Indo-Chinese war breaking out in Sri Lanka ... ONE bull has already been TOO MANY in our little China shop!
.................
India, China to build rail links in Sri Lanka
(AFP) – 14 hours ago
COLOMBO — India and China have clinched two separate contracts to build railway lines and communication links in Sri Lanka, the government said Friday.
Indian Railway Construction International Ltd has won an 86.5 million dollar deal to reconstruct rail lines in the island's northern region of Wanni, a former war zone, the government said in a statement.
The northern rail-track was destroyed during the 37-year ethnic conflict that ended in May last year when government forces defeated the separatist Tamil Tiger rebels.
The government also awarded a 290-million dollar contract to China National Machinery Import and Export Corp to build a railway line in the south of the island, which was largely unaffected by the ethnic strife.
"The contract will also include signals, telecommunications, ticketing systems and their maintenance," the government statement said.
It was not immediately known when the projects would be completed.
onenation,
sure. it all happens within a tight framework of understanding that,
1. SL MUST always remain unitary
2. no room for racism in SL. biggest racist threats to SL come from TAMIL grievences, TAMIL aspirations, TAMIL self determination, TAMIL nationality, TAMIL sovereignty, TAMIL congress, TAMIL arasu kachchi, TAMIL liberation front, TAMIL alliance, TAMIL homolands by tamil elamists.
3. SL must do well
4. SL must not end up like tamil madu, israel-palestine, kosovo, etc.
BUT i'm against stereotyping and classification of ppl/countries based on subjective judgement.
re: USA
gen moshe dayan said,
"USA gives us money, weapons and advice. we TAKE the money; we take their weapons. but we POLITELY REFUSE their advice!!!"
advice includes interference.
this is what we need to do.
we should not refuse money, weapons, and other friendly gestures that are not direvtly or indirectly connected to harm.
indirectly connected means connected by way of secondary repurcussions.
in judging that we should not be like "king kekille" (a primary school story).
who built the house?
who built the pot that was used to build the house?
who caused the pot to be defective that was used in the building of the house?
.............
mathmathica,
IF USA community is racist they would NOT accept a,
1. man with half black parenthood
2. man who apparently looks black, associate mostly blacks in community
3. follow what are considered "black pursuits". oba-ma has done all these.
4. man with a middle name "hussein" when there was a prominent hussien against the USA just a few years ago.
5. man who is not 100% white.
but SL NEVER allowed a patriotic tamil to be the PM when a trecherous sinhala eunuch became PM twice!!!!
ninja,
"My point was sinhalese didn't care 'race' (coming from birth) rather they consider culture (how u live after u born) when it comes to dealing with others in other races."
true.
but only to some extent which is LESS than US ppl.
they still don't accept a tamil patriot as much as they accept a sinhala tritor to lead their country.
Moshe said Re USA ...
[we should not refuse money, weapons, and other friendly gestures that are not direvtly or indirectly connected to harm.]
Acceptance should be conditioned on the APPROPRIATENESS OF USE OF THE MONEY.
MONEY to destabilize Sri Lanka through FAKE "human development activities" designed to divide and conquer Sri Lanka, buy influence and bribe officials, generate civil disobedience, prop up separatists, etc etc ad nauseam ... SHOULD BE REFUSED.
Moshe said ...
[they still don't accept a tamil patriot as much as they accept a sinhala tritor to lead their country.]
Well, had Kadirgarmar been spared by the Sun God and his murderous LTTE followers, he could have been Sri Lanka's OBAMA.
Sri Lanka will not, and should not, elevate wolves in sheep's clothing to its presidency, just because they are Sri Lankan citizens, or seem to have been "rehabilitated" recently.
Obama was elected because the white people of the US found his moderate politics and integrative message acceptable, his patriotism believable, his mixed white-black heritage comforting, and his abilities as an erudite gifted communicator IMPRESSIVE .. simply put ... he both deserved respect and won their trust. And Voila! We have a truly American president!
Likewise, Kadirgamar, through his actions in defense of Sri Lanka, and his marriage to a Sinhala lady, found acceptance by the majority Sinhala community.
That is why I believe that Sri Lankans of mixed Sinhala-Tamil descent are the best equipped to bridge the divide between communities and lead the country in the years ahead. But they will have to be people of exceptional ability and balanced vision to the people's trust.
Until someone of that background and caliber emerges, no Tamil separatists will be trusted to lead the country. No Chelvanayagam, no Karuna, no Sivalingam will be trusted.
The candidate will have to have an unsullied record of patriotism, and prove their loyalty to Sri Lanka just as Kadirgarmar did.
[but only to some extent which is LESS than US ppl.]
This comparison with USA is not fair as SL and USA do not have at least roughly identical conditions. USA is not in a separatist terrorist fight with blacks or any other race. If you wanna test two liquids and you do it by putting two similar metals and observing which one is better whats the point of this experiment if one liquid is already mixed with some acid while other is not?
]they still don't accept a tamil patriot as much as they accept a sinhala tritor to lead their country.]
This accusation is also not fair. I agree we were voting for sinhala traitors. But we vote for tamil patriots when its possible. JeyarajFP easily topped the Gampaha list. He had chance to become at least PM if not EP. Fawzi survives pnly becuz of sinhala votes. You may find many non-sinhala MPs elected by 99% sinhala votes. Non existance of patriotic tamil politicians who are in the class of leaders of nation, is not sinhalese fault. Elite tamil politicos working to become 'president of tamiz peezaam' instead of president of SL, also their problem - not sinhalese fault.
Moshe,
they still don't accept a tamil patriot as much as they accept a sinhala tritor to lead their country.
What are you drinking these days Moshe? Please exclude me and my extended family from this. I would have voted for Hon. Lakshman Kadiragamar in a heart beat if ever competed against the top scum Ranil. Some of my relatives still have photos of Kadiragamar at home. I have no problem accepting a Tamil or Moor as the president of Sri Lanka if he/she is a patriot who stands for an undivided Sri Lanka.
Sam Perera said ...
[I have no problem accepting a Tamil or Moor as the president of Sri Lanka if he/she is a patriot who stands for an undivided Sri Lanka.]
Way to go, Sam! You are speaking for me too!
Interesting Statistics on Fisheries Industry and Fish Consumption in Sri Lanka
.............
President tells fisheries officials : Improve fish production
President Mahinda Rajapaksa said steps should be taken to increase fish production so that the protein intake of the people could be augmented.
Addressing Fisheries Ministry’s senior officials at Temple Trees yesterday, he emphasised that all development plans must be made to ensure that interests of consumers and fishermen are well protected. The President also emphasised that the Fisheries Corporation should reduce the price of fish as it would have an immediate impact on the market, resulting in a healthy control of fish price. The Ministry should also focus its research on aspects of industry prevailing in the country, he said.
He added that due focus must be given to increase the inland fisheries as the masses prefer inland fish to sea fish. Presenting a comprehensive report on the current status of the fishing industry, Fisheries Minister Dr Rajitha Senaratne said his Ministry aims to double fish production from the current of 339,000 metric tonnes to 690,000 metric tonnes so that the fish intake per capita could be increased from the current level of 37 grams per person per day to 60 grams per person per day.
The Minister said the number of sales outlets of the Fisheries Corporation would be doubled within a short period. He said there are 155,000 fishermen in the country and this number would increase as more and more fishermen in the North and East are starting to return to this livelihood. Senaratne said more fishing trawlers will be added to the existing fleet and few mother vessels will be placed around the country to supply fuel and other requirements of fishermen off-shore, so that the trawlers could spend a longer period in the ocean without returning to harbour for supplies.
The Ministry also plans to introduce pension and insurance schemes for fishermen, and they will also be provided with additional benefits such as soft loans.
Senaratne said that the Ministry would establish a new Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) via satellite to provide fishermen with data on identified areas of fish catch. The VMS system will also be capable of fleet monitoring, identifying illegal human smuggling vessels and any vessels intruding into Sri Lanka’s maritime zone.
My Comment as CryCanada
All hail the Superior Highly Intelligent Folks now headed towards their ancestral homeland in Canada! Spring showers bring Mayflowers (err Sun Seas), and Sun Seas bring Tamil Tiger Pilgrims!
What? You say what homeland? Give these folk some time and they will rewrite your paleo-history to sound as if they romped across land bridge from Asia in the dim mists of father time.
Canadian Natives, please prepare to abandon your hearth and home to these perpetually discriminated against folks.
Their skills at making you feel like a monster are simply awesome; they will soon have you weeping in anguish at your cruelty even as you pack your bags to head back to Europe!
An INCH of Canada today, ALL of Canada tomorrow!
God Help Canada .. no one else is minding the store!
ananda,
"It appears to me you were in a temporary confused state of mind when you wrote it .. so why don't you admit you mis-spoke yourself in a moment of discombobulation and let us move on, OK?"
well ananda, i admit when it is the case which i have not seen from you!!
1. USA wnats to control over every country including india
2. on the other hand, USA wants india to stand firm against islamic nations in the region.
this is what i said.
USA depends on india to have their plan in SL. this plan cannot be directed against india bcos if so, india would not co-operate.
so far it seems india is co-operating with the US plan for SL.
you have failed counter my main argument about the possibility of creating another islamic nation with fundamentalists in the island of SL, IF TE becomes a reality.
ninja,
"Do west interfere/ intervene/ manipulate other countries in the world, other than SL? (yes)
If yes, is it becuz tamiz di-ass-pora? (no)"
now that is a sound argument.
agree.
but this is only 1/3 of the big picture.
1. USA wants to disintegrate SL as it wants to do same with other countries.
2. TEs do influence US policy.
e.g. TAG is US based and has been very active
e.g. they managed to hire the services of fein a former US deputy attorney
e.g. law professor boyle is also US based and tigers made use of them.
BUT there are FEWER TEs in USA than UK, cananda, france, switzerland, etc. had they put the same effort in UK, cananda, france, switzerland, etc. they could NOT have achieved anything.
but they knew where to put pressure and did it.
TEs in USA though fewer in number were very active at the highest level of US elections.
e.g. tamils for obama
tamils for clinton
tamils for mccain
such intense involvement was not seen in other countries where there are MORE tamils and TEs!!!
3. US found that they can depend on TEs for their project of disintegrating SL.
you gave good exampls of how tibetians, chechnyans, etc. are used by USA against their countries.
true. but would they do US dirty jobs for free?????
NO!!
they also need something of it.
this is TE (or something closer to TE).
as you can see in 2/3 cases TEs are directly involved in this.
again it is true that USA will find some other avenues of disintegrating SL if TEs are not sufficient.
we have to be vigilent and pre-empt this possibility. STILL they will not stop trying.
but as at now it is TEs that is the US conduit in SL. given that TEs also have their contribution to this plan, it is TEs who are our biggest enemies.
"fcukability" is another concern. we can fcuk TEs but not the USA. that is also very important when picking a battle we can win.
Moshe said ...
[you have failed counter my main argument about the possibility of creating another islamic nation with fundamentalists in the island of SL, IF TE becomes a reality.]
I don't have to counter it; IF TE becomes a reality, such a Moslem state is a REMOTE but VERY UNLIKELY possibility. It is so remote, that I would not even propose it, if I were you!
But, your statement about the US wanting to disintegrate India .. AS YOU STATED IT and WHAT YOU INTENDED, BUT DID NOT SAY THERE .. was wrong and was in conflict with your later statements.
Moshe,
"Moshe Dyan said...
you and i both agree racism in the USA is MUCH MUCH less than SL.
What?
Where did I say that much less agree to it?
Racism amongst Sinhalese is virtually non existent and when compared to suddha would be unheard off especially in the midst of being in a far more complex situation.
In your attempts to try and prop up the West you have got the wrong message from me. My point was entirely opposite; the West is MORE RACIST and MORE INTOLERANT, their views of "tolerance" are superficial and in reality an illusion. If you do not conform or follow their culture, ways of life, religion (at least openly), attitudes and language while ardently sticking to your own ways they will attack, isolate and alienate you. Diversity is something they reject. Their idea of "tolerance" is seeing beyond skin colour (and they still struggle with it).
The “lack of racism” on their part which you are projecting is an illusion sustained through law and media and it has increased resentment and intolerance but sent it under ground. When that happens it comes out in different ways. If economic situation in the West became terrible you will see this “idealised “less racist” societies go up in flames of jingoism and hate.
Further more blacks, Hispanics are still demonised, still live in poverty and are the but end of jokes.
The treatment, resentment and demonisation of muslims throughout the West is another case and point –just imagine if the level of violence unleashed by muslim terror groups ever came close to what Tamil terrorists have done to Sinhalese? The white populations would indeed carry out a full scale genocide and have a media to justify it and cover it up.
"let me give you a striking example you will not forget!!
in sri lanka a sinhala homosexual ponna TRAITOR (CURSE HIS VOTERS) can be the prime minister TWICE but a patriotic tamil gentleman cannot become the prime minister ONCE!!!"
The example you have used to portray SL as “more racist” is just dumb. Kadirgamar was not made PM because of CBKs own inane views, Sinhalese would vote for him en mass if he ran for President. However Tamils would not.
If you are a Tamil leader that spits venom on Sinhalese and promises domination then you get all the Tamil votes. If you do not you are ostracised from Tamil community and branded a traitor.
Obama running for Presidency he stressed his links to his white heritage, if he went around making a big deal about being Black and stressing that he would not have gotten far.
"true. but would they do US dirty jobs for free?????
NO!!
they also need something of it.
this is TE (or something closer to TE).
as you can see in 2/3 cases TEs are directly involved in this."
This is where your argument fails and makes little sense.
These groups (tibet, Chechnya, TE) want "free" states of their own or some crap. The US is thus using such groups (if not creating ones themselves) to fulfil US interests as such "free" movements located in a country the US/West needs to weaken/disintegrate/control immensely benefit US, hence why they back them openly and willingly.
What these "free" groups are getting is their free state
What they are getting in return is US support (at least in appearance on the part of the US) for their goal which is free Tibet, Chechnya and TE.
Their “payment” from the US in exchange for their activity in fulfilling US interests, is their free state and US backing. Nothing else, and having US backing is a huge payment.
Who is pushing the war crimes bs? The US. Why? Because they (the US) sees an avenue to threaten and attack SL. A perfect weapon to point at SL and tell MR to dance or the nation suffer as with “war crimes” they will put economic sanctions on SL and when it is official (we are “war criminals”) it is enough to demonise SL. If it did not benefit the US, the US would not be entertaining this nonsense. Tamils/TAG/US Tamils or whatever is the cart they are using to push the “war crimes” bs while giving their activities a loudspeaker (joined at the hip with scum in Sri Lanka). Again they are a tool who the US is using to punish Sri Lanka (like the way they used the LTTE earlier).
There are reports (see Independent UK, only paper to report anything like this) of “abductions” and “human rights violations” being done in Pakistan and “Pakistanis disappeared population” (against Taliban and Taliban sympathisers etc) yet not a word from US/West/HRW etc.
Why? Because Pakistan is doing US dirty work, fulfilling US interests.
Why no pro-Taliban people in the US (and they exist such as wealthy Somalias, Nigerian business men) lobbying not working?
Why is the PKK who supports Kurdish violence and terrorism against Turkey allowed to operate in US? For decades Turkey is a US ally yet they allowed the PKK/its supporters to operate freely. PKK lobbied and worked hard to get their own state/demonise Turkey yet nothing happens.
Same for Amrenians in US, they also lobbied hard against Turkey for decades, simply because they hate Turkey and pushed hard “genocide” of 1915. But US ignored it.
Then the current leader of Turkey who is more Pro-East/Muslim unity than he is West comes to power and suddenly Turkey is found guilty of genocide.
Ananda,
"But, your statement about the US wanting to disintegrate India .. AS YOU STATED IT and WHAT YOU INTENDED, BUT DID NOT SAY THERE .. was wrong and was in conflict with your later statements."
Moshe is right here because that is EXACTLY what the US wants to do.
Why else do you think they are backing TE or want devolution (aka TE) in Sri Lanka?
They are thinking decades ahead.
Currently they are using India as a counter weight to China and propping India up as "super power".
However the US is fearful/fully aware that if India does become strong and independent (economically and militarily thanks to the Wests investment/support) eventually reaching the same level of power as China that India will start acting completely Independently and not in US/Western interests.
In essence they would have indeed created a "super power" that does what is good for it, not them.
So they want a fail safe and as they have consistently pointed out in their reports/policy statements/NGO works/think tanks the SL Tamil issue can be used to cause major upheaval in Tamil Nadu.
Blake was in Tamil Nadu in april 2009 for this VERY PURPOSE. To cause problems in Tamil Nadu (which he did) to force action on Indias part (Indian Government was acting benignly) to save the LTTE.
How best to control India is to increase ethnic divisions and hatred, i.e. create massive internal problems and potentially civil wars that will severely weaken India.
This is a LONG TERM fail safe.
They see TE as the conduit for it.
The US will never formally recognise a Tamil separate state in Sri Lanka, until such a time it is beneficial to them (as and when India becomes extremely powerful/acts independent of the West against Western interests). TE within SL will be a launching pad, another conduit to cause problems in Tamil Nadu and set India on fire.
They will use TE (through devolution) to also infiltrate southern India. Then when the time suits them they will accelerate TE from “devolved” state to formal state. Everywhere they go they use divide and conquer to weaken and dominate states and people. They are trying it in China already but are failing miserably. They will secede much easily and faster in India because it is far more diverse.
They have done it to SL historically and their recent “anger” masked as “failing to bring unity” is in fact to STOP MR/SL from brining unity (which is what he is doing trying). They want to sustain and maintain Tamil racism in SL. Tamil racism = violence = instability.
Of course that is not hard for them to do because Tamils are extremely racist. But the of chance they may see a different view has all but been snuffed out by the West (their response to the IDP camps was part of this, to stop any “bonding” which may occur, in addition to getting LTTE cadres trapped in the camps released and of course making the situation Tamils were in WORSE, so they have more grounds to attack Sri Lanka and increase Tamil hatred).
ananda,
"Well, had Kadirgarmar been spared by the Sun God and his murderous LTTE followers, he could have been Sri Lanka's OBAMA."
he had all the time to do that but couldn't.
ananda,
again you have confused the 2.
1. US wants to rule over india.
2. US would like to see india is under check by some small scale disintegration.
3. but US would not attempt it via SL disintegration bcos if so india would not support it.
it is #3 that i was harping on.
"I don't have to counter it; IF TE becomes a reality, such a Moslem state is a REMOTE but VERY UNLIKELY possibility. It is so remote, that I would not even propose it, if I were you!"
now this shows your igorance.
so you believe muslims will be happy tamil elam citizens in the east?????
come on ananda. get real. it will not happen.
IF TE is created in the east, muslims in the east will want to be out of it. and given the seperation, they would rather keep it seperated than rejoin with SL.
so it is a sure possibility IF TE is created. that's not all. sinhala areas in TE will also want to break free.
pol,
"The example you have used to portray SL as “more racist” is just dumb. Kadirgamar was not made PM because of CBKs own inane views, Sinhalese would vote for him en mass if he ran for President."
my point is US considers racism less than SL does.
you argument is totally dumb!!!
so CBK gave the PM post to MR who always had a MAJOR grudge against her!!!
lol!!
why on earth didn't the PA make LK the opposition leader in the first place??????
they elected MR as the opposition leader AGAINST CBK's interests didn't they?????
from there MR went on to become the PM.
LK would have done a better job than MR. in the case of patriotism he SURELY DID!!!
he was the only man in parliament at that time to have an "arseache" about national security, trinco, etc.
my point is not that SL is racist. the point is US society is LESS racist than SL society when it comes to political power.
at least you will agree with this.
in the USA there are NO major racist political parties. in SL there are racist parties in the following order of strength,
1. tamil (ACTC, ITAK, TULF, TNA)
2. muslim (SLMC, SLMK, MULF)
3. sinhala (SMBP, SU)
this is UNDENIABLE OPEN racism in politics. no racism can be more GROSS and expressive than this.
i don't see ANY such party in the USA!!!! do you??????
pol,
"Their “payment” from the US in exchange for their activity in fulfilling US interests, is their free state and US backing. Nothing else, and having US backing is a huge payment."
isn't this what i have been saying????
so you FINALLY agree that there IS some payment for doing US's dirty jobs.
you need both for the project.
and don't you that the HIGHER the desire for a free state, the MORE they become US slave??????
this is my point.
thank you for agreeing for a change!!
(now you will disagree for the sake of disagreeing!!) :)
Moshe,
It was the old guard of SLFP who wanted MR there more than LK, I believe. They wanted somebody who was with the party from day zero. It seems to be the case with selecting DMJ for the premiership.
pol,
ok since you finally agree to something lets move forward.
take the LTTE.
in 1970s and 1980s LTTE was a socialist terrorist group. vadu-kundi resolution had it that they would create the socilaist state of TE. india as SU's SA agent did its share to support the LTTE.
SL was supported by USA.
LTTE went to the extent of getting rid of the biggest pro-US PM - rajiv gandhi in 1991. LTTE was made a terrorist group.
but then vezapillai realised communism is over. he made a u-turn. he became pro-western.
IF USA was interested in dividing SL on it's own accord to hell with who will do it, US would have won the LTTE in 1970s and used it against SL. LTTE too didn't give a rat's arse about holding on to communism.
but it didn't happen.
also US cannot be bothered to CREATE seperatism and sustain it against the wishes of the ppl. it tried it in south vietnam and failed. so USA relies on seperatist movements that are self-driven.
sam,
"It was the old guard of SLFP who wanted MR there more than LK, I believe."
more than ratnasiri too??????
pol,
"Their “payment” from the US in exchange for their activity in fulfilling US interests, is their free state and US backing. Nothing else, and having US backing is a huge payment."
isn't this what i have been saying????
so you FINALLY agree that there IS some payment for doing US's dirty jobs.
you need both for the project.
and don't you that the HIGHER the desire for a free state, the MORE they become US slave??????
this is my point.
thank you for agreeing for a change!!
(now you will disagree for the sake of disagreeing!!) :)
You keep saying the US is doing something (war crimes) because that is what Tamils in the US/West are “influencing” the US/West in to doing in exchange for their services. But that is wrong.
The West would not care for either (TE etc) if it did not benefit them.
GET IT.
The “payment” BENFITS THE US in itself.
If it did not then they would not be pursing it.
The “war crimes” BENFITS the US.
You keep trying to skirt around the issue of who is calling the shots to save any blame or responsibility falling on the US and putting it more on Tamils.
But the fact is if what the Tamils “offer” did not benefit the US they would not give a damn AND they would not be pursuing it. The US “payment” is giving them what they want (i.e. TE) ONLY because it benefits the US. If that did not benefit the US (or world circumstances suddenly changed) they would ditch it just as fast. They would not keep up “Payment” and ignore it.
The US/West is using Tamils to destabilise/control SL (for reasons spelt out by me above and in many other posts).
and don't you that the HIGHER the desire for a free state, the MORE they become US slave??????
So you agree now that the US/West is the one who is calling all the shots then? And that they are the ones who are pushing TE/devolution not because of asinine Tamil desires and “influence” but because such a thing BENEFITS the US? And they would not give a damn, nor be attacking SL in the manner they are, if it did not?
The US/West being less racist is extremely flawed. They are just as racist and vile otherwise they would not be acting the way they do to 3rd world countries. They do a better job in masking it through media and legislation. But to say it is less racist is false and misleading (such a con is used in itself to further attack 3rd world countries)
In the West race based parties akin to Tamils ones (openly calling for violence and supporting it) that call for domination of a minority over the white population would never be allowed or tolerated but they are allowed in SL because Tamils want it that way and if such were blocked them then that would be “anti-democratic”.
Guess that means SL is MORE DEMOCRATIC than the US. If we banned all Tamil race based parties (its only tamils who have them) then your mighty US would be the first to accuse us of being anti-democratic/denying Tamils rights. Which in itself reflects how they cultivate and use racism for their own advantage.
It is Tamils who push the racist line, making SL “more racist” in your view than the US, and who is backing them? The US. They are spreading racism and trying to exasperate it in SL (and other places) because that too benefits them.
Kadirgarmar did not get PM or high positions because Kadirgarmar DID NOT WANT any power. He was not interested in pursing leadership. Kadirgarmar preferred to be FM and he was amazing at it. MR was made PM by CBK because CBK saw him as a dud. She supported Ranil at the PE of 2005. She wanted to wriggle her way into power some how and by making MR fail in 2005 (she expected him to loose) she could snuff leadership back.
CBK is a dumb woman everyone hates.
Kadirgarmar is loved by all Sinhalese and if he did ever run he would win in a landslide, but he never wanted to and of course CBK was jealous (stupid whore) so she gave PMship (hence future leadership of SLFP) to MR because she wanted to get rid of him (she tried to do what Ranil did with Fonseka). Her plans (like everything else) blew up in her face.
Hey Asithri aiya
I am actually in Cusco (Peru) these days doing something special (tell you when I talk to you in person)......can't call as it is too freaking expensive.....anyway, Devaka too is here (don't know if you remember him) and sends his regards to u.
What have you been doing yourself......still traveling a lot?
Shall try to call you when we get to Lima.
Internet connection is not bad from here so I log on to this blog when I can......and go F'ing bonkers when I see 'em LTTE whorecuntz still waltzing in here periodically and will gladly castrate 'em bitchies.....hehehehehe
TC, FF
Moshe said ..
[now this shows your igorance.]
Again, you have confused what I said.
I said, a Moslem east is a REMOTE POSSIBILITY, because a TE is now a REMOTE POSSIBILITY, because the Sinhalese will not let that happen.
NO WAY, not until HELL BOILS OVER!
ananda,
TE is NOT a remote possibility!!
still there is plenty of room for TE due to the support TEs get from USA, EU and india.
let me tell you one avenue avialeble to them. there are many such avenues.
they put pressure on SL to share power with "tamils". so SL implements 13+. elections are held and as usual racist parties win in the north and the east. they don't have police, land, legislative powers.
then they demand that they be given those statingf that without those they can't serve ppl meaningfully.
govt refuses. IC tells govt to listen to minority "tamils". EU, USA, india put economic pressure on SL to complete the power sharing process. under severe threat to its export income, SL reluctantly increases POC's powers.
this process continues until north and the east have more powers than tamil madu. then they declare TE which is recognized by USA, EU, etc. but rejected by china, russia. so TE cannot be a UN state but becomes a de facto seperate state as US, EU, indian prevents SL from using force against TE.
seems to me that you have made a wqrong assessment of the threat of disintegration facing SL!!!
pol,
LK was not greedy for power but he NEEDED it to serve the country. that is why this distinguished lawyer entered dirty politics in 1994!!!
also note that the posts of opposition leader and prime minister DO NOT have that much power either!!!
so your argument falls apart.
pol,
"In the West race based parties akin to Tamils ones (openly calling for violence and supporting it) that call for domination of a minority over the white population would never be allowed"
so that is what i've been saying!!!
the topic is not democracy/human rights. SL is much better than USA in that regard!!
the topic is relative racism in US and SL politics.
for WHATEVER REASONS you agree that there is less racism in US politics than SL politics.
anti-sinhala/mulsim racism of "T" racist parties is ALSO racism. and this has been at the HIGHEST LEVEL of SL politics ALWAYS!!!
pol,
mate, this is not a GR-SF affair. so lets agree to facts and not disagree for the sake of disagreeing.
why SL politicvs is more racist than US????
bcos of racist parties making racist demands.
what should we do???
ban them and colonize the areas they draw power from so that they will become powerless.
we MUST accept this. otherwise we cannot move on.
SL has this cancer in its arse. US don't. we have to admit to cure it.
also we MUST COPY the US PATRIOTIC ACT. they can't blame us for passing it in our parliament bcos it is theirs!!!!
that will close MANY lopeholes in the SL system without having to extend the emergency from month to month.
Moshe said ...
[my point is not that SL is racist. the point is US society is LESS racist than SL society when it comes to political power.]
What EVIDENCE do you have that racism in the US is LESS than that in Sri Lanka?
I have lived in both countries.
Racism in the US is ALIVE and WELL (vide Rush Limbaugh), but is no longer "politically correct."
In Sri Lanka too it is not "politically correct" except among Eelamist Tamils who PERSIST in asking for special rights claiming "discrimination" to hide their racism.
Eelam supporters REJECT the notion that ONE MAN ONE VOTE, irrespective of community, will ultimately deliver them the highest positions in the land ... not permanently, but periodically as worthy individuals emerge .. PROVIDED they win the TRUST of the MAJORITY COMMUNITY by their actions and behavior. Since they are a small minority in Sri Lanka, statistically it is less likely that will happen, all other things being equal. The main thing that could make is happen is the exceptional nature of the individual who overcomes that statistical improbability and residual racism in the majority.
That is how Obama made it to the US Presidency, not because of African American voters, but because of Whites voted for him. Obama having become president THIS TIME does not mean that a series of ("partially" or "totally" :) ) black presidents will now follow him. The people will elect other Afican Americans .. should a person who can allay their fears and win their trust again emerge through the electoral process.
In discussing RACISM in the US, it is important to note that the US took centuries to elect an African American as President.
In 1776, when the US won its independence, most blacks supported the British, under whom they could hope to get some level of freedom compared to the Colonials who wanted to use them solely for slave labor. There were many African Americans who were educated landholders who either fled with the British to Canada to escape slavery under the newly independent colonials. Even in the Northern states, many blacks lost their properties and were forced into slavery .. all over again.
The US declaration of independence declared that "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is the inalienable right of every man". So you may fondly ask, so how is that compatible with continuing slavery? In their eyes the declaration of independence was entirely consistent, because Africans where not recognized as "men"!
RACISM Comparison: USA and Sri Lanka
.......continued......
It took another CENTURY before the issue was resolved in 1863, theoretically but not in practice, by President Abraham Lincoln in his emancipation declaration abolishing slavery. The freed slaves were left without any means of fending for themselves; they could flee to the north and join a servant class, or stay on the lands of their former slave owners and continue to work the land, receiving some form of payment in kind or in money. During the next 150 years, racism reasserted itself as the de facto power of the South .. often through virulently violent forms such as the Ku Klux Klan .. with the tacit support of southern political leaders.
When my elder brother was a student in the US in the early 1960's (he returned to SL after studues) .. segregation was commonplace even in Philadelphia .. in buses, in restaurants, in public restrooms, in renting homes, in the work place, and in education. Who does not remember Gov. Wallace confronting the black students being escorted into the U. of Alabama by federal troops!
By the early 1970's .. overt segregation and racism was vanishing from the US .. to be replaced by covert racism. Most whites hated affirmative action, but never said it out loud. However, the effects of racist policies practiced over centuries could be seen in the absence of African Americans in the upper echelons of American life: among university students and faculty, in suburban home ownership, in the managerial ranks, in the political leadership, in integrated TV programs and movies, etc.
Today, I am happy to observe that many African Americans have moved up in society, and are present in every aspect and every level of American life. Yet, for a variety of reasons, many Africans are trapped in urban ghettoes and in crime, and form a segment that is stereotyped as the typical African American. It is important to realize that a very significant number of African Americans are now form a highly respected and productive part of the citizenry of the US.
But yet, has racism not been totally eradicated from the US .. not by a long shot. Every immigrant community ... except for the Africans who were among the earliest immigrants to the country, and the MAJORITY of IMMIGRANTS then ... and easily labelled by the color of their skin ... has suffered discrimination.
The Irish, the Catholics, the Eastern Europeans, the Jews, the Chinese, the Puerto Ricans, the Hispanics, the Vietnamese, the East Indians and the Sri Lankans .. all of them have borne, or are bearing, their cross in turn as they move up the ranks of wealth into communities previously closed to them.
In the US, the acquisition of wealth seems to be the great leveler of social status. In the quest for wealth, Asians .. particularly the Chinese and East Indians .. seem to be making the fastest progress .. earning more and accumulating wealth faster ... to become the wealthiest communities in the US .. largely through their frugality, hardwork, dedication to education, and cultural upbringing. Will those attributes filter down to the later generations, as they become indistinguishable from the rest of the American social fabric? I very much doubt it .. there is already disturbing trends of that.
Social EQUITY is still WORK IN PROGRESS in America, but the KEY is that it is PROGRESSING in the correct direction!
My point here is, it took over 250 years for this level of social equity to be achieved in the US. Much of that social equity has been achieved as a result of the IMPROVED ECONOMY .. without it everyone would have been competing to enslave and exploit the other.
RACISM comparison: USA and Sri Lanka
........continued 2.........
In my view, Sri Lanka today is far ahead of the US, in the level of broad-based SOCIAL EQUITY that the citizens enjoy, than the US was at the point of 63-years after US independence.
If that comparison is unreasonable because of global changes in social norms over the centuries that have affected what is acceptable, let me I say that SRi Lanka today is EQUAL to the US today in the social equity guaranteed to all of its people, but not in ECONOMIC WELLBEING. That is the DIFFERENCE.
Give Sri Lanka TIME to achieve that level of ECONOMIC PROSPERITY and WELLBEING through ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT under a stable progressive government.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa is ABSOULTELY CORRECT in his emphasis on ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT while maintaining the POLITICAL STABILITY of Sri Lanka.
This same view was recently echoed by President ManMohan Singh in the Indian context: DEVELOPMENT is KEY to solving the Maoist problem.
Giving PRACTICAL MEANING to the SOCIAL EQUITY guaranteed under law through ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT is what is at stake in the NEXT TWO DECADES in Sri Lanka.
FINALLY, Canada ACTS!
.................
Canada revokes charitable status of Tamil charity for funding LTTE
ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.
July 17, Ottawa: The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) agency responsible for administering tax laws for the Government of Canada and for most provinces and territories today announced that it has revoked the charitable registration of Ottawa-area charity, Tamil (Sri Lanka) Refugee-Aid Society (TRAS) effective July 17, 2010.
The agency has issued a notice last month of its intention to revoke the charitable registration of the Society saying that on the basis of an audit conducted, it has concluded that the Society has ceased to comply with the requirements of the Income Tax Act for its continued registration.
The CRA stated that in that the charity failed to maintain adequate control and direction over the use of its funds; improperly issued tax receipts on behalf of third parties; and provided funding to non-qualified donees outside Canada.
According to the findings, the Tamil charity has provided funds including $713,000 to an organization, which the CRA believes was operating as part of the support network for the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (the LTTE), a listed entity under the United Nations Suppression of Terrorism Regulations and the Criminal Code of Canada.
The CRA said its audit also indicated that fundraising conducted under the Society's auspices involved an individual who has been convicted in the United States of conspiring to provide material support to the LTTE.
In addition, the Society's liaison officer for Sri Lanka was named in documents filed with the Federal Court of Canada as a contact for area sales coordinators with the World Tamil Movement, also a listed entity under the Criminal Code of Canada because of its ties to the LTTE.
Once its registration revoked, a charity cannot issue donation receipts for income tax purposes and is no longer a qualified donee under the Income Tax Act. The organization is no longer exempt from income tax, unless it qualifies as a non-profit organization, and it may be subject to a tax equal to the full value of its remaining assets, CRA says.
Jail term for THREATENING to KILL Sinhala students in India
.................
Pro- LTTE Indian film director jailed for one year for hate speech against Sinhalese
ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.
July 17, Chennai: The Tamil Nadu government has slapped a one year jail term under the National Security Act (NSA) on the pro-LTTE Tamil film director Seeman for his inflammatory speeches against Sri Lanka, Indian media reported.
The founder of the pro-LTTE Naam Thamizhar Party was arrested on 12 July for his speech while leading a protest against the alleged attack on Tamil Nadu fishermen by the Lankan Navy.
Seeman has threatened to kill Sinhala students in India if the Sri Lankan Navy continued to attack the Indian fishermen.
He has been detained since his arrest at Vellore prison and was seeking bail when the Chennai District Collector implemented the Act imposing a jail term.
The Principal Sessions Court rejected his application for release on bail yesterday. Dismissing the plea the Sessions Judge has said that Seeman's hate speech referring to the Sinhala students seemed to cause danger to their lives.
He was earlier detained under the NSA on 28 February 2009 for his open support to the banned LTTE, the News Today reported.
The detention would mean that Seeman would have to serve in jail for one year and the order was served on him at Vellore Central Prison, where he was lodged for speeches aimed at inciting violence among religious groups.
Seeman was deported from Canada for speeches that propagated extreme views when he delivered a speech last November calling the Tamils in Toronto to start the civil war in Sri Lanka again to "kill all Sinhalese."
Right! CLEARLY, it is Karunanidhi's Job to supervise IDP Rehabilitation in sovereign Sri Lanka.
Karunanidhi can have that assessment as soon as Sri Lanka is allowed to investigate CASTE DISCRIMINATION in Tamil Nadu, and propose solutions up to and including prosecution of Tamil Nadu leaders!
.............
Karunanidhi wants assessment of Sri Lankan Tamils' rehabilitation
HundustanTimes.com
Chennai, July 17, 2010
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi has suggested sending an Indian envoy to Sri Lanka to assess the progress on rehabilitation of Tamils living in refugee camps in the island nation. In his letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh dated July 17, Karunanidhi said: "I would like to suggest that Government of India, through
diplomatic sources or by sending a special envoy, may assess the real situation in the affected areas and the progress of rehabilitation measures so far undertaken by the Sri Lankan government...."
He said that India may also try to get information on "the time-frame for completing the process of resettlement to the satisfaction of the affected persons. This will enable us to plan the future course of action with a view to ensure peaceful and rightful livelihood of the displaced Tamils".
On July 9, Singh in his letter to Karunanidhi had invited his views and advice "on ways forward towards the process of genuine reconciliation to resolve the ethnic issue in Sri Lanka once and for all through political agreement that we have consistently advocated".
Pointing out that the DMK has been advocating the cause of the Sri Lankan Tamils right from the year 1956, Karunanidhi's letter notes that the issue needs short and long term solutions.
The letter cites the denial of permission to Lankan Tamils to return to their native places even though a year has passed since the internal strife ended.
"Though the Government of India have sanctioned a financial assistance of Rs.500 crore for the purpose of rehabilitation long back, it is sad that the rehabilitation measures have not progressed at the expected level," he said.
"Consequently, the displaced people continue to undergo the ordeal of camp life," the letter noted.
Hey, Why not .. Brahmins are PEOPLE too!
But, there is a problem: There are Brahmins of DIFFERENT TYPES who also need to be protected from each other.
For example, there are the Iyers who are Braamins who crowned non-noble kings, and are shunned by other Brahmins. So, they are OUTCASTES within a High Brahmin Caste. CLEARLY, they need to be protected by law.
Let India SLICE and DICE its people into the ever finer-grained categories, and allocate benefits accordingly.
I propose that a "Federal System" of CASTE ADMINSTRATION be imposed on Indians, DEVOLVING benefits to the people. If they cross these category boundaries, they will LOSE THEIR BENEFITS, so there will be a strong incentive to remain within each caste and fight caste wars.
Wow! I have created the basis of a self-perpetuating modern caste system, sanctioned by law, in one fell swoop!
People in every category will fight tooth-and-nail to preserve their "benefits".
Forget Indian citizenship .. BENEFIT CASTES are the way ahead for India!
SLICE & DICE,
SEPARATE & SEGREGATE,
BE-DIVIDED & BE-CONQUERED TOO!
..............
TN Brahmins want 10% quota in jobs, education
July 18, 201
CHENNAI: Brahmins in the state want 10 per cent reservation in jobs and education for the poor amongst them and they would be submitting a petition outlining these demands to the Chief Minister in the next week, said the Thamizhnadu Brahmin Association in the city on Saturday.
The association said that the community would vote only for the party which would deliver on these demands. “There are poor people in every caste and the government needs to give 10 per cent reservation to Brahmins who are economically weak,” said Pammal Ramakrishnan, the General Secretary of the ThamBras Association. “We’re not fanatics, we help people of other castes as well but nothing is done for us,” he rued.
The association pegs the Brahmin population in the state at around five to eight per cent of the total population. The association also lauded the recent World Tamil Conference, that was held in Coimbatore, as an important move to boost Tamil but claimed that Nayanmars and Alwars had not been recognised for their contribution to the Tamil language at the conference.
They planned to build schools and working women’s hostels across the state for not only poor Brahmins, but members of other castes as well.“We do not care who rules in Tamil Nadu, how they rule is what is important,” said S Balasubramanian, former State President of the association.
Let EVERYONE in Sri Lanka be re-registered in preparation for the NEXT Census.
.............
Fresh registration of Colombo Tamils slammed
P K Balachandran
July 17, 2010
COLOMBO: The National Peace Council (NPC) on Friday criticised the Sri Lankan government for ordering a fresh registration of Tamils in certain parts of the capital city of Colombo. "The recommencement of the practice of registering Tamils with the police and of conducting search operations that target them, have been widely reported in the Tamil media in particular, and have created a renewed sense of insecurity and injustice amongst the Tamil population that is detrimental to national reconciliation," the NPC said in a statement.
The practice of registering of Tamils and conducting search operations in private residences even late at night, were there during the period of war and terrorism. "But today, when more than 14 months have elapsed since the war ended, and there have been no acts of militancy or terrorism in this period, there is no need to revive the harsh measures of the past," the statement noted.
"Only two months ago Parliament approved the repeal of a large number of emergency laws which was projected worldwide as a sign that normalcy had returned to the country. On the ground, however, the situation has deteriorated where normal life for Tamil people is concerned," the NPC said.
The Democratic People's Front leader, Mano Ganesan, has requested President Mahinda Rajapaksa to intervene to halt the registration of Tamils in the Wellawatte Police division in Colombo. Responding to a query from the media last week ,the police spokesman said that action was taken under the Police Ordinance.
But the NPC points out that the Police Ordinance gives power in respect of detection and prevention of crime. It cannot be applied in an ethnically discriminatory fashion.
Pol Sambol
Re; "It’s history bears testimony: To send the Dutch away, the Portuguese were got down; to send the Portuguese out , the British were brought in..."
The Portuguese were the first to appear on the horizon and were taken for a long walk down the Old Nawala Road to Kotte...and the rest is known. That was 1505. They proved to be a pain in the ass.
Then came the Dutch, nicer people weren't to be found in Europe then in 1627. They also were the world's largest Navy, with over 20,000 war ships, when the total count world wide was only 25,000. When they blocked the Colombo harbour to starve out the Portuguese at the request of the Sinhala kings, the price of cat and rat-flesh (yea, they ate them from the sewers)in the Parangi (Portuguese) dominated Colombo Fort sky rocketted. (Kolomba kotuwe balal masuth gini ganan una...) Exit the nasty Portuguese,the Dutch set up trading by agreement. A much better system of coexistance between them and the locals commenced. That is how the Dutch always operated and remained one of the most welcome European nations on any other foreign soil.
When the British forces arrived, they weren't invited. They just rolled in, kicked the Dutch out and took over.
Iqbal Athas gets his facts twisted. He probably has his balls twisted too.
...
ananda,
"What EVIDENCE do you have that racism in the US is LESS than that in Sri Lanka?"
in the context of the discussion it is about racism in politics in US and SL.
here is evidence.
1. in 1977 a racist political party with ULTRA racist agenda with an ULTRA racist name (tamil united liberation front) became the main opposition party!!!!
NEVEr in US history.
2. since 1947, at EVERY GENERAL ELECTION racist parties with a racist-ONLY agenda won majority votes in the north east.
3. from 1988 NEPC election to 2004 GE, sri lanka muslim congress won a large number of seats in parts of the country. again by definition it is EXCLUSIVE racism.
never in US history.
4. at the 2000 GE sihala urumaya won a seat.
NEVER in US history.
ananda, you may dispute this for the sake of disagreeing but you know it is the truth.
here is more.
ananda-USA from sri lanka can live in NY, LA, LV, WDC or whatever in the USA but he couldn't live in kilinochchi, jaffna, mulativu or vavuniya!!!
ananda-USA HIMSELF admitted a few days ago that the BLESSED COUNTRY USA welcomes skinny sri lankans wih open arms!!!
but even sri lankans are prevented from living in parts of sri lanka. sri lankans colonized all parts of the USA but when they try to colonize the north of SL, ananda USA is against it!!! he wants it to be toned down with ethnic integration!!!
WTF????
HOWEVER, my main argument is in racism in politics. the other bit is only to cite ananda-USA's own exoerience!!!
:))
Moshe -
Apropos your 'US wants to rule over India'...the US can't even rule itself these days. Wonder if they can even wipe their own communal ass without help, irrespective of global ambitions.
What you are evidencing is the collapse of the Second Roman Empire. Watch closely, as the unfolding events will read in history as an act of history repeating itself..eventually.
When Rome disintegrated, the Romans were fat, arrogant and a stupid people who thought military might alone could give them dominance. They had blacks as slaves to do the menial work, Greeks as intellectuals to teach thier kids and a few Spartans to groom the troops. Then the military started to - not win any wars...and from their it was a quick downhill journey.
As the second Rome (see the Roman statue on top of the Washington Senate house and the latin in everything there..?) collapses, the new Romans are also fat, arrogant, less literate people, dependent on minorities to do the menial work and the literate foreigners (Indians etc) to do the intellectual stuff. Their military will never again win another war, only cause massive damage everywhere...and the economy is fading away.
(I am an American and a US historian pointed these similarities in greater detail.)
Moshe
Let's drop 'colonization'as a description of what is being done. We are simply 'Sri Lankanizing' the entirety of the nation.
Not to do so would be discriminating against our rural hinterland.
pol,
to add to the previous argument....
1. USA is the FOURTH largest weapons supplier to SL since 1983!!!!!
US$154 million weapons were SOLD to SL which is 11% of our total purchases!!!!
$154 million is nothing for US exports for somay years but it was a BIG help for SL.
2. USA is one of the VERY FEW countries to give SL weapons FREE!!
and these were VERY VERY valuable!!
"U.S. radars and dinghies to fight LTTE
[TamilNet, Thursday, 08 November 2007, 13:24 GMT]"
pls note the dates. this was at the EXACT time SL wanted these!!!
"USS Courageous will increase SLN naval power by 75 percent, says Daya Sandagiri
[TamilNet, Wednesday, 30 March 2005, 08:30 GMT]"
"The ship can conduct patrols of up to three weeks without requiring replenishment."
again note the time and assess their significance.
(BTW didn't we get this for free????)
3. USA gave us intel of LTTE weapons warehouses
4. US fire finder mortars played a CRUCIAL role in nailing LTTE hideouts behind the human shield.
NONE of this should have happened had the USA wanted on its own accord to disintegrate SL.
USA is influced by TEs and (i agree) US on its own too wants to disintegrate SL PROVIDED it has a SUSTAINBLE batch of slaves in TE who will have to always suck US dicks for survival.
my point is,
without just bashing USA for everything, BE SELECTIVE, please. we don't need to create more hatred and more enemies.
lets get the good of USA, co-operate when it is beneficial to SL and oppose when it is not in SL's interests.
unlike you, i give verifiable FACTS. consider these FACTS without JUST disagreeing like wesapala!!!
(no offence as you would understand).
TS,
very interesting as usual.
but look at the other would be empires - india, iran, china, russia!!!!
not to mention colonial britain and france that are hanging in there!!!!
they (when become empires) are no better if not worse.
Ananda and Moshe-
Re; Racism in the US;
Govt sponsored racism goes far enough to officially categorize only their white skinned citizens as 'Americans' . Anyone non-white is a 'qualified' American (African-American, Asian-American etc) This is supposedly for census and statistical needs, and to maintain anti-discriminatory testing. Who knows, since most kids pulled in from the available pool of people for hazardous military operations such as ground holding in Vietnam etc were overwhelmingly from minorities - black.
Discrimination and racism in the US is largely individual and is found on the lesser educated rural white small communities. Even then, these tendencies are gradually disappearing mostly towrds the 'smart Indians' who bring specialized skills whch the whites now lack.
In a predominantly white rich educated neighborhood of North Carolina I watched massive crowds of white people attend a rally in support of Obama. Today most are unhappy over his bungling of all major issues.
So it is a mix of things..not exactly black or white; rather shitty grey.
No nation is perfect. In Colombo I am investigating a work place related problem of two Sinhalese harassing and not cooperating with a muslim guy based on religious bias.
And my moslem sister in law is lecturing me for not attending a painful buddhist ceremony even if it is just to please my mother.
[NONE of this should have happened had the USA wanted on its own accord to disintegrate SL.
I think USA didn't want 100% tamiz eezaam either fully controlled by VP/LTTE itself. What USA gave SL during war, I think, becuz USA didn't want GSL to lose its war to LTTE and end it. They gave us what they thought good enough SL to keep fighting and negotiating. What went wrong was with others help and their help, and as MR ignoring their final warnings, our boys finished it off contrary to their estimate and expectation.
Moshe
Empires rise and fall.
Some keep coing back, wanting to avaoid past mistakes, but eventually commit the same and perish.
Abt your comments on arms supplies to SL while the war was on; that was the Bush govt who had a clear agenda against terrorism. They didn't want to know what child hood issue made joey want to pee on others. Bush would rather take Joey's weewee and stick it up his ass.
They did in fact give the big coast guard cutter free. We bought guns and stuff costing appx US$ 1 Mn to refurbish the thing and make it into a formidable platform.
TS,
re: colonization
i use the word for clear communication. but it is for eventual sri lankanization.
still colonization has MORE benefits than 'sri lankanization'.
e.g. an agricultural reawakening
e.g. politically doing to vanni what was done to trinco, ampara
e.g. easing (to some extent) the unsustainable HUGE population density in areas outside the NE
e.g. pre-empting large scale south indian migration to SL. they SETTLE in vanni bcos the vast area is sparsely populated.
also for security reasons what happens in the NE is not entirely sri lankanization. rest of sri lanka don't have to put up with SO MANY SLA, SLN, SLAF camps per 1,000 square kilometres. it is a MUCH MORE militarised part of sri lanka. if entire SL was so militarised, we would not be very happy. it's a sad fact of life. i hope one day not so long into the future we would be able to replace MOST SLDF camps in the NE with new multiethnic settlements.
OK, i agree that what it connotates is not very good for our hinterland!! in fact this area was very developed in the past and it is kind of an insult to say we colonize this area only in the 21st century.
but to take out all ambiguity i want to use the word colonization.
it is multiethnic colonization.
but as time goes by colonization becomes a thing of the past. coexistence becomes the order of the day.
ninja,
sure.
it is easier for USA to handle another saddam hussein or a taliban controlled afghanistan than take on sri lanka (asia's oldest democracy).
now US plays BS TRYING to find a reason to interfere here. IF LTTE had continued its "de facto" BS state promoting suicide bombings, killing politicians, co-operating with taliban, etc. it gives a READY reason to interfere, grab the NE from LTTE and run it. SL wound not have been very angry either AT A TIME ONLY A FEW HAD FAITH IN SLDFs TO COMPLETE THE JOB.
b4 i forget...
USA was one of the first countries to clamp down on LTTE arms purchasing.
FBI arrested 10+ TE terrorirsts in canada trying to buy SA-18s!!!!
OMG had the MFs purchsed those, that would have sealed the war!!!
that had a BIGGER impact around the world.
LTTE arms buyers were shitt scared what they were getting into in other contracts. this substantially affected them and restricted where and with whom they would buy weapons.
I agree with Ninja.
US wanted to avoid a repeat of Burundi style massacre in SL, which the Norwegians and other assholes were whining to Clinton about. Remember, Obama was new to his seat and didn't have much time to learn.
Clinton was new too, and can't or doesn't want to learn. Her pussy's too withered for that. Add that to the fact that the bitch already hates us for depriving her of the cash from the tamil racist monkeys.
The US does have a continuing agenda; instal a more US friendly head of govt preferably with no balls maybe. Or, let one with a legal sword hanging over his head rule, in ways more amendable to US' own interests. (Second is more likely)
Ban-Ki better deliver, or else no second term.
Obama is a slime ball. No principles irrespective of noble declarations, and at the mercy of kinky peaceniks.
The US has lost in Iraq. Iran rules Iraq by proxy.
US will lose Afganistan. Iran is already administering eastern Afganistan where stable governance, and civil services including electricity, water and schools, banks and administration functions. Coming soon to a place near you - nuclear armed Super Iran/emergence of the second Persian Empire.
Unknown quantity/wild card - Israel and potential for a massive conflageration with very high spill over capacity, all the way to the US mainland.
Nevertheless SL must avoid making costly mistakes such as the stupid scene with Wimal W and his farce/fast. No one cared. We only irritated our friends.
Moshe
US would not want to 'grab' land so close to India. Just a few US warships coming into the area makes the Indians bristle with venom still.
And the US is very scared of the tamil tiger expertise in suicide bombing, rated higher than any from the Middle east.
glad to say GOSl understand this well.
whenever USA reaches out to us with good stuff GOSL GRABS IT BY BOTH HANDS!!!!
when USA tries to create trouble GOSL manages that too though not very effectively.
the world is NOT an extremist place. it is a grey area!!! we have to team up with whoever it is on a case by case basis and roll with the punches. no premanant enemies, no permanant friends.
VERY STRANGELY SL has to, like the tougue surviving between 32 sharp teeth, survive the 32 nations that banned the LTTE!!!!
at the end of the day SL must get the BEST it deserves.
http://www.lankaenews.com/Sinhala/news.php?id=14104
TS,
but india and LTTE is nothing for USA to manage. too easy. LTTE was confined to just 10,000 sq km and SL tamil ppl would LOVE the USA unlike iraqis and afghas.
india would not mind as long as china is kept away. eventually USA can handover part of it to india to manage or make india a stakeholder in NE. even the CFA-norway thing had a BIG hidden indian support. the US instigated war crimes BS too has hidden indian support.
fcuking racists. why don't anyone in the govt respond APPROPRIATELY to these sakkili racists. what's wrong with a shrine, especially a buddhist one where most SLs are buddhists?????
@TropicalStorm
"TropicalStorm said...
Pol Sambol
Re; "It’s history bears testimony: To send the Dutch away, the Portuguese were got down; to send the Portuguese out , the British were brought in..."
I was quoting Upul Joseph Fernando. He is pigbal's equally dumb cousin from DailyMirror.
@Moshe,
I agree lets drop this. :))
But only when you stop trying to prop up the US at every turn for some bizarre reason, which you keep doing.
They are NOT our friends and never will be no matter the kind of carebears you make them out to be.
We owe them NOTHING, because they are NOT genuine and that has been pointed out more than once, the world over and even in some of your own posts.
So I do not see what your desire is with proving they are and that we should be “grateful”. I will happily take what they give (assuming it is not poisoned) and tell them to shove it. Why should we be “grateful” and grovel at their feet? You can be “liberal” with wording and call it “Tamil eelamist” but we have been grovelling for 500 years and where has it taken us?
I want a STRONG nation of the mind especially. Your attitude creates and enforces weakness and servitude.
b4 i forget...
USA was one of the first countries to clamp down on LTTE arms purchasing.
FBI arrested 10+ TE terrorirsts in canada trying to buy SA-18s!!!!
LOL. (See, you just had to creep this in).
That is because they are a threat to US in some form. Broke US laws so into jail they go. Does not change the fact that US and the rest of the West is the chief funding source and “moral backer” of the LTTE. They can buy weapons from anywhere, they need MONEY for it, and that comes from the West.
It is not just the LTTE. They allow hundreds of groups to operate within the US/West so long as they do not harm the West in some form whereby these groups are funded and given moral support to subvert and weaken other nations (based on whatever goals/ideologies/grudges these groups and people have for their target nation). But other countries do it to the West, threathen them in some form, they go and flatten those countries and demonise them.
4. at the 2000 GE sihala urumaya won a seat.NEVER in US history.
This is a result of 50 years of Tamil chauvinism and racism. IF the US was in a similar situation you would see the same (in fact in any Western country if they were subject to half that we were they would have thrown every Tamil into interment camps, if subject to brutal violence as we were the West would have simply killed all Tamils without hesitation –or at least beat them into submission).
And to say “never in the US history”, is misleading and out right false. The early US political parties (the Whigs, the democrat party & the American Party) were ALL WHITE. No Blacks allowed.
Racism is/was so entrenched that only political parties allowed were white only with white members only. Blacks were not allowed to make political parties at all.
Today they would never allow an “all black party” to exist formally as a legitimate political body, but they have allowed in the past white only parties to exist.
Moshe,
You want us to be grateful to the US/West because of “good things they do”. That is the focal point of your argument: "the good they do we must be grateful for/acknowledge". (This "good" frankly is deceptive and an illsuion).
But have a look at how grateful they are to people who have GENUNINLY helped them.
Start by the Native Americans: They gave white conquerors food, water, medical help, clothing and shelter during the harsh winter that would have wiped them out and what was the response? They saw the Native Americans as WEAK. Subsequently they were uprooted them from their homes, enslaved, robbed of their land, transplanted from one location to another, all “agreements” which were made were disgustingly broken by the white side and eventually they were wiped out.
In fact you can see this everywhere, people who have welcomed with open arms the suddha have been trampled, robbed, enslaved and brutalised as a result.
But they want to hold us “accountable” and “stick to agreements” and other bs.
They go around interfering and destroying other nations, harbouring, backing and funding within their borders proxy groups than can serve this purpose, but if someone does it right back to them they get vile with fury (because they are “perfect beings who do know wrong”) and destroy them.
That is why they deserve the title para-sudda.
They lie so brazenly and obviously, always plotting and planning something subversive despite the appearance (through propaganda and behaviour/mannerism/speeches) of "good".
Their attitudes are disgusting. But they throw a few dollars at us (implementing a more despicable manipulative agenda that is heavily masked) and we need to be “grateful”?
Is this a joke? Why do we need a coalition govt with UNP now? We have a very strong government and a pathetic UNP opposition who serves their white masters very well. I don't see any need at all in giving the top scum any power at all. Somebody seems to be smoking crack? or is this the imagination of Colombian scum?
I would like to share one of my experience on SL health Care.
MY father got critically illed and admitted on one of the Govt hospital in the southern province. It seems, he had a heart attack and pheumonia, but he was able to talk. There were only two beds in the ICU unit of the hospital and both were occupied at the time. Doctors assesment was that, my father not going to live another day, if not addmitted to ICU.
This is one of the big hospital in Galle district and hospital even refuse to transfer the patient to another hospital, saying that there are no facilities in the ambulance to take the patient to another big hospital, which is 30km away from the place.
Now only option given by the hospital is to wait till one patient is released from the ICU.
As usual my elder sister, who is living in colombo mediate to the situation and called a private hospital in colombo and inquire about transfering father to that hospital in colombo.
Hospital was ready with ambulance to go 400km round trip to bring the patient.
With in 5 days in ICU in colombo hospital, has recoved to greter extent and supposed to be transfered to a normal ward. stay in ICU for one day cost nearly 1000$ and this private hospital is now unnecessarly delaying to release the patient to normal ward. Yesterday (7 day) he was not transfered and reason was "Doctor missed the patient". Today again patient was not release, reason is " Doctor going for meditation sunday". I hope they will not miss the patient again tomorrow.
I felt like, these hospitals are robbing the patients in a big way, because normally families are ready to go for what ever extent save their parents.
One of the big problem in Sri Lanka is, it is very rare to find gunuine Doctors, who really care about healt of the mass. All are busy with their private shops and they do not want to put enough attention to improve their working hospitals. Otherwise improving ambulance condition, with the help of the community is not a big deal now in sri lanka.
Moshe,
I don't understand where your infatuation of being grateful to the masters stemming from? Why do we have to harp this subject. The masters gave us something expecting something else in return. We too got something from them expecting it to be something else. We smile and say thank you and move on. If the masters think that we would happily let them wash their hands over our heads, then we tell them that they are not welcome to practice their usual thing in our home. No emotions attached, it is just trade with them with standard commercial courtesy.
Andare,
I suggest you start collecting evidence to support that it was their willful ignorance that your dad has to stay may days in the hospital. You should simply refuse to pay a penny beyond the necessary amount. May be a statement from the hospital, on the record, that your father is good to transfer elsewhere now. Even judgment of another doctor not affiliated with this hospital should be good.
man-ki-boom mak karandada minihata usa kiyana de karanawa misak? naduth hamuduruwange, baduth hamuduruwange.
[United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has raised his stakes with plans to set up an eight person secretariat, headed by a senior official at a director level (D-2), to facilitate the work of his advisory panel on alleged war crimes in Sri Lanka.
The Inner City Press, a UN-based website, reported that the Chief of Staff of the secretariat would be Jessica Neuwirth, known to be a human rights activist and confidante of UN Human Rights Commissioner Navy Pillay, who has taken a strong stand on the Sri Lankan issue.]
http://sundaytimes.lk/100718/News/nws_01.html
එවැනි පරීක්ෂණ කමිටුවක් පත්කිරීම ජගත් සංවිධාන ප්රඥප්තිය උල්ලංඝනය කිරීමක්. මහ ලේකම්ට හෝ එම කාර්ය මණ්ඩලයේ කිසිවෙකුට තම වගකීම් ඉටු කිරීමේදී කිසිදු රාජ්යයකින් හෝ වෙනත් බාහිර මූලාශ්රයකින් හෝ උපදෙස් ඉල්ලීමට හෝ ලබා ගැනීමට නොහැකි බව එම ප්රඥප්තියේ 100 වන ඡේදයෙන් අවධාරණය කෙරෙනව. කමිටු සාමාජිකයන් තිදෙනාම ජගත් සංවිධානයට අයත් නොවන නිසා කිසිම විවාදයකින් තොරව පිළිගත යුතු මූලික කරුණ වන්නේ බෑන් කී මූන්, නෛතික බලයකින් තොරව හිතුමතේ ශ්රී ලංකාවේ ස්වෛරීභාවය පමණක් නොව එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මූලික සිද්ධාන්තයක් සාහසික ලෙස කඩා දමා ඇති බවයි.
http://www.divaina.com/2010/07/18/feature06.html
[Article 100
1. In the performance of their duties the Secretary-General and the staff shall not seek or receive instructions from any government or from any other authority external to the Organization. They shall refrain from any action which might reflect on their position as international officials responsible only to the Organization.
2. Each Member of the United Nations undertakes to respect the exclusively international character of the responsibilities of the Secretary-General and the staff and not to seek to influence them in the discharge of their responsibilities.]
pol,
"This is a result of 50 years of Tamil chauvinism and racism."
agree. even the SLMC is the result of that.
but the point is none of these are present in the USA or any equal!!
pol and sam,
we have to acknowledge the good USA did (or does in future).
we have to condemn the bad they do.
and shouldn't mix the two when dealing with them.
this is all i'm saying.
and know what, GOSL does exactly this!!! even GR.
just bcos US appointed the panel through monkey boon, GR doesn't stop the USS pearl harbour or SLN joint military exercices with USN.
so lets CONTINUE.
sam,
MR wants UNP support to change the constitution. although govt has enough power to govern, not enough power to do constitution making.
Patriots,
There is an outside chance that the problems the USA is creating for Sri Lanka because of its current FOREIGN POLICY in the South Asian region .. may be reduced after the mid-term US Congressional Elections in November 2010, and totally gone in two years after the next Presidential Elections.
I strongly believe that this US foreign policy is the creation of the current Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Partly this policy is driven by a new emerging STRATEGY for South Asia, and partly by Hillary's PERSONAL EGO and HUBRIS.
Hillary felt humiliated that SL would not do homage to her infallible wisdom and accept the US plan to spirit away the LTTE leaders from the Mullaitivu pocket. She has taken it upon herself to exact revenge from Sri Lanka .. I think. BTW, that should teach us to be MORE DIPLOMATIC when dealing with the leaders of powerful countries with the power to hurt Sri Lanka. If she is no longer the Secy of State, this problem will disappear.
There is a very strong likelihood that Democrats will lose their majority in the US Congress in the mid-term Congressional Elections in 2010. People are quite unhappy with the economy and the actions taken to rectify that situation, and blame it ... unfairly in my view... on the Democrats.
If that happens, control of the Foreign Policy Committees in the House and Senate will pass to the Republicans, and the Administration will not be able to enact any legislation, or fund and pursue their current policy directions.
That will be a blow to Obama .. who I think is a great President ... and he could lose re-election two years later.
In the meantime, Hillary will conclude two things:
1. her job has become a liability for her because she cannot pursue her policies without the firm control of the Presidency, the House and the Senate the Democrats enjoyed so far, and
2. a wounded Obama Presidency opens up an opportunity for her to run for President in the next election. As such, she will resign from Secy of State without completing her term about six to nine months ahead, and will go on the campaign trail to capture the Presidency. If that happens, I expect her to FAIL BIG TIME in that bid .. Republicans hate her, and moderate Democrats are lukewarm. Independents, who are increasing in number, will vote for the Republican candidate.
In my view, the Democrats inherited a mess from the George Bush administration, multiple economic crises, and have done well to pass MAJOR healthcare and financial system regulation bills that will serve the US well far into the future. But, the people are hurting without jobs, are myopic without long term vision, and blame it on the government in power.
From Sri Lanka's point of view, the return of Republicans to power will ELIMINATE the current problems Hillary is creating for Sri Lanka. They will recognize .. correctly .. that as an ENDURING DEMOCRACY that has thoroughly defeated it a terrorist organization acknowledged to be a catalyst for terrorists all over the world, and as an ALLY OF THE US in the global war on terror, that Sri Lanka deserves support.
Republicans have ALWAYS understood that better than the Democrats.
We shall see what happens to the ECONOMY in the months and years ahead of the elections; the fate of the Democrats will depend on that .. so far, things are not looking good.
End of Astrological Political Projection
Andare,
I hope your father will recover quickly, and be able to go home soon.
You point out a problem in Sri Lanka: Govt hospitals are underfunded and without sufficient facilities, and the well equipped private hospitals are enormously EXPENSIVE for ordinary people to use, and are often MERCENARY.
Ordinary families will be driven to poverty by an event such as the one you describe. In the US .. where all hospitals are private and medical insurance coverage is essential to prevent bankruptcy due to hospitalization .. it is a problem too for those without jobs who lose that coverage. Hopefully, the new Obamacare plan will help.
The solution seems to be for the Govt to increase its funding of hospitals and doctors, and placing some limits on doctors private work. The problem is, doctors are not slaves and will leave .. even go abroad .. if they can't earn a good income. So, if doctor's private hours are limited, then their Govt income must be increased accordingly.
But, where will the MONEY for that come from?
There are many older doctors in my family who served in govt hospitals, and younger ones who are serving now in govt hospitals. They are good doctors who care very much for their patients. For better or worse, they are all in Sri Lanka, whereas many of the scientists and engineers in my family .. like me .. work abroad !!! It may be telling us that their ability to earn in Sri Lanka is far better than those of scientists/engineers in Sri Lanka.
But, it may also be telling us something about their DEDICATION TO THE SERVICE OF THEIR PATIENTS of these doctors, and that they find it personally FULFILLING!
Doctors - another Trojan horse from the West,
Folks, be Ayurvedique.
Tell everybody around you to practice preventive living described in Ayurveda.
Even a best village lad, when gone through the mill of a western medical education, becomes a simple commercial agent of western medicine.
We must develop Ayurveda with its wholistic approach to life intimately linked to Buddhism.
andare,
hope your father would recover fully.
that is outright robbery.
1. govt should at least double the salary of doctors and put in place controls to ensure they do serve the ppl.
2. our uni admission system must change.
today 40% of medical students are from the north and the east or decending from ppl from north and east. they are ONLY INTERESTED in migrating out of SL ASAP.
SL is losing twice.
intake of others should increase so that AT LEAST we will have more doctors in SL. then it is about regulating their work.
3. health allocation should increase with the increase in population.
4. private hospitals should be regulated.
Moshe Dyan said...
pol and sam,
we have to acknowledge the good USA did (or does in future).
we have to condemn the bad they do.
and shouldn't mix the two when dealing with them.
-------------------------------
Moshe,
I don't envy you for trying to defend the West and the U.S.
For me what the west and U.S. are trying to do is to make the people of other nations to come to similar set of values as they hold. One of the main ways to achieve this is via propagation of religion. We see this in South America, large parts of Africa and also large parts of Asia. The only nations that they cannot get to are the Muslim nations, that are in totally going against Critians.
But Buddist nations are easy targets. The Buddhist nations that they cannot get to are the militant Buddhist nations. I believe Burma is one of the best examples. I believe if Vietnam has not put up such a fight, it would end up being a Christian states taking it with Laos and Cambodia in similar path to South Korea. Luckyly that did not happen.
I don't think west expect SL to put up such a fight. But we did and I think this has angered most western nations. Only way we can escape this is if we create solid relationships between nations like Vietnam, Burma, Thailand etc. Hopefully when China come out of Communism, the Chinese would put enought check and balances to stop the wholesale missionary work that would end up happening otherwise.
When you are evaluating good or bad things about U.S. what we need to look is the outcome of U.S. or European incursions. For me, the only thing that is clear is, if the natives didn't put up a fight, the large percentage of population end up becoming Christians.
As we do not like Mono ethnicity, it is preferable, that the world has many religions.
What kind of joke is this?
"LTTE suspect ordered to be released: Report"
http://www.adaderana.lk/news.php?nid=9023
Obviously BBC is jumping up and down about it because as always Tamil terrorism and violence = peaceful freedom movement.
Only Sinhalese are violent killers as per suddhas "free media".
Lookie here! Trouble in democrazy paradise. The question is how long till they surrender?
France fears widespread rioting as youths rampage after police shoot robber
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1295639/Riot-alert-France-youths-rampage-police-shoot-robber.html
"Why hasn't parliament passed resolution against UNSG?"
http://www.island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=2460
This raises some good points and states what Sri Lanka should do (resolution in Parliament by Sajith) and what Sri Lanka should not do (treat UN and other foreign trash as gods giving them "diplomatic" visas, why the hell are we the only country that does that?)
thusitha,
"I don't envy you for trying to defend the West and the U.S."
i'm not defending the west against their crimes, undue interference, etc.
my point is appreciate and co-operate with the good, avoid the bad.
is it bad???
in school we used to say, "wali nang wali, shape nang shape".
some kids used to say, "wali nang wali, shape nang eth wali". while others used to say, "shape nang shape, wali nang eth shape".
this is not what i'm saying.
given the hypocricy of west, we should handle them accordingly on a case by case basis.
toiletnet goes on and on about the chingala doctor who was seduced by a tamil nurse into alleged sexual activity. finally the sex deprived bitch committed suicide.
Yes, First VP was a PUPPET, then he became an ENEMY, and now he is NOT AN ENEMY .. but ONLY MISGUIDED!
LOL!
We will hear more DOUBLE TALK from Indian Politicians in the FUTURE too, as they adjust to the politics of the moment.
That is why Sri Lanka has to RELY ON ITS OWN STRENGTH, and not on the random direction of Indian Politics.
India's politics will ultimately turn to accommodating compelling internal pressures forgetting its past mistakes in Sri Lanka.
..................
Prabhakaran Was Not Our Enemy: Chidambaram
Virudhunagar(TN)
Jul 18, 2010
Union Home Minister P Chidambaram has said slain LTTE leader V Prabhakaran would have been "Mudisooda Mannan" (uncrowned monarch) of the northern and eastern provinces of Sri Lanka had he accepted the 1987 Indo-Sri Lankan agreement as requested by former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi.
Addressing a public meeting here last night, Chidambaram said he had met Prabhakaran and talked with him for hours. "He (Prabhakaran) was not our enemy. We were opposed to the path chosen by him."
Virudhunagar is the home constituency of MDMK chief Vaiko, a known LTTE supporter. Vaiko was defeated by Congress nominee Manick Tagore by 15,000 votes in the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.
Chidambaram said a country needs peace for development. "Violence and rioting will not develop a country." There had been heavy loss of lives and properties in Sri Lanka (during the war against the LTTE).
Claiming that peace had returned to the island nation, he said India had given Rs 3,600 crore for the benefit of the internally displaced Tamils. The government had also allocated Rs 1,000 crore for the construction of 50,000 houses in northern Sri Lanka.
The Home Minister said efforts are underway to renovate Kangesanthurai port and repair Palali airport.
He said he was confident that in another two years, 2.5 lakh displaced Tamils would get their houses and they would be rehabilitated.
Chidambaram was participating in the 108th birth anniversary celebrations of former Chief Minister Kamaraj and 125th anniversary of the Congress party.
Even as Chidambaram tries to "rehabilitate" one DEAD TERRORIST .. Velupillai Prabhakaran ... he is under death threat from India's own Maoists!
As always, it depends only on WHOSE OX IS BEING GORED AT ANY GIVEN TIME!
..............
Chidambaram, Pillai under Maoist threat
July 19, 2010
NEW DELHI: AK-47 wielding security personnel have been assigned to accompany Home Minister P. Chidambaram and Home Secretary G.K. Pillai during their routine official work following Maoist threats to their lives.
Official sources told IANS Monday that intelligence agencies had advised the government to enhance the security of the two VIPs, after they intercepted Maoist messages "planning revenge" for the killing of Communist Party of India-Maoist leader and spokesperson Cherkuri Rajkumar alias Azad in Andhra Pradesh recently.
Earlier, Chidambaram and Pillai were accompanied by security personnel carrying small arms. The number of security officials accompanying the two have also been enhanced.
Official sources said all offices and buildings to be visited by Chidambaram and Pillai would be subjected to stricter searches.
Azad, a key member of the central committee of the outlawed CPI-Maoists, was killed in an gunfight with Andhra Pradesh Police in the jungles bordering Maharashtra. However, the Maoists alleged that it was a staged gunfight.
Civil rights activists had demanded a judicial probe into the killing of Azad.
Government sources said the intelligence reports spoke of "doing something spectacular" against the "rulers in Delhi" to avenge the killing of Azad, and therefore the security cover for Chidambaram and Pillai have been upgraded.
"Prabhakaran Was Not Our Enemy: Chidambaram"
maoists are not our enemies either!!!!
this is clear proof that SL cannot depend on crap india. this shitt is worse than USA in INCONSISTENCY.
on odd days they support us, on even days they oppose us.
we should ONLY get what is beneficial to us. certainly NOT their crap advice.
TORONTO—An Ottawa-based aid group stripped of its charity status on the weekend was linked to an arms merchant for Sri Lanka’s Tamil Tiger rebels, according to Canada Revenue Agency documents released today.
The documents obtained by the National Post allege that Thiruthanikan Thanigasalam, a convicted weapons dealer, had served as the Toronto representative of the Tamil (Sri Lanka) Refugee-Aid Society of Ottawa.
The charity’s letterhead identifies Thanigasalam as the representative of the group’s “Toronto office,” the CRA alleges. He was also director of a 2005 tsunami relief fundraising campaign that used the society’s address, telephone, bank account and charity registration number, the agency says.
Thanigasalam was arrested in New York in 2006 and has since pleaded guilty to attempting to purchase Russian surface-to-air missiles and 500 AK-47 assault rifles for the Tamil rebels. He is serving a 25-year sentence.
Read more
Check the caption next to the photo – what a STAR!
[The issue has been debated across Europe, where France, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands are considering banning the niqab on the grounds it is degrading to women.]
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100720/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_syria_islamic_veils
According to females activists aka feminists aka women rights champions aka NGO kakkis in SL, all females should have right to decide what they wear instead of governments telling them what not to wear but this is applicable only for third world countries, not for western governments aka their masters.
Truth is neither the western capitalism nor their culture can stand for or face islam culture, in the same way they preach others. If they avoid (half) naked females body half of economy will go down. I feel good about our own culture where we tolerate both fully cover (except eyes) muslim women and fully uncover (bikini only) western women.
"I feel good about our own culture where we tolerate both fully cover (except eyes) muslim women and fully uncover (bikini only) western women."
and half covered sigiya beauties!!!!
indeed a healthy moderate culture that tolerates everything.
it's time for a new post.
where is KB's history article he promised sometime back????
KB???
i'm sick of monkey boon taking centre stage.
nira wickramasinghe, a historian???, writing to LG talks complete bullshit about colonization.
the bit, "STATE SPONSORED" is immaterial.
it can be private sponsored, NGO sponsored, indian sponsored, church sponsored or even IC sponsored.
then WTF is wrong with state sponsored????
she has the audacity to say "tamil leaders" are against it. in saying so she ADMITS the racism of those who are against colonization.
her views are somewhat similar to the twisted views of wesapala - the unkemp history teacher with deranged eyes.
this is getting more exciting by the week. i wish all these jokers will engage in a MAJOR WAR.
"The United States is sending the aircraft carrier USS George Washington to South Korea this week in a display of "the strength of our alliance and our constant readiness to defend the Republic of Korea," the ship's commander said Monday.
Two U.S. destroyers will also join the George Washington for its call in the port of Busan. A third destroyer will visit Chinhae, U.S. Forces Korea said. The four-day port call begins Wednesday."
just 18 days ago russia had a showdown with the USA here. now that the russians have "left" (or are they???) USA is sending all these CLOSER to the peninsular.
come on guys lets have some fun. the score stands at 46-NIL against the USA.
Moshe,
"my point is appreciate and co-operate with the good, avoid the bad.
we have to acknowledge the good USA did (or does in future)."
Erm why? Why should we?
These are disgusting snakes we are talking about. Again why? What is the need to "appreciate" or "acknowledge" them?
Blake due in Sri Lanka
Why are we allowing this snake back to Sri Lanka? All he will do is lie as usual and hiss more venom at us.
A massive problem is the President meeting every retard that comes here, most of whom are nobodies. We devalue our Presidency and leadership etc this way. MR, GR and the rest should skip meetings with him and send someone else (let news drift they are disgusted with his role in creating a human shield etc to save the LTTE etc).
Another problem of course is the likes of MR etc love to be in the thick of things and handshake every retard who visits.
You only need to see the way other countries behave to foreign "dignitaries" (nobodies) where we on the other hand worship the lowest of the low sluts at Western embassy and scum from the UN for goodness sake. We treat them as gods and they treat us as slaves (then complain about it afterwards when they issue some arrogant insult remark).
Give them the finger. Even Prabakaran refused to meet some Norwegian trolls because he was "not happy" with them (for some reason or another) and sent some low level monkey despite the “pleas” from Norway/West.
We need to learn how to handle the West.
This friendliness and worshipping them has got to stop. They do not treat us with respect or equals because of it but as people to be crushed into “their place” due to it.
Our attitudes as a people and a nation need to change.
@No_MESS
"No_MESS said...
TORONTO—An Ottawa-based aid group stripped of its charity status on the weekend was linked to an arms merchant for Sri Lanka’s Tamil Tiger rebels, according to Canada Revenue Agency documents released today."
LOL.
They allowed it to function without hassel for all these years and only when the LTTE serves no prupose now they ban it? LOL.
Para suddha in action.
Can somebody show the exit door to Blakey. Please don't let this diplomatic ape wash his hands over our heads.
Pol Sambol said...
Moshe,
"my point is appreciate and co-operate with the good, avoid the bad.
we have to acknowledge the good USA did (or does in future)."
Erm why? Why should we?
These are disgusting snakes we are talking about.
------------------------------
Pol,
Some times we have to play the game. The same way Russia and U.S. plays the game. It is hard to take a collision cause against these guys yet. We got MR and GR doing a great job here (I think).
In future, the sphere of power would transfer from the west towards east. After that, the western influence of Asia hopefully would diminish.
It is about time we take action against guys like Blake. Although I am not sure about the repercussions. If we corner ourselves and totally go against the west, we will be in the mercy of India, China and Russia. We need to play our cards right if we need to develop our nation.
Like the way Australia start looking towards the East, we should do the same, but at the same time without burning too many bridges with the west.
Thusitha,
You obviously do not understand my point
I am not averse to taking what they give (assuming it is not some poison) and saying "cheers for that, now shove it" and call them para suddha when they turn their backs.
I DO have a problem with the idea of actually being grateful in mind and heart, which is what Moshe keeps advocating for some bizarre reason. If these people are some kind genuine carebears then i can understand it but we all know they are lying manipulative, child abusing, mass murdering snakes with horrific foul forked tongues giving them an uncanny ability to lie so brazenly to us even when the truth is sitting right in front of both of us.
We need to be MENTALLY STRONG as a people and fully aware and understand how to deal with these people. Being “grateful” and “appreciating” at heart and mind these cretins machinations which are heavily varnished and designed to undermine and damage us in ways we have not conceived upon the providing of said “gift” is a big mistake and is what creates servility in a nation and people.
You want to be servile and have a cultural mindset of servility and weakness? Or one that is strong, with a thick skin ready to defend what is ours against any assault (not just physical) especially when dealing with such horrid snakes.
That is what i am getting at.
Departing U.N. official calls Ban's leadership 'deplorable' in 50-page memo
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/19/AR2010071904734.html
Pol, thanks for the Link; here is the full article.
................
Departing U.N. official calls Ban's leadership 'deplorable' in 50-page memo
Inga-Britt Ahlenius wrote a 50-page memo upon the end of her term as head of the U.N. Office of Internal Oversight Services.
Inga-Britt Ahlenius wrote a 50-page memo upon the end of her term as head of the U.N. Office of Internal Oversight Services.
By Colum Lynch
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
UNITED NATIONS -- The outgoing chief of a U.N. office charged with combating corruption at the United Nations has issued a stinging rebuke of Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, accusing him of undermining her efforts and leading the global institution into an era of decline, according to a confidential end-of-assignment report.
The memo by Inga-Britt Ahlenius, a Swedish auditor who stepped down Friday as undersecretary general of the Office of Internal Oversight Services, represents an extraordinary personal attack on Ban from a senior U.N. official. The memo also marks a challenge to Ban's studiously cultivated image as a champion of accountability.
Shortly after taking office in 2007, Ban committed himself to restoring the United Nations' reputation, which had been sullied by revelations of corruption in the agency's oil-for-food program in Iraq.
But Ahlenius says that, rather than being an advocate for accountability, Ban, along with his top advisers, has systematically sought to undercut the independence of her office, initially by trying to set up a competing investigations unit under his control and then by thwarting her efforts to hire her own staff.
"Your actions are not only deplorable, but seriously reprehensible. . . . Your action is without precedent and in my opinion seriously embarrassing for yourself," Ahlenius wrote in the 50-page memo to Ban, a copy of which was obtained by The Washington Post. "I regret to say that the secretariat now is in a process of decay."
Ban's top advisers said that Ahlenius's memo constituted a deeply unbalanced account of their differences and that her criticism of Ban's stewardship of the United Nations was patently unfair.
"A look at his record shows that Secretary General Ban has provided genuine visionary leadership on important issues from climate change to development to women's empowerment. He has promoted the cause of gender balance in general as well as within the organization. He has led from the front on important political issues from Gaza to Haiti to Sudan," Ban's chief of staff, Vijay Nambiar, wrote in a response.
ad_icon
"It is regrettable to note," Nambiar added, "that many pertinent facts were overlooked or misrepresented" in Ahlenius's memo.
Pol, thanks for the Link; here is the full article.
................
Departing U.N. official calls Ban's leadership 'deplorable' in 50-page memo
Inga-Britt Ahlenius wrote a 50-page memo upon the end of her term as head of the U.N. Office of Internal Oversight Services.
Inga-Britt Ahlenius wrote a 50-page memo upon the end of her term as head of the U.N. Office of Internal Oversight Services.
By Colum Lynch
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
UNITED NATIONS -- The outgoing chief of a U.N. office charged with combating corruption at the United Nations has issued a stinging rebuke of Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, accusing him of undermining her efforts and leading the global institution into an era of decline, according to a confidential end-of-assignment report.
The memo by Inga-Britt Ahlenius, a Swedish auditor who stepped down Friday as undersecretary general of the Office of Internal Oversight Services, represents an extraordinary personal attack on Ban from a senior U.N. official. The memo also marks a challenge to Ban's studiously cultivated image as a champion of accountability.
Shortly after taking office in 2007, Ban committed himself to restoring the United Nations' reputation, which had been sullied by revelations of corruption in the agency's oil-for-food program in Iraq.
But Ahlenius says that, rather than being an advocate for accountability, Ban, along with his top advisers, has systematically sought to undercut the independence of her office, initially by trying to set up a competing investigations unit under his control and then by thwarting her efforts to hire her own staff.
"Your actions are not only deplorable, but seriously reprehensible. . . . Your action is without precedent and in my opinion seriously embarrassing for yourself," Ahlenius wrote in the 50-page memo to Ban, a copy of which was obtained by The Washington Post. "I regret to say that the secretariat now is in a process of decay."
Ban's top advisers said that Ahlenius's memo constituted a deeply unbalanced account of their differences and that her criticism of Ban's stewardship of the United Nations was patently unfair.
"A look at his record shows that Secretary General Ban has provided genuine visionary leadership on important issues from climate change to development to women's empowerment. He has promoted the cause of gender balance in general as well as within the organization. He has led from the front on important political issues from Gaza to Haiti to Sudan," Ban's chief of staff, Vijay Nambiar, wrote in a response.
ad_icon
"It is regrettable to note," Nambiar added, "that many pertinent facts were overlooked or misrepresented" in Ahlenius's memo.
Ahlenius: "Ban Ki Moon ... Deplorable"
.......continued....
The departure of Ahlenius, 72, coincides with a period of crisis in the United Nations' internal investigations division. During the past two years, the world body has shed some of its top investigators. It has also failed to fill dozens of vacancies, including that of the chief of the investigations division in the Office of Internal Oversight Services. That post has been vacant since 2006, leaving a void in the United Nations' ability to police itself, diplomats say.
"We are disappointed with the recent performance of [the U.N.'s] investigations division," said Mark Kornblau, spokesman for the U.S. mission to the United Nations. "The coming change in . . . leadership is an opportunity to bring about a significant improvement in its performance to increase oversight and transparency throughout the organization."
The U.N. General Assembly established the Office of Internal Oversight Services in 1994 to conduct management audits of the United Nations' principal departments and to conduct investigations into corruption and misconduct. The founding resolution granted the office "operational independence" but placed it under the authority of the secretary general and made it dependent on the U.N. departments it policed for much of its funding and administrative support.
The dispute between Ahlenius and Ban has underscored some of the resulting tensions and exposed a protracted and acrimonious struggle for power over the course of U.N. investigations.
While Ahlenius cited Ban's move to set up a new investigations unit as a sign that he was seeking to undermine her independence, Nambiar said that it was intended to strengthen the United Nations' ability to fight corruption.
Ahlenius also clashed with Ban over her efforts to hire a former federal prosecutor, Robert Appleton, who headed the U.N. Procurement Task Force, a temporary white-collar crime unit that carried out aggressive investigations into corruption in U.N. peacekeeping missions from 2006 to last year. The unit's investigations led to an unprecedented number of misconduct findings by U.N. officials and prompted federal probes into corruption.
Ban's advisers said they blocked Appleton's appointment on the grounds that female candidates had not been properly considered and said that the final selection should have been made by Ban, not Ahlenius.
"The secretary general fully recognizes the operational independence of OIOS," Nambiar said. But that, he said, "does not excuse her from applying the standard rules of recruitment."
pol,
hard luck, mate. GOSL is doing what i want!! that is the only way PRACTICALLY available.
we are grateful to the good US does, accept the good they give us and reject the bad.
way to go.
your theory is suitable for north korea, cuba, burma, iran or venizuela. certainly not to SL.
pol,
good find.
we should give wide publicity to this but not b4 finding the REAL reasons WHY monkey-boon is criticised.
some jokers criticise UN bugger for not being aggressive enough.
e.g. louise arbour
Moshe,
This is not about "isolating" Sri Lanka but about not being mental slaves which is what you advocate creates – I am not saying that is your intention but that is the result. I say take the "good" but NOT appreciate it (at least not in heart and mind, put up a show and dance, play the game as Thusitha said) because it is not done with genuine intentions which you and everyone else knows but you have a hard time acknowledging for some reason. There is no "good" done by the West when it comes to 3rd world countries especially. Whatever "good" there might be is coincidental or done to squeeze out some kind of benefit for the West in the long term, even/including creating dependency, but it is always masked in layers of propaganda designed to create servitude amongst a populace and the perception that we “owe” them something and they "care" deeply for us, when their double, subversive, sinister actions prove otherwise.
There is a deep psychological game waged against people.
When they spot it and give the finger they are then demonised for “refusing” the righteous West, thus must be evil (which applies to some of the countries in that list of yours).
Is it not odd when countries tell the US/West to get lost, rejecting their aid/"good", seeing/knowing the poison that it is laced with, they are demonised as evil? Akin to the way SL is also demonised for not "acknowledging" the Wests "concerns" for human rights. Where we must “bow down” to them, and rejecting their bs/"good"/"concerns" and exposing them as liars and frauds with arguments that are better than theirs makes us the "bad guys"?
Save for North Korea, the other countries in your list have not actually done anything wrong.
pol,
thusitha said the same thing!!
play THEIR game.
that is what i say and what SL does too!!
don't jump into extreme conclusions. i never said we should now down to the west. appreciating their help in no way bowing down to them.
SL should avoid extremes.
glad it does.
"Save for North Korea, the other countries in your list have not actually done anything wrong."
ask their OWN ppl and you will get a different answer.
this is the same as one former SLN officer who praises pro-LTTE tamils in jaffna. he says they are the BEST, FRIENDLIEST, MOST GENEROUS.
my arrse!!
i brought a friend of mine to meet him who fits that category and without telling him the guy is a former SLN, told him to describe what SLN meant to them. he went, "they are jewellery robbers, liquor beggars, third grade thugs, MFs, etc."!!!!!
and that was the end of the arsse licking saga of this former SLN pro-LTTE MF.
and why not north korea???? they are the biggest rivals of "para suddas" and their arselicking southkoreans including monkey boon.
Ah lookie here!
http://austnewnation.org/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbuhMpxzZQI&feature=player_embedded
The revolt begins!
They are being settelled in some remote corner of Western Australia.
Afghans and kallathonis.
These two riot a lot.
I have a feeling they will be a massive case of fisty cuffs and in like 20 years time they might sieze control of Western Oz. (Well they are loyal to their white masters but who knows eh?)
I say we send more.
BREAK THE SYSTEM.
Best bit is we can make money out of this (sending them over, making the potential for the above siezure more likely). Plenty of clowns like Gordon war crimianl Wiess to help take them.
Why toss away an oppurtunity to reduce burdens on us and increase it on them?
And on the Canadam front:
http://canadianimmigrationreform.blogspot.com/2010/07/canada-top-nation-for-bogus-refugees.html
[play THEIR game.]
Now thats the point. Game, its rules, playground were all defined by west itself and umpires who decide winners are also non other than west. All were set to assure their safety and victory.. So can we defeat them playing their game..?? May be yes.. (like in cricket) But don't forget they can change rules when they want. (murali became a "chucker" only after he became a threat to auzs.)
More on Monkey moon:
"cynical1 wrote:
This report does not even scratch the surface of corruption surrounding the current Secretary General. Millions of dollars were spent renovating the SG's residence in NYC in the style of a Korean CEO. The renovations are so tradionally Korean that his successor will have to undo the renovation unless he happens to be Korean. Millions of $dollars in waste and mismanagement. The Internal Oversight of the 47 specialized agencies is also a joke with the head of WHO's unit once telling an employee "to stop finding fraud". The waste, fraud and mismanagement is rife, even in the AMRO office of WHO, right across the street from the Department of State. The Obama Administration should insist on placing a few "difficult" former employees to root out the waste and corruption with consequences for the actions shouldered by the guilty parties. The american public would be shocked what a few independent, unintimidated former employees could find in a few days.
7/19/2010 10:44:21 PM."
Nice info on what this corrupt man has been up to. Though i doubt Obama will do anything as "hoped" by the commentator (obviously a follow of Obamaology) as Obama is the pull stringer here. Moon gets his South Korean Palace within New York in exchange for using his "power" (i.e. the illusion of “neutrality”) to interfere in South Asia and other third world countries. Lets not forget he "raises concerns" about the Maldives, is interfering in the political process, REAL reconciliation and unification in Nepal and tried to mess with Thailand (on top of his illegal activites over Sri Lanka).
SL must gather all this evidence (even hire a PI type on Moon boon, it can be done no?) and present it to our allies (China + Russia) then the rest of NAM and HUMILIATE this sucker. The same should be done to the panel.
Incidentally we had the opportunity to do this through Wimals action. Had we collected such evidence and material + learnt about the dislike of Moon within the UN (as per the information in the Washington Post article) and had more dirt on the three monkeys he appointed for his panel (which we actually already do -a Lankaweb article by Ajit Randeniya gave huge info about the Indonesian chimp on the panel) then the international attention Wimal created would have been the perfect time for SL to unleash this information (the dirt) in a sudden bomb shell that would torpedo this panel and moon (i.e. DISCREDIT IT). Followed up by taking the issue into the General assembly if need be (of course have our friends in the UN pre-informed and ready). Then Moons other dirty tactics such as the UNDP lie and Buhne lie tossed into the mix and this clown would be in deep trouble. Sadly the Government is just sitting on its hands.
So many avenues to make Moon and his panel burn into a fire of ZERO credibility, lost unfortunately.
The problem also lies with our Ambassadors, if they are not busy trying to secure their families futures (like ones sent to the West who even STAY in whatever Western country they are posted to after their term ends) they are taught to be servile, unresponsive and meek.
Dayan J to his credit behaved as a diplomat should (even though he could not keep his crap to himself). He had the RIGHT format. Pushing SL first, making us the victims of the West and have charisma and oratory ability to successfully do what he did (minus the communist bs), making friends, and those important connections, plus learning, adapting and following the underlying workings and machinations of the UN exploiting them for the SL benefit (Dayan J lost his head completely towards the end of his stay in Geneva –before getting fired- but did very well the rest of the time).
This is what SL must do (should have done already) to dissolve the panel and Moon in the process.
Things just get more sinsiter:
The UN expert panel will be under the umbrella of OHCHR [Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights], UN Spokesperson said. The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights is Navanethem Pillay.
The spokesman added that the Chief of Staff of the Panel will be Richard Bennett
http://www.adaderana.lk/news.php?nid=9044
"Why toss away an oppurtunity to reduce burdens on us and increase it on them?"
my thinking too.
we should push more and more TEs out of SL by MAKING THEIR LIFE MISERABLE in SL.
let them riot ANYWHERE ELSE.
afghans & TEs = "jadiyata moodiya"
News travels fast:
http://www.adaderana.lk/news.php?nid=9045
Guess Adaderana needed their own source rather than my comment!
First PEEK at APRC Report Reveals Obsolete Thinking:
1. Embeds communal divisions in the Constitution. Communal considerations should be COMPLETELY EXCLUDED from the constitution. Political power should arise from a person's vote in the electorate he/she live in .. nothing else.
2. Retains Provincial Governments setting the stage for large regional power centers that can challenge to authority of the Central Govt in the future, especially as the Provinces gradually accumulate ethnicity based power by various sly means, resurrecting the ethnic basis for the revival of Eelam in the future.
No regional governments larger than Districts should be allowed, and Districts should not have security, or police powers.
This ARPC report should be thrown out for THESE TWO reasons.
..............
Final APRC report recommends unitary state concept for Sri Lanka while sharing powers between center and provinces
ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.
July 20, Colombo: The final report of Sri Lanka's All Party Representative Committee (APRC) that was released to the media by the main opposition United National Party (UNP) and the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress has recommended that Sri Lanka shall be a unitary state while the state powers are shared between the center and the provinces.
UNP MP R. Yogarajan said the final report of the APRC would be tabled in parliament today (20).
The UNP and the SLMC told the media yesterday that the President had failed to publicize the final APRC report even a year after it was handed over to him by the head of the committee Minister Prof. Tissa Vitharana.
Some highlights of the report are as follows:
* A Parliamentary system of government.
* Sinhala and Tamil to be official languages. English may be used for official purposes.
* Status of Buddhism - the foremost place given while according to all religions the rights guaranteed by the constitution.
* A constitutional court to preserve the supremacy of the constitution. This will be separate from the Supreme Court.
* Electoral system- A mixed first-past-the-post system based on electorate basis and PR system on a party basis with two separate ballot papers.
* Power sharing- There will be tiers - at Central govt, provincial govt and local govt levels. Each tier will have separate lists of powers conferred through the constitution. A Senate- A senate will allow the provinces to play a role in the national legislature. It would act as an in-built mechanism to deter hasty legislation that may have an adverse impact on the provinces.
* There will be 63 senators made up of seven members each from the nine provinces. They are to be elected on the basis of a single transferable vote by the members of the Provincial legislature. In addition there shall be 10 senators selected by the community councils (one for Muslims living outside the north and east, the other for the Indian Tamils). The President is to nominate two persons to represent unrepresented community groups.
* Community Council-There shall be two community councils, one for Indian Tamils and one for Muslims outside the north and east without a territorial focus.
* Power Sharing- The concurrent list will be abolished and the powers shall be separated between the central list and provincial lists. A third list will deal with powers of the local authorities.
* A National and Provincial Higher Appointments Council to be named. This aims to ensure the independence of public service and the judiciary. This council shall consist of the Speaker as the Chairman, Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and six persons to be appointed by the President on the nomination of a Parliamentary Committee representing all parties in Parliament. Three of them should be minorities.
Guys,
I just got a call from a friend. He was bubbling with excitement.
He said "Ananda, I have some very Good News, God is allowing Very Handsome People to enter Heaven!"
Then he continues, "No need for you to get excited, I am just calling to bid Goodbye!"
Grr! Foiled Again!
Sounds pretty conventional.
Can someone post more details of this National Technology Policy?
...............
Five year National Science and Technology Policy adopted
A five year National Science and Technology Policy for accelerating the country's development effort and making the Mahinda Chintana vision for the future objective of making Sri Lanka a Wonder of Asia was adopted at the 6th National Science and Technology Conference which concluded at the Hotel Suisse, Kandy yesterday.
Technology and Research Minister Tissa Vitharana said over 200 scientists attended the conference organized by his Ministry's National Science and Technology Commission.
The Minister said special attention was paid at this conference for creating a scientific environment in the country for utilising scientific research and findings and advanced technology to uplift the agriculture, industrial and export sectors and creating a sustainable market for Sri Lanka exports.
An industrialisation program would also be launched with the objective of the country's per capita income to 5,000 US dollars by 2015.
The conference also paid attention towards the export of finished products for exports based on rubber, illmenite and graphite and introduction of nano technology for the agricultural industrial and export sectors.
The new five year Science and Technology Policy will be submitted to the President for his approval.
The bastard snake is actually here.
http://www.adaderana.lk/news.php?mode=head&nid=378
Typical para-suddha, appears friendly, has a "warm" personality but is a despicable immoral unethical venomous criminal at heart, plotting and conniving the down fall, exploitation and subjugation of nations and people so as to ensure the dominance and prosperity of his own kind.
AGAIN, the Tiger Nominated Agents of the TNA are committing TREASON, plotting and planning with foreign powers to influence internal Sri Lankan politics.
I ASK AGAIN, Why are these TRAITORS not being PROSECUTED?
All of these guys would be EXECUTED or SERVING LIFE TERMS IN PRISON if they were US citizens!
Why are the Laws of Sri Lanka, NOT ENFORCED?
Letting them go SCOT FREE TODAY, encourages them to greater treachery TOMORROW!
...................
Sri Lanka's Tamil delegation meets Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Karunanidhi
ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.
July 20, Colombo: A delegation of Sri Lanka's Tamil National Alliance (TNA) parliamentarians led by R. Sampanthan has met Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi today, Indian media reported.
A TNA delegation of five MPs has met Karunanidhi at his residence today and reportedly sought India's intervention in accelerating rehabilitation of displaced Tamils in Sri Lanka.
"We have requested the intervention of India and the Chief Minister for the welfare of Tamils," Sampanthan has told Indian media after meeting Karunanidhi.
Sampanthan had alleged that there was little progress in the rehabilitation measures announced by Sri Lankan government for Tamils after the end of the war against the LTTE last year.
"Sri Lanka has not taken any concrete steps towards implementing a political solution for the Tamil problem. The government has not taken any dialogue with us for achieving a political solution," Sampanthan has been quoted.
He had also alleged militarization and settling of Sinhalese in Tamil-dominated areas in Sri Lanka.
The Indian Express states that the TNA delegation had also welcomed the DMK chief's suggestion to the Central Indian government for deputing a special envoy to Sri Lanka for assessing progress made in rehabilitation measures.
India Vs SL Test in Galle:
India forced to follow on: 245 runs needed to avert loss.
Gambhir OUT , 0/1 !!
Will India collapse?
Ninja said...
[play THEIR game.]
Now thats the point. Game, its rules, playground were all defined by west itself and umpires who decide winners are also non other than west. All were set to assure their safety and victory.. So can we defeat them playing their game..?? May be yes.. (like in cricket) But don't forget they can change rules when they want. (murali became a "chucker" only after he became a threat to auzs.)
---------------------------------
Ninja,
Think about open markets, globalization etc. Initially third world countries got screwed. Later on, we got better at it. Now they are trying to close their markets.
We are learning to play their game and also we are becoming better at it. India, China, Brazil, Russia are good examples of this.
U.S. used 9/11 to attack Iraq, we used it to destroy LTTE.
The west would try to change the rules to their own advantage. But if we are sharp, we should be able to take advantages of these rules ourself. But I don't believe we have to put up with the western influence for that long.
i couldn't convince anyone here why we should play the west's game with them.
OK, here is another one. this is connected to the west topic to some extent. hope you will understand but expect resistence again.
1. we need to develop business in SL (everyone agrees)
2. UNP has always been better promoting business than SLFP (many would agree. CERTAINLY more businessmen agree.)
3. it is CRITICAL to improve sinhala businessmen.
why???
bcos sinhalas are the most ferocious defenders of SL, for some reason.
4. however, sinhalas are the LEAST active in business.
5. this means to get the least active businessmen to business, we need a party that is as much pro-business which is the UNP.
6. but urinepee is in SHITT thanks to homosexual traitors at the moment.
7. so the ruling party should appreciate and promote the UNP's business friendliness so that more sinhala ppl will get into business.
SLFP should not follow communist crap and anti-business crap. they should match the UNP in business friendliness.
this is the only way to bring more and more sinhala people to start up ventures.
essentially sinhala per capita income should be the highest in the country so that patriotism/nationalism are backed by financial strength.
this does not mean others' businesses should be affected.
NO WAY!!
it only means sinhala businesses should be multiplied.
Hi Guys
I posted an article in Lankaweb on need of development in NE in order to occupy the current and future youth to reduce the 'foot soldiers' for a future separatist activity. I got many negative Sinhala extremists comments on this.
I know that there is a set of ealamists that wonder around the net and post anti Tamil comments in Sinhalese sounding names. Their objective I believe is to show that Sinhalese are Tamil haters, and to keep the fire alive for another spate of violence on a future date.
Are these comments are a result of this or am I off the mark from general Sinhalese sentiments?
Link to my article and the comments below.
Systematic_developement_of-NE
Ian, despite your good intension what you have written is nothing more than ridiculous levels of appeasement which are wasted on Jaffna.
Things like this: "It is better if all the name boards in roads, railway stations, army camps, government offices etc. are redone with first line to be in Tamil, and the Sinhalese and English translations later.
".
How about no?
Do you think they will appreciate it? Keep dreaming. History teaches us they are ungrateful, especially Jaffna out of all places. Good INTENTIONS are seen as WEAKNESS to be exploited.
Back in the 1970s and 80s Jaffna alone had an economy that contributed 5% to the nations GDP. Jaffna was heavily developed on par with the Western province. What do you think happened?
The "poverty" was something they themselves created out of their own arrogance. They are NOT victims of anything.
Today the Tamils are all humble to you and Sinhalese after 30 years of war which they started, perpetuated at every opportunity all because they believed they could win as they saw (and still do see) Sinhalese as weak, “modayas” to be EXPLOITED, when they spoke and engaged with you they would have had this running right through their minds and well seems they fooled you pretty well.
Back in the 50s they would not even give you water from a gutter if you asked/begged for some to quench your thirst, rather chase you out and tell you to die on the road.
To call such comments you see as "extremist" or "false flags" is extremely childish and unfair. Sinhalese have been the victims of 60 years of Tamil deceit and deception and deep intolerance and ABUSE. Is it not surprising there is some natural dislike and anger? IT is HUMAN response. Maybe you lived in a cocooned world but Sinhalese HAVE HAD IT with nonsensical Tamil whining, where the one time most privileged community complains the most and starts a war of deceit built on demonisations and their own sense of superiority to go to greater levels of superiority coupled with hopes of domination.
I am not surprised to see the responses to what you have written.
Especially with the following
which is just out right stupid:
“It is up to us to make them feel as victors.”
There sense of “victory” is us submitting to them, i.e. them defeating us. You cannot make them part of “our” victory if they do not want to be part of it.
“We need to go extra mile and make their lives comfortable and make them see a bright future as equal citizens in a united country”
We have done that for the last 60 years and during war where we fed and clothed, gave salaries and gave healthcare to the people slaughtering us. Anywhere else in the world if a people were subjected to Tamil chauvinism and violence in the manner we were they would have been wiped out when they started their bloody ITAK and TUFL, not even getting close to dreaming of an “armed struggle”. We spent more time “looking after” and pampering them than our own, while our people wallowed in poverty they had a good life and gave us a WAR as a result, now Tamils wallow in their own self inflicted misery and I am not interested in re-doing the “make Tamils feel happy so they do not kill us” bs because we tried that and it only strengthened their resolve to murder us.
Sorry Ian, but I am with the commentators responding to you.
We are not going to return to the British apartheid system, which is what Tamils want and only when Tamils will truly feel “equal” -when they come to dominate us again.
ian,
i too disagree with you on many counts. i agree on development but ONLY a process of development in the NE that DIRECTLY benefit tamils, sinhala and muslim ppl TOGETHER.
otherwise it is a BIG NO.
development without ethnic integration in the NE = DISASTER.
you have to understand the mindset of TEs and the physical condition of seperatist 'foot soldiers' first.
development without EI is DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE for racism/seperatism/violence in the north.
e.g. why did tamil leaders demand 50% for 25% tamils in 1931????
bcos british colonialists gave them an unfair advantage and naturally they wanted to keep it.
e.g. what is the natural political selection of tamils in tamil majority areas whether that is in SL north, batti or tamil madu????
racism.
look at all the political parties there. EVERYTHING is racist.
tamil congress/kachchi/front/alliance
dravida munnetram/nam thamilar, etc.
ULTRA RACIST.
and look at their demands.
tamil homolands/grievences/aspirations/self determination/nationality/sovereignty
UTTERLY RACIST.
e.g. what is the development conection to tamil racism???
the HIGHER the development, the MORE AGGRESSIVE their racism is.
e.g. 1931, 1976
from 1965 - 1977 tamil areas had UNPRECEDENTED DEVELOPMENT.
1. a comprehensive university for jaffna
2. kili becoming the island's biggest commodity exchange
3. farmers moving from huts to brick houses.
4. they were the VICTORS of import restrictions while others were the losers.
5. standardisation in 1973 didn't affect them at all. only less than 1% made it to uni at that time. it would have become 0.75% for jaffna and increase 100% for batti, trinco, ampara, vanni. net effect being nothing.
what happened????
their racist demands became stronger leading to the LTTE. in 1971 there were 25K sinhalas in jaffna, in 1981 (BEFORE 1983 MIND YOU), they were chased away and only 4K remained.
2004/5
after years of appeasement, ranil's UNP got a kick in the back TWICE!!!
i'm OK with changing nameboards but that cannot do much. remember even the LTTE kept some sinhala name boards. so it doesn't really matter.
we have to be very clear which came first.
the TAMIL ELAM DEMAND
or
grievences, excuses.
it was TE demand that came first.
whatever we do will be taken as excuses to advance it. only a process of mass colonization that alters the ethnic IMBALANCE can bring lasting peace.
e.g. in areas where tamils are not the majority, they don't engage in racist politics.
e.g. colombo, london, toronto, sydney, etc.
this is the ONLY PROVEN solution. others are not solutions but aggrevation of the problem.
ian,
i too disagree with you on many counts. i agree on development but ONLY a process of development in the NE that DIRECTLY benefit tamils, sinhala and muslim ppl TOGETHER.
otherwise it is a BIG NO.
development without ethnic integration in the NE = DISASTER.
you have to understand the mindset of TEs and the physical condition of seperatist 'foot soldiers' first.
development without EI is DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE for racism/seperatism/violence in the north.
e.g. why did tamil leaders demand 50% for 25% tamils in 1931????
bcos british colonialists gave them an unfair advantage and naturally they wanted to keep it.
e.g. what is the natural political selection of tamils in tamil majority areas whether that is in SL north, batti or tamil madu????
racism.
look at all the political parties there. EVERYTHING is racist.
tamil congress/kachchi/front/alliance
dravida munnetram/nam thamilar, etc.
ULTRA RACIST.
and look at their demands.
tamil homolands/grievences/aspirations/self determination/nationality/sovereignty
UTTERLY RACIST.
e.g. what is the development conection to tamil racism???
the HIGHER the development, the MORE AGGRESSIVE their racism is.
e.g. 1931, 1976
from 1965 - 1977 tamil areas had UNPRECEDENTED DEVELOPMENT.
1. a comprehensive university for jaffna
2. kili becoming the island's biggest commodity exchange
3. farmers moving from huts to brick houses.
4. they were the VICTORS of import restrictions while others were the losers.
5. standardisation in 1973 didn't affect them at all. only less than 1% made it to uni at that time. it would have become 0.75% for jaffna and increase 100% for batti, trinco, ampara, vanni. net effect being nothing.
what happened????
their racist demands became stronger leading to the LTTE. in 1971 there were 25K sinhalas in jaffna, in 1981 (BEFORE 1983 MIND YOU), they were chased away and only 4K remained.
2004/5
after years of appeasement, ranil's UNP got a kick in the back TWICE!!!
i'm OK with changing nameboards but that cannot do much. remember even the LTTE kept some sinhala name boards. so it doesn't really matter.
we have to be very clear which came first.
the TAMIL ELAM DEMAND
or
grievences, excuses.
it was TE demand that came first.
whatever we do will be taken as excuses to advance it. only a process of mass colonization that alters the ethnic IMBALANCE can bring lasting peace.
e.g. in areas where tamils are not the majority, they don't engage in racist politics.
e.g. colombo, london, toronto, sydney, etc.
this is the ONLY PROVEN solution. others are not solutions but aggrevation of the problem.
Post a Comment