Saturday, July 3, 2010

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon Exceeds his Authority Under the UN Charter in Appointing UN Panel to Investigate Sri Lanka's Domestic Matters!

By Ananda-USA

July 1, 2010

The unilateral action of the Secretary General of the United Nations, Mr. Ban Ki Moon, in appointing a UN Panel to investigate any "War Crimes" that may have been committed in Sri Lanka by the warring parties in the recently concluded war against terrorists, appears to exceed his authority under the UN Charter, in that this is purely an internal domestic matter under Sri Lanka's sole jurisdiction, that did not, and does not, threaten international peace.

For example, Article 2, Item #7, of the UN Charter, states

Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state, or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter VII.

Since this matter does not threaten international peace, the provisions of Chapter VII do not apply to it.

As such, the Secretary General's appointment of this UN Panel amounts to unwarranted interference in the domestic matters of the sovereign UN member state of Sri Lanka, that is not sanctioned by the UN Charter which specifically prohibits such intervention.

In recent years, the United Nations has sanctioned several such illegal actions against a number of countries at the bidding of certain powerful western nations who act with impunity. It is high time that the vast majority of member states of the UN, who do not agree with these high-handed interventions, organize and act to prevent the misuse of the United Nations as a cover to demonize and punish targeted nations, at the bidding of powerful nations with self-serving political agendas of their own that are unrelated to the allegations made against those countries.

I present below the full text of the UN Charter of 26th June, 1945, to assist the readers of this blog to do their own legal analysis of the situation. I will add all amendments to this version of the UN Charter in due course.

...................................................................................................................................................................
 Ban Ki Moon changing the rules of UN decisionmaking with a South Korean "Ban Team"!

..........................................................................................................................................................................



Charter of the United Nations (June 26, 1945)

Preamble

We the Peoples of the United Nations Determined

to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and

to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and

to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and

to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

And for these Ends

to practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbors, and

to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security, and

to ensure by the acceptance of principles and the institution of methods, that armed force shall not be used, save in the common interest, and

to employ international machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement of all peoples,

Have Resolved to Combine our Efforts to Accomplish these Aims

Accordingly, our respective Governments, through representatives assembled in the city of San Francisco, who have exhibited their full powers found to be in good and due form, have agreed to the present Charter of the United Nations and do hereby establish an international organization to be known as the United Nations.

CHAPTER I

PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES

Article 1

The Purposes of the United Nations are:

1. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;

2. To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and selfdetermination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace;

3. To achieve international cooperation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion; and

4. To be a center for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends.

Article 2

The Organization and its Members, in pursuit of the Purposes stated in Article 1, shall act in accordance with the following Principles.

1. The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members.

2. All Members, in order to ensure to all of them the rights and benefits resulting from membership, shall fulfill in good faith the obligations assumed by them in accordance with the present Charter.

3. All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.

4. All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

5. All Members shall give the United Nations every assistance in any action it takes in accordance with the present Charter, and shall refrain from giving assistance to any state against which the United Nations is taking preventive or enforcement action.

6. The Organization shall ensure that states which are not Members of the United Nations act in accordance with these Principles so far as may be necessary for the maintenance of international peace and security.

7. Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter VII.

CHAPTER II

MEMBERSHIP

Article 3

The original Members of the United Nations shall be the states which, having participated in the United Nations Conference on International Organization at San Francisco, or having previously signed the Declaration by United Nations of January 1, 1942, sign the present Charter and ratify it in accordance with Article 110.

Article 4

1. Membership in the United Nations is open to all other peace-loving states which accept the obligations contained in the present Charter and, in the judgment of the Organization, are able and willing to carry out these obligations.

2. The admission of any such state to membership in the United Nations will be effected by a decision of the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.

Article 5

A member of the United Nations against which preventive or enforcement action has been taken by the Security Council may be suspended from the exercise of the rights and privileges of membership by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council. The exercise of these rights and privileges may be restored by the Security Council.

Article 6

A Member of the United Nations which has persistently violated the Principles contained in the present Charter may be expelled from the Organization by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.

CHAPTER III

ORGANS

Article 7

1. There are established as the principal organs of the United Nations: a General Assembly, a Security Council, an Economic and Social Council, a Trusteeship Council, an International Court of Justice, and a Secretariat.

2. Such subsidiary organs as may be found necessary may be established in accordance with the present Charter.

Article 8

The United Nations shall place no restrictions on the eligibility of men and women to participate in any capacity and under conditions of equality in its principal and subsidiary organs.

CHAPTER IV

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

Composition

Article 9

1. The General Assembly shall consist of all the Members of the United Nations.

2. Each member shall have not more than five representatives in the General Assembly.

Functions and Powers

Article 10

The General Assembly may discuss any questions or any matters within the scope of the present Charter or relating to the powers and functions of any organs provided for in the present Charter, and, except as provided in Article 12, may make recommendations to the Members of the United Nations or to the Security Council or to both on any such questions or matters.

Article 11

1. The General Assembly may consider the general principles of cooperation in the maintenance of international peace and security, including the principles governing disarmament and the regulation of armaments, and may make recommendations with regard to such principles to the Members or to the Security Council or to both.

2. The General Assembly may discuss any questions relating to the maintenance of international peace and security brought before it by any Member of the United Nations, or by the Security Council, or by a state which is not a Member of the United Nations in accordance with Article 35, paragraph 2, and, except as provided in Article 12, may make recommendations with regard to any such questions to the state or states concerned or to the Security Council or to both. Any such question on which action is necessary shall be referred to the Security Council by the General Assembly either before or after discussion.

3. The General Assembly may call the attention of the Security Council to situations which are likely to endanger international peace and security.

4. The powers of the General Assembly set forth in this Article shall not limit the general scope of Article 10.

Article 12

1. While the Security Council is exercising in respect of any dispute or situation the functions assigned to it in the present Charter, the General Assembly shall not make any recommendation with regard to that dispute or situation unless the Security Council so requests.

2. The Secretary-General, with the consent of the Security Council, shall notify the General Assembly at each session of any matters relative to the maintenance of international peace and security which are being dealt with by the Security Council and shall similarly notify the General Assembly, or the Members of the United Nations if the General Assembly is not in session, immediately the Security Council ceases to deal with such matters.

Article 13

1. The General Assembly shall initiate studies and make recommendations for the purpose of:

a. promoting international cooperation in the political field and encouraging the progressive development of international law and its codification;

b. promoting international cooperation in the economic, social, cultural, educational, and health fields, and assisting in the realization of human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion.

2. The further responsibilities, functions and powers of the General Assembly with respect to matters mentioned in paragraph 1(b) above are set forth in Chapters IX and X.

Article 14

Subject to the provisions of Article 12, the General Assembly may recommend measures for the peaceful adjustment of any situation, regardless of origin, which it deems likely to impair the general welfare or friendly relations among nations, including situations resulting from a violation of the provisions of the present Charter setting forth the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations.

Article 15

1. The General Assembly shall receive and consider annual and special reports from the Security Council; these reports shall include an account of the measures that the Security Council has decided upon or taken to maintain international peace and security.

2. The General Assembly shall receive and consider reports from the other organs of the United Nations.

Article 16

The General Assembly shall perform such functions with respect to the international trusteeship system as are assigned to it under Chapters XII and XIII, including the approval of the trusteeship agreements for areas not designated as strategic.

Article 17

1. The General Assembly shall consider and approve the budget of the Organization.

2. The expenses of the Organization shall be borne by the Members as apportioned by the General Assembly.

3. The General Assembly shall consider and approve any financial and budgetary arrangements with specialized agencies referred to in Article 57 and shall examine the administrative budgets of such specialized agencies with a view to making recommendations to the agencies concerned.

Voting

Article 18

1. Each member of the General Assembly shall have one vote.

2. Decisions of the General Assembly on important questions shall be made by a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting. These questions shall include: recommendations with respect to the maintenance of international peace and security, the election of the non-permanent members of the Security Council, the election of the members of the Economic and Social Council, the election of members of the Trusteeship Council in accordance with paragraph 1(c) of Article 86, the admission of new Members to the United Nations, the suspension of the rights and privileges of membership, the expulsion of Members, questions relating to the operation of the trusteeship system, and budgetary questions.

3. Decisions on other questions, Composition including the determination of additional categories of questions to be decided by a two-thirds majority, shall be made by a majority of the members present and voting.

Article 19

A Member of the United Nations which is in arrears in the payment of its financial contributions to the Organization shall have no vote in the General Assembly if the amount of its arrears equals or exceeds the amount of the contributions due from it for the preceding two full years. The General Assembly may, nevertheless, permit such a Member to vote if it is satisfied that the failure to pay is due to conditions beyond the control of the Member.

Procedure

Article 20

The General Assembly shall meet in regular annual sessions and in such special sessions as occasion may require. Special sessions shall be convoked by the Secretary-General at the request of the Security Council or of a majority of the Members of the United Nations.

Article 21

The General Assembly shall adopt its own rules of procedure. It shall elect its President for each session.

Article 22

The General Assembly may establish such subsidiary organs as it deems necessary for the performance of its functions.

CHAPTER V

THE SECURITY COUNCIL

Article 23

1. The Security Council shall consist of fifteen Members of the United Nations. The Republic of China, France, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America shall be permanent members of the Security Council. The General Assembly shall elect ten other Members of the United Nations to be non-permanent members of the Security Council, due regard being specially paid, in the first instance to the contribution of Members of the United Nations to the maintenance of international peace and security and to the other purposes of the Organization, and also to equitable geographical distribution.

2. The non-permanent members of the Security Council shall be elected for a term of two years. In the first election of the non-permanent members after the increase of the membership of the Security Council from eleven to fifteen, two of the four additional members shall be chosen for a term of one year. A retiring member shall not be eligible for immediate re-election.

3. Each member of the Security Council shall have one representative.

Functions and Powers

Article 24

1. In order to ensure prompt and effective action by the United Nations, its Members confer on the Security Council primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security, and agree that in carrying out its duties under this responsibility the Security Council acts on their behalf.

2. In discharging these duties the Security Council shall act in accordance with the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations. The specific powers granted to the Security Council for the discharge of these duties are laid down in Chapters VI, VII, VIII, and XII.

3. The Security Council shall submit annual and, when necessary, special reports to the General Assembly for its consideration.

Article 25

The Members of the United Nations agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council in accordance with the present Charter.

Article 26

In order to promote the establishment and maintenance of international peace and security with the least diversion for armaments of the world's human and economic resources, the Security Council shall be responsible for formulating, with the assistance of the Military Staff Committee referred to in Article 47, plans to be submitted to the Members of the United Nations for the establishment of a system for the regulation of armaments.

Voting

Article 27

1. Each member of the Security Council shall have one vote.

2. Decisions of the Security Council on procedural matters shall be made by an affirmative vote of nine members.

3. Decisions of the Security Council on all other matters shall be made by an affirmative vote of nine members including the concurring votes of the permanent members; provided that, in decisions under Chapter VI, and under paragraph 3 of Article 52, a party to a dispute shall abstain from voting.

Procedure

Article 28

1. The Security Council shall be so organized as to be able to function continuously. Each member of the Security Council shall for this purpose be represented at all times at the seat of the Organization.

2. The Security Council shall hold periodic meetings at which each of its members may, if it so desires, be represented by a member of the government or by some other specially designated representative.

3. The Security Council may hold meetings at such places other than the seat of the Organization as in its judgment will best facilitate its work.

Article 29

The Security Council may establish such subsidiary organs as it deems necessary for the performance of its functions.

Article 30

The Security Council shall adopt its own rules of procedure, including the method of selecting its President.

Article 31

Any Member of the United Nations which is not a member of the Security Council may participate, without vote, in the discussion of any question brought before the Security Council whenever the latter considers that the interests of that Member are specially affected.

Article 32

Any Member of the United Nations which is not a member of the Security Council or any state which is not a Member of the United Nations, if it is a party to a dispute under consideration by the Security Council, shall be invited to participate, without vote, in the discussion relating to the dispute. The Security Council shall lay down such conditions as it deems just for the participation of a state which is not a Member of the United Nations.

CHAPTER VI

PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES

Article 33

1. The parties to any dispute, the continuance of which is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, shall, first of all, seek a solution by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice.

2. The Security Council shall, when it deems necessary, call upon the parties to settle their dispute by such means.

Article 34

The Security Council may investigate any dispute, or any situation which might lead to international friction or give rise to a dispute, in order to determine whether the continuance of the dispute or situation is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security.

Article 35

1. Any Member of the United Nations may bring any dispute, or any situation of the nature referred to in Article 34, to the attention of the Security Council or of the General Assembly.

2. A state which is not a Member of the United Nations may bring to the attention of the Security Council or of the General Assembly any dispute to which it is a party if it accepts in advance, for the purposes of the dispute, the obligations of pacific settlement provided in the present Charter.

3. The proceedings of the General Assembly in respect of matters brought to its attention under this Article will be subject to the provisions of Articles 11 and 12.

Article 36

1. The Security Council may, at any stage of a dispute of the nature referred to in Article 33 or of a situation of like nature, recommend appropriate procedures or methods of adjustment.

2. The Security Council should take into consideration any procedures for the settlement of the dispute which have already been adopted by the parties.

3. In making recommendations under this Article the Security Council should also take into consideration that legal disputes should as a general rule be referred by the parties to the International Court of Justice in accordance with the provisions of the Statute of the Court.

Article 37

1. Should the parties to a dispute of the nature referred to in Article 33 fail to settle it by the means indicated in that Article, they shall refer it to the Security Council.

2. If the Security Council deems that the continuance of the dispute is in fact likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, it shall decide whether to take action under Article 36 or to recommend such terms of settlement as it may consider appropriate.

Article 38

Without prejudice to the provisions of Articles 33 to 37, the Security Council may, if all the parties to any dispute so request, make recommendations to the parties with a view to a pacific settlement of the dispute.

CHAPTER VII

ACTION WITH RESPECT TO THREATS TO THE PEACE, BREACHES OF THE
PEACE, AND ACTS OF AGGRESSION

Article 39

The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security.

Article 40

In order to prevent an aggravation of the situation, the Security Council may, before making the recommendations or deciding upon the measures provided for in Article 39, call upon the parties concerned to comply with such provisional measures as it deems necessary or desirable. Such provisional measures shall be without prejudice to the rights, claims, or position of the parties concerned. The Security Council shall duly take account of failure to comply with such provisional measures.

Article 41

The Security Council may decide what measures not involving the use of armed force are to be employed to give effect to its decisions, and it may call upon the Members of the United Nations to apply such measures.

These may include complete or partial interruption of economic relations and of rail, sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio, and other means of communication, and the severance of diplomatic relations.

Article 42

Should the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. Such action may include demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations.

Article 43

1. All Members of the United Nations, in order to contribute to the maintenance of international peace and security, undertake to make available to the Security Council, on its call and in accordance with a special agreement or agreements, armed forces, assistance, and facilities, including rights of passage, necessary for the purpose of maintaining international peace and security.

2. Such agreement or agreements shall govern the numbers and types of forces. their degree of readiness and general location, and the nature of the facilities and assistance to be provided.

3. The agreement or agreements shall be negotiated as soon as possible on the initiative of the Security Council.

They shall be concluded between the Security Council and Members or between the Security Council and groups of Members and shall be subject to ratification by the signatory states in accordance with their respective constitutional processes.

Article 44

When the Security Council has decided to use force it shall, before calling upon a Member not represented on it to provide armed forces in fulfillment of the obligations assumed under Article 43, invite that Member, if the Member so desires, to participate in the decisions of the Security Council concerning the employment of contingents of that Member's armed forces.

Article 45

In order to enable the United Nations to take urgent military measures Members shall hold immediately available national air-force contingents for combined international enforcement action. The strength and degree of readiness of these contingents and plans for their combined action shall be determined, within the limits laid down in the special agreement or agreements referred to in Article 43, by the Security Council with the assistance of the Military Staff Committee.

Article 46

Plans for the application of armed force shall be made by the Security Council with the assistance of the Military Staff Committee.

Article 47

1. There shall be established a Military Staff Committee to advise and assist the Security Council on all questions relating to the Security Council's military requirements for the maintenance of international peace and security, the employment and command of forces placed at its disposal, the regulation of armaments, and possible disarmament.

2. The Military Staff Committee shall consist of the Chiefs of Staff of the permanent members of the Security Council or their representatives. Any Member of the United Nations not permanently represented on the Committee shall be invited by the Committee to be associated with it when the efficient discharge of the Committee's responsibilities requires the participation of that Member in its work.

3. The Military Staff Committee shall be responsible under the Security Council for the strategic direction of any armed forces placed at the disposal of the Security Council. Questions relating to the command of such forces shall be worked out subsequently.

4. The Military Staff Committee, with the authorization of the Security Council and after consultation with appropriate regional agencies, may establish regional subcommittees.

Article 48

1. The action required to carry out the decisions of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security shall be taken by all the Members of the United Nations or by some of them, as the Security Council may determine.

2. Such decisions shall be carried out by the Members of the United Nations directly and through their action in the appropriate international agencies of which they are members.

Article 49

The Members of the United Nations shall join in affording mutual assistance in carrying out the measures decided upon by the Security Council.

Article 50

If preventive or enforcement measures against any state are taken by the Security Council, any other state, whether a Member of the United Nations or not, which finds itself confronted with special economic problems arising from the carrying out of those measures shall have the right to consult the Security Council with regard to a solution of those problems.

Article 51

Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of selfdefense shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.

CHAPTER VIII

REGIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

Article 52

1. Nothing in the present Charter precludes the existence of regional arrangements or agencies for dealing with such matters relating to the maintenance of international peace and security as are appropriate for regional action, provided that such arrangements or agencies and their activities are consistent with the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations.

2. The Members of the United Nations entering into such arrangements or constituting such agencies shall make every effort to achieve pacific settlement of local disputes through such regional arrangements or by such regional agencies before referring them to the Security Council.

3. The Security Council shall encourage the development of pacific settlement of local disputes through such regional arrangements or by such regional agencies either on the initiative of the states concerned or by reference from the Security Council.

4. This Article in no way impairs the application of Articles 34 and 35.

Article 53

1. The Security Council shall, where appropriate, utilize such regional arrangements or agencies for enforcement action under its authority. But no enforcement action shall be taken under regional arrangements or by regional agencies without the authorization of the Security Council, with the exception of measures against any enemy state, as defined in paragraph 2 of this Article, provided for pursuant to Article 107 or in regional arrangements directed against renewal of aggressive policy on the part of any such state, until such time as the Organization may, on request of the Governments concerned, be charged with the responsibility for preventing further aggression by such a state.

2. The term enemy state as used in paragraph 1 of this Article applies to any state which during the Second World War has been an enemy of any signatory of the present Charter.

Article 54

The Security Council shall at all times be kept fully informed of activities undertaken or in contemplation under regional arrangements or by regional agencies for the maintenance of international peace and security.

CHAPTER IX

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CO-OPERATION

Article 55

With a view to the creation of conditions of stability and well-being which are necessary for peaceful and friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, the United Nations shall promote:

a. higher standards of living, full employment, and conditions of economic and social progress and development;

b. solutions of international economic, social, health, and related problems; and international cultural and educational co-operation; and

c. universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion.

Article 56

All Members pledge themselves to take joint and separate action in cooperation with the Organization for the achievement of the purposes set forth in Article 55.

Article 57

1. The various specialized agencies, established by intergovernmental agreement and having wide international responsibilities, as defined in their basic instruments, in economic, social, cultural, educational, health, and related fields, shall be brought into relationship with the United Nations in accordance with the provisions of Article 63.

2. Such agencies thus brought into relationship with the United Nations are hereinafter referred to as specialized agencies.

Article 58

The Organization shall make recommendations for the coordination of the policies and activities of the specialized agencies.

Article 59

The Organization shall, where appropriate, initiate negotiations among the states concerned for the creation of any new specialized agencies required for the accomplishment of the purposes set forth in Article 55.

Article 60

Responsibility for the discharge of the functions of the Organization set forth in this Chapter shall be vested in the General Assembly and, under the authority of the General Assembly, in the Economic and Social Council, which shall have for this purpose the powers set forth in Chapter X.

CHAPTER X

THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL

Composition

Article 61

1. The Economic and Social Council shall consist of fifty-four Members of the United Nations elected by the General Assembly.

2. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 3, eighteen members of the Economic and Social Council shall be elected each year for a term of three years. A retiring member shall be eligible for immediate re-election.

3. At the first election after the increase in the membership of the Economic and Social Council from twentyseven to fifty-four members, in addition to the members elected in place of the nine members whose term of office expires at the end of that year, twenty-seven additional members shall be elected. Of these twenty-seven additional members, the term of office of nine members so elected shall expire at the end of one year, and of nine other members at the end of two years, in accordance with arrangements made by the General Assembly.

4. Each member of the Economic and Social Council shall have one representative.

Functions and Powers

Article 62

1. The Economic and Social Council may make or initiate studies and reports with respect to international economic, social, cultural, educational, health, and related matters and may make recommendations with respect to any such matters to the General Assembly, to the Members of the United Nations, and to the specialized agencies concerned.

2. It may make recommendations for the purpose of promoting respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all.

3. It may prepare draft conventions for submission to the General Assembly, with respect to matters falling within its competence.

4. It may call, in accordance with the rules prescribed by the United Nations, international conferences on matters falling within its competence.

Article 63

1. The Economic and Social Council may enter into agreements with any of the agencies referred to in Article 57, defining the terms on which the agency concerned shall be brought into relationship with the United Nations. Such agreements shall be subject to approval by the General Assembly.

2. It may coordinate the activities of the specialized agencies through consultation with and recommendations to such agencies and through recommendations to the General Assembly and to the Members of the United Nations.

Article 64

1. The Economic and Social Council may take appropriate steps to obtain regular reports from the specialized agencies. It may make arrangements with the Members of the United Nations and with the specialized agencies to obtain reports on the steps taken to give effect to its own recommendations and to recommendations on matters falling within its competence made by the General Assembly.

2. It may communicate its observations on these reports to the General Assembly.

Article 65

The Economic and Social Council may furnish information to the Security Council and shall assist the Security Council upon its request.

Article 66

1. The Economic and Social Council shall perform such functions as fall within its competence in connection with the carrying out of the recommendations of the General Assembly.

2. It may, with the approval of the General Assembly, perform services at the request of Members of the United Nations and at the request of specialized agencies.

3. It shall perform such other functions as are specified elsewhere in the present Charter or as may be assigned to it by the General Assembly.

Article 67

1. Each member of the Economic and Social Council shall have one vote.

2. Decisions of the Economic and Social Council shall be made by a majority of the members present and voting.

Procedure

Article 68

The Economic and Social Council shall set up commissions in economic and social fields and for the promotion of human rights, and such other commissions as may be required for the performance of its functions.

Article 69

The Economic and Social Council shall invite any Member of the United Nations to participate, without vote, in its deliberations on any matter of particular concern to that Member.

Article 70

The Economic and Social Council may make arrangements for representatives of the specialized agencies to participate, without vote, in its deliberations and in those of the commissions established by it, and for its representatives to participate in the deliberations of the specialized agencies.

Article 71
The Economic and Social Council may make suitable arrangements for consultation with non-governmental organizations which are concerned with matters within its competence. Such arrangements may be made with international organizations and, where appropriate, with national organizations after consultation with the Member of the United Nations concerned.

Article 72

1. The Economic and Social Council shall adopt its own rules of procedure, including the method of selecting its President.

2. The Economic and Social Council shall meet as required in accordance with its rules, which shall include provision for the convening of meetings on the request of a majority of its members.

CHAPTER XI

DECLARATION REGARDING NON-SELF-GOVERNING TERRITORIES

Article 73

Members of the United Nations which have or assume responsibilities for the administration of territories whose peoples have not yet attained a full measure of self-government recognize the principle that the interests of the inhabitants of these territories are paramount, and accept as a sacred trust the obligation to promote to the utmost, within the system of international peace and security established by the present Charter, the well-being of the inhabitants of these territories, and, to this end:

a. to ensure, with due respect for the culture of the peoples concerned, their political, economic, social, and educational advancement, their just treatment, and their protection against abuses;

b. to develop self-government, to take due account of the political aspirations of the peoples, and to assist them in the progressive development of their free political institutions, according to the particular circumstances of each territory and its peoples and their varying stages of advancement;

c. to further international peace and security;

d. to promote constructive measures of development, to encourage research, and to cooperate with one another and, when and where appropriate, with specialized international bodies with a view to the practical achievement of the social, economic, and scientific purposes set forth in this Article; and

e. to transmit regularly to the Secretary-General for information purposes, subject to such limitation as security and constitutional considerations may require, statistical and other information of a technical nature relating to economic, social, and educational conditions in the territories for which they are respectively responsible other than those territories to which Chapters XII and XIII apply.

Article 74

Members of the United Nations also agree that their policy in respect of the territories to which this Chapter applies, no less than in respect of their metropolitan areas, must be based on the general principle of goodneighborliness, due account being taken of the interests and well-being of the rest of the world, in social, economic, and commercial matters.

CHAPTER XII

INTERNATIONAL TRUSTEESHIP SYSTEM

Article 75

The United Nations shall establish under its authority an international trusteeship system for the administration and supervision of such territories as may be placed thereunder by subsequent individual agreements. These territories are hereinafter referred to as trust territories.

Article 76

The basic objectives of the trusteeship system, in accordance with the Purposes of the United Nations laid down in Article 1 of the present Charter, shall be:

a. to further international peace and security;

b. to promote the political, economic, social, and educational advancement of the inhabitants of the trust territories, and their progressive development towards self-government or independence as may be appropriate to the particular circumstances of each territory and its peoples and the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned, and as may be provided by the terms of each trusteeship agreement;

c. to encourage respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion, and to encourage recognition of the interdependence of the peoples of the world; and

d. to ensure equal treatment in social, economic, and commercial matters for all Members of the United Nations and their nationals and also equal treatment for the latter in the administration of justice without prejudice to the attainment of the foregoing objectives and subject to the provisions of Article 80.

Article 77

1. The trusteeship system shall apply to such territories in the following categories as may be placed thereunder by means of trusteeship agreements:

a. territories now held under mandate;

b. territories which may be detached from enemy states as a result of the Second World War, and

c. territories voluntarily placed under the system by states responsible for their administration.

2. It will be a matter for subsequent agreement as to which territories in the foregoing categories will be brought under the trusteeship system and upon what terms.

Article 78

The trusteeship system shall not apply to territories which have become Members of the United Nations, relationship among which shall be based on respect for the principle of sovereign equality.

Article 79

The terms of trusteeship for each territory to be placed under the trusteeship system, including any alteration or amendment, shall be agreed upon by the states directly concerned, including the mandatory power in the case of territories held under mandate by a Member of the United Nations, and shall be approved as provided for in Articles 83 and 85.

Article 80

1. Except as may be agreed upon in individual trusteeship agreements, made under Articles 77, 79, and 81, placing each territory under the trusteeship system, and until such agreements have been concluded, nothing in this Chapter shall be construed in or of itself to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments to which Members of the United Nations may respectively be parties.

2. Paragraph 1 of this Article shall not be interpreted as giving grounds for delay or postponement of the negotiation and conclusion of agreements for placing mandated and other territories under the trusteeship system as provided for in Article 77.

Article 81

The trusteeship agreement shall in each case include the terms under which the trust territory will be administered and designate the authority which will exercise the administration of the trust territory. Such authority, hereinafter called the administering authority, may be one or more states or the Organization itself.

Article 82

There may be designated, in any trusteeship agreement, a strategic area or areas which may include part or all of the trust territory to which the agreement applies, without prejudice to any special agreement or agreements made under Article 43.

Article 83

1. All functions of the United Nations relating to strategic areas, including the approval of the terms of the trusteeship agreements and of their alteration or amendment, shall be exercised by the Security Council.

2. The basic objectives set forth in Article 76 shall be applicable to the people of each strategic area.

3. The Security Council shall, subject to the provisions of the trusteeship agreements and without prejudice to security considerations, avail itself of the assistance of the Trusteeship Council to perform those functions of the United Nations under the trusteeship system relating to political. economic, social, and educational matters in the strategic areas.

Article 84

It shall be the duty of the administering authority to ensure that the trust territory shall play its part in the maintenance of international peace and security. To this end the administering authority may make use of volunteer forces, facilities, and assistance from the trust territory in carrying out the obligations towards the Security Council undertaken in this regard by the administering authority, as well as for local defense and the maintenance of law and order within the trust territory.

Article 85

1. The functions of the United Nations with regard to trusteeship agreements for all areas not designated as strategic, including the approval of the terms of the trusteeship agreements and of their alteration or amendment, shall be exercised by the General Assembly.

2. The Trusteeship Council, operating under the authority of the General Assembly, shall assist the General Assembly in carrying out these functions.

CHAPTER XIII

THE TRUSTEESHIP COUNCIL

Composition

Article 86

1. The Trusteeship Council shall consist of the following Members of the United Nations:

a. those Members administering trust territories;

b. such of those Members mentioned by name in Article 23 as are not administering trust territories; and

c. as many other Members elected for three-year terms by the General Assembly as may be necessary to ensure that the total number of members of the Trusteeship Council is equally divided between those Members of the United Nations which administer trust territories and those which do not.

2. Each member of the Trusteeship Council shall designate one specially qualified person to represent it therein.

Functions and Powers

Article 87

The General Assembly and, under its authority, the Trusteeship Council, in carrying out their functions, may:

a. consider reports submitted by the administering authority;

b. accept petitions and examine them in consultation with the administering authority;

c. provide for periodic visits to the respective trust territories at times agreed upon with the administering authority; and

d. take these and other actions in conformity with the terms of the trusteeship agreements.

Article 88

The Trusteeship Council shall formulate a questionnaire on the political, economic, social, and educational advancement of the inhabitants of each trust territory, and the administering authority for each trust territory within the competence of the General Assembly shall make an annual report to the General Assembly upon the basis of such questionnaire.

Voting

Article 89

1. Each member of the Trusteeship Council shall have one vote.

2. Decisions of the Trusteeship Council shall be made by a majority of the members present and voting.

Procedure

Article 90

1. The Trusteeship Council shall adopt its own rules of procedure, including the method of selecting its President.

2. The Trusteeship Council shall meet as required in accordance with its rules, which shall include provision for the convening of meetings on the request of a majority of its members.

Article 91

The Trusteeship Council shall, when appropriate, avail itself of the assistance of the Economic and Social Council and of the specialized agencies in regard to matters with which they are respectively concerned.

CHAPTER XIV

THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

Article 92

The International Court of Justice shall be the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It shall function in accordance with the annexed Statute which is based upon the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice and forms an integral part of the present Charter.

Article 93

1. All Members of the United Nations are ipso facto parties to the Statute of the International Court of Justice.

2. A state which is not a Member of the United Nations may become a party to the Statute of the International Court of Justice on conditions to be determined in each case by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.

Article 94

1. Each Member of the United Nations undertakes to comply with the decision of the International Court of Justice in any case to which it is a party.

2. If any party to a case fails to perform the obligations incumbent upon it under a judgment rendered by the Court, the other party may have recourse to the Security Council, which may, if it deems necessary, make recommendations or decide upon measures to be taken to give effect to the judgment.

Article 95

Nothing in the present Charter shall prevent Members of the United Nations from entrusting the solution of their differences to other tribunals by virtue of agreements already in existence or which may be concluded in the future.

Article 96

1. The General Assembly or the Security Council may request the International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion on any legal question.

2. Other organs of the United Nations and specialized agencies, which may at any time be so authorized by the General Assembly, may also request advisory opinions of the Court on legal questions arising within the scope of their activities.

CHAPTER XV

THE SECRETARIAT

Article 97

The Secretariat shall comprise a Secretary-General and such staff as the Organization may require. The Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council. He shall be the chief administrative officer of the Organization.

Article 98

The Secretary-General shall act in that capacity in all meetings of the General Assembly, of the Security Council, of the Economic and Social Council, and of the Trusteeship Council, and shall perform such other functions as are entrusted to him by these organs. The Secretary-General shall make an annual report to the General Assembly on the work of the Organization.

Article 99

The Secretary-General may bring to the attention of the Security Council any matter which in his opinion may threaten the maintenance of international peace and security.

Article 100

1. In the performance of their duties the Secretary-General and the staff shall not seek or receive instructions from any government or from any other authority external to the Organization. They shall refrain from any action which might reflect on their position as international officials responsible only to the Organization.

2. Each Member of the United Nations undertakes to respect the exclusively international character of the responsibilities of the Secretary-General and the staff and not to seek to influence them in the discharge of their responsibilities.

Article 101

1. The staff shall be appointed by the Secretary-General under regulations established by the General Assembly.

2. Appropriate staffs shall be permanently assigned to the Economic and Social Council, the Trusteeship Council, and, as required, to other organs of the United Nations. These staffs shall form a part of the Secretariat.

3. The paramount consideration in the employment of the staff and in the determination of the conditions of service shall be the necessity of securing the highest standards of efficiency, competence, and integrity. Due regard shall be paid to the importance of recruiting the staff on as wide a geographical basis as possible.

CHAPTER XVI

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Article 102

1. Every treaty and every international agreement entered into by any Member of the United Nations after the present Charter comes into force shall as soon as possible be registered with the Secretariat and published by it.

2. No party to any such treaty or international agreement which has not been registered in accordance with the provisions of paragraph I of this Article may invoke that treaty or agreement before any organ of the United Nations.

Article 103

In the event of a conflict between the obligations of the Members of the United Nations under the present Charter and their obligations under any other international agreement, their obligations under the present Charter shall prevail.

Article 104
The Organization shall enjoy in the territory of each of its Members such legal capacity as may be necessary for the exercise of its functions and the fulfillment of its purposes.

Article 105

1. The Organization shall enjoy in the territory of each of its Members such privileges and immunities as are necessary for the fulfillment of its purposes.

2. Representatives of the Members of the United Nations and officials of the Organization shall similarly enjoy such privileges and immunities as are necessary for the independent exercise of their functions in connection with the Organization.

3. The General Assembly may make recommendations with a view to determining the details of the application of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article or may propose conventions to the Members of the United Nations for this purpose.

CHAPTER XVII

TRANSITIONAL SECURITY ARRANGEMENTS

Article 106

Pending the coming into force of such special agreements referred to in Article 43 as in the opinion of the Security Council enable it to begin the exercise of its responsibilities under Article 42, the parties to the Four-Nation Declaration, signed at Moscow October 30, 1943, and France, shall, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 5 of that Declaration, consult with one another and as occasion requires with other Members of the United Nations with a view to such joint action on behalf of the Organization as may be necessary for the purpose of maintaining international peace and security.

Article 107

Nothing in the present Charter shall invalidate or preclude action, in relation to any state which during the Second World War has been an enemy of any signatory to the present Charter, taken or authorized as a result of that war by the Governments having responsibility for such action.

CHAPTER XVIII

AMENDMENTS

Article 108

Amendments to the present Charter shall come into force for all Members of the United Nations when they have been adopted by a vote of two thirds of the members of the General Assembly and ratified in accordance with their respective constitutional processes by two thirds of the Members of the United Nations, including all the permanent members of the Security Council.

Article 109

1. A General Conference of the Members of the United Nations for the purpose of reviewing the present Charter may be held at a date and place to be fixed by a two-thirds vote of the members of the General Assembly and by a vote of any seven members of the Security Council. Each Member of the United Nations shall have one vote in the conference.

2. Any alteration of the present Charter recommended by a two-thirds vote of the conference shall take effect when ratified in accordance with their respective constitutional processes by two thirds of the Members of the United Nations including all the permanent members of the Security Council.

3. If such a conference has not been held before the tenth annual session of the General Assembly following the coming into force of the present Charter, the proposal to call such a conference shall be placed on the agenda of that session of the General Assembly, and the conference shall be held if so decided by a majority vote of the members of the General Assembly and by a vote of any seven members of the Security Council.

CHAPTER XIX

RATIFICATION AND SIGNATURE

Article 110

1. The present Charter shall be ratified by the signatory states in accordance with their respective constitutional processes.

2. The ratifications shall be deposited with the Government of the United States of America, which shall notify all the signatory states of each deposit as well as the Secretary-General of the Organization when he has been appointed.

3. The present Charter shall come into force upon the deposit of ratifications by the Republic of China, France, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America, and by a majority of the other signatory states. A protocol of the ratifications deposited shall thereupon be drawn up by the Government of the United States of America which shall communicate copies thereof to all the signatory states.

4. The states signatory to the present Charter which ratify it after it has come into force will become original Members of the United Nations on the date of the deposit of their respective ratifications.

Article 111

The present Charter, of which the Chinese, French, Russian, English, and Spanish texts are equally authentic, shall remain deposited in the archives of the Government of the United States of America. Duly certified copies thereof shall be transmitted by that Government to the Governments of the other signatory states.

IN FAITH WHEREOF the representatives of the Governments of the United Nations have signed the present Charter.

DONE at the city of San Francisco the twenty-sixth day of June, one thousand nine hundred and forty-five.

866 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   401 – 600 of 866   Newer›   Newest»
Ananda-USA said...

ACABQ Report: - Ban Ki Moon more corrupt than Kofi Annan
Ban Ki-moon Tries Again on U.N. Efficiency


.......continued 3....
Nor is the committee impressed with Ban's proposed Results Management Unit. Rather than a bureaucratic add-on, the report would have "no objection" to a "dedicated focus" on results that would start with a "clear conceptual framework of results-based management," which the U.N. evidently lacks.

The ACABQ further complains that the bureaucracy has a bad habit, "year after year," of ignoring recommendations by its auditors and other bodies charged with overseeing its operations that would reduce the U.N.'s financial and other kinds of risk.

In other words, the U.N. does not pay timely attention to the overseers who already tell it where the bureaucracy is going wrong, or violating its own rules.

The ACABQ clearly feels it's time for Ban to begin asking why, through "a review of the underlying causes." It also offers one possible cause of its own: in Ban's report, "the Secretary-General does not make mention of the consequences in cases when [his] delegated authority is mismanaged or abused."

What Ban himself thinks of the ACABQ's criticism is not known. A detailed series of questions sent Wednesday from Fox News about the Secretary General's reactions to the main elements of the ACABQ report had not received a reply before this article was published.

George Russell is executive editor of Fox News.

Ananda-USA said...

International Conspiracy Led By Ban Ki Moon, Secretary General of the UN

By Gavin Karunaratne, Ph.D.
March 30, 2010

Sri Lanka, today, is in the throes of an international conspiracy aimed at throwing out President Rajapaksa, balkanizing Sri Lanka, and destabilizing our motherland. It is sad that very few of us realize what is happening. The international community is the key player through their NGOs, with support from the Tamil Diaspora and Sri Lanka’s Opposition, led by the United National Party (UNP).


In my paper, “The International Conspiracy” (LankaWeb, 12/18/2009), I laid bare facts to prove how the USA has handled its foreign affairs to ensure that every ruler in the world that does not accede to their advice will get overthrown somehow. The list includes many elected rulers like President Lumumba of Congo, Mossadeq of Iran, and President Allende of Chile. President Omar Torrijos of Panama died strangely in a plane crash.

Though in pre-trial hearings, it was alleged that General Noriega had, in his possession, documents showing US complicity in the assassination, the presiding judge agreed with the US government that their public mention would violate the Classified Information Procedures Act!

Simon Mann of the elite British SAS, who was caught redhanded when trying to stage a coup d’etat in Equatorial Guinea, in collaboration with Sir Mark Thatcher, son of former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, has said that “tacit approval for the regime change came from the Pentagon, the CIA, and the big oil companies. President Castro of Cuba stands to have survived over a hundred assassination attempts.

President Allende of Chile was proceeding on a socialist path and had to be gotten rid of. He was closely guarded by his Army Commander, General Schneider, a man who could not be bought over. The CIA planned to abduct Army Commander Schneider as the first step in killing Allende. Unfortunately, the abduction became an assassination, and the Army Commander was killed in the confrontation.

Thereafter, President Allende was on the mat – he was assassinated. It was an ‘army coup’ which ended in Allende’s killing! Sheik Mujibur Rahaman, the father of Bangladesh who tried to fight for the poor in Bangladesh was killed by a group of Army Officers, and it is alleged that the perpetrators found solace in the USA. Anyone that wants to know more is advised to read John Perkin’s recent book, The Secret History of the American Empire.

One can go around the world – to Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, and to Pakistan, and find how US policies have decimated countries. Now it is Sri Lanka’s turn and woe be unto us if we stand divided! The United National Party, the Party that once won our independence, has now become the cat’s paw of the imperialists and has sold the country to the IMF and to the Western powers.

Today, the US Senators pose to the world as saints, and the moment a journalist disappears in Sri Lanka, they accuse the Rajapaksa Government of abduction. The US Senators have, at the back of their mind, how the CIA planned to abduct Allende’s Army Commander Schenieder, and think that every disappearance in Sri Lanka is a State abduction.

The manner in which one of the chief architects of the victory against the LTTE -the Army Commander Sarath Fonseka – was bought over to contest at the presidential election and the subsequent happenings are indicative of a conspiracy – a conspiracy that is alive and very active today.

Every super power, including the USA and even the United Nations, is gunning against the Rajapaksa Government. They all keep talking of human rights violations, the lack of democracy, and freedom of speech.

Ananda-USA said...

International Conspiracy Led By Ban Ki Moon, Secretary General of the UN

......continued 1....
The very fact that Sarath Fonseka is being tried for his misdeeds, with lawyers appearing for him, and due action is being taken on the representations made by the Counsels shows how there is justice. In many other countries, hear of a conspiracy and one is immediately told that the conspirators have already been put to death.

Why did the Premadasa Government not charge Rohana Wijeweera in the Courts? Our judicial system was alive at that time. He was caught alive and disposed of in cold blood. Not a whimper from any super power or the United Nations!

President Rajapaksa defied the USA and other Western super powers and Japan. Rajapaksa proved a match for all of them. He was not prepared to stop battling the terrorist LTTE whenever they advised him to talk peace and to confine the army to the barracks.

In his first presidential election in 2005, he told the people that he will rid the LTTE menace from our shores, and he did actually achieve it in a matter of three years – what other presidents miserably failed. He even had the stature to remind the Foreign Secretary of the UK, David Milliband, that Sri Lanka is no longer a colony of theirs to dictate to us what we have to do. He was no Jayawardena that caved in to the might of India when the Indian Air Force flew a few armed sorties over the city of Colombo, and dropped a few parippu aid packs in Jaffna. Jayawardena shivered in his boots before the mighty Rajiv Gandhi and forced the 13th Amendment onto our Constitution – a piece of legislation which is not suitable for a small country like Sri Lanka. Rajiv Gandhi forced Jayawardena to pave the way for a divided Sri Lanka. This led to a divided Sri Lanka – divided for three decades.

Everyone in Sri Lanka has to cast aside their political allegiances and appreciate what President Mahinda Rajapaksa has done to eradicate the LTTE from our shores. Have we forgotten the fact that for the past three decades, everyone in Sri Lanka was not sure as to whether one could be back at home for certain. In 1995 to 2000, when I lived in Nugegoda, I dared to go to Colombo only when I had no alternative. I would drive carefully, observant throughout, and when I parked my car, I would look around to see if anything was strange.

Every step was taken only when I looked all around me to see whether any untoward thing was happening. Those were the days of the Rajagiriya shooting where a group of disturbed terrorists ran through Castle Street for over a half mile shooting at random – one terrorist shot his way through the Maternity Hospital at Castle Street, and others shot their way to the nearby flats. As much as 38 people died and 50 injured died on that fateful day in March 2000.

Action to destabilize Sri Lanka after the LTTE was defeated in May 2009 involved splitting the group of armed officers and the political leadership that led the country to victory. There was Admiral Wasantha Karannagoda, the Naval Chief who sank the LTTE supply ships and successfully laid a dragnet of armed ships around the coast, who stood his ground. He was beyond approach. So was the Air Force Chief, Air Chief Marshall Gunatileke, who provided cover to the ground forces and ferried supplies, braving the anti-aircraft bastions of the LTTE.

Ananda-USA said...

International Conspiracy Led By Ban Ki Moon, Secretary General of the UN

......continued 2....
Then came Sarath Fonseka, the Army Commander – the weakling who could be cornered to be a traitor to the nation. He was bought over, and the leaders of the Opposition courted him to run as a common candidate for the presidency against President Rajapaksa, the one man who led the war and did instruct the three armed forces – the Ground Army, the Navy, and the Air Force to battle the foes.

Fonseka has suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of the electorate in his bid to be elected as the President. His supporter, the Leader of the Opposition, Ranil Wickremasinghe, who cajoled him to come forward as the presidential candidate has now dumped him. The JVP that backs him now at the parliamentary elections is also very likely to dump him when he is unable to deliver the goods.

The fact that what is happening today is an international conspiracy is proven by many facts.

1. At the final stages of battling the LTTE, the USA’s Secretary of State, Hilary Clinton, Milliband the Foreign Secretary of the UK, Kouchner, Foreign Minister of France, Japan, and other nations like Norway cajoled, then persuaded, and finally dictated to President Rajapaksa that he should stop fighting, declare peace, and give the LTTE another life support. None of them succeeded because we had a man of iron resolve and determination in President Rajapaksa.

The motives of these super powers has to be sought out and debated aloud. Why did they want the LTTE to be given a lease of life? They all posed as if they wanted to destroy terrorists, but in fact they are not interested in annihilating any terrorist once and for all. The never ending scenes in Iraq and Afghanistan indicate that it is not their intention to end the war they are waging. They want the war to continue because it is then that they can continue to tap the vast oil resources of Iraq and to control uranium rich Afghanistan. They wanted us to keep fighting because it is only then that arms and armaments made by them will find sales. They also wanted to destabilize Sri Lanka.

2. The USA, after the humiliating
defeat of the LTTE, got Senator John Kerry and Senator Richard Lugar to redraft the foreign policy of the USA. The Report “Sri Lanka: Re-charting US Strategy After the War”(111 Congress: 2009) states that “the US cannot afford to ‘lose’ Sri Lanka. This does not mean changing the relationship overnight or ignoring the real concerns about Sri Lanka’s political and humanitarian record. It does mean however, considering a new approach that increase US leverage vis-à-vis Sri Lanka by expanding the number of tools at our disposal. A more multifaceted US strategy would capitalize on the economic, trade, and security aspects of the relationship. This approach could in turn catalyze much needed political reforms that will ultimately help secure longer term US strategic interests in the Indian Ocean.”

Ananda-USA said...

International Conspiracy Led By Ban Ki Moon, Secretary General of the UN

......continued 3....
The attempt of the US is to counteract the influence of China. However, it is important to note the fact that the US emphasizes a political solution. It would interest the US to understand that the LTTE, as well as the Tamil Diaspora, want not only self determination, but the right to deal with foreign donors, to have armed forces – all of which are not available even to the States in the USA or to States in India. It is one united Sri Lanka now, where all people can live freely anywhere.

The majority of the Tamil population, which is today less than 10% of the population, lives in harmony within the Sinhala population. Thus, any further devolution of power has to be given to the entire island. The US and other foreign powers fail to realize that the Provincial Councils forced on Sri Lanka by India in the 13th Amendment to the Constitution has proven to be a waste of expenses and a duplication of administration not suitable for a small country like Sri Lanka.

3. The fact that the LTTE was supported by the USA is also proven by the connections that Robert Blake, the US Assistant Secretary, has had in meeting the Global Tamil Diaspora in Washington. Recently, the Global Tamil Forum meetings were addressed by David Milliband, the Foreign Minister of the UK. Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister of the UK, was associated with the Global Tamil Forum.

The UK Ambassador, Lyall Grant has said that, “the UK wants to see an end to impunity, wants to see allegations of War Crimes, human rights violations, and abuses thoroughly investigated”(The Island : 3/21/10).

This statement should apply with equal force to the role that the UK is playing in Iraq and Afghanistan, where the UK has committed armed aggression on the pretext that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, while the UK’s own inspector David Kelley, said that there was no such evidence.

The battles in Iraq and Afghanistan are not in domestic domain. Neither Iraq nor Afghanistan occupied by force an inch of land belonging either to the UK or to the USA. In the case of Sri Lanka, the terrorist LTTE was occupying by force a third of the country and almost two thirds of the coast. If not for President Rajapaksa, Sri Lanka would have by now had to accept Eelam in more than half our country.

4. An international conspiracy is caught in action due to the foreign funding that reaches Sri Lanka via NGOs (Non Governmental Organizations). From where are the funds coming into the NGOs for some of their employees to draw salaries of over a million rupees a month?

It is these funds that are disbursed freely to local journalists and officers to espouse the cause of separatism. The 2009 Manifesto of the United National Party was alleged to have been printed by funds from a foreign NGO. Further, international financing becomes clearly evident in the caches of foreign funds found in bank vaults of the accomplices of presidential contestant Sarath Fonseka.

It is important to note that there were thousands of dollars in brand new crispy notes in sequential number, the type of which cannot have come through normal banking channels. This points out to the dollars being smuggled in through DPL bags. We are all aware that the 1971 JVP insurrection was done by the North Korea because of the massive funds spent by the North Korean Embassy.

This even led to the closure of that embassy.

Ananda-USA said...

International Conspiracy Led By Ban Ki Moon, Secretary General of the UN

......continued 4....
5. Ban Ki Moon, the United Nation’s Secretary General, has decided to appoint a panel of experts to advise him on accountability issues relating to the humanitarian abuses in the last stages of annihilating Prabhakaran. President Rajapaksa has rightly lambasted the UN Secretary General by stating facts. The proposed investigation is “both unprecedented and unwarranted as no such action has been taken about other member states with continuing armed conflicts on large scale involving major human catastrophes and causing the deaths of large numbers of civilians due to military action.”

President Rajapaksa has rightly pointed out that allegations of human rights violations were motivated by misrepresentations by apologists of the LTTE and by some non-governmental organizations with a misguided agenda directed against Sri Lanka.

Why is the Secretary General of the United Nations silent about the armed exploits in Iraq and Afghanistan by the USA, the UK, and the NATO?

The USA and the UK have already reduced both Iraq and Afghanistan to rubble, and are now even destabilizing Pakistan with frequent drone attacks, with many civilian causalities.

It would be good for the Secretary General to read the article found in the UK Times of March 13, 2010, Nato Covered Up Botched Raid, which states, “A night raid carried out by the US and Afghan gunmen led to the deaths of two pregnant women, a teenage girl, and two local officers (police) in an atrocity which NATO then tried to cover up. The Operation on Friday, February 12, was a pre-dawn assault… NATO claimed that the force had found the women’s bodies tied up, gagged, and killed in a room. A Times investigation suggests that NATO claims are either willfully false or at best misleading.”

Similar atrocities perpetrated by foreign forces on the civilian populations of sovereign countries are occurring daily in Iraq and Afghanistan, where foreign forces are occupying countries thousands of miles away under the pretext of annihilating terrorism.

It will be of interest to find out why the Secretary General of the UN is silent over the Chagosian islanders – 2,000 of them that inhabited Diego Garcia, who were bundled up, and moved forcibly from 1967 to 1973 by Britain to enable the USA to establish their naval base at Diego Garcia. The Chagosian islanders were first moved forcibly to the island of Peros Banhos, 100 miles away, and later dumped in Mauritius.

By a Court Judgement on October 9, 2003, Justice Ousley of the High Court denied the right of the Chagosian islanders to any compensation.

However, on May 11, 2006, the islanders won their case in the High Court to return to the Chagos Islands. But David Milliband, the Foreign Secretary of the UK Government, appealed, and on October 22, 2008, the Law Lords ruled that the islanders had no right to return. The United States yet rules the waves of the Indian Ocean at Diego Garcia while the 2,000 islanders are left without hearth and home. Now, is this not a case which the United Nations’ Secretary General should take up?

Again it will be of interest for the Secretary General of the UN to look into the fate that befell the UN Arms Inspector, the British Officer Dr. David Kelly, who told the British Government that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. It was Dr. Kelly, “that exposed claims by George Bush, Tony Blair, and Collin Powell that mobile biological warfare units had been found as false (The Independent: 7/25/2003).

Ananda-USA said...

International Conspiracy Led By Ban Ki Moon, Secretary General of the UN

......continued 5....
This was not what Tony Blair, the Prime Minister of Britain, wanted to hear when he plunged the armed forces of Britain to battle Iraq, playing poodle to George Bush. Is it of interest for the Secretary General to note that David Kelly died a strange, sudden death, classified officially as a suicide? “Evidence concerning the assassination of Dr. David Kelly has been covertly classified as Top Secret and will not be released for at least 70 years” (The Insider: 3/22/2010). In the words of The Daily Mail, “David Kelly post mortem to be kept secret for 70 years as doctors accuse Lord Hutton of concealing vital information”(01/25/2010). This is only one instance of a human rights abuse and lack of transparency on the part of the UK.

The unwarranted incursion into Iraq has killed millions of Iraqi people and hundreds of British soldiers. It is done for the UK and the USA to grab the oil wealth of Iraq. All this is not within the sight of the blinkered eyes of the United Nations!

Why is the United Nations silent about the atrocities of Israel against the Palestinians? As we write, Israel is turing out Palestinians from their homes, forcibly taking over their lands, and building homes for new Israelis by force. Joe Biden, the Vice President of the USA who came to talk of peace for the Palestinians, has been rebuffed by the Israel Prime Minister Netanhau who has decided to build another 1,500 homes.

Is the Secretary General of the UN aware that the Israelis who occupy homes do not hold the title deeds to those occupied lands? The title deeds are held by Palestinians who are homeless in Gaza and other areas where they had to flee in face of the Israeli onslaught. As I pen these words, Israel has again commenced shelling the Gaza strip.

Gaza was reduced to rubble in January 2009, when the Israel Army is alleged to have killed over 1,400 Palestinians, destroyed hospitals, and even United Nations establishments. A few years earlier, Israel reduced Lebanon to rubble. Israel is more than a State of the USA. The Secretary General of the United Nations is evidently now playing poodle to the USA.

What was the Secretary General of the United Nations doing when over 91 people were killed and 1,400 injured, when the Central Bank was blown up by the LTTE in Colombo on January 31, 1996?

What of over the killing of pilgrims worshipping at the most Sacred Bo Tree of the Buddhists in Anuradhapura in 1985? The official estimate is that 200 were killed, while an Assistant Superintendent of Police told me that the number killed was over 500. The United Nations was very silent then.

Ananda-USA said...

International Conspiracy Led By Ban Ki Moon, Secretary General of the UN

......continued 6....
Now, when a savior has sprung up to rid Sri Lanka of the terrorist LTTE, the UN questions the standards used in defeating the terrorists. He has not done carpet bombing – what the USA did in Vietnam. He did not use bunker busters, used by the USA in many countries. He has not wantonly killed people en masse, as the US and the UK has done in Iraq and Afghanistan. He carefully ensured that there was the least civilian causalities. It is sad to realize that the United Nations has become the mouthpiece for the United States and the Tamil Diaspora – the LTTE members that have opted to live overseas.

Why has the Secretary General of the United Nations descended to becoming the mouthpiece for the terrorists?

It is reported that the Secretary General of the UN is said to be determined to press for War Crimes against Sri Lanka. Why is the Secretary General silent about the War Crimes committed by the USA, the UK, and Israel?

It will be well for him to be aware that he will expose himself to a charge of double standards if he is not fair by every member of the United Nations. The battle in Sri Lanka to rid the menace of terrorism was an entirely domestic matter, totally within the legal boundaries of a sovereign country. Has he forgotten that the LTTE ran a fascist dictatorship, and the last episode of civilians caught in the mayhem was because the LTTE forced the civilians, at gunpoint, to move as hostages with the LTTE cadres, keeping them as human shields.

A good number of the Tamil Diaspora with whom the United Nations and Robert Blake and David Milliband are now conversing with are responsible for the carnage, and they alone deserve to be charged for War Crimes.

6. The 2009 Human Rights Report of the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor of the US Department of State has just been released in the teeth of the parliamentary elections in Sri Lanka, evidently aimed at helping the pro-West United National Party at the elections.

The very timing of the release reveals that it is a part of the conspiracy to destabilize Sri Lanka’s current parliamentary election.

The Report makes a scathing attack on Sri Lanka:

“The Government’s respect for human rights declined as armed conflict reached its conclusion … Credible reports cited unlawful killings by paramilitaries and others believed to be working with the awareness and assistance of the government, assassinations by unknown perpetrators, politically motivated killings and disappearances. The Government was credibly accused of arbitrary arrests and detentions, poor prison conditions, denial of fair public trial, government corruption, and lack of transparency, infringement of freedom of movement, harassment of journalists, and lawyers critical of the Government and discrimination against minorities. Human Rights observers alleged that Government paramilitary groups and security forces participated in armed attacks against civilians and practiced torture, kidnapping, hostage taking, and extortion with impunity.”

Ananda-USA said...

International Conspiracy Led By Ban Ki Moon, Secretary General of the UN

......continued 7....
It is evident from the full Report that there is no basis to make such a judgement on the situation of democracy, human rights, and freedom of the press in Sri Lanka. At best, the Report gives a series of instances without definite proof, and it reflects poorly on the United Nations for having put forward a Report without firm proof.

For instance, the Report states that torture is practiced by the Government in Sri Lanka: “Following a 2007 Visit, UN Special Rapporteur (UNSR) on Torture, Manfred Nowak, concluded that torture is widely practiced in Sri Lanka. No accurate publicly released statistics on reported torture cases were available.” There are no instances nor any evidence of torture being practiced by the Armed Forces in Sri Lanka.

There are a few instances where excesses have happened by police personnel where action has been taken. The statement that torture is widely practiced in Sri Lanka has no basis whatsoever, and would be more applicable to the happenings in Iraq, Guantanamo Bay, and Afghanistan today.

I wish to point out that sporadic instances of excesses by armed personnel and the police, and lack of law and order can be found in any country. That does include the USA and the UK.

Last year, I had purchased an air ticket to tour Brazil. Near the date for departure, I read in the newspaper of a few instances where there were armed thugs attacking motorists when they stopped at traffic lights with the aim of extortion and robbery. It has been my method of touring to rent a car and travel thousands of miles to come to know the country. I went on the internet and found that in the cities in Brazil, it was normal for such incidents, and so I backed out. I cancelled my trip, incurring a loss.

Talk of the UK, and there is the Menezes incident where the London Police shot dead an electrician in an Underground Station in London, thinking that he was one of four persons that had planted bombs earlier that day. He was followed. What happened on 5/22/2005 is very interesting:

“Menezes entered the tube station at about 10 AM, walked through the barriers, and descended the escalator slowly. He then ran across the platform to board the newly arrived train. Menezes boarded the train and found one of the first available seats. Three surveillance officers, code named Hotel1, Hotel3, and Hotel9 followed Menzes onto the train. According to Hotel3, Menezes sat down … Hotel3 then took a seat on the left about two or three passengers between Menezes and himself. When the firearms officers arrived on the platform, Hotel3 moved to the door, blocked it from closing with his left foot and shouted, ‘He is here’ to identify the suspect’s location. The Firearms officers boarded the train and it was initially claimed that they challenged the suspect, though later Reports indicate that he was not challenged. According to Hotel3, Menezes then stood up and advanced towards the officers and Hotel3, at which point, Hotel 3 grabbed him…

Hotel3 heard a shot close to his ear… Hotel 3 then heard several shots… Menezes was shot seven times in the head and once in the shoulder at close range and died at the scene … It was revealed that police policy toward suspected suicide bombers had been revised, and that officers had been ordered to fire directly towards suspect’s heads, the theory according to British authorities being that shooting at the chest could conceivably detonate a concealed bomb.”

Ananda-USA said...

International Conspiracy Led By Ban Ki Moon, Secretary General of the UN

......continued 8....
The family of Menezes took the Metropolitan Police to the Courts. Police were found guilt and were fined 175,000 pounds with 385,000 pounds as legal costs. The Acting Police Commissioner, Paul Stephenson, said, “We made a most terrible mistake.” However, Cressida Dick, the officer who shot Menezes was accorded a double promotion – to the position of Deputy Assistant Commissioner.

What is clear is that with so many policemen around Menezes, he could have been arrested alive. He need not have been shot. It is a real case of murder. The UK authorities had decided to shoot suspected suicide bombers in the head to immobilize them before they could detonate any bomb they had.

It is of interest to note that the Armed Forces of Sri Lanka never used such inhuman methods. Suspected suicide cadres were subjected to a body search, and many soldiers died in the process. Sri Lankan soldiers are mere flies that can be squashed, while the lives of the London Metropolitan police have to be safeguarded. The Secretary General of the UN and the Human Rights Commission should note that Sri Lanka did not use the inhuman methods used by the UK in combating terrorism. Yet, the Secretary General of the UN is holding Sri Lanka ransom.

Talk of the USA, the home of the United Nations, and one cannot forget what happened to Rodney King, a motorist who was felled by the police, hit with a baton, and kicked till he was unconscious on March 3, 1991. Unknown to the policemen, the incident was video taped, and action was then taken against the police. King had not done anything to warrant an assault. The four officers were charged in court, but were acquitted. This sparked riots resulting in 53 deaths, 2,383 injuries, and over 7000 fires. Subsequently, a federal trial found two officers guilty, and the judgement was only a two and a half years’ imprisonment.

Similar police brutalities are a common occurrence in the USA. So much for human rights in the USA!

The problem that I see today is that the entire world is trying to run our country. They forget the fact that the country has a population of 21 million whose interests have to prevail. It is one of the few countries in the world that has a recorded history harking back 2,500 years, backed by epigraphical records. Today the Tamil Nadu Government has wanted Sri Lanka to pursue a political settlement for the Tamils in the North and the East. What about the Tamils who live in the rest of the island, and that amounts to 55% of them. What of the Muslims and the Sinhala people, and the latter amount to 75% of the people in the entire country?

All the super powers – the USA, the UK, Germany, France, and Japan all have their own idea of what should happen to Sri Lanka. To all of them, my message is that Sri Lanka is not the Africa of 1884 – when the super powers that had forcibly carved out portions of Africa met at a conference presided over by Chancellor Otto Von Bismark of Germany – when they parceled Africa among themselves.

Let our people stand firm against foreign domination. The super powers all wanted the war against the LTTE to continue. But now we have created history by annihilating the terrorist LTTE from our shores. Let us stand firm by the savior who delivered us from that menace. All the super powers pleaded with us that it was not possible to defeat them, and advised us to talk peace. They were all proved wrong. The future of our country and its economic development can also be achieved only under President Rajapaksa.

Garvin Karunaratne is a former member of the Sri Lanka Administrative Service, and is the author of How the IMF Ruined Sri Lanka, (Godages) 2006.

Originally published on LankaWeb on March 25, 2010.

Sam Perera said...

Wimal taken away after President’s arrival

Wimal can be serious about giving his life for the country. The unstated motto of Sri Lanka is that we fight to survive not to perish. We shall live another day and fend off the terrorists and their meddling masters.

Anonymous said...

A very important comment posted on Adaderana, all the people attacking Wimal are no different to the SoBs who chased Angarakia Dharmpala out of our country. Sick bastards hounded and attacked him for challenging the British, as they are doing to Wimal today, all because they love to worship their white masters.

These people are CURSE on us.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
MathaMathica said...

Ananda & Pol,

US pumped billions into S. Korea, S. Vietnam & Taiwan to counter communist China. In fact, the US strategy in Korea was similar to that in Vietnam except that in the case of Vietnam, the Vietnamese people won but in the case of Korea, the Korean people as a whole continue to suffer due to the division of their country.

US evangelised Korea in order to protect their investment and maintain the people mentally subjugated to them.
Korea became a manufacturing economy under military dictatorship since the end of the Korean Wer ( 1950 ies ).

If you look at Korean or Japanese traditional handicrafts, they are as fine or superior to those of the Chinese. That is an indicator to their mental set-up.

You know, when EU & US companies gave up production of LCD screens due to the high percentage of defects in a production lot ( even if a single cell is defective, the whole screen has to be rejected), Koreans took up the challenge and now it is one of their successful monopolies. May be that they are not very original thinkers but are very good at refining and developing existing products.

But the ultimate truth is that Koreans may have Dollars to buy all these good for nothing gadgets, and may continue to produce them for the world, but if they do not stop & think for a moment, they will continue to kill themselves at work.

Never forget that the Dollar economys are fictions since Dollar was unpaged from Gold. What is really real is the US military power which is indirectly financed by the Chinese savings! ! !

MathaMathica said...

since Dollar was unpegged from Gold

MathaMathica said...

Pol,

Our ancestors on observing the first Whites said “ Mun lae bothi, Thiruvanagal Kathi”.

I can assure you that it remains valid even today and their contact with the East has not changed their greedy, short-sighted, voracious mindset.

We as a people must know with whom we are dealing with and act accordingly.

As long as we remain producers of low-tech products and providers of low-grade services as house maids, we will remain at the mercy of the West.

We must become a real Knowledge based economy, we must send Doctors, Engineers & Nurses to the middle east, not house maids.

We must produce high quality, non-industrial, bio agri products.

We must invite worlds top brains to come and settle in SL. We can provide them green & luxurious villages for them to settle and do R & D. We can provide them Buddhist temples where they can search for the real truth.

These Earth, with its fantastic diversity is ours as any body elses. We must learn to put to good use this diversity.

Simply, we must learn to make even the devils work for us!!

TropicalStorm said...

Many of you seem to be belaboring the verbage and trying to define the re-integration of civillian life in the NE. There is no need to be politically correct about what we are doing, and there is no need to worry too much about semantics either. However we need to base our observations on facts, to be accurate.
What's happening in the NE is a re-Sri Lankanisation effort. Sri Lanka by nature is a multi ethnic nation and that environemnt needs to prevail in every part of the country. It is unfortunate that we had to spend so much on military hardware to open the NE areas back to normality, but Sri Lankanization of our land mass mst be completed with/without anyone else' approval.
Doing it at gun point is ok.

TropicalStorm said...

Iraqi death count due to US invasion;

http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq

Tell Fcking Ban Ki to go investigate.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
TropicalStorm said...

Interesting article and dialigue on the above;

http://firedoglake.com/2010/04/06/aghan-civilian-killings-nothing-new/

Anonymous said...

MathaMathica,

“I can assure you that it remains valid even today and their contact with the East has not changed their greedy, short-sighted, voracious mindset.

We as a people must know with whom we are dealing with and act accordingly.”


That is the thing MathaMathica. People refuse to see this, especially within Asia and parts of East Asia. Many still worship suddha, even a powerful nation like China is obsessed about suddhas “approval”. Worse after the humiliation suddha tried to subject them to during the Olympics they have not learnt a damn thing.

The biggest obstacle in breaking the mental shackles on our people is there are those who come running to tighten the bindings.

And I absolutely agree with the need to change our industrial base into a high tech one. We must also ditch tourism as a primary industry. It should be a secondary to other industries. Currently because it is a primary industry our “development” is focused on building the nation for tourists, where the people benefit little other than standing on the sides begging for scraps. Development should be for the people and as a result the infrastructure improvements bring in tourists.

There are so many ugly negatives with tourism, it has even compromised our national security, the only border to our nation the airport is so porous, so many spies, venom spitters and others threats which are not so obvious as a documented Tamil extremist waltz into our country to destroy it under the guise of “tourist” (this is because of the dumb visa on arrival and that too is done “to make things easier for tourists”).

Anonymous said...

Once again the attitudes of these sick bastards and their "game plan" is exposed:

"First our Srilankan cattles must know what this panel about, it is not a panel to charge anybody only to investigate the truth about both sides but MR-Clan is afraid the investigation will lead to LTTE money & assets where they have swindled, robbed, some shared with KP giving him perks & security. The clown acted to safeguard his masters but failed miserably

M.H.Sheriff
"


May the UNP BURN IN HELL.

Ananda-USA said...

Mathematica said ...

[But the ultimate truth is that Koreans may have Dollars to buy all these good for nothing gadgets, and may continue to produce them for the world, but if they do not stop & think for a moment, they will continue to kill themselves at work.]

Implied somewhere in the above is that a country should not industrialize or grow its economy, but should isolate itself to preserve its roots, and stagnate without aping the rest of the world.

That is in fact, what has largely happened to Sri Lanka. We have stagnated .. there are many reasons for that.

There is a price for that: Other countries that grow rich and powerful, build weapons, COLONIZE COUNTRIES that remain mired in the past, and backward economically and technologically.

Until the Meiji Restoration in Japan, Japan isolated itself for the same cultural-preservation reasons, but when it realized it cannot defend itself against Western Powers without the command of modern new technology, it raced to embrace western methods, and became a first world power capable of defending itself toe-to-toe in three short amazing decades. In spite of this, the Japanese also managed to hold onto some of their cultural heritage and local religions (Shinto, Buddhism) largely kicking out Catholic Christianity introduced by the Portuguese. Japan is arguably the most culturally homogeneous nation in the world.

My point is, if Sri Lanka does not grow economically and technologically to match the developed countries, it WILL BE RECOLONIZED AGAIN SOMETIME IN THE FUTURE in some form or the other.

We have NO CHOICE but to match the cultural and technological transformations occurring in the rest of the world, if we want to remain a free and independent self-governing nation. NO CHOICE, because Sri Lanka is TOO SMALL to dictate the FUTURE DIRECTION of the world.

The ONLY CHOICE Sri Lanka has is: do we want to be in COMMAND of our own country, or do we allow FOREIGNERS to take command AGAIN and slowly wipe us out as a people .. like the Hawaiians and American Indians?

If the answer is YES, then we have to develop as Japan and South Korea did .. there is NO OTHER CHOICE.

Ananda-USA said...

TropicalStorm said ...

[Doing it at gun point is ok.]

Yes, but do you think the rest of the world is going to allow Sri Lanka to do that? I think not!

We have to be a little SMARTER!

Ananda-USA said...

I am glad that Wimal gave up the fast, rather than DIE on Ban Ki Moon's UN Panel altar.

However, he should not have BEGUN the fast in the first place, because giving it up before his goal is achieved exposes him to ridicule .. and we need him as a strong credible leader to LEAD the Patriots.

In any case, he helped to FOCUS ATTENTION of all Sri Lankans and the World on our OPPOSITION to the UN Panel.

Now we will have to PERSEVERE in continuing that OPPOSITION with redoubled efforts.

tata said...

Ananda said...
"Yes, but do you think the rest of the world is going to allow Sri Lanka to do that? I think not!

We have to be a little SMARTER! "

That reminds me of Ranil's smart talks. If we tried to be smart with war, we'll be still at Mavil Aru. Doing piss talks. Hoping that "rest of the world" will save us. Hope you remember the great "safety net". ha ha...

I am also of the opinion that we need to "just do it"!
(Mainly because it's not illegal and as you say the pressure from "international community" will be there anyway. As you see it happening today.)

Anonymous said...

Exactly it is not illegal.

It is OUR country, we just have to do it. Use the lanuagae and say it is to build bridges, bring peace and communal harmony. Toss in GSP+ loss as also the economic factor and thus toss the blame back onto them.

Anonymous said...

"The world" aka the West will be opposed to whatever we do regardless, like Ranilam monkey.

It has to be done to preserve our future.

MathaMathica said...

Ananda,

[we have to develop as Japan and South Korea did .. there is NO OTHER CHOICE.]

The plan of the West is to turn India & China to manufacturing centres while remaining the brains, the thinkers, inventors and financiers.

The CHOICE is to become a brain power which matters. With our Buddhist approach to life, it can be done. That is why I say « Give Buddhi its rightful place in the land of the Buddha »


Pol,

[Even a powerful nation like China is obsessed about suddhas]

The bogus revolution of the proletariat of Marx, Eagles & Lenin duped our great Chinese friends. Idolatry of these three White Westerners has made the Chinese subservient to what is White.

I wish, China will drop these three hooligans and bring back the real patriots Sun-Yat-Sena, Chu-En-Lai & Mao.

Ananda-USA said...

tata said ...

[I am also of the opinion that we need to "just do it"!]

Easy to say for people like us, Hard to do for the leaders who have to implement it and face the immediate consequences.

You may have missed my settlement-under-EI vs settlement-only debate with Moshe Dayan, but the SMARTER approach I advocate is settlement under the EI umbrella. :)

Ananda-USA said...

Mathematica said ...

[US pumped billions into S. Korea, S. Vietnam & Taiwan to counter communist China. ]

I don't agree.

The US only pumped billions into S. Vietnam to pay for weapons, soldiers and military infrastructure, even as they bombed the countryside into oblivion.

Massive funds were NOT pumped in for ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.

FukkFace said...

Hooligan

"mara scene no?"

Why?

Did you look up your LTTE Tamizia whoreamma's saree - after she got gangbanged by the weera-Ranavirus of the Socialist Democratic Republic of Sri Lanka?

hehehehehehehe

Thanks for the entertainment.....we need LTTE Tamiz whores like you to keep our lives stress free!

hehehehehehehe

FukkFace said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
FukkFace said...

Hooligan

"what is weera monkey gonna do next"

He just might fukk you LTTE Tamizia whoreamma much better than your sakkili dad ever did!

hehehehhehehe....

God, just when life was getting to be boring!

hehehehhehehe...

FukkFace said...

Ananda et al admins of this blog:

Delete this Hooligan Tamiz whore-pup's postings and then you can delete mine too.....but just to be fair, let mine stay for at least 2 hours more okay - to rub salt into the wounds of this Tamiz whore-pup....okay?

mey para wesa-koti ballo aaith enewa wagey.....mama dennam oonta puka pallenta!

hehehehhehe

Asithri said...

Pol

Re. Adaderana...after your post that there are vile comments there against WW, I too went and posted:

Well done Wimal sahodaraya. We are proud of you! The pro-west, pro-LTTE "Colombians" are disappointed that you lived, but hey who cares about them as they are NOT Sri Lanka!

But the post that caught my eye for the bulls-eye hit from a Patriot was:
______________________

We´re proud of Wimal. The masses of this country are with you and are proud of your love for this country. Only the Colombian slaves who backed the LTTE and wanted our Army defeated or destroyed are against him and it is evident with their vile hate filed with comment. The moment their masters “came down” “hard” on Sri Lanka they became activated with energy from their earlier demoralised state. They know nothing else other than being slaves and have such hate for Wim because he ruined their election hopes when he exposed Fonseka through Sapphire gate and the HiCorp debate and "ruined" the Budget vote of 2007, thus torpedoing there biggest chances of unscrupulously grabbing power. Real heroes are ready to sacrifice themselves for the name and safety of the country; traitors sacrifice the name of the country for their selfish power seeking agendas much like Ranil, the JVP and Fonseka did.

Raju

________________________

Bravo Raju!!!

OaO Asithri

Asithri said...

Holy FF!!!

FF is here!!!

Matey...what gives?

Where have you been? Where are you now? Still in the US?

Give me a call at your leisure...I am still at the same number. Call collect bro...if you are broke :))

Good to see you castrate them anti-SL whores!!!

OaO Asithri

Asithri said...

hooligan

[weera monkey now enjoying lobster feed courtesy of Banki Moon]

might be.

Speaking of lobsters...they love to burrow into holes or orifices...

As such, I recall on May 18/19th last year one unfortunate, idiotic "we Tamiz" racist mommafucker entertained lobsters up his anus/rectum when he, after his head was blown/hacked off, decided to lay perfectly flat in a muddy pool in a place called Nanthikadal!!!

LMSSAO!!! Truly LMSSAO!!!

OaO Asithri

Anonymous said...

wimal marena thuru bala siti (multiplor pramuka) siyalu modayanta apage sathishaya sanvegaya

tata said...

"You may have missed my settlement-under-EI vs settlement-only debate with Moshe Dayan, but the SMARTER approach I advocate is settlement under the EI umbrella. :)"

Ananda,
I am with you on making EI a national policy (or whatever you call it) or I would go further and say to make it law.
It should be done in such a way that it will not only make Col/EI/xxx legal (which is the case even now), but it will also make it illegal to NOT do it!

It will be the day someone going to courts for not doing Col/EI/xxx!

I am only against your idea that we should also do things to please/satisfy/comply with IC. I feel it's a wild goose chase. We should follow the tried and tested method we used during the war (which is "don't listen to IC").

Ananda-USA said...


A WARNING to India:

DO NOT INTERFERE AGAIN in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka by aiding, abetting, plotting and planning with any community groups in Sri Lanka .. as you ILLEGALLY DID in the past.

Do not receive in India representations by any non-governmental Sri Lankan groups.

The GOSL was DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED by the people of Sri Lanka to administer their affairs; INDIA has not been given any such authority, by the people of Sri Lanka.

Give ANY ADVICE YOU HAVE to the GOSL, and ABIDE BY the decisions of the GOSL. We are a sovereign nation, and we know what is best for our country.

Sri Lanka does not interfere in India's internal matters, and India should not interfere in Sri Lanka's internal matters .. no matter what the benefit to India is.

Briefly, BUTT OUT OF Sri Lankan POLITICS!


..............
India will work with TNA: Manmohan

July 11, 2010

COLOMBO: Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has told a delegation of the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) that India has decided to work with it to find solutions to short and long-term problems faced by Tamils of the island nation.

This was revealed by TNA MP M A Sumanthiran, who was a member of the delegation that met the Indian Prime Minister in New Delhi on Thursday. He told Express that Singh asked the TNA to work with other Tamil parties so that a joint Tamil view could be presented to the Lankan government on various issues.

Singh's request is significant in the light of the fact that only recently, about a dozen Tamil parties and NGOs had met in Colombo to begin working out a common minimum programme on issues facing the Tamils. The TNA had kept out of the venture thinking that these parties were basically out to undermine its position in the Tamilspeaking northern and eastern provinces, where it had emerged as the single largest party in the last parliamentary elections, with 14 MPs.

Responding to Singh's plea for unity, TNA leader R Sampanthan assured his outfit would cooperate with other Tamil parties so long as it did not violate the trust that the people of the north and east had vested in it.

The TNA asked the PM to put pressure on Lanka to find a political solution to the Tamil question within a specific time frame, to see that high security zones were dismantled, and to ensure that the ethnodemographic character of the north and east was not changed through governmentsponsored colonisation of Sinhalese.

Asked if the delegation gave the Indian PM any details to substantiate the claim that the Sri Lankan government had schemes to change the ethnodemographic character of the north and east, Sumanthiran said the details had already been given to the Indian authorities. The Prime Minister did not directly address this issue, but he assured that India would endeavour to see that the Tamils lived in safety and security and that their political aspirations were met.

Singh requested the TNA to continue to hold talks with the Lankan government in a constructive way.

The delegation wanted the Tamilspeaking northern and eastern provinces to be reunited as a Tamil homeland, as per the IndiaSri Lanka Accord of 1987. The unification had been annulled by a court order in 2006.

The TNA thanked India for undertaking vital developmental projects in the north, especially the building of 50,000 houses for waraffected Tamil civilians in Wanni.

Asked for an overall impression of the meeting, Sumanthiran said, "We were satisfied."

Ananda-USA said...

Rajapaksa makes minister break fast

P K Balachandran
July 11, 2010

COLOMBO: Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa made Housing Minister Wimal Weerawansa break his 'fastuntodeath' on Saturday by persuading him to take a sip from a glass of water.

Rajapaksa had come to the venue of the fast in front of the UN's main office on Bauddhaloka Mawatha around 4.30 pm and persuaded Weerawansa to give up his penance saying that his life was precious.

The minister, who had been off food and drink, including water, since Thursday morning, was getting weaker by the minute. He was put on drips on Saturday morning. Immediately on breaking the fast, he was whisked away to a hospital in an ambulance.

Weerawansa had undertaken the fast to get UN SecretaryGeneral Ban Kimoon, to abolish the expert panel he had appointed to advise him on the human rights situation in Sri Lanka. But, it had failed to achieve the goal, as there was no indication from NewYork that Ban was softening on the controversial issue.

Though feeble, the fasting Lankan minister was defiant in the morning.

"Only the UN SecretaryGeneral Ban Kimoon can stop this. He and the UN Colombo representative will be responsible for my death if I die," he had told the media.

FAST NOT POPULAR: Perhaps one of the reasons why Rajapaksa intervened to stop the fast was that it was not getting to be popular. Though his ministers were backing the fast, justifying it as a democratic, nonviolent protest, the media in Sri Lanka thought it was bringing Sri Lanka a bad name internationally. Both independent English dailies of Colombo, Daily Mirror and The Island had written editorials criticising it and the government's support for it.

Significantly, the crowd at the venue of the fast had never numbered more than 150. And Weerawansa's appeal for an islandwide agitation had fallen on deaf ears. In fact, the Sri Lanka Freedom Party, the main constituent of the ruling United Peoples Freedom Alliance, had not thrown its considerable manpower into the agitation. Other allies too kept away.

Besides, envoys of the Western nations had condemned the breach of international conventions with regard to safeguarding the UN and its staff.

BAN CALLED FOR URGENT ACTION: In a statement issued in New York on Friday, Ban Kimoon had called upon the Sri Lankan government to take "urgent action" to normalise the conditions around the UN office in Colombo and allow the staff to continue to work for the people of Sri Lanka.

Though there were no impediments to movement to and from the UN office, the staff had been asked to stay at home as the crowd could get restive. It had already held them hostage for six hours on Tuesday.

JUSTIFICATION OF PANEL: The UN chief had been repeatedly stressing that the panel set up by him was only a followup to the joint statement issued by him and the Sri Lankan President on May 23, 2009, immediately after the Sri Lankan forces crushed the LTTE.

Ananda-USA said...

Rajapaksa makes minister break fast

........continued......
The joint statement had said, "Sri Lanka reiterated it strongest commitment to the promotion and protection of human rights in keeping with international human rights standards and Sri Lanka's international obligations. The SecretaryGeneral underlined the importance of an accountability process for addressing violations of international humanitarian and human rights law. The government (of Sri Lanka) will take measures to address these grievances."

Ban's contention is that the panel he had appointed is not an investigative and intrusive body, but is only meant to "advise" him on the modalities, applicable international standards and comparative experience relevant to an accountability process. The panel will be a resource available to assist the Sri Lankan government and the Commission on Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation, which it had appointed, in applying the international best practice in this regard.

The Sri Lankan government, however, considers the panel an intrusion in the work of the commission it had set up, and also an invasion of its sovereignty as Ban had set up his panel without its prior approval.

Ananda-USA said...

Where in the World is Patriot Moshe Dayan?

Hope he is OK!

Ananda-USA said...

Why do the Tiger Nominated Agents of the TNA object to Chinese fishing in Nanthikandal Lagoon?

As Chinese are allowed to fish elsewhere in Sri Lanka, they can be allowed to fish in that Lagoon as well.

The GOSL makes those decisions; not the TNA.

This is a PLOY to Get India excited about it.

..............
TNA objects to Chinese fishing in Nanthikadal

P K Balachandran
July 10, 2010

COLOMBO: Vino Noharaathalingam, Tamil National Alliance (TNA) MP for the north Sri Lankan Tamil-speaking region of Wanni, has expressed opposition to a reported plan to give China fishing rights in the Nanthikadal lagoon in Mullaitivu district, where the Liberation Tamil Tigers Eelam leader, Velupillai Prabhakaran, was killed in May 2009.

The MP told parliament on Wednesday that while the fishermen were happy with the resumption of fishing in Mullaitivu, they were dismayed that the Chinese were going to be allowed to fish in the lagoon.

Earlier, Daily Mirror had quoted the Fisheries Minister, Dr Rajitha Senaratne, as saying that a Chinese company had been given the right to establish a prawn farm in the Nanthikadal lagoon.

When Express sought more details, Senaratne denied the media report and said that while various parties had evinced interest in the commercial exploitation of the aquatic resources in the lagoon, the government had not taken a decision in the matter.

However, Tamil circles are worried not only about the foreign presence in the area, but fear loss of employment opportunities for locals.

RAJAPAKSA REJECTS MINISTER’S RESIGNATION: Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa on Friday refused to accept the resignation of Housing Minister Wimal Weerawansa, who is on a fast unto death seeking the dissolution of the United Nations advisory committee on the human rights situation in Sri Lanka.

A spokesman of Weerawansa’s National Freedom Front (NFF), who told the media about the resignation and its subsequent rejection by the President, said that the fast would continue because the United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon did not seem to be relenting. In a related development, several embassies lodged their protest over anti-UN actions in Lanka.

Ananda-USA said...

I REPEAT:

Use this OPPORTUNITY to REDUCE UN Presence in Sri Lanka.

These are BUSYBODIES spying and interfering with Sri Lanka's sovereignty.

Recall Sri Lanka's UN peace keeping contingents as well.

Ananda-USA said...

UN accused of derailing peace process in Nepal

Sudeshna Sarkar
July 10, 2010

KATHMANDU: After Sri Lanka, where a minister is leading protests against alleged UN interference, the world body is now under fire in Nepal, where the prime minister has accused it of trying to derail the Himalayan republic's fragile peace process.

An unusually strong outburst came from Nepal's caretaker Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal, who objected to an unsolicited plan drawn up by the UN political unit in Nepal.

The plan deals with the contentious issue of what to do with over 19,000 combatants of the Maoist party's guerrilla army who are currently under the supervision of the UN unit, known as the UN Mission in Nepal (UNMIN).

UNMIN has formulated an ambitious plan to decide the fate of the fighters within 60 weeks and reportedly put its plan before the ruling parties and the opposition last month.

The 60-week period comes ahead of the Maoists formulating their own plan for the People's Liberation Army (PLA) soldiers which will be tabled at a meeting of the three major parties Saturday.

The PLA remains the main hurdle to Nepal's peace process.

While the ruling parties want the parallel army to be disbanded, the Maoists are seeking to stall the process, demanding the en masse induction of the guerrillas in the army despite Maoist chief Prachanda having agreed before the political leaders that about 5,000-7,000 fighters should be hired in the state army.

The protracted stalemate over the PLA has derailed the promulgation of a new constitution and is now obstructing the formation of a new government even 10 days after the premier's resignation.

"When only 11 months are left to write the new constitution, UNMIN has suggested a 14-month time-table for the integration and rehabilitation of the Maoist combatants," a fuming Nepal said, according to the official media Saturday.

"This is a ploy to derail the process of writing the new statute," he said.

The prime minister also said the country "did not need these experiences, which have failed to work in other countries".

Without naming UNMIN, Nepal said outsiders should not offer unsolicited suggestions.

"They should do it when we ask them," he said. "I urge outsiders, who are not related to the statute-writing process, to refrain from showing unnecessary concern in the issue."

Though the UN was called in 2006 to assist the peace process in Nepal on the insistence of the Maoists, Nepal's ruling parties remain wary of the world body, accusing it of taking the side of the Maoists.

While the government has been seeking to minimise the UN's role in Nepal and has limited the mandate of the UN human rights agency, the Maoists are now pushing for a further two-month extension for UNMIN.

Earlier, some UN officials in Nepal were declared persona non grata by India after it was revealed they had sought tourist visas to go to India to hold clandestine talks with armed groups from Nepal.

The European Union and the US have been pressuring the Nepal government for a bigger and longer role for the UN, especially the UN rights agency.

Nepal's anger with the UN comes even as its South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) neighbour Sri Lanka is protesting against the formation of a panel by the UN to probe war crimes in the island nation, calling it a violation of its sovereignty.

Anonymous said...

Asithri,

You have already met Raju ;))

By the way that clown has left a response:

"July 11, 2010 11:22 am

In reply to Raju, All MR cohorts address the Democratic loving people this way to humiliate & force their political ideologies for dissent view. sorry we dont have any white masters as they imagine we bloody well aware of peoples consequence,For war crimes it is the Army Commander answerable not 3rd grade comic politicians. Sorry Raju the people dont hate SF or the opposition but they are forced & intimidated & brain washed to hate us, when they fail they resort to Thuggerysm to win elections by force & fabricate case after case to destroy dissent.

M.H.Sheriff
"


The mental deficiencies of these people are unbelievable. And they wonder why they are out of power.

Sujeewa Kokawala said...

Taboo on WW

This deserves a comment I believe. I did.

දේශපාලුවා said...

Blogger Ananda-USA said...

Deshapalua said ...

[Ananda do you want to start an online petition to impeach Ban Ki Moon.?

http://www.petitiononline.com/]

Yes, I am willing to lead this.


------------------
Ananda it looks like, it is a better idea to start a petition to dissolve the panel.

Many other organizations are starting that.

So we could have a united voice.


http://www.lankacnews.com/sinhala/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2213:2010-07-11-13-59-25&catid=1:latest-news&Itemid=269


http://www.lankacnews.com/sinhala/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2215:2010-07-11-14-34-30&catid=1:latest-news&Itemid=269


we can impeach the iditot after dissolving the panel.

What do you say?

tata said...

Desha/Ananda,
How do you impeach sec. gen?
As far as I know, there are no provisions in UN charter to impeach the sec. gen.
Maybe it comes under some other framework.
First, let's know how to do it.

Ananda-USA said...

tata,

Impeachment procedures should be available at UN's website.

Ananda-USA said...

Desha,

Agreed. A petition to dissolve the UN panel is a milder, more specific approach.

Ban Ki Moon is clearly trying to suck up to the dominant powers at the UN in search of a second term and as such, may represent a longer term recurring problem for developing nations, that is best resolved by showing him the door.

The problem is, there is no guarantee that his replacement will be any better!

Moshe Dyan said...

ananda,

what tropicalstorm says is 100% correct. don't take word to word. take the meaning in the context.

we don't do "srilankanisation" literally at gunpoint. but we do it with a strong military presence in the NE. the VERY HIGH degree of miliarisation of the NE MEY BE described by some as at gunpoint. but that is still very much OK.

it's the best for all, especially for the brainwashed tamils in the NE. although NE tamils don't realize it, tamils the world over are better off in multiethnic communities!!!

Moshe Dyan said...

re: WW

i was bloody foolish of WW to start this crap farce. i think he realized it.

he didn't achieve anything.

MR cannot guarantee him anything. but he stopped his farce when MR visited him.

WTF????

anyway it a good decision to stop after all. well done WW.

Moshe Dyan said...

pol,

don't blame the entire south korean masses for monkey boon.

and their CHANGING religion has nothing to do with it.

FYI, japan is also following south korea religion-wise.

and china too to a great extent.

we cannot "save" koreans, japanese, chinese from christianity!!! and the BS allegation of bribing ppl to convert is not entirely true in these cases. they are the richest in asia.

Ananda-USA said...

Patriots,

We have two issues in setting up the SLDF Rana Viru Fund, raised by Sujeewa:

1. We need a trustworthy group of people in Sri Lanka to gather info and reach out to Rana Viru families. I hope you all have such contacts, in addition to mine. We need a big number of ppl working on this.

2. Progress Monitoring: How can we do this? It is not wise to throw money w/o monitoring. Work should be sustainable. People should raise themselves with our money. How can we monitor the work?

Please offer your suggestions. Thanks!

Anonymous said...

"BS allegation of bribing ppl to convert is not entirely true in these cases. they are the richest in asia."

Yeah all right calm down Moshe, we know how biased you are on this subject.

දේශපාලුවා said...

tata said...

Desha/Ananda,
How do you impeach sec. gen?
As far as I know, there are no provisions in UN charter to impeach the sec. gen.

-----------

I dont know , but surely there should be a method to remove him if he abuse his power.

දේශපාලුවා said...

Blogger Moshe Dyan said...

re: WW

i was bloody foolish of WW to start this crap farce. i think he realized it.

he didn't achieve anything.

------------------
MD I disagree.

Wimals action caused BKM to lie about UNDP reomoval, clearly shows that he is playing politics with SL.

Then again Wimals actions forced him to declare that the panel is not an investigative body, contradicting the claims of the head of the pannle.

Proving us with evidence that BKM is not honest and the panle cannot be trusted.

Moshe Dyan said...

pol,

"Yeah all right calm down Moshe, we know how biased you are on this subject."

ROFL!!

so i'm the biased one here????

(to let out the kid in me) i think you are the biased one!!

dear pol, please don't bcome a BUDDHISTY!!!!

Moshe Dyan said...

desha,

"Wimals action caused BKM to lie about UNDP reomoval, clearly shows that he is playing politics with SL.

Then again Wimals actions forced him to declare that the panel is not an investigative body, contradicting the claims of the head of the pannle."

mate these 2 things ANYWAY happens with monkey boon. he IS HIGHLY impartial from the start.

he was south korea's FM b4 and everybody knows south korea is pro-US. it's FM will be the TONGUE of arselicking!!

he is abusing his authority no doubt. this is not the first time. and i doubt this will have any serious impact in the international arena.

they have been making contradictory statements over it. it IS an investigative panel with a BS cover of "advising monkey boon".

it violates the UN charter.

SL to proceed along these lines.

anyway WW gave up his fast WITHOUT ACHIEVING ANYTHING HE SET OUT TO ACHIEVE.

didn't he??

it is good he stopped it.

he MUST do hell of a lot as the minister of housing, contruction, etc. to destroy the TE project. that is his calling. he must FIRST do that.

Moshe Dyan said...

OAOA, sam, pol,

USA, UK, germany, italy, etc. account for more than 60% of our exports.

we cannot be seen by them as violent and aggressive. they can source their cheap imports from alsmost ANY country.

essentially we are at their mercy to a great degree as long as we continue our international trade as now.

that does NOT mean we should do everything they say. pol, don't jump to this extremist conclusion :))

it means whenever we can, we should avoid antogonising them.

losing their business means only one thing for SL. URINEPEE motherfcukers will come back to power. loss of export revenue is a bloody disaster for SL which can change govts in no time. this is why ranil ponnaya and TE sakkiliyas are trying that very hard.

do you get it???

we should not fall into this trap.

whatever shortcomings are, SL should have the present lot. it is unfortunate that they are the BEST SL can have!!

GR did such a stupid thing at the UN which he should never have done.

this is not the first time words slipped from his lose mouth that created disgust in the IC. again don't jump to the other extreme!! it means WHENEVER WE CAN we should AVOID adding insult to the wound.

Moshe Dyan said...

re: monkey boon

we cannot do anything in a hurry. we have to wait till monkey boon is disliked by many other countries.

then we should strike.

HOPEFULLY war will erupt in his country further exposing his bias. we should be able to nail him then.

Anonymous said...

[GR did such a stupid thing at the UN which he should never have done.]

What was that??

Anonymous said...

[I dont know , but surely there should be a method to remove him if he abuse his power.]

No such method exists as I know.

Moshe Dyan said...

ninja,

correction.

at the incident at the UN colombo office

GR's involvement

tata said...

Everyone is saying impeachment procedure of sec. gen. should be here and there...

No it's nowhere. At least nowhere on the web that I could find.

This is the only thing that I could find. (Which I posted earlier).
The author of that article says "In fact, there is no procedure at the UN for impeaching or firing the Secretary-General."

So much for the guardian of democracies! ha ha...
If this is true, it must be the joke of our time!

Moshe Dyan said...

ananda,

"A Controversial Question:

1. Do we really NEED the UN in Sri Lanka?

2. Is this a GOOD OPPORTUNITY to end UN presence in Sri Lanka?"

reassessing UN's significance to SL a timely thing.

but we really need the UN in SL. sadly that is the only global diplomatic organisation with so much clout that we cannot do without.

"Use this OPPORTUNITY to REDUCE UN Presence in Sri Lanka."

agree. we should cut down their presence and MAKE THEM WORK TO OUR PRIORITIES in SL, not their priorities.


"Recall Sri Lanka's UN peace keeping contingents as well."

NO WAY!!

we should do the oppositte. we should INCREASE SL troops!!! they pay for this. this can be developed into a FOREX earner. unfortunately the haiti operation created a bit of a stigma. but still we continue in haiti.

compared to the number of allegations against SLA in the haiti mission, the UN army in general has a VERY HIGH rate of sexual abuse, murder, theft. so the haiti thing is not really significant.

more UN operations means more chances for our guys to work with their international counterparts too. this is very encouraging.

Sam Perera said...

My comment at Sunday Leader the Toilet Paper.

The biggest con-artists are the Sunday Leaders the political tabloid run by the fundamentalist religious lunatic fringe including FJ. Perhaps, Sri Lanka is the only country which would consider likes of Sunday Leader to be news papers not toilet paper. I simply wish that Sri Lankans use bit of western style toilet paper so that we can recycle Sunday Leader at least for one eco-friendly use.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

WW and his fast

Its hard to believe this is a pre-set drama as MR/BR/GR can't be this stupid. WW is a true patriot from his heart but not brain. He did a right thing (a protest, expressing his opposition to UN) in a wrong and useless way.

All those who dream destruction for SL had great time with full fun - UNP, JVP, di-ass-pora, western media, (and our sicko multipolar.. shiting all over web now..) This is like RP giving weapons to his enemy - Expect the same result.

If he really wanted to do 'something on the street' he should have first done a peaceful protest without disturbing anyone, and then a limited fasting (sathyagraha) peacefully expressing his opposition to monki-boon instead of demanding to dissolve panel. In such way he could get media attention, score some personal points and western media will not be in a position to insult SL as violent lovers.

His chosen method - talking taking hostages at UN, dissolve or death promise all affected SL negatively. I think it will be wise to accept his mistake and release a statement saying "I did what I believe best for country, and apologize to MR if there was any inconveniance to GSL".

Its the same lot who dreamed WW death and now claim this is GSL drama. No wonder this mental slaves have no sense... According to these colombians we should request UN to come to SL and hang MR/GR then all problems solved. If UN is wrong who will punish UN/monki-boon? USA? western white masters? If USA/western white masters wrong who will punish them? OH, no one can punish god... OH, again no.. UN/USA/western white masters can do nothing wrong.. They are always right..

____________________________________________

@ GR's involvement

If there is some protest in SL it is customary to hear police attacking them and a few getting hospitalized. Blame goes to the ruling party and not for police or protestors.

Reason is 1. Protestors do not know to do a protest without disturbing others (or protestors intentionally break such laws) 2. Police was trained in such a way only to attack protestors.

So police did their job as usual and if they continue situation could go worse. There was no time to educate protestors or re-train police. Unlike other protests here ruling party had full control over protestors via WW. So GR did the right thing by ordering police to withdraw. There was no any damage to UN people or assets and it was a peaceful protest without police.

Even though tamilnutz report links GR to EU statement, EU has mentioned WW not GR. The (reliable) sinhala journalists tamilnuts mentioned is nothing but LeN gang. GR can say any thing to police and he doesn't need these journalists approval or feedback. Perhaps this journalist expected GR to say 'ane chuty patiyo, ohanin enda mehata, man chuingam ekak dennan'.

_____________________________________________

@ GSP+

SL got GSP+ due to tsunami and owners enjoyed increased profits. I think now SL gets GSP which is the usual one, which SL had until getting GSP+. So losing by GSP+ garment owners going to earn reduced profits, and SL will compete in more natural ground, as usual. How long our garment owners expect to enjoy additional profits citing tsunami? However, if USA blacklist SL, depending on investigation on workers rights, carried out due to the request of the American Federation of Labor–Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), we lose all tax relief from USA. Export income from USA is not big but that may effect EU and IF EU stop (normal) GSP for SL that will be different scenario.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

[We have two issues in setting up the SLDF Rana Viru Fund, raised by Sujeewa:

1. We need a trustworthy group of people in Sri Lanka to gather info and reach out to Rana Viru families. I hope you all have such contacts, in addition to mine. We need a big number of ppl working on this.

2. Progress Monitoring: How can we do this? It is not wise to throw money w/o monitoring. Work should be sustainable. People should raise themselves with our money. How can we monitor the work?

Please offer your suggestions. Thanks!
]

The best and easiest way to gather info, reach out and monitor progress is via SLA itself. Process is already set up and we just need to donate. We can trust SLA I don't think we should seek any better options.

http://www.army.lk/sevavanitha.php

SLN, SLAF, STF all have their own units.

My honset suggestion. (No offense)

Moshe Dyan said...

"if USA blacklist SL, depending on investigation on workers rights, carried out due to the request of the American Federation of Labor–Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), we lose all tax relief from USA. Export income from USA is not big but that may effect EU and IF EU stop (normal) GSP for SL that will be different scenario."

USA is the BIGGEST export destination after the EU!!!

Ananda-USA said...

Ninja said ...

[We can trust SLA I don't think we should seek any better options.

http://www.army.lk/sevavanitha.php

SLN, SLAF, STF all have their own units.]

Good suggestion, brother!

Any other ideas?

Ananda-USA said...

'Not enough funds' for Api Venuwen Api


Luxman Hulugalla in a press conference (file photo)
Mr. Hulugalla criticised the response from the public 'despite best efforts'

The authorities in Sri Lanka have criticised the response from the public for a special fund created for the welfare of the service personnel.

The fund only received Rs. 700 million “despite best efforts of the president and the defence secretary,” said Luxman Hulugalle, the Director General of Media Centre for National Security (MCNS).

He made the remarks at a function in Kandy, attended by President Mahinda Rajapaksa and Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, to hand over 25 houses to service personnel.

“The beneficiaries were the war heroes who were killed in combat and become disabled. Also several war heroes currently in service were among the beneficiaries,” the Ministry of Defence said in its website.

Corruption charges

It is the first public event the president attended after persuading Minister Wimal Weerawansa to end the ‘fast’ in front of the UN compound in Colombo but the president did not speak at the event.

We cannot provide houses to every service personnel with this money

Lakshman Hulugalla

“We cannot provide houses to every service personnel with this money,” Mr. Hulugalle said the gathering.

He also criticised those “through media and using special privileges” to question the purpose and alleged corruption in the Fund.

Soldiers, disabled soldiers and family members of the soldiers killed in action took part in the event.

The Api Wenuwen Api Fund (Be Together for All) is established by the Ministry of Defence in collaboration with the Central Bank of Sri Lanka “to build 50,000 houses” for the service personnel.

Sri Lankans around the worldwide have contributed to the Fund.

Ananda-USA said...

Lanka to explore executive prime ministership

P K Balachandran
July 12, 2010

COLOMBO: President Mahinda Rajapaksa and the Leader of Opposition Ranil Wickremesinghe agreed on Saturday to explore the possibility of replacing the executive presidency by an executive prime ministership, through a constitutional amendment.

But Express learns that they have contradictory views on what kind of powers the executive prime minister should have.

According to a top source in the Opposition United National Party (UNP) Rajapaksa wants the executive prime ministership to have most of the powers now being enjoyed by the allpowerful executive President.

Rajapaksa wants all arms of the State to be under the Prime Minister. But the UNP is not for this.

"The system that Rajapaksa has in mind is not what you get in the UK or India, which have a parliamentary form of government with executive power being vested in a cabinet of ministers headed by a Prime Minister.

Under the Indian and British systems, the major institutions of the state, like the public service, the judiciary, and the Election Commission, become independent bodies once appointed by the executive. But under the system envisaged by Rajapaksa, they would all be firmly under the executive," the source in the UNP said.

DIFFERENCES OVER 17TH AMENDMENT

The 17th amendment of the Sri Lankan constitution seeks to depoliticise and give independence to the public service, the police, the judiciary, and the Commissioner of Elections.

The amendment envisages the setting up of independent commissions to conduct recruitment for these institutions, and oversee their functioning.

But Rajapaksa has been reluctant to implement the amendment because he believes it clashes with the constitutionally entrenched powers of the executive President. The UNP, on the other hand, is committed to the implementation of the 17th amendment.

It wants the powers of the Executive (comprising the Prime Minister and his cabinet) to be circumscribed by the 17th amendment.

However, Rajapaksa and Wickremesinghe have agreed to meet again on Monday to discuss in depth, this and other proposals for constitutional reform.

WHY RAJAPAKSA WANTS CHANGE?

Rajapaksa's interest in abolishing the executive presidency and replacing it with an executive Prime ministership, arose after some parties in the ruling United Peoples' Freedom Alliance (UPFA) expressed opposition to his plan to abolish the twoterm limit for the President. He wanted to contest for a third or a fourth time.

The leftists had made their opposition public. The UNP said that the plan smacked of political greed, and the media said it could block change.

Ananda-USA said...

Sam,

Please check your email. I sent you a msg about the SLDF Rana Viru Fund.

Moshe Dyan said...

now it is very unlikely ppl will contribute to api wenuwen api. most ppl have put the war behind and moving on.

requesting, asking or begging for money to build houses for war heroes is not going to work.

the only option is to get the army build houses for the army!!!

no other option.

land comes free. adjoining lands to SLDF camps are the starting points. at the inception there is a ready access to medical, communication, etc. facilities. there is no other way.

Hara said...

I THINK ONLY WAY WE CAN IMPEACH UNSG IS THROUGH GENERAL ASSEMBLY. THERE ARE NO PROVISIONS BUT UNG CAN DO ANY THING AT THE UN. OTHER THING IS OUR POLITICIANS MUST TURN THERE ATTACK ON THE PERSON NOT THE UN AS A WHOLE. WE HAVE TO PROTECT UN. THAT HAS TO BE OUR MOTTO. I RECENTLY READ ONE OF OUR PRO SRI LANKA ORGANIZATION IN DIASPORA WAS SUGGESTING TO WITHDREW OUR TRUPES FROM "HAITI" THAT IS THE MOST STUPID PROPOSAL I HEARD SO FAR. I AM AFRAID IF OUR POLITICIANS TRAP IN THAT.WE ALWAYS HAS TO STAND BY THE UN AND PROTECT THAT FORUM. BUT IF SOME ONE, ORGANIZATION OR A MEMBER NATION IS TRYING TO HIJACH UN WE HAVE TO FIGHT TO PROTECT IT.

Sam Perera said...

Welcome to the blog HARA. Your candid views are most welcome.

Sam Perera said...

Fee levying Universities in Sri Lanka is on the cards with a 20 percent share from the total intake being allocated as Scholarships for needy local students, Higher Education Minister S.B. Dissanayake said.

The protest was organized against the proposed plan to establish private universities in Sri Lanka, Inter University Student Federation Convenor Udula Premaratne said.
Meanwhile, the Higher Education Ministry issuing a press release said Minister S.B. Dissnayake referring to the students protest at the time he visited the Peradeniya University had said he was open for discussion with students.
Minister Dissanayake had invited a group representing the students to come and meet him for talks on the subject but no one had come forward.
He had also said students of the unions could talk to him over the telephone but there were some problems about student ragging and assaulting fellow students which were illegal.
The law of the land was the same for everyone but those who work with political agendas had to be dealt with by the university authorities when they violate the law, the Minister had also said.


Good work SB. Please stay on the course and don't let these JVP elements to steal our future in the same way they stole our future in 1986-1989 era. All of the A/L qualified students deserve a chance to earn a degree. Even the ones who didn't do A/L well due to other distractions deserve another chance in their lives.

Ananda-USA said...

Hara,

Welcome to the Blog!

I have several questions about your post.

1. You said "OTHER THING IS OUR POLITICIANS MUST TURN THERE ATTACK ON THE PERSON NOT THE UN AS A WHOLE. WE HAVE TO PROTECT UN."

Ban Ki Moon is a PUPPET serving the agenda of a Club of major Western Countries who control the UN and use it to achieve their objectives, many of which are inimical to developing nations.

Ban Ki Moon was chosen and appointed by the Power Club and is trying to get a second term as UN Sec. Gen.

There are two ways to foil that:

A. Take control of the UN away from the Western UN "Power Club." That is NEXT TO IMPOSSIBLE, because those nations provide the BULK of the FUNDS for the UN, and the UN staffers live off those funds.

B. Leave the UN and FORM AN ALTERNATIVE ORGANIZATION. This is also a hard task, given the lack of funds, and the fact that many developing nations have yet to come into conflict with the UN. However, this is much easier to accomplish than take control of the UN back from the Power Club .. that control is deeply embedded.

The MERE THREAT of over 75% of the UN member states, who are developing nations, moving out of the UN may cause some power to be relinquished by the Power Club.

2. You said "I RECENTLY READ ONE OF OUR PRO SRI LANKA ORGANIZATION IN DIASPORA WAS SUGGESTING TO WITHDREW OUR TRUPES FROM "HAITI" THAT IS THE MOST STUPID PROPOSAL I HEARD SO FAR."

Thank you for the compliment .. I am well known for making "Stupid Proposals" now and then. I wrote a post saying that we should consider recalling our troops serving the UN as a means of showing our displeasure with the UN.

Yet, it is not as stupid as it seems to you .. our troops serving in UN, actually serve the Western Club that controls the UN.

Some say, the pay and experience in collaboration our troops get, is sufficient reason not to recall them.

On the other hand, if we run afoul of that UN "Power Club", as we have, our troops could be targeted next to discredit Sri Lanka. Also, depending on the country where they are deployed, it could impact our global alliances, if perceived as "assisting" the Club main control of other countries. Currently, some countries in South America (Venezuela, Cuba, Brazil, etc) view the UN operation in Haiti as an extension of US power, and our troops are tagged with that association. Sri Lanka has to be careful where we allow our troops assisting the UN to be deployed.

3. You said "WE ALWAYS HAS TO STAND BY THE UN AND PROTECT THAT FORUM." No we don't ... not if that very same UN is controlled by ENEMIES OF THE MOTHERLAND who are trying to UNDO the recent Victory over Terrorism and PUSH the MOTHERLAND back into the CHAOS that prevailed only a YEAR AGO!

Many Developing Countries in which the Power Club interfere under the "UN sheepskin" to preserve their interests are SUFFERING, and are beginning to wakle up to the realization that they are rubber stamping these acts, and may themselves be subject to such violations of their national sovereignty some day.

Nations should support the UN only if that organization ABIDES BY ITS CHARTER. There are TOO MANY examples that INDICATE that the UN has drifted away from its original charter, and has become a "global cover" for advancing the interests of a few powerful nations.

Are we seeing a new colonialist imperialism at work in the world?

Ananda-USA said...

Response to Hara:

.......continued.....
4. You said "BUT IF SOME ONE, ORGANIZATION OR A MEMBER NATION IS TRYING TO HIJACH UN WE HAVE TO FIGHT TO PROTECT IT."

YES, Indeed! But with that "BUT IF" you are begging the answer .. which I have stated as Option "A" above.

Who will BELL this Power Club CAT? ... and CAN THIS CAT BE BELLED by the MICE of the Developing Nations?

My guess is: No it CANNOT BE BELLED given the network of bribes of the UN Staff and of nations by both the UN and the Power Club.

Option "B" seems to be both an Alternative Solution, and a way of achieving Option "A"!

If the United Nations threw a "Party", and the invited Nations don't show up .. it would not be much of a "Party" would it now?

Ananda-USA said...

Problem: "Intolerable Discrimination" against Indians, mostly Tamil, in Malaysia.

Solution: A "political solution" of a separate state of "Tamil Eelam of Malaysia"!

Are we seeing the tip of an "engineered" Eelam iceberg here?

............
Indians call for Royal intervention

July 12, 2010

KUALA LUMPUR: Alleging discrimination, a group of 20 ethnic Indians in Malaysia have approached the country's royal constitutional head for more scholarships and loans to help deserving students pursue higher studies.

Activists of the Human Rights Party (HRP) turned up Sunday outside Istana Negara, the royal palace here, to hand over a memorandum seeking the king's intervention to help top Indian students.

In Malaysia, such protests require prior police permission.

No untoward incident occurred as a group of policemen stood by to monitor the situation, The Star newspaper said.

They were seeking the king's intervention to help top Indian students secure Public Service Depart­ment scholarships and study loans as well as university and matriculation places.

The HRP claimed that over 2,000 Indian students had their applications for scholarships rejected by the government despite passing their exams with flying colours.

The group was led by HRP secretary-general P. Uthayakumar, who was one of the leaders of the banned Hindu Rights Action Front (Hindraf), detained for staging a rally to protest discrimination against ethnic Indians.

Malaysia is home to 1.7 million Indians, a bulk of them Tamil Hindus who migrated here during the British era.

Ananda-USA said...

INDIA should BUTT OUT OF Sri Lanka's Internal Matters.

Given that INDIA is unable to solve its own problems of WIDESPREAD terrorism in India, it is the HEIGHT OF ARROGANCE to think it knows what is best for Sri Lanka!

Mr. Singh .. Please do not receive the TNA TRAITORS in India .. that is THE SAME MISTAKE Indiura and Rajiv Gandhi made long ago! India has done enough DAMAGE in Sri Lanka.

REMEMBER?

Sri Lanka will handle its own Internal Matters!


.............
India will work with TNA: Manmohan

July 11, 2010

COLOMBO: Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has told a delegation of the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) that India has decided to work with it to find solutions to short and long-term problems faced by Tamils of the island nation.

This was revealed by TNA MP M A Sumanthiran, who was a member of the delegation that met the Indian Prime Minister in New Delhi on Thursday. He told Express that Singh asked the TNA to work with other Tamil parties so that a joint Tamil view could be presented to the Lankan government on various issues.

Singh's request is significant in the light of the fact that only recently, about a dozen Tamil parties and NGOs had met in Colombo to begin working out a common minimum programme on issues facing the Tamils. The TNA had kept out of the venture thinking that these parties were basically out to undermine its position in the Tamilspeaking northern and eastern provinces, where it had emerged as the single largest party in the last parliamentary elections, with 14 MPs.

Responding to Singh's plea for unity, TNA leader R Sampanthan assured his outfit would cooperate with other Tamil parties so long as it did not violate the trust that the people of the north and east had vested in it.

The TNA asked the PM to put pressure on Lanka to find a political solution to the Tamil question within a specific time frame, to see that high security zones were dismantled, and to ensure that the ethnodemographic character of the north and east was not changed through governmentsponsored colonisation of Sinhalese.

Asked if the delegation gave the Indian PM any details to substantiate the claim that the Sri Lankan government had schemes to change the ethnodemographic character of the north and east, Sumanthiran said the details had already been given to the Indian authorities. The Prime Minister did not directly address this issue, but he assured that India would endeavour to see that the Tamils lived in safety and security and that their political aspirations were met.

Singh requested the TNA to continue to hold talks with the Lankan government in a constructive way.

The delegation wanted the Tamilspeaking northern and eastern provinces to be reunited as a Tamil homeland, as per the IndiaSri Lanka Accord of 1987. The unification had been annulled by a court order in 2006.

The TNA thanked India for undertaking vital developmental projects in the north, especially the building of 50,000 houses for waraffected Tamil civilians in Wanni.

Asked for an overall impression of the meeting, Sumanthiran said, "We were satisfied."

Ananda-USA said...

God Help Australia as Tiger relative seeks Senate Seat

....................
Sri Lankan refugee, who reached Australia via M’sia, seeks senate seat

MELBOURNE: At age eight, she fled the Sri Lankan civil war to Malaysia with her family before settling in Sydney as a refugee 22 years ago.

In the federal election expected to be called in the next few days, Brami Jegan will seek a Senate seat.

The 30-year-old former investment banker with Macquarie Bank and JP Morgan in Sydney, for about eight years, will stand as a Greens candidate as she wants to "contribute to our society".

She told The Australian newspaper she became determined to chart a more public-minded course after returning to Sri Lanka for two weeks in 2002, with her father.

"Seeing children blinded through malnutrition and adults without arms and legs because of landmines was really shocking," Brami was quoted as saying.

"And that's when I decided to do something more with my life. That was the beginning of a road to a career in politics."

Having worked as a journalist with an Australian television station, and currently as a communications officer with Union Aid Abroad-APHEDA, Brami is also expecting the scrutiny that comes with seeking public office.

Last year in Britain, her uncle, Arunachalam Chrishanthakumar -- known as AC Shanthan -- was jailed for two years for allegedly aiding the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), outlawed in Britain as a terrorist organisation.

The founder of the British Tamil Association, Shanthan was found to have acquired electrical components and military manuals for the LTTE.

Three other charges were dismissed.

"Yes, it happened, but I don't believe I have anything to apologise for," Brami said, pointing to a transcript of the judge's comments in which her uncle was called "a thoroughly decent man" who hadn't sought to "assist (the LTTE) in war".

"The fact is, my uncle was trying to help Tamils in Sri Lanka. He wasn't a terrorist," she told the newspaper.

Brami nominates refugee policy as her main political focus in Australia.

She is a regular visitor to the 39 Tamil asylum-seekers held at Villawood Detention Centre in Sydney's west.

And, while she agrees Sri Lanka is more secure now, she cites the latest UNHCR report in stating the threat still exists for some, and that asylum-seekers should be assessed, case by case.

Ananda-USA said...

IMPOSSIBLE! I don't believe it!

Separatists in India?

And here I was thinking that the "federal political solution" has prevented separatism in India.

Well, looks like India has much homework to do before it prescribes "political solutions" for its neighbors!

You could have fooled me!


................
Restrictions reimposed in Srinagar

July 11, 2010

SRINAGAR: Authorities reimposed curfew-like restrictions in a few localities of Srinagar Sunday even as a shutdown called by separatists paralysed life in the Kashmir Valley.

After a 24-hour long curfew break, restrictions were imposed again in the Old City and uptown Maisuma and Batmallo areas of the summer capital. State authorities moved heavy police and paramilitary reinforcements into the Old City to enforce the restrictions early morning.

Road intersections were blocked with barricades and wire coils. Security forces patrolled the sensitive Batmallo and Maisuma localities as well.

Restrictions were also imposed in the two south Kashmir towns of Pulwama and Kakpore to maintain law and order.

Curfew was relaxed Sunday in the north Kashmir Sopore town till 11 a.m. to enable people to buy essential commodities, said Mohammad Sayed Khan, special commissioner (Baramulla).

But when the curfew was relaxed, mobs indulged in stone-pelting in the market.

Restrictions apart, life in Srinagar and other towns was paralysed due to a protest shutdown called by the hardline Hurriyat Conference group led by Syed Ali Geelani.

Shops were shut and vehicles remained off the roads.

Authorities had relaxed curfew in the entire Kashmir Valley Friday evening to enable people to join the special prayers on the Muslim festival of Shab-e-Meraj (ascension of the Prophet to heaven).

During the relaxation, people thronged shops in various localities of the capital city and other towns to buy essential commodities.

දේශපාලුවා said...

HARA Welcome to our forum.

Hara's article on impeaching BKM is spreading.

Yesterday when I searched it was only one blog that has picked up , but now several other blogs has picked it up and people are twittering about it.

Lets try to give as much publicity to it.

I have posted it in my blog as a main article.

Ananda do you want to post Hara's impeachment article here?

Can you also have a separate section for videos and post the video in the current article there, so that it wont drop down the page.

Inserting a blog gadget might do

Moshe Dyan said...

ananda,

look at the fate of the NAM. it is next to nothing today. why???

bcos for some reason, smaller nations DON'T want to stand up against the big.

this is the reality.

so let me propose OPTION C.

wait till anti-monkey boon sentiments gather momentum in UN member states. do whatever we can to increase the momentum.

at his weakest point, bash him ferociously with the ALLEGATIONS MADE BY OTHER BIG NATIONS.

that should ensure his downfall.

the bad thing is there is VERY LITTLE we can do ahead in time. we have to wait till the opportune moment comes.

HOPEFULLY the korean crisis will escalate. or another major disagreement will arise among the superpowers.

Ananda-USA said...

Moshe said ..

[Wait for an opportunity to attack the Moon "that should ensure his downfall."]

True, but the problem is ... Moon is not the Problem .. the Power Club is the problem.

Moon can be demolished .. indirectly confronting the Power Club .. but the Power Club remains in control.

How can the excessive influence of the Power Club over the UN be tamed? .. that is the REAL PROBLEM!

Ananda-USA said...

A protest against expert panel planned before UN Geneva head office

ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.

July 12, Colombo: Expatriate Sinhala organizations have planned a protest campaign in front of the United Nations office in Geneva to protest the appointment of the panel of experts by the UN Secretary-General to advice him on Sri Lanka's accountability issues.

The protests are to be held tomorrow before the UN Geneva offices at 12 noon. Sri Lankans from UK, France, Germany, Italy, Norway, and other European countries are to travel to Switzerland to participate in the protest.

The protest is organized by a group called the Organization of Expatriate Sri Lankans to Safeguard the Sovereignty of Sri Lanka.

A spokesman of the organization says that certain elements attempt to disrupt the protest by sending emails saying the event was cancelled. He said the protest would be held tomorrow as scheduled.

Ananda-USA said...

As Clint Eastwood quipped, "A man has gotta know his limitations" .. apparently Ban Ki Moon does not.

So, I propose that like-minded UN member states form a PERMANENT UN Panel to investigate Ban Ki Moon's actions and remind him of his "Limitations" under the UN Charter!

A man's gotta know his Limitations, God Dammit!

Anonymous said...

http://www.lakbimanews.lk/columns/col4.htm

Anonymous said...

http://www.dailymirror.lk/print/index.php/opinion1/15363.html

tata said...

Ananda,
What you are saying is true (regarding UN).
But let's start with a small project (for practice).
Let's first impeach Bankey the monkey.

It will be a good lesson for all the future monkeys who get appointed by the "club" to not to cross the line.

Moshe Dyan said...

ananda,

"True, but the problem is ... Moon is not the Problem .. the Power Club is the problem."

agree.

but the power club has VERY FEW choices.

if you take all the previous UN sec gens, only monkey boon and to some extent kofi annan were their henchos.

monkey boon is the biggest arselicker who managed to lie low till elected.

not many can do this.

also it sends a signal to the power club number - 2 to reject buggers from pro-US countries.

remember UNSC P5 have the right of veto in relation to the appointment of the UN sec gen.

this way we can screww power club 1. actually we won't do much. we AMPLIFY charges against him. we become to tool in the hands of power club - 2 to hammer monkey boon.

and moneky boon as a person also has a BIG part to play here. he is such a dumb stubbon MF.

as you said quoting clint eastwood he should know his limits. so getting rid of the monkey is also a must.

Anonymous said...

Thank you for the UN Charter. Ban is doing something fishy and that has to be taken care at the UN, not outside. This is not the first time Ban has been accused of corruption.
I am glad Sri Lanka decided to stand against the his panel, ready pound on Sri Lanka on imaginary reasons. Perhaps those LTTE fund at work. Let us see what KP has to say now!
Ban come at us right way, if he wants.

Anonymous said...

Hara is right in his approach to the UN.

In fact we need to use that method for other things.

It is the method used by para-suddah all the time.

In the case with monkey moon we are "trying to protect the UN" from him.

Like wise we need to fashion or other responses over HR/media freedom etc as "protect our nation of these para-suddha human right violators"

i.e. the NGOs who assisted brutal Tamils violence.
i.e. the media who assist brutal Tamil violence.

Point being we need to change the language to our own "we need to protect you for your own good" as the way para-suddha goes around playing "white mans burden" as if the crimes and lies they perpetuate against us is done "for our own good, because they care for us and our trying to protect us" (which is the attitude these SoBs always adopt and are doing so with regards to the latest UN affair, as though they are fighting for the masses rights and the people want them to be doing so because they "care" and the people know they "care", which is the usual bs attitude they rap up their racist dominations/attempts at domination).

දේශපාලුවා said...

Magerata .. welcome to the forum, we look forward to your continued input of ideas.

SL boy said...

Ananda,
Can you give an email to reach you.
I have some info with regard to SL to share and need some advise.

Ananda-USA said...

SLBoy,

Please email me at LankaPatriot@gmail.com . :)

Ananda-USA said...

Deshapalua,

Where is Hara's article you want me to post at the SLDF blog.

Let me read it first.

Ananda-USA said...


Dengue Situation is INTOLERABLE in Sri Lanka!

Dengue ERADICATION should be a TOP PRIORITY!

Community PUBLIC HEALTH education, testing, vaccination, and enforcement programs, and GARBAGE PICKUP and CONTROL are URGENTLY NEEDED islandwide.



................
Sri Lanka's losing battle against dengue

The Island/Asia News Network
July 13, 2010

Why does a holiday have to be this stressful, especially if you have young kids? With an alarming rise in death toll I have to say Sri Lanka has lost the dengue battle or its losing it.

The health ministry and the environment ministries have failed the young children of this country. Considering the high death toll in an ideal situation they should resign from their posts since there seemed to be no political will to rectify.

This story was infact a plea from a mother of a 1 year old child who was a victim of dengue and was just released from the hospital. I do relate to her story .

Three years ago I was living on a prayer inside the Apollo ICU, with my 5 year old daughter who was battling a strange combination of Chikungunya and Dengue (DHF) at the same time. An island wide blood drive and eight packs of platelets she was out of hospital.

Since then I do have a travel advisory for parents with children, "please be careful and take plenty of mosquito repellents (never a believer of the latter but was forced to accept that repellents do work). How can any parent relax when you have to run around checking for mosquito bites and carrying thermometers around?

Within the last week alone 11 dengue deaths most being children. Wonder who is responsible for this? Most certainly this should be the responsibility of the environmental ministry to implant a cohesive action plan to tackle dengue, but where are they?

The past week I have heard from the health authorities that the children are brought to hospital at latter stages. Is there any literature indicating which stage that the children should be taken to hospital and how to monitor there progress? Or for that matter how to keep your environment clean.

Needless to say an ailing sewage system in the city of Colombo and the suburbs with its swelling population, mountains of garbage pile ups and the many construction sites are definitely culprits.

For years there seemed to be more talk on clearing up garbage and cleaning up the roads, people are yet to see the results. The garbage pile ups are all over Colombo including a mini one down my road, since it is a never ending battle with the CMC to collect the daily garbage the people seemed to have found a convenient alternative.

Any empty space or a bare land is easily converted to a dump yard. With Dengue reaching pandemic levels and the rising of my husband's stress levels my bags are packed and out of here, and I sigh in relief once I reach Changi. But what about all the parents who have to stay back and raise their children? Can the authorities fail them?

It is time Sri Lanka followed Singapore's concerted efforts to control dengue. Singapore is not a dengue free country; even as I write this I could see the weekly fogging outside. During dengue peak times fogging is done on a regular basis. The National Environment Agency (NEA) adopts a multi-pronged approach to control dengue.

Extracted from its web site

a. preventive surveillance and control;

b. public education & community involvement;

c. enforcement; and

d. Research.

Preventive Surveillance and control

Through data gathered during field surveillance and with the aid of the Geographical Information System, NEA conducts daily mosquito surveillance operations. The information enables NEA to move quickly into areas to do source reduction (i.e. remove/destroy breeding grounds found). These are important steps to prevent possible dengue transmission.

Ananda-USA said...

Sri Lanka's losing battle against dengue

......continued.....
NEA's operations strategies are:

* Active surveillance in areas prone to dengue and/or where there is high mosquito population.

* Breaking the source of transmission as quickly as possible when cases (both suspected and confirmed) and clusters of cases emerge

* In 2006, NEA had doubled its manpower deployment for mosquito control to 500 officers and formed dedicated teams responsible for regular auditing, inspections and enforcement in each of the 84 constituencies.

* These teams, being familiar with the areas under their charge, are able to identify and pre-empt potential problematic areas quicker and more effectively.

* NEA had inspected 1.5 million premises and carried out more than 40,000 ground surveys in 2006, an increase of 60% and 29%, respectively, as compared to 2005.

* The number of breeding found in homes in 2006 was 44% lower than in 2005, this is observed despite the increase in inspections by NEA by 59%.

(b) Integrated Efforts with Other Agencies/Organizations

NEA works with various land agencies as well as private organizations and associations to ensure that there is a coordinated approach in keeping the mosquito population and dengue cases low. Some of the agencies NEA has worked with include:

i) Construction Sites

* Since 2001, an Environmental Control Officer (ECO) Scheme had been introduced in construction sites. Under the Scheme, construction sites are required to engage a part time or full time ECO depending on the cost of the development.

* These NEA-trained ECOs are responsible for maintaining the pest and mosquito control works within the construction sites.

* Today, only 6% of construction sites inspected were found breeding Aedes mosquito, down from 30% in 1999.

-The Island/Asia News Network

Ananda-USA said...

Locally produced BTI in the market to control dengue epidemic in Sri Lanka

ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.
July 13, 2010

July 13, Colombo: Sri Lanka Industrial Technology Institute says the BTI (Bacillus Thuringiensis Israelensis) bacteria produced locally by the institute will be released to the market by the end of July.

The news comes as the outbreak of the mosquito-borne dengue fever has caused 140 deaths so far this year.

The Pesticides Registration Bureau granted permission last week to release the bacteria to the market.

Bio Power Lanka Company contracted to produce the bacteria by the Industrial Technology Institute will release 10,000 to 15,000 liters to the market initially.

The bacteria will be marketed in 50, 100 and 200 ml bottles at a concessionary price, the Industrial Technology Institute says. The lavicide bacteria kill the larvae within 24 hours and can be spread on places where the disease-carrying mosquitoes breed.

Bio Power Lanka is licensed to produce the bacteria for five years.

Ananda-USA said...

God Bless Australia, for taking our Tigers!

PLEASE TAKE ALL OF THEM!

Very soon they will be agitating for "Tamil Eelam of Australia" as a "homeland"!

Reason: "Intolerable Discrimination" against an indigenous native people!!!

..............
Half of Sri Lankan arrivals have ties to Tigers

AS many as half of Sri Lankans seeking asylum in Australia are suspected of being former fighters, operatives or supporters of the Tamil Tigers.

The Tigers have been designated a terrorist organisation in many countries but not in Australia.

Sri Lankan officials estimate that between 25 and 50 per cent of Tamils fleeing to Australia have connections to the defeated Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).

Defence analyst Sergei DeSilva-Ranasinghe said that during a recent visit to Sri Lanka, two government ministers and several other officials, including Catholic Church staff with deep ties in the Tamil community, told him 25 per cent was at the lower end of their estimates.

"The people I spoke to constantly said 50 per cent," he told The Australian.

Mr DeSilva-Ranasinghe says former Tamil Tiger members are attracted to Australia because the LTTE remains legal here, unlike in the US, Canada, Britain and 27 EU member countries, where it is proscribed as a terrorist organisation.

Start of sidebar.

* Tamil urges aid to repatriate refugees The Australian, 1 day ago
* Sri Lanka hunts for Tamil Tigers operating overseas The Australian, 13 May 2010
* Beware of asylum-seekers bearing tales of woe The Australian, 6 Apr 2010
* Terror trio's secret cash plot Herald Sun, 31 Mar 2010
* Tamil Tiger group praised suicide squads Herald Sun, 31 Mar 2010

End of sidebar.


He said this was an anomaly that should be rectified by Canberra adding the LTTE to its list of banned terrorist groups.

"You've got people here who've essentially been radicalised, who've fought and (may have) committed acts of terrorism, and they've come here without any sense of being rehabilitated," he said.

Since the surge in boat arrivals started in late 2008, 1100 Sri Lankan asylum-seekers have arrived in Australia. Of these 325 have been granted visas, 85 have returned and the rest are in detention.

Last week Julia Gillard lifted the freeze on processing Sri Lankan asylum applications, after the UN High Commissioner for Refugees issued new guidelines on the handling of Tamil claims.

The UN said that improvements in the security situation in Sri Lanka since the 26-year civil war ended in May last year meant there was no need to provide automatic protection to Sri Lankans leaving the country. Rather, it said, their claims should be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

However, the new UN guidelines say individuals deemed to be at risk in their homeland require "a particularly careful examination" of their asylum claims.

Those classified among the UNHCR's "potential risk profiles" include "persons suspected of having links with the LTTE".

Mr DeSilva-Ranasinghe says the UN's recommendation that Tamil Tiger fighters be given refuge is "ridiculous".

"They wouldn't say that for al-Qa'ida, and in my view there is no difference between the Tamil Tigers and al-Qa'ida. If anything, the Tamil Tigers are a far more ruthless organisation than al-Qa'ida," he said.

Ananda-USA said...

Half of Sri Lankan arrivals have ties to Tigers

.......continued....
However, Clive Williams, head of terrorism studies at the Australian National University, says there is no compelling case to ban the LTTE in Australia.

"They've never done anything here except collecting money and they've never posed a threat to Australia. I don't know of anything they've done that would warrant it," Professor Williams said.

Mr DeSilva Ranasinghe says LTTE supporters in Australia act as fundraisers for the group.

In March three Tamil Australians in Melbourne pleaded guilty to sending more than $1 million and $97,000 worth of electronic components capable of being made into bomb detonators to the LTTE. "There's an element in the Tamil Tigers that is trying to revive (its use of) terrorism. So the question for Australia is whether it's in Australia's interests for LTTE terrorism to be revived, and whether these fundraising activities will contribute to that."

The US State Department, which listed the LTTE as a terrorist group in October 2001, says: "The Tigers have integrated a battlefield insurgent strategy with a terrorist program that targets not only key personnel in the countryside but also senior Sri Lankan political and military leaders in Colombo and other urban centres.

"The Tigers are most notorious for their cadre of suicide bombers, the Black Tigers. Political assassinations and bombings are commonplace."

The FBI describes the Tigers as "among the most dangerous and deadly extremists in the world" and says their "ruthless tactics" have inspired terrorist networks worldwide, including al-Qa'ida in Iraq. It says the LTTE uses its supporters in countries such as the US to raise funds and buy weapons and explosives.

Ananda-USA said...

Q+A - Sri Lanka's new deal on constitutional changes

Sri Lanka's President Mahinda Rajapaksa waves during a May Day rally in Colombo May 1, 2010. Sri Lanka's president and opposition leader have struck a broad deal on constitutional changes, chief of which is a plan to return the Indian Ocean island nation to leadership by an executive prime minister. REUTERS/STR/Files

Sri Lanka's President Mahinda Rajapaksa waves during a May Day rally in Colombo May 1, 2010. Sri Lanka's president and opposition leader have struck a broad deal on constitutional changes, chief of which is a plan to return the Indian Ocean island nation to leadership by an executive prime minister.

By C. Bryson Hull
July 13, 2010

COLOMBO (Reuters) - Sri Lanka's president and opposition leader have struck a broad deal on constitutional changes, chief of which is a plan to return the Indian Ocean island nation to leadership by an executive prime minister.

Here are some questions and answers about the agreement:

IS THIS A FINAL AGREEMENT?

Not at all. It's a broad agreement in principle. President Mahinda Rajapaksa enjoys sweeping and largely unchecked powers, but has long promised to reduce them.

With a big parliamentary majority, he needs only six opposition votes to change the constitution, and there are fears Rajapaksa will act in his own interest and not the country's.

It's worth noting that a similar deal failed in 2000 when the main opposition, headed then as it is now by United National Party leader Ranil Wickremesinghe, pulled out.

HAS RAJAPAKSA GIVEN UP PLANS FOR A THIRD TERM IN OFFICE?

Yes and no. If the deal goes through, he will serve only two terms as president, the maximum now allowed.

But there is unlikely to be any prohibition on him running for the post of prime minister, which would give him a third crack at leading the nation if his present popularity holds. He's said publicly he would consider that option.

WHAT OTHER CHANGES ARE CONTEMPLATED?

Broadly, more changes to take power out of presidential hands. The two sides agreed to work on the never-implemented 17th amendment, designed to put a check on the president's power to appoint the judiciary, the attorney-general, police, the election and financial commissions and other state bodies.

Bringing independence to those institutions would go a long way toward boosting confidence that the government is not operating solely at the whim of a single politician.

WHAT DOES THE AGREEMENT MEAN FOR INVESTORS?

The Colombo Stock Exchange rose on Tuesday, with traders attributing some of the optimism to the fact that another potential political tussle appears to have been averted.

Sri Lanka's politics can get unruly, and although opposition parties are woefully fragmented, they could re-align against Rajapaksa as they did during the presidential campaign that turned bloody before the Jan. 26 vote.

That, and uncertainty ahead of the ensuing April parliamentary election, held back portfolio and foreign direct investment.

WHEN ARE THESE CHANGES EXPECTED TO GO TO PARLIAMENT?

Although Rajapaksa and his allies have given no firm date, they have talked about discussing this after he takes his oath for his second term in mid-November. That is an eternity in Sri Lankan political terms, so the deal has a long way go.

දේශපාලුවා said...

Ananda
Here is Hara's article

http://hrblogonsrilanka.blogspot.com/2010/07/it-is-time-to-impeach-bam-ki-moon-for.html

Moshe Dyan said...

IF 25% to 50% of SL refugee arrivals in austraia are tigers, that means 275 to 550 tigers have escaped SL!!!!

this is a very disturbing situation.

they should have been handled appropriately.

how many more of these cases are in SL????

what is the plan to handle them???

they leaving SL is good but they leaving the world is BETTER!!!

let them leave the world not just SL.

setting up terrorist activity in australia is not that difficult. australia will not bother bcos it won't affect them, directly.

my boat strategy is the BEST way to handle these MFs discretely. no HR violation issues will arise. SL will be safe and australia will not get terrorirsts.

Sam Perera said...

A 1200 acre Navy camp for Wakarai


(Lanka-e-News, July 13, 2010, 7.15PM) A new Navy camp is to be established at Kajuwatte in the Wakarai District Secretarial Division, Batticaloa.

It is reported that the Navy had requested 1200 acres of the land belonging to the Cashew Corporation to be demarcated for this purpose

Though this request has been forwarded to the cashew Corporation, no decision has been taken so far. When the joint District Council met on the 28th of last month, nothing was decided conclusively on it, despite the proposal relating to this land having been made.
Meanwhile, the Navy piling up a large quantity of Building materials is seen at the Kajuwatte junction.


Way to go Sri Lanka. Make these cantonments please. Don't forget Vidathalthivu and Nacchikuda either.

Moshe Dyan said...

from bbc

"Jailed former Sri Lankan armed forces chief Gen Sarath Fonseka has been charged in two new cases in the civilian courts.

Gen Fonseka already has one other civilian and two military cases pending against him.

In one of the new cases he is accused of recruiting army deserters to help him in his failed presidential election campaign in January.

Reports say this charge carries a possible 20-year prison sentence.

The state has also pressed 21 new charges against Gen Fonseka in relation to another case, in which he is accused of corruption in granting arms procurement contracts while he was army commander."


if our corrupt judges for once uphold the law, that will be the end of gonzeka!!

well done. frame more charges.

Moshe Dyan said...

sam,

unfortunately this is another toiletnet style exaggeration.

we certainly need LARGE, PERMANANT military bases. but false alarms over it is counterproductive.

i hope SLN will JUST DO IT.

Moshe Dyan said...

less than 2 weeks to black july crap.

TEs will try to link the panel, etc. to black july.

patriots should launch a pre-emptive attack on them.

1. COMPLETE genocide of sinhalas in 5 districts

2. COMPLETE genocide of muslims in 4 districts

3. horrendous killings of civilians by TAMIL ELAMISTS including the LTTE.

most village massacres were done by tamil elamist civilians with the assistence of a few LTTE cadres.

4. tamil elamist riots in UK, USA, canada, australia that killed sinhala, tamil ppl and damaged property including places of religious worship.

දේශපාලුවා said...

ජවිපේ අවස්ථාවාදය සහ එජා සංවිධානයේ පැනල් එක
MD No pun intended, not directed to you.

ඉංග්‍රීසි පත්තර වලට ලියන කට්ටියක් විමල් ට බැනපු එක ගැන අපේ ජේවීපී මල්ලිලාට පුදුම චූන් එකක් ගිහිල්ලා වගේ. මැතිවරන ගනනාවක් එක දිගට පැරදිලා ජනතාවගෙන් ප්‍රතික්ෂේප වෙලා කුජීත වෙලා හිටපු මේගොල්ලන්ට මෙකට සිහි නැතිවෙන ගානට ආතල්, අන්තිමට තමන්ට ජොලි මොකක් නිසාද කියලාවත් මේගොල්ලන්ට තේරුමක් නැහැ.

එජා මහලෙකම් කියනේ ජවිපේ මහලේකම් කම වගේ හිටගෙන බොරු කියන්න පුළුවන් වගකීමකින් තොර තනතුරක් නෙමෙයි. විමල් ගේ වැඩේට ප්‍රතිචාර දක්වන්න ගිහිල්ලා මහ ලේකම් ඇදගෙන නාගත්තා, තමන් කිසිම වගකීමක් නැති, කිසිම විශ්වාසයක් තැබිය නොහැකි රූකඩයක් බව ලෝකෙටම පෙන්නුවා.

විමල් ගේ උපවාසය යනකොට මහලේකම් මාධ්‍ය සාකච්චාවක් පවත්වලා තමන් වහාම ලංකාවේ UNDP කාර්යාලය ඉවත් කරගන්නා බව පැවසුවා. නමුත් මෙක අලි බොරුවක් බව ලකාවේ UN කට්ටිය කිව්වා මේ කෙහෙම්මල් කාර්යාලය ඉවත් කරන්න තීරනය කලේ 2009දී බව ඒ අය කියනවා. මහ ලේකම බොරු කිය කිය හෙලුවෙන් දගලන බව ලෝකෙටම පෙනුනා, මේක කොච්චර සීරියස්ද කියනවානම් නිව් යෝර්ක් UN කට්ටියම තවත් මාධ්‍ය සාකච්චාවක් කැදවලා මහලේකම් ගෙ ප්‍රකාශයෙන් සිදුවුනු අවමානය වහන්න තැත් කලා.

මේ සේරම විමල් ගේ වැඩ මිසක් විජිත හේරත් ගේ වැඩ නෙමෙයි.

මීට අමතරව විමල් උපවාසය නවත්වපු දා ඊට ටිකකට කලින් ආයෙත් මහලේකම් ප්‍රකාශයක් කලා මේ පැනල් එක පරීක්ෂන පවත්වනේ නැහැ නිකම් මට ඇඩ්වයිස් දෙනවා විතරයි කියලා. විමල් උපවාසය නැවත්වුවේ මෙ කතාවට පස්සෙයි.

නමුත් මේකෙන් මහ ලෙකම් ආයෙත් ලෝකෙට පෙන්නුවා තමන් කරන්නේ මොකක්ද කියලා තමන්ටත් හරි තෙරුමක් නැතිබව.

ඔය පැනල් එක පත් කලාට පසුදා ඒකෙ ලොක්කා , සරම උස්ස ගෙන කෑගැහුවා, " අඩෝ සේරම ඉන්වෙස්ටිගේට් කරනවා, බෙලි කපනවා කොටනවා කියලා". එතකොට මේ පැනල් එකේ ලොක්කා පාලනය කරන්න මහ ලේකම්ට බැරිද? ඌ කරන්නේ ඌට ඕන දේද මහ ලේකම්ට ඕන දේද? පැනල් එකේ ලොක්කා කියනවා ඉන්වෙස්ටිගේට් කරනවා කියලා, මහලේකම් කියනවා මොන බලු ඉන්වෙස්ටිගේසන් එකක්වත් කරන්නෑ කියලා. මෙතන් ඇත්ත කියන්නේ කවුද? එහෙනම් ඇත්තටම මෙ පැනල් එක කරන්නේ මොකක්ද? මේකෙන් කරන වැඩේ මහ ලේකම්වත් දන්නේ නැද්ද?

විමල් ගේ වැඩ නිසා ලොකෙටම හෙලිවුනා, මහලේකම් මේ ප්‍රශ්නයෙදී පුදුම විදිහට කලබල වෙන, පරස්පර විරෝධී, සමහරවිට අමූලික බොරු කියන, අවිශ්වාසවන්ත පුද්ගලයෙක් බව.

මේ නිසා මේ පැනල් එක ගැනත් මහලේකම් ගැනත් ලෝක ප්‍රජාවට (අධිරාජ්‍යවාදීන් හැරුනුකොට ) අබමල් රේනුවක හරි විශ්වාසයක් තිබ්බානම් ඒකත් නැතිවුනා.

විමල් ගේ මූලික අරමුන ඉටු නොවුනත්, පැනල් එකයි, මහලේකම් පිලිබදවයි ලෝක ප්‍රජාවගේ තිබුනු විශ්වාසය බිදීමෙන්, පැනල් එක අවලගු කාසියක් ගානට වැටුනා.

දැන් මට තවත් ප්‍රශ්නයක් තියෙනවා, විමල් UN එක ගාව බිම බුදිය ගත්තාම ජේවීපී කට්ටියටයි, ටයිකෝට් තානාපති ප්‍රජාවයි පොරකකා ඉස්සරහට ආවා ඒක වැරදියි කියන්න. නමුත් ඒකට ප්‍රතිචාර දක්වන්න ගිහිල්ලා මහ ලේකම් ගල් පැලෙන බොරු කිව්වාම, පරස්පර විරෝධී ප්‍රකාශ කලාම මේ කිසි කෙනෙක් නෙමෙයි හ්ම් කිව්වේ, ඇයි මහ ලේකම්ට විරුද්ධව මොනවත් කියන්න බයද? මේ අය්යලා හිතාගෙන ඉන්නේ මහලේකම් රහත් වෙලා කියලද? ටයිකොට් තානාපති ගොල්ලොනම් බය බව අපිට තෙරෙනවා උන්ට ඕන උන්ගේ බඩ ගෝස්තරේ, ඒත් ඇයි මේ ජේවීපී කට්ටිට්ය මහ ලේකම් වන්දනාවේ? මීට වඩා අසික්කිත තුප්පහි අවස්ථාවාදයක් තවත් තියනවාද?

ජේවීපී මල්ලිලා දැන් චූන් වේලා දැගලුවාට, මෙකේ දීර්ඝ කාලීන දේශපාලන වාසියත් විමල්ටයි ජනිපෙටයි, ඒක තෙරුම් ගන්න අමාරු නැහැ.

ජේවීපී මල්ලිලා කොළඹ කැම්පස් එකේ දොඹ ගහ යට වාඩිවෙලා සයන්ස් ෆැකල්ටි එකේ කොළඹ හයි ෆයි බඩුවල පස්ස පැති දිහා බල බල හූල්ලන වෙලාවේ ඕක හිතලා බැලුවානම් තේරුම්යයි.

Moshe Dyan said...

desha,

no worries mate.

interesting.

Moshe Dyan said...

raju,

you have crapped all over the internet!! :))

good going buddy.

Anonymous said...

I don't like this, they are obssessed with the East (and obviously the North) to push TE more than anything.

http://www.island.lk/userfiles/image/2010/07/14/mainpic.jpg

"USS Pearl Harbour arrived at the Port of Trincomalee on Tuesday (July 13). The vessel, capable of carrying 500 marines, is a Harpers Ferry class dock landing ship. It is the first US ship to arrive in Sri Lanka since the conclusion of the war in May last year. (Photo Courtesy SLN Media)"

Anonymous said...

I am impressed with LeN, it truely has become our own version of TamilNet.

Why can't these morons ever write crap like this against our enemies?
Why is it only Sinhalese have such scum in their society?

Anonymous said...

With regards to the the LeN story it is probably pre-emptive. Those SoBs read this site as well -as they are averse to nationalism in any form.

If such things are happening and we don't know about it all the better.

Its strange such people exist, willing to through away their own peoples future just for a few dollars or selfish power lusts (LeN is run by the UNP after all).

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Suddhas mights democrazy in action.

"French back burka ban as only ONE MP votes against move to outlaw Islamic 'walking coffins'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1294418/France-MPs-burka-ban-ONE-votes-measure-act-walking-coffins.html#ixzz0tcF1Y6qF
"


See how they sell it as "doing it because they care for the rights of women, this is to PROTECT them".

Now imagine if something like this happened elsewhere, say i dunno China? According to suddha Chinese-muslim fundamentalism is not linked to Al Qaeda but more to do with "oppressive policies of China", ain't that cute? (Of course this got busted with an arrest of Uighur operative working for Al Quidea in Norway).

Now where are the rights groups? I would like to hear from AI and HRW, or is it a matter of policy not to question their primary benefactors (Western Governments)??

Anonymous said...

Moshe,

Panel shit starts in 83 week

It finishes (Moon monkey giving it 4 months) on Mahaburuwa day.

Anonymous said...

Human rights champions again in action:

Missing Iranian scientist appears at embassy in US

A missing Iranian nuclear scientist, who Tehran says was kidnapped a year ago by the CIA, has taken refuge in the Iran section of Pakistan's US embassy.

A spokesman from Pakistan's Foreign Office, Abdul Basit, told the BBC that Shahram Amiri was seeking immediate repatriation to Iran.

In June videos purportedly of Mr Amiri but containing contradictory information on his whereabouts emerged.

The US rejected Tehran's claims that it was behind Mr Amiri's disappearance.

Iranian media say Mr Amiri worked as a researcher at a university in Tehran, but some reports say he worked for the country's atomic energy organisation and had in-depth knowledge of its controversial nuclear programme.

ABC News reported in March that he had defected and was helping the CIA, revealing valuable information about the Iranian nuclear programme.

But earlier this month, Tehran said it had proof he was being held in the US.

The allegation came after three videos purportedly of Mr Amiri emerged - the first said he had been kidnapped, the second that he was living freely in Arizona, and the third that he had escaped from his captors.

Diplomatic standoff

The BBC's former correspondent in Tehran, Jon Leyne, says that Iran's version of the story seems to be backed up by events unfolding in Washington DC.

Our correspondent says Mr Amiri's sudden appearance is a major embarrassment for the American spy agencies and could lead to a diplomatic stand-off.

According to Mr Basit in Pakistan, the head of Iran's interest section, Dr Mustafa Rehman, is planning to repatriate the scientist back to his country.

But while US authorities cannot enter Iran's diplomatic premises, they could prevent Mr Amiri leaving.

The Iran interest section is housed in Pakistan's embassy in Washington, but run by Iranians. The US cut diplomatic relations with Iran shortly after the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

Mr Amiri went missing a year ago while on pilgrimage in Saudi Arabia.

The first two videos, telling starkly contradictory stories, were posted on the video-sharing site YouTube on 8 June.

In the first, initially broadcast by Iranian television, a man purporting to be Mr Amiri says he was kidnapped by the US while on pilgrimage in the Saudi Arabian city of Medina and that he is now living in the US state of Arizona.

At the time the Iranian government described the video as evidence that he was being held in the US against his will.

In the second, posted hours later on YouTube, a similar-looking man claiming to be the scientist says he is happy in the US, living in freedom and safety.

Plea for help

In the third video, which was broadcast by Iranian state TV on 29 June, a man claiming to be the missing scientist says: "I, Shahram Amiri, am a national of the Islamic Republic of Iran and a few minutes ago I succeeded in escaping US security agents in Virginia.

"Presently, I am producing this video in a safe place. I could be rearrested at any time."

The man in the video also dismisses the second recording, in which it was claimed that the scientist was living freely in the US, as "a complete fabrication".

"I am not free here and I am not permitted to contact my family. If something happens and I do not return home alive, the US government will be responsible."

The video finishes with the man urging Iranian officials and human rights organisations to "put pressure on the US government for my release and return".

"I was not prepared to betray my country under any kind of threats or bribery by the US government," he adds.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/10609461.stm

Anonymous said...

More on the story here:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100713/ap_on_go_ot/us_iran_missing_scientist#mwpphu-container

"He has been in the United States of his own free will and obviously he is free to go," department spokesman P.J. Crowley said"

Good 'ole Crowley.

Sujeewa Kokawala said...

Almost certain Koti Dena entering Aus parliament. If there is anything good about her, it seems to be the short skirt.

I hope she'll loose this election. In fact Greenies are a minority party so it is not likely that she'll win.


Tamil refugee, seeks Aussie Senate seat

As an ex-banker of Tamil heritage, Brami Jegan has hardly been plucked from central casting for a life in Australian politics.

“I know, my background is a bit different,” the newly anointed Greens Senate candidate says with a laugh. “But I’ve got nothing to hide. I’m here because I want to contribute to our society.”

Ms Jegan, 30, was born in the northern Sri Lankan city of Jaffna. But with the civil war raging, her family moved to Somalia, Tanzania and Malaysiabefore finally settling in Sydneyas refugees when she was eight. Her first career was as an investment banker with Macquarie Bank and JPMorgan for eight years.

But Ms Jegan determined to chart a more public-minded course after returning to Sri Lankain 2002 for two weeks with her father.

“Seeing children blind through malnutrition, and adults without arms and legs because of landmines, it was really confronting,” Ms Jegan says. “And that’s when I decided to do something more with my life. That was the beginning of a road that led here, to a career in politics.”

Having worked as a journalist with SBS, and currently as a communications officer with Union Aid Abroad-APHEDA, Ms Jegan is also expecting the scrutiny that comes with seeking public office -- even if, ranked fourth on the Greens Senate ticket in NSW, her chances of winning a seat are slim.

Last year in England, her uncle, Arunachalam Chrishanthakumar -- known as AC Shanthan -- was jailed for two years for aiding the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, the notorious Tamil Tigers militia outlawed in Britainas a terrorist organisation.

The founder of the British Tamil Association, Shanthan was found to have acquired electrical componentry and military manuals for the LTTE. Three other charges were dismissed.

“Yes, it happened, but I don’t believe I have anything to apologise for,” the Greens candidate says, pointing to a transcript of the judge’s comments in which her uncle was called “a thoroughly decent man” who hadn’t sought to “assist (the LTTE) in war”.

“The fact is my uncle was trying to help Tamils in Sri Lanka. But he wasn’t a terrorist,” she says.

Unsurprisingly, Ms Jegan nominates refugee policy as her main political focus. She is a regular visitor to the 39 Tamil asylum-seekers held at Villawood Detention Centre in Sydney’s west.

And while she agrees Sri Lanka is more secure now, she cites the latest UNHCR report in stating the threat still exists for some, and that asylum-seekers should be assessed case by case.

theaustralian

දේශපාලුවා said...

The NGO don JC Weliamuna is appearing on behalf of JVP newspaper editor sirimalwatta.

its is now official , foreign money of unknown origin is now funding JVP.

http://www.dailymirror.lk/print/index.php/news/news/15168.html

Moshe Dyan said...

pol,

that is an interesting find.

so monkey boon panel gets to work from black july and completes work in time for the mahabooru day!!!

Moshe Dyan said...

pol,

that is a very good sign. its a shame you hate "suddas".

IF US really thinks SL was into war crimes BS, it would not interact with the "genocidal" SLN!!

this clearly means they don't believe so.

it seems their actions are rather influenced by the need to pay SOMETHING for the cheap hooker - tamil elamists, than a US interest per se in SL.

Sam Perera said...

Desha,

I am under the impression that Irida is from Sunday Losers.

Sam Perera said...

Moshe,

Come on Moshe, what they truly believe, what they truly want, and what they truly show are very different. We should never mix-up the Asian-Russian style with the western style. We have to follow the same format with them. Give them the middle when we have to, smile when we want to, an give the middle when we have to

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

LOL Moshe,

Any excuse to pour praise on suddha and exonerate them of any guilt and responsibility right? They only "do good!". Hikz.

Sorry I am not going to worship them. And I have no shame about it (gee didn't realise not worshipping and viewing them with deep suspicion and "hate" due to their actions against us is something to be "ashamed about").

If anything it shows they are ugly lying exploiting and manipulative SoBs. If they were our “friends” they would not be engaging in such deception and attacks against us in the same breath of "joint ventures" while carrying out vilification and demonisation campaigns.

Moshe Dyan said...

sam,

yes there are contradictions.

OK this does not mean what they truely beleive, i admit.

they are such hypocrites.

they will wine and dine with you, then stab you in the back (up or down!!!)

e.g. calling 1920s events in turkey as genocide despite turkey being a NATO member

e.g. supporting the IRA despite UK being US's biggest arselicker



but will they allow THEM to be seen associating a "genocidal" navy????

i don't think so.

Anonymous said...

"U.S Government Expands Support to Local Authorities in the Eastern Province"

http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2010/07/14/us-government-expands-support-local-authorities-eastern-province


Now engaging directly with the PCs, smacks of proto TE set up. This is merely laying the ground work. (That US shipping visiting Trinco must be viewed in this regard as well). This is how they undermine Government authority while bolstering up the “significance” of “devolved” administration.

But, hey this too is a "good sign" which we should be "ashamed" to miss, especially because some "good" (probably none) is there. Whatever they do has a long term price which is far more damaging than whatever "good" there might be.

It is better to sign a deal with the devil; at least you know what you are getting into unlike with these unscrupulous unethical forked tongued scoundrels.

Moshe Dyan said...

pol,

we are not going to worship.
it's just about a warship!!!

"If they were our “friends” they would not be engaging in such deception and attacks against us in the same breath of "joint ventures" while carrying out vilification and demonisation campaigns."

well, that is how they treat their friends!!!!

but the point is we should follow their game plan. get maximum benefits and stab in the back when it comes to that. just rolling with the punches.

no permanant enemies and no permanant friends in the IC.

Sam Perera said...

Moshe,

but will they allow THEM to be seen associating a "genocidal" navy????

However, they have some issues with our SF/CR boys. When it comes to the west, this can be a totally different mission than a friendly meeting. It could be that USS PH commander want to have a beer in Nilaweli beach. It could be just plain refueling too. I will not try to give them credit but deal with them in their own style.

Moshe Dyan said...

though pol sambol bashes "sudda", his handle is the sudda version of a local delicacy.

in sinhala it is "sambola".
in tamil it is "sampal/champal".

in "sudda" language it is "sambol".

hypocrite!!

rofl!!

Moshe Dyan said...

sam,

agree with the plan but warships just don't make calls like that.

for instance why don't russian warships call on SL ports?????

Moshe Dyan said...

my prediction about US plan for a kosovo model in SL comes to pass.

this is their ultimate goal.

from tn.


"On the 15th anniversary of the Srebrenica genocide, Samantha Power, Director of Multilateral Affairs and Human Rights of the National Security Council in the Obama administration on her way to deliver message from President Obama in Srebrenica-Potocari memorial said, "as a factual matter, as a historical matter – it is very difficult to see lasting peace and stability without this kind of justice. So the more Serbia recognizes, the Bosnian government recognizes what atrocities were committed by its forces, the Croatian government grapples as well, more progress you will see and the more forward we move."

it sums up the US plan.


intimidate SL to such an extent that SL will have to give up the victory in favour of the losers ultimately allowing the creation of a toilet elam by whatever name here.

this is their plan.

SL must take measures to cripple this plan. SL must convince them that "this kind of justice" actually make ppl move BACKWARD.

how to do it????

1. further militarisation of the north and east in response to the panel.

2. aggressive colonization of the north and east

3. re-introduction of counter terror operations that may not be liked by some.

essentially we should do MORE what triumphalism would indulge in doing in response to the panel.

this way we can convince them that it is best to leave SL to SLs bcos otherwise problems will escalate.

Sam Perera said...

Moshe,

With the bogus war crime charges, they apply the same words in SL context too. The genocide bitch Power seems totally blind towards US war crime in Iraq and Afghanistan. When US commits war crimes, they become classified information or they will be based on some non-existing weapon the other party has, how simple is that.

Anonymous said...

Moshe,

I am far more prickly than you as i just can't stand the high levels of bullshit tossed against us and lose my cool easily (i think you already know that).

As for my handle, lol, you figured out the exact reason why i have it. It emanates from a private joke between my friends over suddhas. It is an old handle for me in a sense.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Why do we not have a similar act?

"Top secret MI6 spy list at risk after 'loose cannon' agent touts documents for £2million"

Daniel Houghton admits two breaches of Official Secrets Act

Judge warns agent caught in sting jail term is 'inevitable'

Security sources: Some documents have not been traced


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1294582/Ex-MI6-agent-pleads-guilty-trying-disclose-secret-files.html#ixzz0tebpXBFH



We should also have a national anti bullshit act as well -to charge the likes of Gonseka when they open their foul mouths.

Anonymous said...

There have been more lies from Monkey Moon.

Why can we not use these events to expose the panel as a fraud?

Ban Monkey has not integrity -like his para suddha masters.

http://www.adaderana.lk/news.php?nid=8963

Anonymous said...

Look at all the top UNP scum attacking the Government over holding a cabinet meeting in Kilinochchi, while that may sound like an “extravagance” MR is making a great point here. These UNPers are extremely JEALOUS. Best bit we lost the North and East UNDER A UNP GOVERNMENT, when Mrs B handed over power to top scum JR she gave him the whole country, he lost it within a year of office. We nearly completely lost it for good under another UNP Government led by top scum Ranil in 2002. Who the hell are these UNPers/Colombians to lecture or complain, or attack this current Government which unified the country. Just shows they are a bunch of frustrated losers.


http://www.adaderana.lk/news.php?nid=8962#

Sam Perera said...

Sajith is the only UNP politician who has the backbone to stand up or not engage in treachery.

He said that the UNSG was nothing but an international bureaucrat who represented an organisation funded and nurtured by the international community. So, there should be left no room for him to act according to his whims and fancies. "There are protocols to be followed, and it’s mandatory for Moon to follow them," he said.

Ananda-USA said...

Jayawewa!

BURYING THE HATCHET in KILINOCHCHI!

...............
'Sink differences' to rebuild north

By Charles Haviland
BBC News, Colombo

President Rajapaksa chairing the cabinet meeting in Kilinochchi
By assembling in Kilinochchi, the government is making a clear statement of its role in reunifying the island after years of civil war

President Mahinda Rajapaksa of Sri Lanka has called for people in the north of the island to sink their political differences and rebuild the region.

He was speaking after chairing an unprecedented cabinet meeting in the town of Kilinochchi, which was the headquarters of the separatist Tamil Tigers until just before their military defeat last year.

The government has confirmed that northern Sri Lanka will now host permanent military garrisons.

President Rajapaksa told public servants in Kilinochchi that local lives must be rebuilt, saying that the authorities were resettling displaced Tamil civilians in their homes with unparalleled speed.

Resettling IDPs

This comes after international criticism that they were being kept in closed camps for too long.


Gotabhaya Rajapaksa
Mr. Rajapaksa has confirmed that northern Sri Lanka will now host permanent military garrisons

Meeting about two thousand recent returnees, the president made a presentation of farming equipment and sewing machines.

As he is done on key occasions before, the president used a combination of languages – the local Tamil language, English, and his own Sinhala.

By holding these meetings and a cabinet session in the former Tamil Tiger headquarters, Kilinochchi, the government is stressing that its writ runs all over the island and the days of separatism are gone.

“Previously, one could not move in that place,” a government spokesman told the BBC. Normalisation in the mainly Tamil north is only just starting.

Some of those returning home complain at the heavy military presence there.

But the defence secretary has just told officers in the north that there will be permanent garrisons in the former rebel strongholds of Kilinochchi and Mullaitivu to strengthen security.

There will also be new homes there for officers of the mainly Sinhalese army.

Ananda-USA said...

Sinhala "Demon" trains and employs ex-LTTE women!

We need MORE such Demons!

....................
Ex-Tamil Fighters Start Factory Life in Sri Lanka

By Chandani Jayatilleke
WeNews correspondent
Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Sri Lankan women who were Tamil combatants a year ago are leaving rehabilitation camps and moving into the work force. Four hundred just arrived at a hostel for workers in a factory that ships clothes to Target and Wal-Mart.

Ex-Tamil Fighters Start Factory Life in Sri LankaNITTAMBUWA, Sri Lanka (WOMENSENEWS)--Four hundred women who once fought for Liberation Tigers of Tamil Ealam left rehabilitations camps in the northern district of Vavuniya last month and made the seven-hour trip south to a hostel here set up for them by a major apparel exporter.

Fourteen months ago many of them carried arms. They gave them up in May when Sri Lankan troops won the 30-year battle with the separatist group. Now, with their lives as guerrillas behind them, they faced new jobs in clothing factories owned by the Tri Star Group, a major apparel exporter in Sri Lanka that has set up housing for the ex-combatants.

Bookmark and Share

They arrived in the evening and the next morning they would be enrolled as machine operators in three garment plants a few miles away. Each day Tri Star buses transport them to work and back.

In the rehabilitation camp they were taught to meditate, participated in theatrical activities and received training on beauty, culture and personal care.

Almost a year later, it was time to rejoin society.

"I am here to begin a new life," said Manju, who only goes by one name. She spoke Tamil and communicated through a translator in a meeting at one of the hostels, furnished with beds, toilets and bathing facilities.

As she spoke other women, who had also just arrived, sipped soft drinks and arranged their belongings in the drawers that had been allotted to them. "I am excited about coming here. From tomorrow, I will be a working woman. I will never touch a gun again," she said.

Tri Star Group, based in Ratmalana, a major suburb in the capital Colombo, is a nearly 30-year old company with 16 garment factories island-wide. It exports women's and children's apparel to major international retailers such as Wal-Mart, Target stores and Gap, employing 10,000 people, mostly women.
Resuming a Decent Life

The company's chairman, Kumar Devapura, promised to provide 1,200 jobs to former Tamil Tiger women when the government sought private-sector support to provide employment to graduates of the rehabilitation process.

"I only want to help them to resume a decent life," Devapura said, as he stood in the hostel, helping to greet the new arrivals. "By training them in apparel industry, they will get confidence. I have already trained 150 women in our Ratmalana factories. I am impressed with their progress over the last three weeks."

So far, 550 ex-combatants have joined the company; 650 more will arrive in the next few weeks.

Devapura greeted the women alongside Commissioner General of Rehabilitation Brigadier Sudantha Ranasinghe, whose staff members were quickly trying to learn a few Tamil words so they could communicate with the newcomers as they got off the buses carrying their bags.

The women looked tired from the trip. Many were dressed in a traditional style, in skirts, blouses and pottus, or forehead decorations that announced their marital status; red for married, black for single. Most wore leather slippers and anklets.

Ananda-USA said...


This kind of direct interference by foreign govts in the internal politics of Sri Lanka should be DISCOURAGED, NOT ALLOWED!

It only gives these BUSYBODIES opportunities to drive WEDGES among Sri Lankans in their drive to DIVIDE and CONQUER!

GOSL should discourage both NGO and foreign Govt presence of this kind in Sri Lanka. They undermine the National Authority over the people!

Haiti is an EXTREME example, where the people looked to foreigners for earthquake diasaster help, ignoring their own Govt which had NEITHER RESOURCES NOR AUTHORITY among their own people .. both had been siphoned away to private NGOs supported by foreigners!


...............
U.S government expands support to local authorities in the Eastern Province

ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.

July 13, Colombo: The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Ministry of Local Government and Provincial Councils had signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) recently to expand the Supporting Regional Governance Program (SuRG) to all 37 Pradeshiya Sabhas and one Urban Council in the Eastern Province.

The Minister of Local Government and Provincial Councils A.L.M. Athaullah and U.S. Ambassador to Sri Lanka Patricia A. Butenis witnessed the signing.

Under the SuRG program, USAID/Colombo, the development office of the U.S. Embassy, provides technical assistance to local authorities to support their efforts to serve the public.

This MOU will expand the SuRG program to include all local authorities in the Eastern Province. Training will include topics such as office administration, financial management, and participatory training as well as Sinhala and Tamil language instruction.

Speaking at the occasion, Ambassador Butenis said she is pleased that the U.S. Government is partnering with the Ministry of Local Governance and Provincial Councils in this program.

"This demonstrates our shared vision on the importance of local government serving the needs of its citizens, and increasing transparency and accountability in service delivery and development," she said.

Acknowledging USAID's contribution to building the capacity of local officials, Chairperson of the Muttur Pradesihya Sabha K.M. Thoufeek said the only reason that they were able to be selected this year for funding under the World Bank's North East Local Services Improvement Project was because they had formed development groups in all villages which they learned about during USAID's training program.

Deputy Minister Indika Bandaranayake and key officials of the USAID and the Ministry of Local Government and Provincial Councils were present at the MoU signing ceremony.

Since 1956, USAID/Sri Lanka has invested nearly $2 billion to benefit all the people of Sri Lanka.

Ananda-USA said...

The COAST of Sri Lanka is a beauty beyond measure, the inherited treasure of ALL Sri Lankans, to be enjoyed by the MANY, not the FEW.

.................
Kalutara targeted for Mass demolition

By Don Asoka Wijewardena
July 13, 2010

Ports and Aviation Deputy Minister Rohitha Abeygunawardena said yesterday that all unauthorized structures, including hotels, houses and industrial complexes, erected on beaches in Kalutara would be demolished to construct the Calido Coastal Gardens.

All OICs of police stations in the coastal areas would be made aware of the provisions of the Coastal Conservation Act and in accordance with its provisions Police would have direct powers to demolish such structures, the Minister said at a media conference held at the Ports and Aviation Ministry Auditorium.

Minister Abeygunawardena said that on a concept of President Mahinda Rajapaksa, during the first phase of the Calido Coastal Line in Kalutara would be converted into a Coastal Garden to promote tourism, provide recreational facilities to the public, open new avenues for income generation and prevent illegal activities taking place there at present.

The Coast Conservation Act had been amended to protect the coastal areas and all illegal activities there would be eliminated, the Minister said adding that several Ministries would assist the Ports and Aviation Ministry to achieve the expected goals.

Sam Perera said...

Ananda,

U.S government expands support to local authorities in the Eastern Province

I agree. US should have no business with local governments. The only interface they shall be allowed is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. I hope that President Rajapakse will nip the bud soon. Furthermore, any INGO or NGO that works for the interests foreign nations shall be barred from any business in Sri Lanka.

Moshe Dyan said...

ananda, sam,

USAID in this instance is working THROUGH the relevant ministry, not bypassing it.

it is more about training ppl.

" Training will include topics such as office administration, financial management, and participatory training as well as Sinhala and Tamil language instruction."

i see nothing wrong in this. in fact this is good.

our disgust towards US meddling in internal affairs is one thing, supporting these is another.

we all agree that they are INCONSISTANT. so it is possible for them to good and bad at the same time. lets get rid of the bad and make use of the good.

IF they try any BS, we can always close the program.

Moshe Dyan said...

JJ sakkiliya should not be around. bugger is an open tiger supporter and must be handled appropriately.

ppl measure the effectiveness of the govt in the way these sakkiliyas are handled.

Moshe Dyan said...

guys,

don't if this is good or bad. seems good. my article on US trying the kosovo model in SL has been published here in the "kosovo compromise" website

also take a look at the "charts" section of the website. it contains some cool stuff in graphical/tabular form.

you will see HOW SIMILAR it is to the SL case (of course a very few dissimilarities are also there).

in one case serbia had the slogan R.I.P. UN!!!

INDEED!!

i think we have struck shitt. kosovo model seems to be the US plan.

Moshe Dyan said...

i meant "don't know if this is good or bad."

Ananda-USA said...

Moshe,

[USAID in this instance is working THROUGH the relevant ministry, not bypassing it.]

Maybe, but these are all stealth attacks, trying to influence grass roots politics in SL, even if it comes through the ministry.

That is EXACTLY MY POINT, the ministry should CRITICALLY EVALUATE & DECIDE what is WORTHWHILE AID, and what is just PROPAGANDA.

The amount of USAID to SL is pitifully small, and is typically this type of nonsensical SWILL.

The United States, the richest and most powerful nation on earth, should give us MORE MEANINGFUL AID, like:

1. A 100MW Wind Power plant, with local Wind Turbine Maintenance capabilities, a a manufacturing base for extending it.

2. A Solar Cell manufacturing Plant to wean us off global warming fuels we can ill afford.

3. A Proliferation Resistant (say, Thorium based) Nuclear Power Plant.

4. A Continuously FUNDED High-Technology American University with MIT, UC Berkeley, and Stanford as US Partners.

5. A State-of-the-Art American Hospital with American Doctors Training and Collaborating with our medical personnel.

6. Equipment and Technology to sustainably exploit the food growing and mineral resource extraction in the Ocean around Sri Lanka.

That is what is needed from our rich and powerful American ally, not watered-down gruel telling us how to "manage" our country.

TRANSFER and FUND the Technology and Skills to ENABLE US to become their thriving partner in DEMOCRACY in this part of the world, instead of driving us into the embrace of less democratic partners!

Give a man a FISH,
Feed him for a Day.
TEACH a man to FISH,
Feed him ALL his LIFE!

Moshe Dyan said...

i LOVE confrontation. now i'm on a confrontation course with my good friends. no guarantee who will win. whoever wins, we win. here we go.


"The United States, the richest and most powerful nation on earth, should give us MORE MEANINGFUL AID, like:"

so says ananda-USA!!!!

lol!!

i find this really intriguing.

1. pol sambol (the english word for pol sambola which is the correct word)

2. sam, of UNCLE SAM fame

3. ananda-USA

all are inclined marginally against USA!!

are there 2 uncle sams, 2 USAs?????

looks like they are too AMERICANIZED!!!

Ananda-USA said...

Moshe,

[all are inclined marginally against USA!!]

My dear Moshe,

As usual, you have gotten it BASS-ACKWARDS!

I am not against the USA; on the CONTRARY, I LOVE and PROTECT this blessed country that has given me as much as my motherland of Sri Lanka, and has won my heart through its friendship for skinny student who landed here many decades ago.

There is NOTHING I would like more than AMITY and CLOSE FRIENDSHIP between the USA and Sri Lanka, and I have worked towards that end all the years I have lived in the United States.

But, obviously there is something that is SERIOUSLY AMISS in this relationship .. that those of us who LOVE BOTH COUNTRIES have to HELP HEAL.

Part of that SOLUTION involves TOUGH LOVE .. saying it as we see it. We should say what is wrong .. but should not stop there .. we should also SUGGEST what can be DONE TO SET IT RIGHT .. blessed are the peacemakers among friends.

In my posts, I have been decrying the fact that the US, the avowed GLOBAL CHAMPION OF DEMOCRACY, does not appreciate this SMALL but ENDURING DEMOCRACY that is Sri Lanka, even as it accords a special place to that other DECIDEDLY ANNOYING DEMOCRACY .. Israel.

In the hope that decision makers from both sides are reading our posts at this blog, springing from deep within our patriotic minds, I have persisted in saying what is wrong on BOTH SIDES and SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS where necessary. But, I have not stopped there .. I have lauded to high heaven WHAT IS RIGHT ABOUT BOTH COUNTRIES as well.

I admit I can neither fathom nor unravel, the labyrinthine twists and turns of the Moshe Dayan mind.

A mind that OFTEN IGNORES evidence of my largely MODERATE posture on ALL things except the TRUTH at this blog over several years, an UNFORTUNATE AFFLICTION that OFTEN leads you to miss the forest, being too close to the trees.

Rest assured, dear friend, you got the BASS-ACKWARDS here!

Ananda-USA said...

Moshe,

And what, I dare ask is wrong with my statement

""The United States, the richest and most powerful nation on earth, should give us MORE MEANINGFUL AID, like:" ??!!

and the suggestions for CLOSE COLABORATION at a very high level between US citizens and Sri Lankan citizens?

Not meaningless pontifical punditry on how to "manage" Sri Lanka's internal politics, which we don't want, but GREAT GOBS of REAL HELP that will bring together the best and brightest of both nations, and foster a closer alliance.

What do you find wrong with that?
What IRKS you, my friend? What Indeed!

Moshe Dyan said...

dear ananda-USA,

it has to be looked at in the context of other things you said.

"Maybe, but these are all stealth attacks, trying to influence grass roots politics in SL, even if it comes through the ministry.

The amount of USAID to SL is pitifully small, and is typically this type of nonsensical SWILL."

so you have decided that these are stealth attacks!!!

and US$ 2,000,000,000 from your blessed country is pitifully small for SL!!!

i disagree. it is BIG. may not be the largest but BIG.

read what i said,
"inclined marginally against USA"

i have come across ppl with the name ISRAEL in their name.

i have also come across ppl with lanka in their name.

i have also come across ppl with india in their name.

i have also come across ppl with english in their name.

i have also come across ppl with german in their name.

but you are the only one with USA in your name!!

well done ananda-USA.

Asithri said...

Ananda

[There is NOTHING I would like more than AMITY and CLOSE FRIENDSHIP between the USA and Sri Lanka, and I have worked towards that end all the years I have lived in the United States.]

Well said! I ditto that!

[But, obviously there is something that is SERIOUSLY AMISS in this relationship .. ]

Agree. I think...

What went "amiss" in the relationship is WE (you, me, the next person, GOSL, etc.)
let the tamizia whorebitches hijack the USA plane, especially the "USA plane" that had Robert Blake in it, to their advantage.

Now there are all kinds of "rumors" as to why Bobby went over to the LTTE-sympathetic camp (from outright monetary gifts to being hoodwinked by the clever Tamizia whore with their false propaganda or, to being brainwashed by UriNePee Ranil ponnaya/Mangali Nawenaya/RaviK soopuwa...but whichever way, WE did squat when it was the time to up the ante and bring Bobby back on track either by hook or by crook!!!

Evidence of this is seen when one considers what did Bobby do as soon as he was the asst. secretary of state (deputy to Hilarious Clinton)?

He invited the USA LTTE undercover Tamizia "elite" whores for a discussion !!!

Yes, either going on the hook or on the crook, we have failed SL-USA relationship as far as this Bobby bugger is concerned (and sadly he is a decision-maker in Washington today :((

Time for "out of the box" thoughts...decisions....not necessarily ones I expect you to publish in the public forum.

OaO Asithri

Asithri said...

Hey FF, if you are visiting here, pls. note I called you mobile and it said "this number is not assigned"....whao, what give mate?

As I said, call me matey...would love to catch up (no, your univ email does not work anymore either).

Cheersy,

OaO Asithri

Moshe Dyan said...

so what should we do????

1. try to rekindle the friendship with USA whenever we can.

for this to happen we should not look at the good USA does with suspicion.

2. try to win back US support whenever we can.

3. these would reverse the tamil elam crappies' victories. but there is an element we cannot overcome by these means.

USA is interested in creating a satellite state in part of SL which will be ruled by the cheapest whores and slaves in the world who were taken around the world by the brits to fcuk, labour and enslave.

we have to frustrate this attempt by colonization. democracy will do the rest.

then US-SL relations will be on track again.

Moshe Dyan said...

from the lille bit kasporov i have, i can see that this confrontation is going to end up with my knights, rooks, bishops getting gangbanged.

so i concede defeat to ananda-USA, pol and sam and move on.

Sam Perera said...

Moshe,

I am not sure why you are fixated on our blog handles. However, you are misinterpreting "Pol Sambol." It is a very common practice to call pol sambol, pol sambol in plural sense in certain parts of our hinterlands. This has nothing to do with English. I can give you the following examples for your reference.

මැල්ලුම්
සම්බොල්
බැදුම්

By now, you should know that my blog handle has no connection to anything other than a generic and easy to remember name.

Be it US, Russia, China, India, or Galapagos Islands, we don't need anybody meddling with Sri Lanka. That is matter totally up to the people of Sri Lanka. Similar condition can be applied to any of the above countries in taking care of their own businesses.

I hope that you are not naive enough to believe that a country at the apex of capitalism spends millions expecting nothing in return. That is what it is and no need to put a veneer to cover the true motives. However, your and my motherland should be well aware of the unstated intentions of their involvement.

Moshe Dyan said...

sam,

the handle thing is over so no more of it. :)

"I hope that you are not naive enough to believe that a country at the apex of capitalism spends millions expecting nothing in return. That is what it is and no need to put a veneer to cover the true motives."

capitalism or communism, it is the same. all countries have "interests" in most others, nothing else.

but don't forget that MUTUAL BENEFIT is also a benefit!!

that is what SL-US must maximise not suspicion where it is not needed.

Anonymous said...

MD is right its pol sambola or just sambola not sambol most of the time. But that english version also not sambol its some thing like 'sumble'. Sambol is I think how to say it when one is drunk.

Anonymous said...

SL is heading for a checkmate in diplomatic front becuz while di-ass-pora, western media, terrorist/human rights experts, are all making their moves we are doing 'upawasa' instead of playing the game. Unless our 'upawasa' method destroy the chessboard somehow SL heading for trouble...

Colonization (sinhalization of NE) is solution internally but its long term one. We need short term - outside/diplomatic solution as well.

There is a limit when it comes to asking and getting 'help' from any country. There is no guarantee China/ Russia/ India etc helping SL forever. SL need to stop creating more enemies and start rebuilding new friendships with all countries including USA/west. I like NAM approach with little more weight (say 60%) to Asia. Even though we list USA/west as our enemies we can't destroy or defeat them so we have to make a deal.

Main problem right now is western diplomatic attack and one main reason is di-ass-pora. I think GSL should use KP and neutralize di-ass-pora some how. If GSL can make di-ass-pora to the position "ok, lets forget about past-wrong things happened from both side, and help GSL to rebuild SL so that all sinhala, tamil, muslim people can live in peaceful developed SL" then west will be in no position to attack SL.

However, as I believe di-ass-pora is well managed by west itself. So above situation is like a fantasy. Its 180 degrees turn for sure. I don't know what exactly to be done but do nothing or upawasa is not the way.

Ananda-USA said...

Moshe,

[and US$ 2,000,000,000 from your blessed country is pitifully small for SL!!!]

So, let us assume .. for the moment .. that $2B is the sum total of all US aid from 1948 to now.

Let's see, $2B/63-years = $31.75M aid annually on average.

YUP! That is a PITIFULLY SMALL amount of aid for the richest and most powerful nation on earth to give to Sri Lanka.

Also, that aid has never been infrastructure development aid, but mostly consumer items like rice and flour.

I remember the when Sirimavo Bandaranaike was in power, when western countries WOULD NOT GIVE TECHNOLOGY as aid to Sri Lanka ... or manufacturing plants of any type ... because they feared those plants would COMPETE with their own and reduce their markets. Newly independent countries of Sri Lanka were viewed as suppliers of RAW MATERIALS, and at most places for VACATION TOURS .. the hewers of wood and the drawers of water ... FOREVER!

It was the USSR that, for example, supplied the steel, cement and tire mills so WE COULD MANUFACTURE our own construction materials, process of our own rubber, and ADD VALUE to our own exports.

Even today, we see China and Russia continuing to play that role assisting in infrastructure development in Sri Lanka.

What is WRONG with this picture, the US must ask!

THE BOTTOM LINE is:

GIVE Sri Lanka TECHNICAL know how and funds to ADD VALUE to our raw materials, develop the SKILLS to benefit from the literacy of our people, the MANUFACTURING plants to produce the goods to sell in the global market, the INFRASTRUCTURE to exploit our unique geographic location in the world, and OPEN UP your markets and give us trade preferences .. if YOU VALUE SRI LANKA'S role as a functioning democracy, a good global citizen, and a reliable political ally.

STOP trying to stealthily undermine the country by divide and conquer strategies similar to those used by the colonial powers of yesteryear, by setting different communities against each other. Remember, the great majority of the People of Sri Lanka have WOKEN UP and are watching you!

Remember, it is ALWAYS in your interest to have the MAJORITY POPULATION of ANY country as your unwavering allies .. that is why the British are such good allies of the US, while the Iranians are not.

Ananda-USA said...

Jayawewa!

Finally, NGO operations are under scrutiny in a systematic way.

Not only must their use/misuse of funds be examined, but the appropriateness of their agenda's for the long-term well-being of Sri Lanka.

Politically Motivated Global Aid is now a major Industry undermining developing nations from within; their presence must be curtailed in Sri Lanka.


................
Aid workers barred in Lanka

P K Balachandran
July 15, 2010

COLOMBO: Aid agencies, both local and foreign, have been barred from working in waraffected North Sri Lanka pending scrutiny of their work by the Ministry of Defence.

This has caused dismay in NGO circles, generally. But aid workers who desire good governance feel that scrutiny is urgently called for, given the high degree of nonperformance and wastage in the nongovernmental aid sector.

A local aid worker told Express that on June 30, there was an order requiring NGOs working in the North to get the clearance from the Ministry of Defence through the Presidential Task Force (PTF), with which the NGOs working in the North were already registered.

The NGOs were told that they would not be allowed into Wanni, the worst affected in the 20062009 Eelam War IV, unless they had obtained fresh clearance from the Defence Ministry.

"We have a lot of materials to be distributed among the IDPs (internally displaced persons), which we cannot distribute because of this new requirement. We had applied for registration on June 30 itself, but till date, our application is pending," the aid worker, who did not want to be identified, said. "On Tuesday, there was a call from the PTF seeking our staffing pattern projectwise. I think an evaluation is being carried out," the worker said.

ENSURING PERFORMANCE: Many NGOs wonder why a Ministry of Defence clearance is required, now that the war is over. But those in the know say that the issue is not "security", but an urgent need to evaluate the work of the NGOs, many of which allegedly spend a lot of money on their own upkeep while doing precious little for war refugees, for whom the donors had sent the money.

VEHICLES OUTNUMBER STAFF: According to the head of a wellknown group of NGOs, the ratio of vehicles to staff is three to one. And these are luxury vehicles that have been imported with a duty concession. Administrative expenses, especially the huge amounts spent on the expatriate staff, outstrip what is allocated for work in the field. According to a source in an international monitoring organisation, the head of a wellknown foreign NGO is living in a house by paying a rent of SLR 3 lakh (USD 2,648) per month and moves in a huge luxury vehicle.

POOR QUALITY OF WORK: The work done by many of the NGOs leaves much to be desired in terms of quality. Some foreign prescriptions have proved to be wrong too. In the refugee camps in Vavuniya, the UN agencies had insisted on building temporary or semipermanent toilets, against the advice of local experts. No wonder these flimsy structures caved in, creating a mess.

LACK OF MONITORING: The time lag could be alarming too. "A project which is meant to be completed in July 2010, may have only begun in July 2010, " the head of a leading local NGO said.

Ananda-USA said...

If Indians are REALLY SMART, they'll throw away the jail keys!
.............
Bid to enter SL mission: Vaiko, Nedumaran held

July 15, 2010

CHENNAI: MDMK General Secretary Vaiko, Tamil Nationalist Movement leader P Nedumaran and hundreds of pro-Tamil protesters were arrested here today for trying to enter the Sri Lankan Deputy High Commission with an intention to forcibly shut it down, police said.

The protesters, under the umbrella organisation of Sri Lankan Tamils Protection Movement, staged a protest near the Sri Lankan Deputy High Commission against the closure of the UN office in Sri Lanka.

When they later tried to proceed towards the Consular office without permission, they were arrested, police said.

A police release said Vaiko and Nedumaran were later remanded to judicial custody.

Meanwhile, CPI state secretary D Pandian, who participated in today's demonstration along with Vaiko and others, but was not among the arrested, criticised the arrest of Vaiko and others

Ananda-USA said...

Indian Democracy in Action:

THE INALIENABLE RIGHT TO THROW STONES IS ALIVE & WELL!

.............
Omar & Rahul get stoned

Aditya Sinha
July 10, 2010

Perhaps 15 to 20 Kashmiris have been killed during demonstrations in the Valley this summer, and for the first time since 1993 the army has been asked to assist the civil administration. Plainly, the situation in Jammu and Kashmir has worsened since the days when indigenous militancy had petered out and the Valley’s Muslims felt sad that A B Vajpayee was no longer prime minister. And while most commentators have been busy blaming Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, it is obvious that the UPA culprits who let Kashmir slip out of hand are Omar’s buddy Rahul Gandhi and his chauffeur (as a recent column in The Economist termed him), Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

The Kashmir issue as a matter of fact has been directly dealt with by prime ministers since Partition and Independence. It is true that J L Nehru got us into the international mess by taking the Pakistani tribal invasion to the United Nations in 1948, but it is also true that Kashmir was seen differently than the rest of India’s states by the rest of the world (you can blame British skulduggery or Sheikh Abdullah’s Switzerland-type ambitions or the Cold War team-ups, but there it is: Kashmir was always seen as disputed, in the way that no one in the world thinks of Tibet as a natural part of China). It is also true that Nehru’s home minister (the best one we’ve ever had, by far) Sardar Patel was not keen on retaining the Valley. Even recent prime ministers like P V Narasimha Rao and Vajpayee laid down a Kashmir policy, and to say that so far as azaadi is concerned “the sky’s the limit” is to make a political statement. Kashmir, as anyone who has had a serious look into the issue knows, is a political problem, not a military one; and it needs a political solution.

Whenever Manmohan Singh visits Kashmir, he mumbles something stale and uninspiring. You would think that this genius economist would have, after six years on the job, learned a thing or two about politics. The only thing it seems he has learned is how to keep his mouth shut and keep his boss, Congress chief Sonia Gandhi, happy. He has not learned that politics is a dynamic process; that what works today may not have worked in 1953; that politics involves a lot of talking almost all the time about everything to everyone — and then taking your own decision; that politics cannot be substituted by an economic package or a military deployment; that no one can predict in whose favour time will work; and that in a democracy, you can only solve problems through politics. Manmohan Singh behaves ignorant of all this.

Instead, he’s dumped the problem on Union home minister P Chidambaram who has proved that accountants posing as verbose intellectuals are best left in ministries like finance or commerce. Chidambaram’s pompous demeanour has infected even his bureaucrats, who tell the media that Omar Abdullah has been “told” to be resolute and bring trouble-makers to justice, and bring the Valley under control. Obviously Chidambaram has gotten such a hammering from the Maoists that he doesn’t know where to look, and it is a measure of how things have gotten out of hand that today he sees the Kashmir problem as the soft one. He and his PM have been ambushed. All they can do is lay the blame for stone-throwing in Kashmir on the Lashkar-e-Toiba (left to the LeT it would be lobbing grenades, not stones). And talk of deploying the army, even if it is just a rhetorical measure to help cool down tempers on the street, is not something that will help you find the UN Security Council seat that you keep begging every foreign visitor for.

Ananda-USA said...

Omar & Rahul get stoned

........continued.....
The worst is the home ministry telling Omar Abdullah what to do. Even in the Hindi heartland, the states do not like being told by the Centre what to do. It always looks bad, and it would seem to have knocked the bottom out of his government. He will not recover, unless something dramatic happens (and even if something dramatic does occur, it is doubtful that he will be involved or be the beneficiary). Omar probably shouldn’t have been in the seat of government in the first place, and many commentators are now pointing out how his father Farooq Abdullah had been projected during the last elections as the National Conference’s chief ministerial candidate. Many of these same people have always derided Farooq as an attention-deficit playboy, though he has proven to be one of the shrewdest politicians in India (disclosure: this columnist has written a biography of Farooq Abdullah). These commentators now point out that Omar got the top job because of his drag-racing buddy, Rahul Gandhi, who once again wanted to project a youth icon instead of concentrating on good governance.

For those voters who think that a 40-year-old still represents youth, Omar’s inability to keep control of public protests and to replace stone-throwing with dialogue should be an eye-opener to what kind of disastrous administrator and political leader Rahul Gandhi may turn out to be. It is true that Rahul has been touring the country to strengthen the Youth Congress and by extension his party organisation; it is true that he has increased membership and put up a good showing in UP in the last Lok Sabha elections; and the word from Bihar is that Rahul Gandhi may throw up a surprise or two in the coming assembly poll. However, it remains to be seen whether he can replicate the UP success in 2012, when the assembly elections take place, particularly given Mayawati’s administrative and political work in the last one year. In Tamil Nadu his impact remains to be seen.

However, if Rahul can find time to quietly go abroad and celebrate his 40th birthday, then he can certainly find time to give a press conference and take a stance on long-standing policy issues. As The Economist put it, “the question remains is what Mr Gandhi believes in”. He perhaps thinks he is being clever by not staking out a position and alienating voters. All he is doing is reinforcing the perception that while our young politicians, like Omar, look good, they are incapable of delivering the goods.

So what does this mean for Kashmir? Nothing, and that is saddening. Expect no initiatives while Manmohan Singh and the UPA remain in saddle. And expect that in the way that the Tibet riots shamed China just a month before the Beijing Olympics, the stone-throwing and retaliatory deaths will do the same for us before the Delhi Commonwealth Games three months from now.

Ananda-USA said...

What, I thought social justice was assured by the Indian "Federal System".

Federal System not working? God forbid ... is it not the ONE TRUE and UNIVERSAL solution to all ills?

Here, then, is ANOTHER apologist preaching compassion for people hurling stones for justice. A novel concept, indeed!

Make her Prime Minister, and she will devolve power to everyone until INDIA is NO MORE.



................
Hurling stones for justice

Seema Mustafa
July 12, 2010

Kashmir is on the boil and the situation is perhaps, worse, than what it has been for years now. And if those in power remain with their heads stuck in the sand, there is every possibility of the state erupting in a manner that far eclipses the situation even at the height of the militancy decade. For this time, the anger and the frustration is spilling out on the streets, and the security forces are not tackling terrorists sent in by Pakistan, but their own citizens.

Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah blamed the Hurriyat, then he blamed the PDP for the current phase of violence. Union home minister P Chidambaram insisted that the Lashkar-e-Toiba was responsible. Neither of them is right. It is frustration, unemployment, anger, unhappiness all coming together in young people who have been born and brought up in conflict. They are fed up. Fed up of the political parties, fed up of India, fed up of Pakistan, fed up of their meaningless lives, fed up of the conflict and the violence, fed up with the inability of all concerned to resolve the issue and bring a semblance of peace into their lives. So they have picked up stones and moved into the streets, targeting police and anyone else who confronts them.

They are not the Lashkar, at least not as yet. Chidambaram’s statement is the usual cunning rhetoric that governments use to justify killing the innocent youth. They are not under the leadership of the Kashmiri separatists, who they in fact despise and who are now following this faceless, nameless, angry youth instead of the other way around. Until the governments in Srinagar and New Delhi realise this one very simple fact, they will not be able to deal with the situation that is already spiralling out of control. The next episode of sustained violence in Kashmir will not subside after a week or 10 days, it will go on and on with disastrous consequences for the people.

Ananda-USA said...

Hurling stones for justice

.....continued....
The fault does not lie with the people of Kashmir. Not at all. It lies completely with the political parties in and out of power, with the Kashmiri separatists and all those who have developed the problem of Kashmir into a little industry from which they derive their legitimacy and their livelihood. The Kashmiri separatists have slowly lost their hold over the people, they are not spoken of at all with respect in the Valley and are today a group of squabbling men who do not see eye-to-eye on any one issue concerning the state. The ordinary Kashmiri insists they are getting money from both New Delhi and Islamabad, and even if this is not true, the perception is so widespread that no one really believes otherwise. Except for hardliner Syed Ali Shah Geelani who is seen as more consistent and more honest than the others, no one from the separatist camp now commands a following in the Valley.

The Omar Abdullah government is floundering, and totally out of its depth now. The chief minister is seen as weak, and that is not a good reputation for a politician in the Valley. Even those who have access to him admit that while he is a nice person, he has no control over either the state government or the National Conference. The absolutely insensitive handling of not just the alleged rape of the two girls, but also of the recent deaths in police firing have really been inexcusable. There is little point in blaming the CRPF and suddenly waking up to its ruthless reality. Kashmir is a disturbed state and a government sitting in office cannot afford to lose sight of the people’s problems and issues for even a second. But somehow the National Conference has managed to do precisely that, and the party has disappeared from view. Omar Abdullah, in a candid interview, has admitted that the NC tends to go to sleep when in power, but then certainly the problem cannot be resolved without some hard action. Union minister Farooq Abdullah is the National Conference president, but has shown little interest in Srinagar since he was absorbed into the government at the Centre.

Ananda-USA said...

Hurling stones for justice

.....continued 2....
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has just no interest in the state, except for infrequent visits to hand out dole. For him a settlement of the Kashmir problem is just talks with Pakistan, and financial aid from time-to-time for Jammu and Kashmir. The first is not going anywhere, and the second only creates more anger and resentment in the Valley as the politicians use the money to line their own coffers, while the people smart at having been reduced to the level of beggars. Justice, dignity and respect that have to be the basis of a people and government relationship is completely missing with the UPA government remaining clueless and indifferent. There is no attempt to talk to the Kashmiris, and except for one half hearted effort, the prime minister or his functionaries have refused to initiate any dialogue between New Delhi and Srinagar that is very essential for peace and calm in the state.

In the absence of a will and initiative, the stone-pelting youth will have no option but to continue hurling the missiles at the security forces. Each stone they hurl is basically a cry for help, for justice, for dignity but the deaf and blind governments use these stones to kill and maim, and prepare the ground for more violence. A young generation that is born in conflict, that has never known peace and a normal life, has decided to follow the Palestinian intifada and use stones against bullets. These are really young boys, with anger and frustration bottled up inside, with a viciousness that frightens not just onlookers but even they themselves. Someone needs to reach out and speak to them, someone needs to handle the fires but unfortunately for Kashmir, the separatists can only fan the flames, and the government has long since lost its ability to douse the fires.

“Let the people of Jammu and Kashmir breathe” was the plea of a seasoned professor in the Valley. It was a heartfelt plea but the politicians in Srinagar and New Delhi have long since lost their ability to understand the meaning and the significance of this passionate advice.

About the author:

Seema Mustafa is a commentator on political affairs

Sujeewa Kokawala said...

If you haven't seen this so far:

Protest, Wimal and "Educated" Ppl - NdeS

Ananda-USA said...

Sanghvi's view is that the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan is unsolvable: Pakistan lays claim to Kashmir, but India will not yield it. There you have it .. in a nutshell!

I beg to differ. All it needs is an astute "political solution" culminating in a 13th Amendment to constitutions of both countries, mediated and enabled by ... you guessed it .. Sri Lanka!

This political solution is .. again in a nutshell .. RECONSTITUTE BRITISH INDIA by combining Pakistan and India (and Bangla desh?) into one multicultural, multireligious country, assuring the INALIENBLE RIGHT for both Moslems and Hindus to live in Kashmiri.

This agreement will be supervised on the ground by the SLPKF (Sri Lanka Peace Keeping Force) an expeditionary arm of the Sri Lanka Defense Forces.

For this signal service, Sri Lanka will be paid an annual fee of $100B (adjusted for inflation), will be assured complete freedom of action upto and including dictating the constitution of the newly resurrected nation, henceforth called INDIASTAN, and full and complete absolution from all blame and liability in perpetuity.

Amen.

.................
The unending season of horror and mayhem

Vir Sanghvi
July 11, 2010

One reason why all attempts at making peace between India and Pakistan fail is that there is a basic disconnect between our approaches. Indian peaceniks believe that Indians and Pakistanis are the same people separated only because of the actions of first, colonial rulers and now, unscrupulous politicians. Get past the politics, they say, and the people of the two countries can live like brothers.

The Pakistanis have a different perspective. Pakistani peaceniks buy the line that we are the same people (not surprising because peaceniks on both sides of the border tend to be Punjabis) but argue that there is a substantive issue that divides us and that it must be settled before any lasting peace is ensured.

Ananda-USA said...

The unending season of horror and mayhem

....continued 1...

That issue is Kashmir.

Every India-Pakistan dialogue flounders ultimately on the subject of Kashmir. The Pakistani position is that Muslim-majority Kashmir is occupied illegally by India which runs puppet governments in the state and uses the army to keep the unhappy populace in line. The Indian position is that the people of Kashmir have just as much democracy as the people of, say, Bihar, which is more than can be said for the people of Pakistan whose experience with democracy has been intermittent over the last 60 years. We believe that Kashmir is an integral part of India and that its status is not negotiable.

Given these two differing perspectives, it is hard to see how any peaceful understanding is possible. All we can hope for are periods of civility before the Kashmir issue flares up again. When Manmohan Singh became Prime Minister he believed that he had a formula that would satisfy both sides. India would keep Kashmir but it would de-militarize the region and open the border so that Pakistanis could come and go at will. As the Prime Minister said, political borders were irrelevant in the 21st century.

I applauded Manmohan Singh’s initiative but wondered if he could sell the formulation to either side. The government says I was wrong. It claims that during UPA I, India came to an understanding with Pakistan along the lines that Manmohan Singh had envisaged. Sadly, just as this peace deal was about to be announced, General Musharraf was toppled and the new government repudiated the negotiations.

I have no idea whether this is true but I do know that every time you mention this deal to Pakistanis they laugh very loudly and deny that they had ever agreed to it. Even if Musharraf had been persuaded (by Washington, for instance) to accept these terms, they say, the people of Pakistan would never have bought it. I have doubts also about whether the people of India would have accepted this settlement. Within weeks of the deal being implemented, Pakistanis would have flooded into Kashmir, would have been welcomed as heroes by at least some of the people, would have put up Pakistani flags and India would have been abused at every street corner.

Pro-Pakistan elements would have been backed by the might of the militants and without Indian forces to counter them, would have had free run of the valley. There would have been so much anger in India that the Manmohan Singh government would have fallen. I admire Manmohan Singh greatly and I understand why he believes that the Kashmir issue should be resolved. But frankly, I don’t think a resolution is possible. Both sides are too set in their views to ever meet each other half-way.

Ananda-USA said...

The unending season of horror and mayhem

....continued 2...
In 1972, Indira Gandhi believed that she had settled Kashmir once and for all when Z A Bhutto agreed to accept the Line of Control as the international border. Bhutto asked for this understanding not to be included in the Shimla Agreement, maintaining that public opinion in Pakistan would be against the settlement. Nevertheless, he asked for time to be able to persuade the people of Pakistan to accept this reality.

Bhutto went back on that undertaking and Pakistan has more or less repudiated the Shimla Agreement. Pakistanis deny that Bhutto had ever agreed to accept the Line of Control as the border and argue that even if he did and even if this had been recorded in writing, this had no validity. After all, the Shimla Agreement was unfair, because it was forced on a defeated Pakistan by a victorious India, which blackmailed Bhutto by refusing to free thousands of prisoners of war unless he signed on the dotted line.

Both aborted arrangements — with Bhutto and Musharraf — serve to re-emphasise that no settlement over Kashmir is possible unless the two nations agree to solve the issue of sovereignty. Either Pakistan agrees that Kashmir is a part of India or India concedes that Kashmir is a disputed territory which Pakistan has a legitimate claim to.

Given that neither side will go that far, I think we can forget about peace in the foreseeable future. So, what do we do? I think we owe it to ourselves as a nation built on liberal democratic principles to guarantee as much democracy and freedom as possible to the people of Kashmir. We must move to prevent human rights abuses and must spend money on the development of the state.

But we must do all this without hoping for any kind of reward. All too often, we say things like, “The Kashmiris now have a stable government of their own choosing and development is back on track so peace will return to the state.”

In fact, peace will never return to Kashmir, not as long as Pakistan wants to claim the state. In the old days, the Pakistanis believed in military adventures. Now that Pakistan has become the epicentre of global terrorism, military adventures seem pointless. Far better to send terrorists into the Valley. In the old days, Pakistan used a political approach. Now, in this jehadi era, it uses an Islamist approach. The people of Kashmir are told that the battle is not just about freedom, it is an Islamic crusade against the Hindu infidel.

Pakistan’s own experience shows us that democracy is no counter to jehad. Even though Pakistan is now going through one of its rare democratic phases, jehadi violence is actually on the rise. Islamic nutcases are no respecters of democratic rights.

It’s time to be realistic about Kashmir. There will be periods of peaceful development. But as long as Pakistan exists — and perhaps long after it has broken up — there will never be any lasting peace in Kashmir. And so, there will never be peace between India and Pakistan.

Exclusive to TNSE. More at www.virsanghvi.com. Follow him at twitter.com/virsanghvi

SL boy said...

Ananda,
I sent you email to the patriot gmail. Did you get to look at it?

Moshe Dyan said...

ananda,

"Let's see, $2B/63-years = $31.75M aid annually on average.

YUP! That is a PITIFULLY SMALL amount of aid"

$31.75 million aid for 63 years is a COLOSSAL amount of aid!!!

we must appreciate it.

agree that USA or most other countries never gave SL the technology. they never will.

israel is the only country that gave SL military technology.

a chinese harbour will be the best SL can have.

Sam Perera said...

Moshe,

I believe that we need to have an objective evaluation of "aid" from any country. A simple money per year is not a real comparison. Were they outright grants? Were they loans, How many strings were attached, etc. Also, we need to look at the NPV of the money and the long term contributions to the national economy and stability. Their attempts to save the LTTE leadership and veiled threats by Booby to frame MR for bogus war crimes can not be taken lightly when he is in-charge of our regions interests. Their attempts to meddled with the democratic will by pitting SF against MR is not something we can take lightly either. I think it is very fair to view their involvements with a cautious eye all the time.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Whenever suddha is attacked in some form, you seem to be almost sweating in worry about it. You also react angrily/not happily, almost hurt about it? Why? Always out to defend them (the infamous para balla remark to me)? Why?


I see this throughout SL, worst is of course when I try and give a smack down to a suddha who wants to lecture me and expects me to actually listen to him and “be happy” for his ugly bs suddenly some other Sinhala slave comes to defend him (wtf?).

If I or anyone else attacks suddha why are you so worried about it?

Ananda has hardly said anything wrong either, he (unlike me) has not even out righted attacked suddha or USA.

He has done/said in a far more friendly way (as that his nature) how we should be wary of USAID and other crap based entirely on what USAID and the US has been trying to do to Sri Lanka and has done to other countries and their duplicitous nature. Everything comes at a price, with suddha it is far more devious and dangerous. What little they give us costs us a thousand times more than we see with all sorts of consequences. Why blindly trust them or show “appreciation”, they are doing the “aid” business to help their own interests not ours.

South American countries, African countries all who have been recipients of this “aid” have become as a result more impoverished, unstable and backward than had they been if they had not bothered taking this aid as the “conditions”, consequences, dependence and literal domination which comes with such aid only entrench servitude and theft of wealth/natural resources to the aid benefactor.

The West still treats Africa and Africans as their property and are happy to fund wars to destabilise and weaken States and peoples while controlling stronger states and individuals using all kinds of tools (HR, more wars, cancelling aid projects which the people have become dependent on by blindly following them) just to rob them all of their wealth.

They got the shock of their lives when suddenly China jumped in and the economies of countries (such as Angola, Chad, CAR) started racing ahead far greater than what was achieved under decades of suddhas “aid schemes” because said aid schemes are designed to keep the masses impoverished while a few local lackeys get rich. Had Ranilam had his way the same thing would have happened to us. EU aid to Africa as a condition involves signing up to the ICC and being enslaved to that. Any leader falls out of line and off they go to the Hague (and the West has “reasons” for it as they are funding wars, encouraging wars and deepening ethnic division to give grounds for wars/instability, along with carrying out assassinations and creating economic + political hardships).

Anonymous said...

If you do not believe in the nature of para suddha have a look at the “Pilgrims”, they went to the US to rob the natives of their land and wealth and also pollute it with their archaic believes, then almost died out in the harsh Winter which followed to be only protected with shelter and food by the very same Native American tribes they openly declared their hostility, forcefully converted and some they had already enslaved.

What happened? The kindness, respect and higher ethics of the Native Americans who saved these targ holes miserable lives were SEEN AS WEAK. Subsequently they were wiped out. And this is the mentality of para suddha, and these are the people we need to be “grateful” to? They only changed their minds after they bombed themselves to bits, and that to SAVE THEMSELVES while engineering knew tools and mechanism to keep the peoples of the world they had already enslaved under their boot using new tools and psychological weapons.

Anonymous said...

With regards to Blake.

He is just scum. You can tell it from his face. He appears as “friendly” but is one slimy sakkiliya.

He was in Sri Lanka, he saw the truth but he did not give a damn because that is not in US interests.
His job is looking after US interests at all costs and that means keeping Tamils racism and separatism (= violence) alive to keep Sri Lanka at war and broken. That is what he tried throughout his stint in SL and does now from Washington. It is his job to further US domination and Tamils are an excellent willing tool.

These people are not children to be influenced or "tricked" or "conned" by Tamils. They see a tool and opportunity to further themselves and they are using it.

He is causing problem in central asia as well –there is no Tamil die-ass-pora there.

The current whore sent to SL caused huge problems in Bangladesh trying to destabilise an already volatile place (make things worse) –there is no Tamil die-ass-pora there.

Do not over estimate the "power" of the die-ass-pora because you then miss other players. They only have "power" because suddha is using them thus creating that illusion. While they are indeed our enemy, and are very loud and think they are bigshots they would not be so potent if not for someone else backing them: India in the past, suddha today. They pimp themselves to whoever if it means getting at us and we still beat them (loll), that must really be painful for those sakkiliyas.

Suddha now has to do things more directly.

Anyway coming back to the West as a whole, if an opportunity comes destabilise and fracture nations and people the West will seize it and use it (as Sam pointed out Gonseka was one such avenue) if the end results means furthering their interests.

Moshe Dyan said...

sam,

NPV is not a suitable indicator bcos most benefits are non-quantifiable.

the simple acid test is - SL should reject USAID if it is too costly (due to conditions, etc.) at least for once.

tis never happened and will not happen.

NGOs is a good example of how SL EVENTUALLY reacted to a national crime.

lets not waver from what we decided b4.

1. lets appreciate the good USA does.

2. defeat US attempts to do bad to SL

3. not expect more than USAID type assistence. they are not likely to give us factories, etc.

4. be OBJECTIVE, not anti-"sudda" when evaluating US work in SL.a healthy skeptical approach is OK but paranoia is not.

5. we should not forhet that US is first or second largest export destination.

although they never gave us factories, they buy are produce. of course it is not a favour (and we don't need favours in this regard) but USA is one of the most important trade partners.

Moshe Dyan said...

pol,

i'm against all forms of RACISM including anti-"sudda" racism.

but SOMETIMES you seem to be driven by racism be it anti tamil or anti-christian, anti-semetic, anti-"sudda", anti-korean, etc, etc, etc.

the problem is that the world does not work on racism for most part. and the importance of it is reducing fast as ppl move further away from a tribal society to a multiethnic one.

Ananda-USA said...

Yesterday, I proposed a "political solution" to the burning Kashmir problem between the TWO contending nations of INDIA and PAKISTAN.

The "political solution" was rather simple: RECONSTITUTE BRITISH INDIA in ts entirety .. without the British of course .. and the SLPKF .. a PAID SERVICE of the Sri Lanka Defence Forces would SUPERVISE it.

It just occurred to me that the BENEFITS of this SEMINAL SOLUTION to the FOUR COUNTRIES involved needs to be spelled out .. for those of us who are mentally challenged.

FOUR countries you say, when you thought there were only two fighting over Kashmir .. well .. stick around and learn .. there are at least FOUR involved .. until the word gets around how SRi Lanka is going to get rich on the deal.

In this Sri Lankan solution to J&K problem:

1. The Pakistani need to get hold of Kashmir is sated as they get possession of Kashmir as citizens of INDIASTAN.

2. The Indian need to hold onto Kashmir is assured as they get to keep Kashmir as citizens of INDIASTAN,

3. Bangladeshis need to have high-ground to run to when the low-lying delta that is their country floods EVERY YEAR is solved; they can now legally run to high ground in INDIASTAN, as their very own refuge,

4. Sri Lankans need to earn EASY MONEY is satisfied; each Sri Lankan citizen gets about $5,000 EVERY YEAR so they can live in comfort in perpetuity. Note that this amount is indexed to inflation and increases every year, so it should be maintain us in the manner we are accustomed to until the meteor hits and makes money irrelevant to all.

Suukshma plan-ekak neda?

Sam Perera said...

Suukshma plan-ekak neda?

Ha ha ha, what are you up to these days?

Sam Perera said...

Moshe,

I have no disagreement about anything you said as long as we understand the underlying reality.

I can praise a foreign nation all over the day just to keep a friendly veneer while we do everything structurally possible to prevent this "highly praised" nation to meddle with out country. The flip side of the plan is that we don't want our own citizens to buy in to this "praising" and get fooled in masses next time. Praising is only to the ears of the unsavory foreign powers.

«Oldest ‹Older   401 – 600 of 866   Newer› Newest»